×

Perturbation methods for Markov-switching dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models. (English) Zbl 1395.91305

Summary: Markov-switching dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (MSDSGE) modeling has become a growing body of literature on economic and policy issues related to structural shifts. This paper develops a general perturbation methodology for constructing high-order approximations to the solutions of MSDSGE models. Our new method – “the partition perturbation method” – partitions the Markov-switching parameter space to keep a maximum number of time-varying parameters from perturbation. For this method to work in practice, we show how to reduce the potentially intractable problem of solving MSDSGE models to the manageable problem of solving a system of quadratic polynomial equations. This approach allows us to first obtain all the solutions and then determine how many of them are stable. We illustrate the tractability of our methodology through two revealing examples.

MSC:

91B51 Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium theory
60J20 Applications of Markov chains and discrete-time Markov processes on general state spaces (social mobility, learning theory, industrial processes, etc.)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Aldrich, E., J.Fernández‐Villaverde, R.Gallant, and J.Rubio‐Ramírez (2011), “Tapping the supercomputer under your desk: Solving dynamic equilibrium models with graphics processors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35 (3), 386-393. 10.1016/j.jedc.2010.10.001 · Zbl 1232.91006
[2] Amisano, G. and O.Tristani (2011), “Exact likelihood computation for nonlinear DSGE models with heteroskedastic innovations.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35 (12), 2167-2185. 10.1016/j.jedc.2011.08.003 · Zbl 1241.91133
[3] Andreasen, M., J.Fernández‐Villaverde, and J.Rubio‐Ramírez (2013), “The pruned state‐space system for non‐linear DSGE models: Theory and empirical applications.” Working Paper 18983, NBER.
[4] Aruoba, S. B., J.Fernández‐Villaverde, and J. F.Rubio‐Ramírez (2006), “Comparing solution methods for dynamic equilibrium economies.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30 (12), 2477-2508. 10.1016/j.jedc.2005.07.008 · Zbl 1162.91468
[5] Becker, E., M. G.Marianari, T.Mora, and C.Treverso (1993), “The shape of the shape lemma.” In International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, 129-133, ACM Press, New York. · Zbl 0925.13006
[6] Bi, H. and N.Traum (2012), “Estimating sovereign default risk.” European Economic Review, 102 (3), 161-166.
[7] Bianchi, F. (2010), “Regime switches, agents” beliefs, and post‐World War II US macroeconomic dynamics.” Working Paper 12‐04, Duke University.
[8] Bianchi, F. and L.Melosi (2013), “Modeling the evolution of expectations and uncertainty in general equilibrium.” Manuscript.
[9] Blake, A. and F.Zampolli (2006), “Optimal monetary policy in Markov‐switching models with rational expectations agents.” Working Paper 298, Bank of England.
[10] Bloom, N. (2009), “The impact of uncertainty shocks.” Econometrica, 77 (3), 623-685. 10.3982/ECTA6248 · Zbl 1176.91114
[11] Borovička, J. and L. P.Hansen (2013), “Examining macroeconomic models through the lens of asset pricing.” Manuscript.
[12] Buchberger, B. (1998), “An algorithmic criterion for the solvability of algebraic systems of equations.” Gröbner Bases and Applications, 251, 535-545. · Zbl 0906.13007
[13] Cho, S. (2011), “Characterizing Markov‐switching rational expectation models.” Working paper.
[14] Clarida, R., J.Gali, and M.Gertler (2000), “Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (1), 147-180. · Zbl 1064.91512
[15] Costa, O., M.Fragoso, and R.Marques (2005), Discrete‐Time Markov Jump Linear Systems. Springer, London. 10.1007/b138575 · Zbl 1081.93001
[16] Cox, D. A., J. B.Little, and D. B.O’Shea (1997), Ideals, Varieties and Algorithms: An Introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, second edition. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer‐Verlag, New York.
[17] Davig, T. and T.Doh (2008), “Monetary policy regime shifts and inflation persistence.” Research Working Paper 08‐16, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
