×

Effects of grid straggering on numerical schemes. (English) Zbl 0661.76024

Nine finite difference schemes using primitive variables on various grid arrangements were systematically tested on a benchmark problem of two- dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes flows. The chosen problem is similar to the classical lid-driven cavity flow, but has a known exact solution. Also, it offers the reader an opportunity to thoroughly evaluate accuracies of viscous conceptual grid arrangements. Compared to the exact solution, the non-staggered grid scheme with higher-order accuracy was found to yield an accuracy significantly better than others. In terms of ‘overall performance’, the so-called 4/1 staggered grid scheme proved to be the best. The simplicity of this scheme is the primary benefit. Furthermore, the scheme can be changed into a non- staggered grid if the pressure is replaced by the pressure gradient as a field variable.
Finally, the conventional staggered grid scheme developed by F. H. Harlow and F. E. Welch [Phys. Fluids 8, 2182-2189 (1965)] also yields relatively high accuracy and demonstrates satisfactory overall performance.

MSC:

76D05 Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible viscous fluids
76M99 Basic methods in fluid mechanics
65N22 Numerical solution of discretized equations for boundary value problems involving PDEs
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Harlow, Phys. Fluids. 8 pp 2182– (1965)
[2] and , ’Teach-T: a general computer program for two-dimensional, turbulent, recirculating flows’, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College, London, 1976.
[3] Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere, Washington, 1980, ch. 6. · Zbl 0521.76003
[4] Wong, Numer. Heat Transfer 2 pp 139– (1979)
[5] Shih, Numer. Heat Transfer 7 pp 413– (1984)
[6] Chorin, Math. Comput. 22 pp 745– (1968)
[7] Huyakorn, Comput. Fluids 6 pp 25– (1978)
[8] Jackson, Int. j. numer. methods eng. 17 pp 1659– (1981)
[9] Schneider, Numer. Heat Transfer 1 pp 433– (1978)
[10] Burggraf, J. Fluid Mech. 24 pp 113– (1966)
[11] Sani, Int. j. numer. methods fluids 1 pp 17– (1981)
[12] Vanka, Numer. Heat Transfer 3 pp 1– (1980)
[13] Cullen, J. Comput. Phys. 51 pp 273– (1983)
[14] Hughes, J. Comput. Phys. 30 pp 1– (1979)
[15] Cullen, J. Comput. Phys. 51 pp 291– (1983)
[16] Pracht, J. Comput. Phys. 17 pp 132– (1975)
[17] Gresho, J. Comput. Phys. 60 pp 161– (1985)
[18] Maliska, Int. j. numer. methods fluids 4 pp 519– (1984)
[19] Gresho, Int. j. numer. methods fluids 7 pp 1111– (1987)
[20] Briley, J. Comput. Phys. 14 pp 20– (1974)
[21] Chorin, J. Comput. Phys. 2 pp 12– (1967)
[22] and , ’Equivalence of the artificial compressibility method and the penalty function method’, Technical Report # DTRC-PAS-88-12, 1988.
[23] Shih, Int. j. numer. methods eng. 21 pp 1027– (1985)
[24] and , ’Pressure gradient method for incompressible unsteady flows’, Technical Report # DTRC-PAS-88-12, 1988.
[25] ’A numerical scheme for solving incompressible Navier-Stokes equations’, Ph.D. dissertation, the University of Maryland, 1988.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.