×

Multi-objective meta level soft computing-based evolutionary structural design. (English) Zbl 1269.90098

Summary: Evolutionary structural design has been the topic of much recent research; however, such designs are usually hampered by the time-consuming stage of prototype evaluations using standard finite element analysis (FEA). Replacing the time-consuming FEA by neural network approximations may be a computationally efficient alternative, but the error in such approximation may misguide the optimization procedure. In this paper, a multi-objective meta-level (MOML) soft computing-based evolutionary scheme is proposed that aims to strike a balance between accuracy vs. computational efficiency and exploration vs. exploitation. The neural network (NN) is used here as a pre-filter when fitness is estimated to be of lesser significance while the standard FEA is used for solutions that may be optimal in their current population. Furthermore, a fuzzy controller updates parameters of the genetic algorithm (GA) in order to balance exploitation vs. exploration in the search process, and the multi-objective GA optimizes parameters of the membership functions in the fuzzy controller. The algorithm is first optimized on two benchmark problems, i.e. a 2-D Truss frame and an airplane wing. General applicability of the resulting optimization algorithm is then tested on two other benchmark problems, i.e. a 3-layer composite beam and a piezoelectric bimorph beam. Performance of the proposed algorithm is compared with several other competing algorithms, i.e. a fuzzy-GA-NN, a GA-NN, as well as a simple GA that only uses only FEA, in terms of both computational efficiency and accuracy. Statistical analysis indicates the superiority as well as robustness of the above approach as compared with the other optimization algorithms. Specifically, the proposed approach finds better structural designs more consistently while being computationally more efficient.

MSC:

90C29 Multi-objective and goal programming
90C59 Approximation methods and heuristics in mathematical programming
90B22 Queues and service in operations research

Software:

NSGA-II

References:

[1] Papadrakakis, M.; Lagaros, N. D.; Kokossalakis, G., Evolutionary algorithms applied to structural optimization problems, (Topping; Lämmer, High Performance Computing for Computational Mechanics (2000), Saxe-Coburg Publications: Saxe-Coburg Publications Edinburgh), 207-233
[2] Brans, J.-P.; Mareschal, B., How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24, 228-238 (1986) · Zbl 0576.90056
[4] Papadrakakis, M.; Lagaros, N. D.; Sompanakis, Y. T., Structural optimization using evolution strategies and neural networks, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 156, 309-333 (1998) · Zbl 0964.74045
[5] Papadrakakis, M.; Lagaros, N. D., Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and monte carlo simulation, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng, 191, 3491-3507 (2002) · Zbl 1101.74377
[6] Zhang, L.; Subbarayan, G., An evaluation of back-propagation neural Networks for the optimal design of structural systems: Part I. Training procedures, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 191, 2873-2886 (2002) · Zbl 1131.74332
[7] Zhang, L.; Subbarayan, G., An evaluation of back-propagation neural networks for the optimal design of structural systems: Part II. numerical evaluation,, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng, 191, 2887-2904 (2002) · Zbl 1131.74333
[15] Subbu, R.; Bonissone, P., A retrospective view of fuzzy control of evolutionary algorithm resources, Technical Report 2003GRC045 (2003), Component Information and Decision Technologies: Component Information and Decision Technologies Niskayuna
[18] Goldberg, D. E., Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning (1989), Addison-Wesley: Addison-Wesley New York · Zbl 0721.68056
[19] Zitzler, E.; Deb, K.; Thiele, L., Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 8, 2, 181 (2000)
[22] Cybenko, G., Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function, Math. Control, Signal, Systems, 2, 303-314 (1989) · Zbl 0679.94019
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.