×

Modeling of transfer length of prestressing strands using genetic programming and neuro-fuzzy. (English) Zbl 1423.74493

Summary: The efficiency of neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and genetic expression programming (GEP) in predicting the transfer length of prestressing strands in prestressed concrete beams was investigated. Many models suggested for the transfer length of prestressing strands usually consider one or two parameters and do not provide consistent accurate prediction. The alternative approaches such as GEP and ANFIS have been recently used to model spatially complex systems. The transfer length data from various researches have been collected to use in training and testing ANFIS and GEP models. Six basic parameters affecting the transfer length of strands were selected as input parameters. These parameters are ratio of strand cross-sectional area to concrete area, surface condition of strands, diameter of strands, percentage of debonded strands, effective prestress and concrete strength at the time of measurement. Results showed that the ANFIS and GEP models are capable of accurately predicting the transfer lengths used in the training and testing phase of the study. The GEP model results better prediction compared to ANFIS model.

MSC:

74K10 Rods (beams, columns, shafts, arches, rings, etc.)
74S30 Other numerical methods in solid mechanics (MSC2010)
92B20 Neural networks for/in biological studies, artificial life and related topics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] American Concrete Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (ACI 318-02). Detroit Michigan; 2002.
[2] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Standard specifications for highway bridges. Washington, DC; 1992.
[3] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). LRFD specifications for highway bridges. Washington, DC; 1997.
[4] Kaar, P. H.; Magura, D. D.: Effect of strand blanketing on performance of pretensioned girders, J prestr concr inst, 20-34 (1965)
[5] Castrodale RW, Burns NH, Kreger ME. A study of pretensioned high strength concrete girders in composite highway bridges – laboratory tests. Research Report 381-3. CTR, the University of Texas at Austin; 1988.
[6] Mitchell, D.; Cook, W. D.; Khan, A. A.; Tham, T.: Influence of high strength concrete on transfer and development length of prestressing strand, Pci j 38, No. 3, 52-66 (1993)
[7] Cousins TE, Stallings JM, Simmons MB. Effect of strand spacing on development of prestressing strand. Project No. 65308, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama; 1993.
[8] Hanson, N. W.; Kaar, P. H.: Flexural Bond tests of pretensioned prestressed beams, Aci j 55, No. 7, 783-803 (1959)
[9] Russell BW, Burns NH. Design guidelines for transfer, development and debonding of large diameter seven wire strands in pretensioned concrete girders. Research Report 1210-5F. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin; 1993.
[10] Abdalla OA, Ramirez JA, Lee RH. Strand debonding in pretensioned beams-precast prestressed concrete bridge griders with debonded strands, Part 2. Final Report: Simply Supported Tests. Publication No. FHWA/INDOT/JHRP-92-25. School of Civil Engineering of Purdue University and the Indiana Department of Transportation; 1993.
[11] Lane SN. A new development length equation for pretensioned strands in bridge beams and piles. Research Report FHWA-RD-98-116. Structures Division, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA; 1998.
[12] Shahawy, M. A.; Isa, M.; Batchelor, B. Dev: Strand transfer lengths in full-scale AASHTO prestressed concrete girders, Pci j 37, No. 3, 84-96 (1992)
[13] Gross SP, Burns NH. Transfer and development length of 15.2mm (0.6in.) diameter prestressing strand in high performance concrete: results of the Hoblitzell – Buckner beam tests. Research Report 580-2. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin; 1995.
[14] Jobson HL. Transfer and development length of fully bonded 0.6-in. (15-mm) diameter prestressing strand in AASHTO type I concrete beams. Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin; 1997.
[15] Grove JW. Transfer and development length of debonded 0.6-in. (15-mm) diameter prestressing strand in AASHTO type I girder specimens. Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin; 1998.
[16] Kilgore JH. Transfer and development length of debonded 0.6-in. (15-mm) diameter prestressing strand in AASHTO type I concrete beam. Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin; 1997.
[17] Kose, M. M.; Burkett, W. R.: Evaluation of code requirement for 0.6in. (15mm) prestressing strands, ACI struct J 102, No. 3, 422-428 (2005)
[18] Ferreira, C.: Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems, Complex syst 13, No. 2, 87-129 (2001) · Zbl 1167.92329
[19] Muñoz DG. Discovering unknown equations that describe large data sets using genetic programming techniques. Master’s Thesis, Linköping Institute of Technology; 2005.
[20] Cevik, A.: A new formulation for longitudinally stiffened webs subjected to patch loading, J construct steel res 63, 1328-1340 (2007)
[21] Teodorescu, L.; Sherwood, D.: High energy physics event selection with gene expression programming, Comput phys commun 178, 409-419 (2008)
[22] Kayadelen C, Günaydın O, Taşkıran T, Fener M. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy modeling for the swelling potential of compacted soils. Environ. Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-009-0009-5.
[23] Sherrod PH. DTREG Predictive Modeling Software 2008. <http://www.dtreg.com/>.
[24] Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets, Inform control 8, 338-353 (1965) · Zbl 0139.24606 · doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[25] Topcu, I. B.; Saridemir, M.: Prediction of rubberized concrete properties using artificial neural network and fuzzy logic, Constr build mater 22, 532-540 (2008)
[26] Dubois, D.; Prade, H.: Fuzzy sets and systems, (1980) · Zbl 0444.94049
[27] Takagi, T.; Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control, IEEE trans syst man cybern 15, 116-132 (1985) · Zbl 0576.93021
[28] Tutmez, B.; Tercan, A. E.: Spatial estimation of some mechanical properties of rocks by fuzzy modeling, Comput geotech 34, 10-18 (2007)
[29] Shahin, M. A.; Maier, H. R.; Jaksa, M. B.: Settlement prediction of shallow foundations on granular soils using B-spline neurofuzzy models, Comput geotech 30, 637-647 (2003)
[30] Jang, J. S. R.: ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference systems, IEEE trans syst man cybern 23, No. 3, 665-685 (1993)
[31] Demuth, H.; Beale, M.: Neural network toolbox for use with Matlab, (2001)
[32] Padmini, D.; Ilamparuthi, K.; Sudheer, K. P.: Ultimate bearing capacity prediction of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils using neurofuzzy models, Comput geotech 35, 33-46 (2008)
[33] Buckner CD. An analysis of transfer and development lengths for pretensioned concrete structures. Research Report FHWA-RD-94-049. Virginia Military Institute; 1994.
[34] Kose, M. M.; Burkett, W. R.: Formulation of new development length equation for 0.6in. Prestressing strand, Pci j 50, No. 5, 96-105 (2005)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.