×

The inflation bias under Calvo and Rotemberg pricing. (English) Zbl 1401.91404

Summary: New Keynesian analysis relies heavily on two workhorse models of nominal inertia – due to G. A. Calvo [“Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework”, J. Monetary Econ. 12, No. 3, 383–398 (1983; doi:10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0)] and J. J. Rotemberg [“Sticky prices in the United States”, J. Political Econ. 90, No. 6, 1187–1211 (1982; doi:10.1086/261117)], respectively – to generate a meaningful role for monetary policy. These are often used interchangeably since they imply an isomorphic linearized Phillips curve and, if the steady-state is efficient, the same policy conclusions. In this paper we compute time-consistent optimal monetary policy in the benchmark New Keynesian model containing each form of price stickiness using global solution techniques. We find that, due to an offsetting endogenous impact on average markups, the inflation bias problem under Calvo contracts is often significantly greater than under Rotemberg pricing, despite the fact that the former typically exhibits far greater welfare costs of inflation. The nonlinearities inherent in the New Keynesian model are significant and the form of nominal inertia adopted is not innocuous.

MSC:

91B64 Macroeconomic theory (monetary models, models of taxation)

Software:

CompEcon

References:

[1] Anderson, G. S.; Kim, J.; Yun, T., Using a projection method to analyze inflation bias in a micro-founded model, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 34, 9, 1572-1581, (2010) · Zbl 1231.91335
[2] Aruoba, S.B., Schorfheide, F., 2013. Macroeconomic Dynamics Near the ZLB: A Tale of Two Equilibria. NBER Working Paper No. 19248.
[3] Ascari, G.; Rossi, L., Trend inflation and firms price-settingrotemberg versus calvo, Econ. J., 122, 563, 1115-1141, (2012)
[4] Ascari, G.; Sbordone, A. M., The macroeconomics of trend inflation, J. Econ. Lit., 52, 3, 679-739, (2014)
[5] Braun, R. A.; Korber, L. M., New Keynesian dynamics in a low interest rate environment, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 35, 12, 2213-2227, (2011) · Zbl 1241.91123
[6] Calvo, G. A., Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework, J. Monet. Econ., 12, 3, 383-398, (1983)
[7] Chen, X., Kirsanova, T., Leith, C., 2014. How Optimal is US Monetary Policy? University of Glasgow Discussion Paper Series.
[8] Coeurdacier, N.; Rey, H.; Winant, P., The risky steady state, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 3, 398-401, (2011)
[9] Damjanovic, T.; Nolan, C., Relative price distortions and inflation persistence, Econ. J., 120, 547, 1080-1099, (2010)
[10] Damjanovic, T.; Nolan, C., Seigniorage-maximizing inflation under sticky prices, J. Money Credit Bank., 42, 2-3, 503-519, (2010)
[11] Damjanovic, T.; Nolan, C., Second-order approximation to the rotemberg model around a distorted steady state, Econ. Lett., 110, 2, 132-135, (2011) · Zbl 1207.91039
[12] Fernández-Villaverde, J.; Gordon, G.; Guerrón-Quintana, P.; Rubio-Ramirez, J. F., Nonlinear adventures at the zero lower bound, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 57, 182-204, (2015) · Zbl 1401.91362
[13] Gavin, W.T., Keen, B.D., Richter, A., Throckmorton, N., 2013. Global Dynamics at the Zero Lower Bound. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series, 2013-007A.
[14] Goodfriend, M., King, R., 1997. The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the role of monetary policy. In: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, vol. 12. MIT Press, pp. 231-296.
[15] Gust, C., Lopez-Salido, D., Smith, M.E., 2012. The Empirical Implications of the Interest-Rate Lower Bound. Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2012-83.
[16] Johannsen, B.K., 2014. When are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Uncertainty Large? Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2014-40.
[17] Judd, K. L., Projection methods for solving aggregate growth models, J. Econ. Theory, 58, 2, 410-452, (1992) · Zbl 0769.90016
[18] Judd, K. L., Numerical methods in economics, (1998), MIT Press Cambridge, M.A · Zbl 0924.65001
[19] King, R.G., Wolman, A.L., 1996. Inflation Targeting in a St. Louis Model of the 21st Century. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Revie 78 (May/June 1996).
[20] Leeper, E.M., Leith, C., Liu, D., 2016. Optimal Time-Consistent Monetary, Fiscal and Debt Maturity Policy. University of Glasgow Discussion Paper No. 2016-04.
[21] Lombardo, G.; Vestin, D., Welfare implications of calvo vs. rotemberg-pricing assumptions, Econ. Lett., 100, 2, 275-279, (2008) · Zbl 1255.91132
[22] Miao, J., Ngo, P.V., 2016. Does Calvo Meet Rotemberg at the Zero Lower Bound? Mimeo.
[23] Miranda, M. J.; Fackler, P. L., Applied computational economics and finance, (2004), The MIT Press Cambridge, M.A · Zbl 1014.91015
[24] Nakata, T., 2013. Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy With Occasionally Binding Zero Bound Constraints. Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2013-40.
[25] Ngo, P. V., Optimal discretionary monetary policy in a micro-founded model with a zero lower bound on nominal interest rate, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 45, 44-65, (2014) · Zbl 1402.91487
[26] Niemann, S.; Pichler, P.; Sorger, G., Public debt, discretionary policy, and inflation persistence, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 37, 6, 1097-1109, (2013) · Zbl 1402.91488
[27] Nistico, S., The welfare loss from unstable inflation, Econ. Lett., 96, 1, 51-57, (2007) · Zbl 1255.91289
[28] Richter, A. W.; Throckmorton, N. A.; Walker, T. B.; Walker, T. B., Accuracy, speed and robustness of policy function iteration, computational economics, 44, 4, 445-476, (2014)
[29] Rotemberg, J. J., Sticky prices in the united states, J. Polit. Econ., 90, 6, 1187-1211, (1982)
[30] Roulleau-Pasdeloup, J. 2013. Why Is the Government Spending Multiplier Larger at the Zero Lower Bound? Not (Only) Because of the Zero Lower Bound. Mimeo.
[31] Shibayama, K., Sunakawa, T., 2012. Inflation Bias and Stabilization Bias in Rotemberg Pricing. Mimeo, University of Kent.
[32] Van Zandweghe, W., Wolman, A., 2011. Discretionary Monetary Policy in the Calvo model. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Working Paper Series, WP11-03.
[33] Wieland, J., 2013, Are negative supply shocks expansionary at the zero lower bound? Mimeo., UC Berkley.
[34] Woodford, M., Interest and prices: foundations of a theory of monetary policy, (2003), Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.