On the reasonable and unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in classical and quantum physics. (English) Zbl 1211.81014
Summary: The point of departure for this article is Werner Heisenberg’s remark, made in 1929: “It is not surprising that our language [or conceptuality] should be incapable of describing processes occurring within atoms, for \(\dots\) it was invented to describe the experiences of daily life, and these consist only of processes involving exceedingly large numbers of atoms. \(\dots \) Fortunately, mathematics is not subject to this limitation, and it has been possible to invent a mathematical scheme – the quantum theory [quantum mechanics] – which seems entirely adequate for the treatment of atomic processes.” The cost of this discovery, at least in Heisenberg’s and related interpretations of quantum mechanics (such as that of Niels Bohr), is that, in contrast to classical mechanics, the mathematical scheme in question no longer offers a description, even an idealized one, of quantum objects and processes. This scheme only enables predictions, in general, probabilistic in character, of the outcomes of quantum experiments. As a result, a new type of the relationships between mathematics and physics is established, which, in the language of Eugene Wigner adopted in my title, indeed makes the effectiveness of mathematics unreasonable in quantum but, as I shall explain, not in classical physics. The article discusses these new relationships between mathematics and physics in quantum theory and their implications for theoretical physics – past, present, and future.
MSC:
| 81P05 | General and philosophical questions in quantum theory |
| 00A79 | Physics |
| 00A30 | Philosophy of mathematics |
Keywords:
classical physics; quantum mechanics; epistemology; mathematical formalism; prediction vs. description; probabilityReferences:
| [1] | Wigner, E.: The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 13, 1 (1960) · Zbl 0102.00703 · doi:10.1002/cpa.3160130102 |
| [2] | Heisenberg, W.: The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. Dover, New York (1930). Translated by Eckhart, K. and Hoyt, F.C., rpt. (1949) · JFM 56.0745.04 |
| [3] | Bohr, N.: The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, 3 vols. Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge (1987) |
| [4] | Heisenberg, W.: Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. Harper & Row, New York (1962) |
| [5] | Schrödinger, E.: The present situation in quantum mechanics (1935). In: Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.) Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 152–167. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983) |
| [6] | Kahn, C. (ed.): The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: A New Arrangement and Translation of the Fragments with Literary and Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981) |
| [7] | Kragh, H.: Dirac: A Scientific Biography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990) |
| [8] | Greene, B.: The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory. Random House, New York (2000) |
| [9] | Weyl, H.: Symmetry. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983) · Zbl 0018.38603 |
| [10] | Weyl, H.: Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics. Dover, New York (1984) · Zbl 0041.56804 |
| [11] | Heisenberg, W.: Encounters with Einstein, and Other Essays on People, Places, and Particles. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1989) |
| [12] | Aristotle: The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1984). Edited by Barnes, J. · JFM 56.0819.02 |
| [13] | Wheeler, J.A.: Law without law. In: Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.) Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983) |
| [14] | Arndt, M., Nairz, O., Voss-Andreae, J., Keller, C., van der Zouw, G., Zeilinger, A.: Wave-particle duality of C60. Nature 401, 680 (1999) · doi:10.1038/44348 |
| [15] | Plotnitsky, A.: Epistemology and Probability: Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and the Nature of Quantum-Theoretical Thinking. Springer, New York (2009) · Zbl 1328.00091 |
| [16] | Pais, A.: Einstein and the quantum-theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 863 (1979) · doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.863 |
| [17] | Einstein, A.: Autobiographical Notes. Open Court, La Salle (1991). Translated by Schilpp, P.A. |
| [18] | Proust, M.: The Remembrance of Things Past, 3 vols. Vintage, New York (1981). Translated by Moncrieff, C.K.S. and Kilmartin, T. |
| [19] | Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997). Translated by Guyer, P. and Wood, A.W. |
| [20] | Gray, J.: Plato’s Ghost: The Modernist Transformation of Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008) · Zbl 1166.00005 |
| [21] | Weyl, H.: The Continuum: A Critical Examination of the Foundation of Analysis. Dover, New York (1918). Translated by Pollard, S. and Bole, T., rpt. (1994) |
| [22] | Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? (1935). In: Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.) Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 138–141. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983) · Zbl 0012.04201 |
| [23] | Heisenberg, W.: Quantum-theoretical re-interpretation of kinematical and mechanical relations (1925). In: Van der Waerden, B.L. (ed.) Sources of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 261–277. Dover, New York (1968) |
| [24] | Heisenberg, W.: The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics (1927). In: Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.) Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 62–86. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983) · JFM 53.0853.05 |
| [25] | Dirac, P.A.M., Kuhn, T.: Interview with Dirac, April 1, 1962, Niels Bohr Library, Center for the History of Physics, American Institute of Physics, College Park, Maryland |
| [26] | Wootters, W.K.: Quantum mechanics without probability amplitudes. Found. Phys. 16(4), 391 (1985) · doi:10.1007/BF01882696 |
| [27] | Fuchs, C.A., Schack, R.: Quantum-Bayesian coherence, 11 June 2009. arXiv:0906.2187v1 [quant-ph] · Zbl 1182.81026 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
