On the stability of crystal growth. (English) Zbl 1083.82523
Summary: We investigate properties of solid-on-solid models for crystal growth, involving general microscopic rates of capture of atoms by the crystal surface and of escape of atoms. The rates in this Markov process influence the stability of the growing surface. We prove, for various different ranges of the rate parameters, stability (i.e., ergodicity) and instability (i.e., nullity) of the growth process. Symmetry properties of the process, such as reversibility, dynamic reversibility, and reflection invariance, are proved or disproved under various conditions. We give a measure of surface smoothness that distinguishes between stable and unstable growth.
MSC:
82C24 | Interface problems; diffusion-limited aggregation in time-dependent statistical mechanics |
82D25 | Statistical mechanics of crystals |
Keywords:
crystal growth; stability; Markov process; ergodicity; transience; null recurrence; dynamic reversibility; surface roughnessReferences:
[1] | K. L. Chung,Markov Chains with Stationary Transition Probabilities, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967). · Zbl 0146.38401 |
[2] | D. R. Cox and H. D. Miller,The Theory of Stochastic Processes (Methuen, London, 1965). · Zbl 0149.12902 |
[3] | W. Feller,An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol. I, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1968). · Zbl 0155.23101 |
[4] | F. G. Foster, On the stochastic matrices associated with certain queueing processes,Ann. Math. Stat. 24:355-360 (1953). · Zbl 0051.10601 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728976 |
[5] | D. J. Gates, Growth and decrescence of two-dimensional crystals: A Markov rate process,J. Stat. Phys. 52:259-271 (1988). · Zbl 1083.82538 · doi:10.1007/BF01016412 |
[6] | D. J. Gates and M. Westcott, Kinetics of polymer crystallization. I. Discrete and continuum models,Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 416:443-461 (1988). · doi:10.1098/rspa.1988.0043 |
[7] | D. J. Gates and M. Westcott, Kinetics of polymer crystallization. II. Growth regimes,Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 416:463-476 (1988). · doi:10.1098/rspa.1988.0044 |
[8] | G. H. Gilmer, Growth on imperfect crystal surfaces,J. Crystal Growth 35:15-28 (1976). · doi:10.1016/0022-0248(76)90209-8 |
[9] | G. H. Gilmer, Transients in the rate of crystal growth,J. Crystal Growth 49:465-474 (1980). · doi:10.1016/0022-0248(80)90121-9 |
[10] | G. H. Gilmer and K. A. Jackson, Computer simulation of crystal growth, inCrystal Growth and Materials, E. Kaldis and H. J. Scheel, eds. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976), pp. 80-114. |
[11] | P. J. Holewijn and A. Hordijk, On the convergence of moments in stationary Markov chains,Stochastic Proc. Appl. 3:55-64 (1975). · Zbl 0313.60045 · doi:10.1016/0304-4149(75)90006-X |
[12] | K. A. Jackson, On the theory of crystal growth: Growth of small crystals using periodic boundary conditions,J. Crystal Growth 34:507-511 (1968). · doi:10.1016/0022-0248(68)90211-X |
[13] | F. P. Kelly,Reversibility and Stochastic Networks (Wiley, Chichester, 1979). |
[14] | R. G. Miller, Jr., Stationarity equation in continuous time Markov chains,Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 109:35-44 (1963). · Zbl 0128.37903 |
[15] | R. L. Tweedie, Some ergodic properties of the Feller minimal process,Q. J. Math. Oxford (2) 25:485-495 (1974). · Zbl 0309.60046 · doi:10.1093/qmath/25.1.485 |
[16] | R. L. Tweedie, Sufficient conditions for regularity, recurrence and ergodicity of Markov processes,Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 78:125-136 (1975). · Zbl 0331.60047 · doi:10.1017/S0305004100051562 |
[17] | R. L. Tweedie, Criteria for classifying general Markov chains,Adv. Appl. Prob. 8:737-771 (1976). · Zbl 0361.60014 · doi:10.2307/1425932 |
[18] | J. D. Weeks and G. H. Gilmer, Dynamics of crystal growth,Adv. Chem. Phys. 40:157-228 (1979). · doi:10.1002/9780470142592.ch4 |
[19] | P. Whittle, Reversibility and acyclicity, inPerspectives in Probability and Statistics, J. Gani, ed. (Academic Press, London, 1975). · Zbl 0349.60068 |
[20] | P. Whittle,Systems in Stochastic Equilibrium (Wiley, New York, 1986). · Zbl 0665.60107 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.