Markowitz revisited: social portfolio engineering. (English) Zbl 1395.91404
Summary: In recent years, socially responsible investing has become a popular subject with both private and institutional investors. At the same time, a number of scientific papers have been published on socially responsible investments (SRIs), covering a broad range of topics, from what actually defines SRIs to the financial performance of SRI funds in contrast to non-SRI funds. In this paper, we revisit Markowitz’ portfolio selection theory and propose a modification allowing to incorporate not only asset-specific return and risk but also a social responsibility measure into the investment decision making process. Applied in an a posteriori fashion, the model results in a three-dimensional capital allocation plane illustrating the complete set of feasible optimal portfolios. It enables investors to custom-tailor their asset allocations and incorporate all personal preferences regarding return, risk and social responsibility. In an empirical analysis with a data set of over 6000 international companies (including the complete universe of social responsibility-rated stocks), we find that investors opting to maximize the social impact of their investments do indeed face a statistically significant decrease in expected returns. However, the social responsibility/risk-optimal portfolio yields a statistically significant higher social responsibility rating than the return/risk-optimal portfolio.
Keywords:
finance; socially responsible investments; portfolio optimization; international financial marketsReferences:
| [1] | Alexander, G. J.; Buchholz, R. A., Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance, Academy of Management Journal, 21, 3, 479-486 (1978) |
| [2] | Aupperle, K. E.; Carroll, A. B.; Hatfield, J. D., An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 28, 2, 446-463 (1985) |
| [3] | Bai, J.; Shi, S., Estimating high dimensional covariance matrices and its applications, Annals of Economics and Finance, 12, 2, 199-215 (2011) |
| [4] | Ballestero, E.; Bravo, M.; Pérez-Gladish, B.; Arenas-Parra, M.; Plà-Santamaria, D., Socially responsible investment: A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives, European Journal of Operational Research, 216, 2, 487-494 (2012) |
| [5] | Barracchini, C., An ethical investments evaluation forportfolio selection, EJBO, 9, 1 (2004) |
| [6] | Basso, A.; Funari, S., Constant and variable returns to scale DEA models for socially responsible investment funds, European Journal of Operational Research, 235, 3, 775-783 (2014) · Zbl 1305.90292 |
| [7] | Bilbao-Terol, A.; Arenas-Parra, M.; Cañal-Fernández, V., Selection of socially responsible portfolios using goal programming and fuzzy technology, Information Sciences, 189, 110-125 (2012) |
| [8] | Bilbao-Terol, A.; Arenas-Parra, M.; Cañal-Fernández, V.; Bilbao-Terol, C., Selection of socially responsible portfolios using hedonic prices, Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 3, 515-529 (2013) · Zbl 1305.91214 |
| [9] | Bowen, H. R., Social responsibilities of the businessman (1953), Harper: Harper New York |
| [10] | Carhart, M. M., On persistence in mutual fund performance, The Journal of Finance, 52, 1, 57-82 (1997) |
| [11] | Cochran, P. L.; Wood, R. A., Corporate social responsibility and financial performance, Academy of Management Journal, 27, 1, 42-56 (1984) |
| [12] | Dorfleitner, G.; Leidl, M.; Reeder, J., Theory of social returns in portfolio choice with application to microfinance, Journal of Asset Management, 13, 6, 384-400 (2012) |
| [13] | Dorfleitner, G.; Utz, S., Safety first portfolio choice based on financial and sustainability returns, European Journal of Operational Research, 221, 1, 155-164 (2012) · Zbl 1253.91165 |
| [14] | Drut, B., Social responsibility and mean-variance portfolio selection, vol.10 (2010) |
| [15] | Du, S.; Bhattacharya, C.; Sen, S., Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Overcoming the trust barrier, Management Science, 57, 9, 1528-1545 (2011) |
| [16] | Evans, J. L.; Archer, S. H., Diversification and the reduction of dispersion: An empirical analysis, The Journal of Finance, 23, 5, 761-767 (1968) |
| [17] | Gil-Bazo, J.; Ruiz-Verdú, P.; Santos, A., The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: The role of fees and management companies, Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 2, 243-263 (2010) |
| [18] | Hamilton, S.; Jo, H.; Statman, M., Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds, Financial Analysts Journal, 49, 6, 62-66 (1993) |
| [19] | Hirschberger, M.; Steuer, R. E.; Utz, S.; Wimmer, M.; Qi, Y., Computing the nondominated surface in tri-criterion portfolio selection, Operations Research, 61, 1, 169-183 (2013) · Zbl 1267.90132 |
| [20] | Kempf, A.; Osthoff, P., SRI funds: Nomen est omen, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 35, 910, 1276-1294 (2008) |
| [21] | Loew, T.; Ankele, K.; Braun, S.; Clausen, J., Bedeutung der internationalen CSR-Diskussion für Nachhaltigkeit und die sich daraus ergebenden Anforderungen an Unternehmen mit Fokus Berichterstattung (2004), Future e. V.-verantwortung unternehmen |
| [22] | Markowitz, H., Portfolio selection, The Journal of Finance, 7, 1, 77-91 (1952) |
| [23] | McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D., Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective, Academy of Management Review, 26, 1, 117-127 (2001) |
| [24] | Renneboog, L.; Ter Horst, J.; Zhang, C., The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds, Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 3, 302-322 (2008) |
| [25] | Sauer, D. A., The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: Evidence from the domini 400 social index and domini equity mutual fund, Review of Financial Economics, 6, 2, 137-149 (1997) |
| [26] | Scholtens, B., Measuring sustainability performance of investments: The case of Dutch bond funds, Proceedings of the PRI academic conference (2009) |
| [27] | Schröder, M., Is there a difference? The performance characteristics of SRI equity indices, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 34, 12, 331-348 (2007) |
| [28] | Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C. B.; Korschun, D., The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 2, 158-166 (2006) |
| [29] | Sharpe, W. F., Mutual fund performance, Journal of Business, 39, 1, 119-138 (1966) |
| [30] | Sparkes, R.; Cowton, C. J., The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 1, 45-57 (2004) |
| [31] | Statman, M., How many stocks make a diversified portfolio?, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22, 03, 353-363 (1987) |
| [32] | Steuer, R. E.; Qi, Y.; Hirschberger, M., Multiple objectives in portfolio selection, Journal of Financial Decision Making, 1, 1, 5-20 (2005) |
| [33] | Tang, G. Y., How efficient is naive portfolio diversification? An educational note, Omega, 32, 2, 155-160 (2004) |
| [35] | Tobin, J., Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk, The Review of Economic Studies, 25, 2, 65-86 (1958) |
| [36] | Utz, S.; Wimmer, M.; Hirschberger, M.; Steuer, R. E., Tri-criterion inverse portfolio optimization with application to socially responsible mutual funds, European Journal of Operational Research, 234, 2, 491-498 (2014) · Zbl 1304.91210 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
