Algorithm selection model based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision in big data information mining. (English) Zbl 07930190
Summary: In the era of big data, efficient classification of rapidly growing data volumes is a critical challenge. Traditional algorithms often fall short in handling the scale and complexity of big data, leading to inefficiencies in classification accuracy and processing times. This study aims to address these limitations by introducing a novel approach to algorithm selection, which is essential for advancing big data classification methods. We developed an advanced classification algorithm that integrates a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model, specifically tailored for big data environments. This integration involves leveraging the analytical strengths of MCDM, particularly the analytic hierarchy process, to systematically evaluate and select the most suitable classification algorithms. Our method uniquely combines the precision of fuzzy logic with the comprehensive evaluative capabilities of MCDM, setting it apart from conventional approaches. The proposed model is meticulously designed to assess key performance indicators such as accuracy, true rate, and processing efficiency in various big data scenarios. Our findings reveal that the proposed model significantly enhances classification accuracy and processing efficiency compared to traditional algorithms. The model demonstrated a marked improvement in true rates and overall classification performance, showcasing its effectiveness in handling large-scale data challenges. These results underline the model’s potential as a pragmatic solution for big data classification, offering substantial improvements over existing methodologies. The study contributes a groundbreaking perspective to the field of big data classification, addressing critical gaps in current practices. By combining fuzzy logic with MCDM, the proposed model offers a more nuanced and effective approach to algorithm selection, catering to the intricate demands of big data environments. This research not only enhances the understanding of classification behaviors in big data but also paves the way for future advancements in data mining technologies. Its implications extend beyond theoretical value, providing practical tools for practitioners and researchers in the realm of big data analytics.
MSC:
| 68T05 | Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence |
| 90B50 | Management decision making, including multiple objectives |
Keywords:
information mining; \(K\)-means; fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making; fuzzy logic in big data; algorithm efficiency in data mining; big data scalabilityReferences:
| [1] | S. Çalı and Ş. Y. Balaman, Improved decisions for marketing, supply and purchasing: Mining big data through an integration of sentiment analysis and intuitionistic fuzzy multi criteria assessment, Comput. Ind. Eng. 129 (2019), 315-332, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43753-z. |
| [2] | M. Yang, S. Nazir, Q. Xu, and S. Ali, Deep learning algorithms and multicriteria decision-making used in big data: a systematic literature review, Complexity 2020 (2020), 2836064, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2836064. |
| [3] | S. Farzin, F. N. Chianeh, M. V. Anaraki, and F. Mahmoudian, Introducing a framework for modeling of drug electrochemical removal from wastewater based on data mining algorithms, scatter interpolation method, and multi criteria decision analysis (DID), J. Clean. Prod. 266 (2020), 122075, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122075. |
| [4] | R. Jiang, Y. Xin, Z. Chen, and Y. Zhang, A medical big data access control model based on fuzzy trust prediction and regression analysis, Appl. Soft Comput. 117 (2022), 108423, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108423. |
| [5] | L. Lamrini, M. C. Abounaima, and M. Talibi Alaoui, New distributed-topsis approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems in a big data context, J. Big Data 10 (2023), no. 1, 1-21, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00788-3. |
| [6] | S. Djenadic, M. Tanasijevic, P. Jovancic, D. Ignjatovic, D. Petrovic, and U. Bugaric, Risk evaluation: brief review and innovation model based on fuzzy logic and MCDM, Mathematics 10 (2022), no. 5, 811, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10050811. |
| [7] | A. Mohaghegh, S. Farzin, and M. V. Anaraki, A new framework for missing data estimation and reconstruction based on the geographical input information, data mining, and multi-criteria decision-making; theory and application in missing groundwater data of Damghan Plain, Iran, Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 17 (2022), 100767, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100767. |
| [8] | P. Ziemba, J. Becker, A. Becker, and A. Radomska-Zalas, Framework for multi-criteria assessment of classification models for the purposes of credit scoring, J. Big Data 10 (2023), no. 1, 94, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00768-7. |
| [9] | J. Ge, M. Song, J. Huang, and M. Huang, Research on location problem based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision method, In Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing, 2023, January, pp. 1-9, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3583788.3583789. |
| [10] | J. Wang, Y. Zhao, P. Balamurugan, and P. Selvaraj, Managerial decision support system using an integrated model of AI and big data analytics, Ann. Oper. Res. 32 (2022), 1-18, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04359-8. |
| [11] | C. Lu, M. Zhao, I. Khan, and P. Uthansakul, Prospect theory based hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for low sulphur fuel of maritime transportation, Comput. Mater. Contin. 66 (2021), no. 3, DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2020.012556. |
| [12] | X. Meng, Y. Lu, and J. Liu, A risk evaluation model of electric power cloud platform from the information perspective based on fuzzy type-2 VIKOR, Comput. Ind. Eng. 184 (2023), 109616, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109616. |
| [13] | M. Masdari and H. Khezri, Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review, J. Ambient. Intell. Humanized Comput. 12 (2021), no. 2, 2803-2834, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02441-w. |
| [14] | Z. Yang, and Y. Wang, The cloud model based stochastic multi-criteria decision making technology for river health assessment under multiple uncertainties, J. Hydrol. 581 (2020), 124437, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124437. |
| [15] | E. Rafiei Sardooi, A. Azareh, T. Mesbahzadeh, F. Soleimani Sardoo, E. J. Parteli, and B. Pradhan, A hybrid model using data mining and multi-criteria decision-making methods for landslide risk mapping at Golestan Province, Iran, Environ. Earth Sci. 80 (2021), 1-25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09788-z. |
| [16] | R. Ohlan and A. Ohlan. A bibliometric overview and visualization of fuzzy sets and systems between 2000 and 2018, The Serials Librarian 81 (2021), 190-212, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2021.1995926. · doi:10.1080/0361526X.2021.1995926 |
| [17] | X. Tian, J. Ma, L. Li, Z. Xu, and M. Tang. Development of prospect theory in decision making with different types of fuzzy sets: A state-of-the-art literature review, Information Sciences 615 (2022), 504-528. |
| [18] | Z. Ali, T. Mahmood, M. Aslam, and R. Chinram. Another view of complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based on prioritized aggregation operators and their applications to multiattribute decision making, Mathematics 9 (2021), no. 16, 1922, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161922. · doi:10.3390/math9161922 |
| [19] | Y. Xue and Y. Deng. Decision making under measure-based granular uncertainty with intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Applied Intelligence 51 (2021), 6224-6233, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02216-6. · doi:10.1007/s10489-021-02216-6 |
| [20] | N. Alkan and C. Kahraman. Continuous intuitionistic fuzzy sets (CINFUS) and their AHP&TOPSIS extension: Research proposals evaluation for grant funding. Applied Soft Computing 145(2023), 110579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110579. · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110579 |
| [21] | S. Kumar, S. Sahoo, W. M. Lim, S. Kraus, and U. Bamel. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 178 (2022), 121599, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121599. · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121599 |
| [22] | P. Zikopoulos and C. Eaton. Understanding Big Data: Analytics for Enterprise Class Hadoop and Streaming Data (1st ed.), 2011, McGraw-Hill Osborne Media. DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2132803. · doi:10.5555/2132803 |
| [23] | J. R. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993, San Mateo, CA. DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/152181. · doi:10.5555/152181 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
