×

Return policy in product reuse under uncertainty. (English) Zbl 1356.90024

Summary: One complicating factor in a reverse logistics activity is the uncertainty in the volume of the reverse product flow coupled with uncertain demand. These uncertainties are creating a problem for the reuse businesses because, in order to have a profitable business, their plants need some minimum number of used products to operate efficiently. Several researches have indicated that there is a significant quantity of used products that failed to enter the reverse channel. Therefore finding a way to ensure supply of used products is essential for the viability of the plant. In this paper, we propose the use of financial incentives (also referred to as ‘return policy’) so that adequate supply of the used products is ensured. We present a profit-maximisation model to obtain the optimal return policy. We also obtain a number of managerial guidelines for using marketing and operational strategy variables to influence the reaction parameters so as to obtain the maximum benefit from the market.

MSC:

90B06 Transportation, logistics and supply chain management
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Akcali, E and Cetinkaya, S. 2010. Quantitative models for inventory and production planning in closed loop supply chains.International Journal of Production Research, doi: 10.1080/00207541003692021. [In press 29 April (iFirst), 1–35]
[2] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.050 · Zbl 1121.90048 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.050
[3] DOI: 10.1016/0925-5273(92)90055-C · doi:10.1016/0925-5273(92)90055-C
[4] DOI: 10.1080/07408170490279561 · doi:10.1080/07408170490279561
[5] DOI: 10.3401/poms.1080.0051 · doi:10.3401/poms.1080.0051
[6] DOI: 10.1080/00207540902933148 · Zbl 1197.90119 · doi:10.1080/00207540902933148
[7] DOI: 10.1509/jppm.19.1.93.16950 · doi:10.1509/jppm.19.1.93.16950
[8] Carter CR, Journal of Business Logistics 19 pp 85– (1998)
[9] Chen F, Management Science 46 pp 463– (2000)
[10] DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00194.x · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00194.x
[11] DOI: 10.1016/S0148-6195(98)00013-7 · doi:10.1016/S0148-6195(98)00013-7
[12] DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1040.0045 · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0045
[13] DOI: 10.1287/inte.30.3.143.11670 · doi:10.1287/inte.30.3.143.11670
[14] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.44.2.276 · Zbl 0989.90043 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.44.2.276
[15] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00230-0 · Zbl 0920.90057 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00230-0
[16] DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00022-0 · doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00022-0
[17] Geyer R, California Management Review 46 pp 55– (2004) · doi:10.2307/41166210
[18] DOI: 10.1108/09600030010372621 · doi:10.1108/09600030010372621
[19] DOI: 10.1080/002075400189220 · Zbl 0944.90521 · doi:10.1080/002075400189220
[20] DOI: 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00110-9 · doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00110-9
[21] DOI: 10.2307/3147062 · doi:10.2307/3147062
[22] DOI: 10.1016/1053-5357(95)90032-2 · doi:10.1016/1053-5357(95)90032-2
[23] Kahn K, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 4 pp 72– (1996) · doi:10.1080/10696679.1996.11501725
[24] Kauffman RJ, Journal of Management Information Systems 21 pp 137– (2004)
[25] DOI: 10.1287/inte.30.3.156.11657 · doi:10.1287/inte.30.3.156.11657
[26] Lambert DM, California Management Review 22 pp 65– (1980) · doi:10.2307/41164891
[27] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00123-4 · Zbl 1009.90005 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00123-4
[28] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00088-6 · Zbl 0985.90004 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00088-6
[29] DOI: 10.1080/00207540701837029 · Zbl 1198.90305 · doi:10.1080/00207540701837029
[30] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601418 · Zbl 1139.90399 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601418
[31] DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00074.x · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00074.x
[32] Matthews HS, California Management Review 46 pp 105– (2004) · doi:10.2307/41166213
[33] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.016 · Zbl 1121.90365 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.016
[34] Murphy P, Transportation Journal 40 pp 5– (2000)
[35] DOI: 10.1287/mksc.16.1.81 · doi:10.1287/mksc.16.1.81
[36] Rosenau WV, Journal of Business Logistics 17 pp 139– (1996)
[37] DOI: 10.1080/00207540600943977 · Zbl 1160.90321 · doi:10.1080/00207540600943977
[38] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.032 · Zbl 1163.90371 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.032
[39] DOI: 10.1023/A:1012224422616 · doi:10.1023/A:1012224422616
[40] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186 · Zbl 1232.90119 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186
[41] DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x
[42] Teague P, Purchasing 134 pp 15– (2005)
[43] DOI: 10.1108/13598540210447719 · doi:10.1108/13598540210447719
[44] DOI: 10.1287/msom.2.4.372.12342 · doi:10.1287/msom.2.4.372.12342
[45] DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00055-0 · doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00055-0
[46] DOI: 10.1080/09640569811533 · doi:10.1080/09640569811533
[47] DOI: 10.1080/09640560050010383 · doi:10.1080/09640560050010383
[48] DOI: 10.1080/00207540701440303 · Zbl 1128.90459 · doi:10.1080/00207540701440303
[49] DOI: 10.1080/00207540903150585 · Zbl 1197.90178 · doi:10.1080/00207540903150585
[50] DOI: 10.1080/00207540903173637 · Zbl 1197.90040 · doi:10.1080/00207540903173637
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.