×

Editorial: Analysis of author gender in TPB, 1991–2018. (English) Zbl 1425.01127

From the conclusion: We have observed that the current fraction of female authorships, 18.8% for 2012–2018, exceeds the 7.4% for 1970–1990, and that the trajectory continues to show a modest upward trend. We have also found that the fraction of female authors in TPB, the pattern of female authorship by position in author lists, and temporal trends in female authorship generally reflect patterns in adjacent disciplines.

MSC:

01A90 Bibliographic studies
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bonham, K. S.; Stefan, M. L., Women are underrepresented in computational biology: an analysis of the scholarly literature in biology, computer science and computational biology, PLoS Comput. Biol., 13, Article e1005134 pp. (2017)
[2] Brisbin, A.; Whitcher, U., Women’s representation in mathematics subfields: evidence from the arXiv, Math. Intell., 40, 39-49 (2018) · Zbl 1465.01012
[3] Bronstein, J. L.; Bolnick, D. I., Her joyous enthusiasm for her life-work…: early women authors in The American Naturalist, Am. Nat., 192, 655-663 (2018)
[4] Clifton, S. M.; Hill, K.; Karamchandani, A. J.; Autry, E. A.; McMahon, P.; Sun, G., Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies, Chaos, 29 (2019), 023135
[5] De Welde, K.; Laursen, S. L., The glass obstacle course: informal and formal barriers for women Ph.D. students in STEM fields, Int. J. Gender Sci. Technol., 3, 571-595 (2011)
[6] Dung, S. K.; López, A.; Barragan, E. L.; Reyes, R.-J.; Thu, R.; Castellanos, E.; Catalan, F.; Huerta-Sánchez, E.; Rohlfs, R. V., Illuminating women’s hidden contributions to historical theoretical population genetics, Genetics, 211, 363-366 (2019)
[7] Fortunato, S.; Bergstrom, C. T.; Börner, K.; Evans, J. A.; Helbing, D.; Milojevic, S.; Petersen, A. M.; Radicchi, F.; Sinatra, R.; Uzzi, B.; Vespignani, A.; Waltman, L.; Wang, D.; Barabási, A.-L., Science of science, Science, 359, 107 (2018)
[8] Fox, C. W.; Ritchey, J. P.; Paine, C. E.T., Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: first, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography, Ecol. Evol., 2018, 1-16 (2018)
[9] Grogan, K. E., How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace, Nature Ecol. Evol., 3, 3-6 (2019)
[10] Hargens, L. L.; Long, J. S., Demographic inertia and women’s representation among faculty in higher education, J. Higher Educ., 73, 494-517 (2002)
[11] Holman, L.; Stuart-Fox, D.; Hauser, C. E., The gender gap in science: how long until women are equally represented?, PLoS Biol., 16, Article e2004956 pp. (2018)
[12] Lariviere, V.; Ni, C.; Gingras, Y.; Cronin, B.; Sugimoto, C. R., Global gender disparities in science, Nature, 504, 211-213 (2013)
[13] Marschke, R.; Laursen, S.; Nielsen, J. M.; Rankin, P., Demographic inertia revisited: an immodest proposal to achieve equitable gender representation among faculty in higher education, J. Higher Educ., 78, 1-26 (2007)
[14] Mihaljevic-Brandt, H.; Santamaría, L.; Tullney, M., The effect of gender in the publication patterns of mathematics, PLoS One, 10, Article e0165367 pp. (2016) · Zbl 1432.01112
[15] Petersen, A. M.; Riccaboni, M.; Stanley, H. E.; Pammoli, F., Persistence and uncertainty in the academic career, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 5213-5218 (2012)
[16] Shaw, A. K.; Stanton, D. E., Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 279, 3736-3741 (2012)
[17] Thomas, N. R.; Poole, D. J.; Herbers, J. M., Gender in science and engineering faculties: demographic inertia revisited, PLoS One, 10 (2015), e0139767
[18] Watterson, G. A., On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination, Theoret. Popul. Biol., 7, 256-276 (1975) · Zbl 0294.92011
[19] Wellenreuther, M.; Otto, S. P., Women in evolution — highlighting the changing face of evolutionary biology, Evol. Appl., 9, 3-16 (2016)
[20] West, J. D.; Jacquet, J.; King, M. M.; Correll, S. J.; Bergstrom, C. T., The role of gender in scholarly authorship, PLoS One, 8, Article e66212 pp. (2013)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.