×

Ecogenetic models, competition, and heteropatry. (English) Zbl 0676.92006

We develop a system of equations to analyse the existence of genetic polymorphisms under disruptive selection in heterogeneous environments. These equations have both a genetic and a population density regulation component. In the absence of the genetic component, the equations reduce to a discrete time description of competition between interacting clonal lines or species. We use these equations to demonstrate that different populations, competing along a resource spectrum, are able to dynamically coexist, as asymptotically periodic or chaotic solutions to our system of equations, despite the fact that a coexistence equilibrium - stable or unstable - does not exist. We then extend these results to environments in which several niches are explicitly defined. Our analysis of the ecological component of our model establishes that the answer to questions of coexistence among groups of individuals cannot rely on analyses of the existence of equilibria and their stability properties.
In the most general model presented here, we allow for an assortative mating structure that is induced by the spatial heterogeneity of the environment. The level of assortative mating is controlled by a parameter so that at one extreme mating is panmictic, while at the other extreme individuals mate within their natal niches before dispersing to oviposit in other niches. We refer to this spatial mating structure as heteropatry.

MSC:

92D10 Genetics and epigenetics
92D40 Ecology
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Arnold, J.; Anderson, W. W., Density-regulated selection in a heterogeneous environment, Amer. Nat, 121, 656-668 (1983)
[2] Asmussen, M. A., Regular and chaotic cycling in models of ecological genetics, Theor. Pop. Biol, 16, 172-190 (1979) · Zbl 0443.92010
[3] Asmussen, M. A., Density dependent selection incorporating intraspecific competition. I. A haploid model, J. Theor. Biol, 101, 113-127 (1983)
[4] Asmussen, M. A., Density dependent selection incorporating intraspecific competition II. A diploid model, Genetics, 103, 335-350 (1983)
[5] Bergh, M. O.; Getz, W. M., Stability and harvesting of competing population with genetic variation in life history strategies, Theor. Pop. Biol, 36, 77-124 (1989) · Zbl 0676.92007
[6] Christiansen, F. B., Hard and soft selection in a subdivided population, Amer. Nat, 109, 11-17 (1975)
[7] Clarke, B., Density-dependent selection, Amer. Nat, 106, 1-13 (1972)
[8] Deakin, H., Sufficient conditions for genetic polymorphism, Amer. Nat, 100, 690-691 (1966)
[9] Dempster, E. R., Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity, (Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol, 20 (1955)), 25-32
[10] Dickenson, H.; Antonovics, J., Theoretical considerations of sympatric divergence, Amer. Nat, 107, 256-274 (1973)
[11] Edelstein-Keshet, L., Mathematical Models in Biology (1988), Random House: Random House New York · Zbl 0674.92001
[12] Ewing, E. P., Genetic variation in a heterogeneous environment. VII. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity in infinite populations, Amer. Nat, 114, 197-212 (1979)
[13] Felsenstein, J., Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals?, Evolution, 35, 124-138 (1981)
[14] Futuyma, D. J., The role of behavior in host-associated divergence in herbivorous insects, (Hueffel, Milton D., Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior (1986), Plenum), 295-302
[15] Futuyma, D. J.; Mayer, G. C., Non-allopatric speciation in animals, Syst. Zool, 29, 254-271 (1980)
[16] Gillespie, J. H., A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. II. Characterization of fitness, Amer. Nat, 110, 809-821 (1976)
[17] Guckenheimer, J.; Holmes, P., Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcation of Vector Fields (1983), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag New York/Berlin · Zbl 0515.34001
[18] Hassell, M. P.; Comins, H. N., Discrete time models for two species competition, Theor. Pop. Biol, 9, 202-221 (1976) · Zbl 0338.92020
[19] Hedrick, P. W.; Ginevan, M. E.; Ewing, E. P., Genetic polymorphisms in heterogeneous environments, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst, 7, 1-32 (1976)
[20] Hoekstra, R.; Bijlsma; Dolman, A. J., Polymorphisms from environmental heterogeneity: Models are only robust if the heterozygote is close to the favoured homozygote in each environment, Genet. Res, 45, 299-314 (1985)
[21] Jaenike, J., Genetic complexity of host-selection behavior in Drosophila, (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 83 (1986)), 2148-2151
[22] Levene, H., Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available, Amer. Nat, 87, 331-333 (1953)
[23] Levins, R.; MacArthur, R. M., The maintenance of genetic polymorphism in a spatially heterogeneous environment: Variations on a theme by Howard Levene, Amer. Nat, 100, 585-589 (1966)
[24] MacArthur, R. H., Geographical Ecology (1972), Harper & Row: Harper & Row New York
[25] May, R. M., Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (1973), Princeton Univ. Press: Princeton Univ. Press Princeton, NJ
[26] May, R. M., Biological populations obeying difference equations: Stable points, stable cycles, and chaos, J. Theor. Biol, 49, 511-524 (1975)
[27] May, R. M., Models for single populations, (May, R. M., Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications (1981), Sinauer: Sinauer Sunderland, MA) · Zbl 0491.92020
[28] May, R. M.; Oster, G. F., Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simple ecological models, Amer. Nat, 110, 573-590 (1976)
[29] Maynard Smith, J., Sympatric speciation, Amer. Nat, 100, 637-650 (1966)
[30] Maynard Smith, J., Genetic polymorphisms in a varied environment, Amer. Nat, 104, 487-490 (1970)
[31] Maynard Smith, J., Models in Ecology (1973), Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge Univ. Press London · Zbl 0312.92001
[32] Maynard Smith, J.; Hoekstra, R., Polymorphisms in a varied environment: How robust are the models, Genet. Res, 35, 45-57 (1980)
[33] Prout, T., Sufficient conditions for genetic polymorphism, Amer. Nat, 102, 493-496 (1968)
[34] Rausher, M. D., The evolution of habitat preference in subdivided populations, Evolution, 38, 596-608 (1984)
[35] Wilson, D. S.; Turelli, M., Stable underdominance and the evolutionary invasion of empty niches, Amer. Nat, 127, 835-850 (1986)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.