×

Effects of vacuum fluctuation suppression on atomic decay rates. (English) Zbl 1220.81206

Summary: The use of atomic decay rates as a probe of sub-vacuum phenomena will be studied. Because electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations are essential for radiative decay of excited atomic states, decay rates can serve as a measure of the suppression of vacuum fluctuations in non-classical states, such as squeezed vacua. In such states, the renormalized expectation value of the square of the electric field or the energy density can be periodically negative, representing suppression of vacuum fluctuations. We explore the extent to which atomic decays can be used to measure the mean squared electric field or energy density. We consider a scheme in which atoms in an excited state transit a closed cavity whose lowest mode contains photons in a non-classical state. A crucial feature of our analysis is that we do not employ the rotating wave approximation. The change in the decay probability of the atom in the cavity due to the non-classical state can, under certain circumstances, serve as a measure of the mean squared electric field or energy density in the cavity. We make some estimates of the magnitude of this effect, which indicate that an experimental test might be possible, although very challenging.

MSC:

81V80 Quantum optics
81V45 Atomic physics
81T10 Model quantum field theories
81R30 Coherent states

References:

[1] Epstein, H.; Glaser, V.; Jaffe, A., Nuovo Cim., 36, 1016-1022 (1965)
[2] Brown, L. S.; Maclay, G. J., Phys. Rev., 184, 1272-1279 (1969)
[3] Slusher, R. E.; Hollberg, L. W.; Yurke, B.; Mertz, J. C.; Valley, J. F., Phys. Rev. Lett., 55, 2409-2412 (1985)
[4] Ford, L. H., Phys. Rev. D, 43, 3972-3978 (1991)
[5] Ford, L. H.; Roman, T. A., Phys. Rev. D, 55, 2082-2089 (1997)
[6] Fewster, C. J.; Eveson, S. P., Phys. Rev. D, 58, 084010 (1998)
[7] Marecki, P., Phys. Rev. A, 66, 053801 (2002)
[8] Ford, L. H.; Grove, P. G.; Ottewill, A. C., Phys. Rev. D, 46, 4566-4573 (1992)
[9] Davies, P. C.W.; Ottewill, A. C., Phys. Rev. D, 65, 104014 (2002)
[10] Grove, P. G., Class. Quantum Grav., 5, 1381-1391 (1988)
[11] Marecki, P.; Szpak, N., Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 14, 428-437 (2005) · Zbl 1071.81601
[12] Gerry, C. C.; Knight, P. L., Introductory Quantum Optics (2005), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, p. 79 and Section 4.5
[13] Graham, N.; Olum, K. D., Phys. Rev. D, 72, 025013 (2005)
[14] Fewster, C. J.; Olum, K. D.; Pfenning, M. J., Phys. Rev. D, 75, 025007 (2007)
[15] Borde, A.; Ford, L. H.; Roman, T. A., Phys. Rev. D, 65, 084002 (2002)
[16] Babiker, M.; Barton, G., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 326, 255-275 (1972), 277-288
[17] Haroche, S.; Raimond, J-M., Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons (2006), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press New York, Chap. 5 · Zbl 1118.81001
[18] Purcell, E. M., Phys. Rev., 69, 681 (1946)
[19] Fox, M., Quantum Optics (2006), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press New York, Sections 10.3.3 and 10.3.4 · Zbl 1196.78001
[20] Caves, C. M., Phys. Rev. D, 23, 1693-1708 (1981)
[21] Jackson, J. D., Classical Electrodynamics (1999), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, Chap. 8 · Zbl 0114.42903
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.