×

A model category structure on the category of simplicial categories. (English) Zbl 1114.18006

The morphisms between two objects in the homotopy category of a model category \(\mathcal M\) form a set (of homotopy classes). In the Dwyer-Kan simplicial localization of \(\mathcal M\) they form a simplicial set, whose set of components is the afore-mentioned set of homotopy classes. This simplicial category encodes the homotopy theoretic information of \(\mathcal M\) and can thus be thought of as its homotopy theory. Therefore, the study of the homotopy theory of homotopy theories starts with finding a model category structure on the category of simplicial categories. This is achieved in this carefully written article. The weak equivalences are the Dwyer-Kan equivalences, that is, the maps between simplicial categories inducing an equivalence of categories on \(\pi_0\) and, at the level of morphisms, weak equivalences of simplicial sets. The model category structure is in fact cofibrantly generated and right proper. Another motivation for the study of simplicial categories comes from the theory of higher categories, where they provide a model for the so-called \((\infty, 1)\)-categories. There are other models for both the homotopy theory of homotopy theories and \((\infty, 1)\)-categories, such as C. Rezk’s complete Segal spaces [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 353, 973–1007 (2001; Zbl 0961.18008)], or Joyal’s quasi-categories. In her survey paper [J. E. Bergner, Topology 46, 397–436 (2007; Zbl 1119.55010)], the author shows that all these models are Quillen equivalent.

MSC:

18G55 Nonabelian homotopical algebra (MSC2010)
55U35 Abstract and axiomatic homotopy theory in algebraic topology
18D20 Enriched categories (over closed or monoidal categories)

References:

[1] J.E. Bergner, Three models for the homotopy theory of homotopy theories, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Notre Dame, 2005. · Zbl 1119.55010
[2] William G. Dwyer, Philip S. Hirschhorn, Daniel M. Kan, and Jeffrey H. Smith, Homotopy limit functors on model categories and homotopical categories, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 113, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004. · Zbl 1072.18012
[3] W. G. Dwyer and D. M. Kan, Function complexes in homotopical algebra, Topology 19 (1980), no. 4, 427 – 440. · Zbl 0438.55011 · doi:10.1016/0040-9383(80)90025-7
[4] W. G. Dwyer and D. M. Kan, Simplicial localizations of categories, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 17 (1980), no. 3, 267 – 284. · Zbl 0485.18012 · doi:10.1016/0022-4049(80)90049-3
[5] W. G. Dwyer and J. Spaliński, Homotopy theories and model categories, Handbook of algebraic topology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 73 – 126. · Zbl 0869.55018 · doi:10.1016/B978-044481779-2/50003-1
[6] Paul G. Goerss and John F. Jardine, Simplicial homotopy theory, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 174, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1999. · Zbl 0949.55001
[7] Philip S. Hirschhorn, Model categories and their localizations, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 99, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003. · Zbl 1017.55001
[8] Mark Hovey, Model categories, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 63, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999. · Zbl 0909.55001
[9] Jean-Pierre Serre, Groupes d’homotopie et classes de groupes abéliens, Ann. of Math. (2) 58 (1953), 258 – 294 (French). · Zbl 0052.19303 · doi:10.2307/1969789
[10] Bertrand Toën and Gabriele Vezzosi. Homotopical algebraic geometry I: topos theory, preprint available at math.AG/0207028. · Zbl 1120.14012
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.