[18] Davig, T. and E.Leeper (2007), “Generalizing the Taylor principle.” American Economic Review, 97 (3), 607-635.
[19] Davig, T., E. M.Leeper, and T. B.Walker (2010), “Unfunded liabilities and uncertain fiscal financing.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 57 (5), 600-619.
[20] Davig, T., E. M.Leeper, and T. B.Walker (2011), “Inflation and the fiscal limit.” European Economic Review, 55 (1), 31-47.
[21] Farmer, R., D.Waggoner, and T.Zha (2009), “Understanding Markov‐switching rational expectations models.” Journal of Economic Theory, 144 (5), 1849-1867. 10.1016/j.jet.2009.05.004 · Zbl 1195.91114
[22] Farmer, R., D.Waggoner, and T.Zha (2011), “Minimal state variable solutions to Markov‐switching rational expectations models.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35 (12), 2150-2166. 10.1016/j.jedc.2011.08.005 · Zbl 1241.91140
[23] Fernández‐Villaverde, J., P.Guerrón‐Quintana, and J. F.Rubio‐Ramírez (2014), “Estimating dynamic equilibrium models with stochastic volatility.” Manuscript.
[24] Fernández‐Villaverde, J., P.Guerrón‐Quintana, J. F.Rubio‐Ramírez, and M.Uribe (2011), “Risk matters: The real effects of volatility shocks.” American Economic Review, 101 (6), 2530-2561.
[25] Fernández‐Villaverde, J. and J. F.Rubio‐Ramírez (2007), “Estimating macroeconomic models: A likelihood approach.” Review of Economic Studies, 74 (4), 1059-1087. 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00437.x · Zbl 1206.91064
[26] Gomme, P. and P.Klein (2011), “Second‐order approximation of dynamic models without the use of tensors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 604-615. 10.1016/j.jedc.2010.10.006 · Zbl 1209.91111
[27] Hamilton, J. (1989), “A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle.” Econometrica, 57, 357-384. 10.2307/1912559 · Zbl 0685.62092
[28] Holmes, M. H. (2012), Introduction to Perturbation Methods, second edition. Springer, New York. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5477-9
[29] Judd, K. (1998), Numerical Methods in Economics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. · Zbl 0924.65001
[30] Judd, K. and A.Solnick (1994), “Numerical dynamic programming with shape‐preserving splines.” Report.
[31] Klein, P. (2000), “Using the generalized Schur form to solve a multivariate linear rational expectations model.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, 1405-1423. 10.1016/S0165-1889(99)00045-7 · Zbl 0968.91027
[32] Leeper, E. and T.Zha (2003), “Modest policy interventions.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 50 (8), 1673-1700.
[33] Liu, Z., D. F.Waggoner, and T.Zha (2011), “Sources of macroeconomic fluctuations: A regime‐switching DSGE approach.” Quantitative Economics, 2 (2), 251-301. 10.3982/QE71 · Zbl 1226.91033
[34] Lombardo, G. (2010), “On approximating DSGE models by series expansions.” European Central Bank Working Paper 1264.
[35] Lubik, T. A. and F.Schorfheide (2004), “Testing for indeterminacy: An application to US monetary policy.” American Economic Review, 94 (1), 190-217.
[36] Santos, M. S. and A.Peralta‐Alva (2005), “Accuracy of simulations for stochastic dynamic models.” Econometrica, 73 (6), 1939-1976. 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00642.x · Zbl 1152.91684
[37] Schmitt‐Grohe, S. and M.Uribe (2004), “Solving dynamic general equilibrium models using a second‐order approximation to the policy function.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28 (4), 755-775. 10.1016/S0165-1889(03)00043-5 · Zbl 1179.91132
[38] Schorfheide, F. (2005), “Learning and monetary policy shifts.” Review of Economic Dynamics, 8, 392-419.
[39] Sims, C. A. and T.Zha (2006), “Were there regime switches in US monetary policy?” American Economic Review, 96 (1), 54-81.
[40] Svensson, L. and N.Williams (2007), “Monetary policy with model uncertainty: Distribution forecast targeting.” Discussion Paper 6331, CEPR.
[41] Tauchen, G. (1986), “Finite state Markov‐chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions.” Economics Letters, 20 (2), 177-181.
[42] Uhlig, H. (1999), “A toolkit for analyzing nonlinear dynamic stochastic models easily.” In Computational Methods for the Study of Dynamic Economies (R.Marimon (ed.) and A.Scott (ed.), eds.), 30-61, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.