×

Lower bound limit analysis by quadrilateral elements. (English) Zbl 1398.74356

Summary: This paper presents a quadrilateral element formulation of lower bound theorem. The formulation uses a four-noded quadrilateral element. The weak form of the equilibrium equations is performed to linearize the equilibrium equations. By Green’s theorem, the integral over quadrilateral element are transformed into boundary integral over the element boundary. The major advantage of using quadrilateral element, rather than triangular element, is that more accurate lower bound can be obtained with the same element size.
Two numerical examples are given to illustrate the capability of the new method for computing lower bound. The accuracy of the quadrilateral element formulation is compared with that of three-noded triangular element formulation in detail.

MSC:

74S05 Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
65N30 Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Wilson, D. W., Undrained stability of a square tunnel where the shear strength increases linearly with depth, Comput. Geotech. (2012)
[2] Sloan, S.; Assadi, A., Undrained stability of a square tunnel in a soil whose strength increases linearly with depth, Comput. Geotech., 12, 4, 321-346 (1991)
[3] Kim, J.; Lee, J., Stability analysis of complex soil slopes using limit analysis, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 128, 546 (2002)
[4] Yu, H. S., Limit analysis versus limit equilibrium for slope stability, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124, 1, 1-11 (1998)
[5] Kumar, J.; Khatri, V. N., Bearing capacity factors of circular foundations for a general c-phi soil using lower bound finite elements limit analysis, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 35, 3, 393-405 (2011) · Zbl 1274.74189
[6] Salgado, R., Two-and three-dimensional bearing capacity of foundations in clay, Geotechnique, 54, 5, 297-306 (2004)
[7] Khatri, V. N.; Kumar, J., Effect of anchor width on pullout capacity of strip anchors in sand, Can. Geotech. J., 48, 3, 511-517 (2011)
[8] Merifield, R. S.; Sloan, S. W., The ultimate pullout capacity of anchors in frictional soils, Can. Geotech. J., 43, 8, 852-868 (2006)
[9] Degwitz, F. G., Numerical Upper and Lower Bound Limit Analysis for Braced Excavations (2004), Massachusetts Institute of Technology
[10] Ukritchon, B.; Whittle, A. J.; Sloan, S. W., Undrained stability of braced excavations in clay, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129, 8, 738-755 (2003)
[11] Christiansen, E.; Pedersen, O. S., Automatic mesh refinement in limit analysis, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 50, 6, 1331-1346 (2001) · Zbl 0982.74065
[12] Lyamin, A. V., Lower bound limit analysis with adaptive remeshing, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 63, 14, 1961-1974 (2005) · Zbl 1103.74359
[13] Munoz, J., Upper and lower bounds in limit analysis: Adaptive meshing strategies and discontinuous loading, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 77, 4, 471-501 (2009) · Zbl 1155.74313
[14] Sloan, S. W., Lower bound limit analysis using finite-elements and linear-programming, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 12, 1, 61-77 (1988) · Zbl 0626.73117
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.