×

Higher codimension bifurcation analysis of predator-prey systems with nonmonotonic functional responses. (English) Zbl 1453.34074

Summary: In this paper, we study the dynamic behaviors of a predator-prey system with a general form of nonmonotonic functional response. Through analysis, it is found that the system exists in extinction equilibrium, boundary equilibrium and two positive equilibria, one or no positive equilibrium. Furthermore, the conditions are given such that the boundary equilibrium is a saddle, node or a saddle-node point of codimension 1, 2 or 3. Then, some conditions are obtained so that the unique positive equilibrium of the system is a cusp point of codimension 2, 3 and higher or a saddle-node one of codimension 1 or 3, or a nilpotent saddle-node of codimension 4. When there are two positive equilibria in the system, the equilibrium with a large number of preys is a saddle point. For the other one, the system may undergo Hopf bifurcation. To verify our conclusion, we consider the functional response function in the literature [H. Zhu et al., SIAM J. Appl. Math. 63, No. 2, 636–682 (2002; Zbl 1036.34049); D. Xiao and S. Ruan, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 11, No. 8, 2123–2131 (2001; Zbl 1091.92504)]. Finally, we give a brief discussion and numerical simulation.

MSC:

34C60 Qualitative investigation and simulation of ordinary differential equation models
34C05 Topological structure of integral curves, singular points, limit cycles of ordinary differential equations
34C23 Bifurcation theory for ordinary differential equations
34C20 Transformation and reduction of ordinary differential equations and systems, normal forms
34D20 Stability of solutions to ordinary differential equations
92D25 Population dynamics (general)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Andrews, J. [1968] “ A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates,” Biotechnol. Bioeng.10, 707-723.
[2] Collings, J. [1997] “ The effects of the functional response on the bifurcation behaviour of a mite predator-prey interaction model,” J. Math. Biol.36, 149-168. · Zbl 0890.92021
[3] Dumortier, F., Roussarie, R. & Sotomayor, J. [1987] “ Generic 3-parameter families of vector fields on the plane, unfolding a singularity with nilpotent linear part. The cusp case of codimension 3,” Erg. Th. Dyn. Syst.7, 375-413. · Zbl 0608.58034
[4] Freedman, H. & Wolkowicz, G. [1986] “ Predator-prey systems with group defence: The paradox of enrichment revisited,” Bull. Math. Biol.48, 493-508. · Zbl 0612.92017
[5] Han, M. [1999] “ Lyapunov constants and Hopf cyclicity of Lienard systems,” Ann. Diff. Eqs.15, 113-126. · Zbl 0968.34029
[6] Holling, G. [1965] “ The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation,” Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can.45, 3-60.
[7] Hu, J., Xue, Y., Sun, G., Jin, Z. & Zhang, J. [2016] “ Global dynamics of a predator-prey system modeling by metaphysiological approach,” Biotechnol. Bioeng.283, 369-384. · Zbl 1410.92100
[8] Huang, J. & Xiao, D. M. [2004] “ Analyses of bifurcations and stability in a predator-prey system with Holling type-IV functional response,” Acta Math. Appl. Sin.-Engl. Ser.20, 167-178. · Zbl 1062.92070
[9] Huang, J., Xia, X. & Zhang, X. [2016] “ Bifurcations of codimension 3 in a predator-prey system of Leslie type with simplified Holling type 4 functional response,” Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos26, 1650034-1-11. · Zbl 1334.34099
[10] Huang, J., Liu, S., Ruan, S. & Xiao, D. [2018] “ Bifurcations in a discrete predator-prey model with nonmonotonic functional response,” J. Math. Anal. Appl.464, 201-230. · Zbl 1392.92077
[11] Jiang, X., She, Z., Feng, Z. & Zheng, X. [2017] “ Bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey system with ratio-dependent functional response,” Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos27, 1750222-1-20. · Zbl 1383.34071
[12] Lamontagne, Y., Coutu, C. & Rousseau, C. [2008] “ Bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey system with generalised Holling type 3 functional response,” J. Dyn. Diff. Eqs.20, 535-571. · Zbl 1160.34047
[13] May, R. M. [1972] “ Limit cycles in predator-prey communities,” Science177, 900-902.
[14] Pringle, R. M., Kartzinel, T. R., Palmer, T. M.et al. [2019] “ Predator-induced collapse of niche structure and species coexistence,” Nature570, 58-64.
[15] Rothe, F. & Shafer, D. [1990] “ Multiple bifurcation in a predator-prey system with nonmonotonic predator response,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A: Math.120, 313-347. · Zbl 0763.92011
[16] Ruan, S. & Xiao, D. [2001] “ Global analysis in a predator-prey system with nonmonotonic functional response,” SIAM J. Appl. Math.61, 1445-1472. · Zbl 0986.34045
[17] Takens, F. [1974] “ Singularities of vector fields,” Publ. Math. IHES43, 47-100. · Zbl 0279.58009
[18] Wang, D. [1990] “ An introduction to the normal form theory of ordinary differential equations,” Adv. Math. (China)19, 38-71. · Zbl 0709.34012
[19] Xiao, D. & Ruan, S. [2001] “ Codimension two bifurcations in a predator-prey system with group defense,” Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos11, 2123-2131. · Zbl 1091.92504
[20] Xiao, D. & Zhu, H. [2006] “ Multiple focus and Hopf bifurcations in a predator-prey system with nonmonotonic functional response,” SIAM J. Appl. Math.66, 802-819. · Zbl 1109.34034
[21] Xiao, D. [2008] “ Bifurcations on a five-parameter family of planar vector field,” J. Dyn. Diff. Eqs.20, 961-980. · Zbl 1163.34024
[22] Zhu, H., Campbell, S. A. & Wolkowicz, G. [2002] “ Bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey system with nonmonotonic functional response,” SIAM J. Appl. Math.63, 636-682. · Zbl 1036.34049
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.