Deletion, Bell’s inequality, teleportation. (English) Zbl 1209.81044
Summary: We analyze the efficacy of the entangled output of A. K. Pati and S. L. Braunstein [arXiv:quant-ph/0007121 (2000)] deletion machine as a teleportation channel. We analyze the possibility of it violating the Bell’s inequality. Interestingly we find that for all values of the input parameter \(\alpha \) the state does not violate the Bell’s inequality but when used as a teleportation channel can give a fidelity higher than the classical optimum (i.e., \(\frac{2}{3}\)).
MSC:
| 81P45 | Quantum information, communication, networks (quantum-theoretic aspects) |
| 81P40 | Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations |
References:
| [1] | Wootters W.K., Zurek W.H.: A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299, 802 (1982) · Zbl 1369.81022 · doi:10.1038/299802a0 |
| [2] | Pati A.K., Braunstein S.L.: Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state. Nature 404, 164 (2000) · doi:10.1038/35004532 |
| [3] | Pati, A.K., Braunstein, S.L.: arxiv:quant-ph/0007121v1 (2000) |
| [4] | Qiu D.: Non-optimal universal quantum deleting machine. Phys. Lett. A 301, 112 (2002) · Zbl 0997.81518 · doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00990-8 |
| [5] | Adhikari S.: Quantum deletion: beyond the no-deletion principle. Phys. Rev. A 72, 052321 (2005) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052321 |
| [6] | Adhikari S., Choudhury B.S.: Improving the fidelity of deletion. Phys. Rev. A 73, 054303 (2006) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.73.054303 |
| [7] | Bell J.S.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics 1, 195 (1964) |
| [8] | Werner R.F.: Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989) · Zbl 1371.81145 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 |
| [9] | Benett C., Brassard G., Crepeau C., Jozsa R., Peres A., Wootters W.K.: Teleporting an unknown qunatum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993) · Zbl 1051.81505 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895 |
| [10] | Popescu S.: Bell’s inequalities versus teleportation: what is nonlocality?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 797 (1994) · Zbl 0973.81506 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.797 |
| [11] | Horodecki R., Horodecki M., Horodecki P.: Teleportation, Bell’s inequalities and inseparability. Phys. Lett. A 222, 21 (1996) · Zbl 0972.81507 · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(96)00639-1 |
| [12] | Buzek V., Hillery M.: Quantum copying: beyond the no-cloning theorem. Phys. Rev. A 54, 1844 (1996) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1844 |
| [13] | Adhikari S., Ganguly N., Chakrabarty I., Choudhury B.S.: Quantum cloning, Bell’s inequality and teleportation. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 41, 415302 (2008) · Zbl 1192.81046 · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/41/415302 |
| [14] | Peres A.: Separability criterion for density matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996) · Zbl 0947.81003 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413 |
| [15] | Horodecki M., Horodecki P., Horodecki R.: Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996) · Zbl 1037.81501 · doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
