×

Paraconsistent conjectural deduction based on logical entropy measures. I: \(C\)-systems as non-standard inference framework. (English) Zbl 1185.03046

Summary: A conjectural inference is proposed, aimed at producing conjectural theorems from formal conjectures assumed as axioms, as well as admitting contradictory statements as conjectural theorems. To this end, we employ Paraconsistent Informational Logic, which provides a formal setting where the notion of conjecture formulated by an epistemic agent can be defined. The paraconsistent systems on which conjectural deduction is based are sequent formulations of the \(C\)-systems presented by W. A. Carnielli and J. Marcos [“A taxonomy of \(C\)-systems”, in: W. A. Carnielli et al. (eds.), Paraconsistency. The logical way to the inconsistent. Proceedings of the 2nd world congress on paraconsistency, WCP 2000, in honor of Newton da Costa on the occasion of his 70th birthday, São Paulo, Brazil, May 12–19, 2000. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker. Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math. 228, 1–94 (2002; Zbl 1036.03022)]. Thus, conjectural deduction may also be considered to be a tool for investigating the properties of paraconsistency in general.

MSC:

03B53 Paraconsistent logics

Citations:

Zbl 1036.03022
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177704255 · Zbl 0114.07204 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704255
[2] BATENS D., Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic (2000)
[3] BENASSI C., Third World Conference on Paraconsistency (2003)
[4] BOOLOS G., The Logic of Provability (1993) · Zbl 0891.03004
[5] BUSS S., Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 53 pp 75– (1991) · Zbl 0749.03039 · doi:10.1016/0168-0072(91)90059-U
[6] DOI: 10.1016/S0049-237X(98)80016-5 · doi:10.1016/S0049-237X(98)80016-5
[7] CARNIELLI W., Handbook of Philosophical Logic 12
[8] CARNIELLI W., The Journal of non Classical Logic 8 (1) pp 59– (1991)
[9] CARNIELLI W., Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3) pp 375– (1999) · Zbl 1007.03028 · doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1022615617
[10] CARNIELLI W., Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2 pp 848–
[11] CARNIELLI W., Paraconsistency: the logical way to the Inconsistent (Proceedings of WCP 2000), vol. 228 of Lecture Notes In Pure and Applied Mathematics (2002) · doi:10.1201/9780203910139
[12] CARNIELLI , W. and MARCOS , J. A taxonomy of C-systems 1–94. Carnielli et al. [CAR 02a] · Zbl 1036.03022
[13] DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1093891487 · Zbl 0236.02022 · doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093891487
[14] DA COSTA N., Inconsistency in Science pp 105– (2002) · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0085-6_6
[15] DUBOIS D., Handbook of Logic in AI and Logic Programming (1994)
[16] FORCHERI P., Paraconsistent Conjectural Deduction based on Logical Entropy Measures II: Logical Laws as Algebraic Function · Zbl 1185.03046
[17] FORCHERI P., Logic and Algebra, vol. 180 of Lecture Notes In Pure and Applied Mathematics (1996)
[18] FORCHERI P., Journal of Automated Reasoning 20 pp 167– (1998) · Zbl 0893.68148 · doi:10.1023/A:1005905025531
[19] FORCHERI P., Artificial Intelligence Communications 12 pp 185– (1999)
[20] FORCHERI P., Journal of Applied Logic 3 pp 97– (2005) · Zbl 1063.03012 · doi:10.1016/j.jal.2004.07.013
[21] GENTILINI P., Studia Logica 63 pp 27– (1999) · Zbl 0952.03069 · doi:10.1023/A:1005203020301
[22] GENTILINI P., Studia Logica 63 pp 245– (1999) · Zbl 0952.03070 · doi:10.1023/A:1005266731458
[23] GENTILINI P., Studia Logica 63 pp 301– (1999) · Zbl 0960.03049 · doi:10.1023/A:1005262101188
[24] GIRARD J., Proof-Theory and logical complexity, vol. I of Studies in proof theory (1987) · Zbl 0635.03052
[25] HÀJEK P., Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, vol. 4 of Trends in Logic (2001)
[26] DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(90)90019-V · Zbl 0723.03007 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90019-V
[27] HUNTER A., Proc. AAAI 2002 pp 68–
[28] KHINCHIN A., Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory (1957) · Zbl 0088.10404
[29] KNIGHT K. M., Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 pp 227– (2003) · Zbl 1015.03035 · doi:10.1023/A:1022351919320
[30] KONIECZNY S., Proc. IJCAI 2003
[31] KREPS D. M., A Course in Microeconomic Theory (1990)
[32] KYBURG H., Handbook of Logic in AI and Logic Programming 3 (1994)
[33] MEHEUS J., Inconsistency in Science (2002) · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0085-6
[34] MONTAGNA F., Archive of Mathematical Logic 35 pp 225– (1996) · Zbl 0854.03020 · doi:10.1007/s001530050043
[35] PARIKH R., Trans. of Am. Math. Soc. 177 pp 29– (1973) · doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1973-0432416-X
[36] PARIS J., Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 pp 1007– (1998) · Zbl 0918.03015 · doi:10.2307/2586724
[37] PEARL J., Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems (1998) · Zbl 0746.68089
[38] PUDLAK P., Handbook of Proof Theory pp 547– (1998) · doi:10.1016/S0049-237X(98)80023-2
[39] RAGGIO A., Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 9 (4) pp 359– (1968) · Zbl 0184.00702 · doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093893524
[40] SAVAGE L., The Foundations of Statistics (1954) · Zbl 0055.12604
[41] DOI: 10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71672-0 · doi:10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71672-0
[42] DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Zbl 1154.94303 · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
[43] SMORYNSKI C., Handbook of Mathematical Logic pp 821– (1991)
[44] TAKEUTI G., Proof Theory, 2. ed. (1987)
[45] DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139168717 · doi:10.1017/CBO9781139168717
[46] VON NEUMANN J., Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour (1944) · Zbl 0063.05930
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.