×

Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis: a new taxonomy of reference technology sets. (English) Zbl 1431.91195

Summary: Adequate modeling of undesirable outputs in production processes plays an important role in management practice. Nonparametric models that assume jointly weak disposability of desirable and undesirable outputs have become prevalent in the literature although a consensus on how to implement this axiom has not been reached yet. Particularly, there is still an unresolved debate on whether to use single or multiple scaling factors when applying weak disposability to real datasets in practice. In this paper, we shed some new light on the debate from various theoretical and practical viewpoints including disposability, convexity, returns to scale, and computational issues. Furthermore, we introduce a new model and unveil some interesting properties of the current ones, which then help to construct a comprehensive taxonomy of reference technology sets for activity analysis models under variable returns to scale.

MSC:

91B38 Production theory, theory of the firm
90B30 Production models
90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
90C08 Special problems of linear programming (transportation, multi-index, data envelopment analysis, etc.)

References:

[1] Arocena, P.; GarcÃa-Prado, A., Accounting for quality in the measurement of hospital performance: Evidence from Costa Rica, Health Economics, 16, 7, 667-685, (2007)
[2] Banker, R. D.; Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 30, 9, 1078-1092, (1984) · Zbl 0552.90055
[3] Banker, R. D.; Maindiratta, A., Piecewise loglinear estimation of efficient production surfaces, Management Science, 32, 1, 126-135, (1986) · Zbl 0596.90011
[4] Baumol, W. J.; Oates, W. E., The Theory of Environmental Policy, (1975), Cambridge University Press
[5] Baumol, W. J.; Oates, W. E., The Theory of Environmental Policy, (1988), Cambridge University Press
[6] Berre, D.; Vayssieres, J.; Boussemart, J.-P.; Leleu, H.; Tillard, E.; Lecomte, P., A methodology to explore the determinants of eco-efficiency by combining an agronomic whole-farm simulation model and efficient frontier, Environmental Modelling & Software, 71, 46-59, (2015)
[7] Bogetoft, P., DEA on relaxed convexity assumptions, Management Science, 42, 3, 457-465, (1996) · Zbl 0884.90001
[8] Bogetoft, P.; Tama, J. M.; Tind, J., Convex input and output projections of nonconvex production possibility sets, Management Science, 46, 6, 858-869, (2000) · Zbl 1231.90228
[9] Borts, G. H.; Mishan, E. J., Exploring the “uneconomic region” of the production function, The Review of Economic Studies, 29, 4, 300-312, (1962)
[10] Boyd, S.; Vandenberghe, L., Convex optimization, (2004), Cambridge University Press · Zbl 1058.90049
[11] Chambers, R.; Chung, Y.; Färe, R., Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98, 2, 351-364, (1998) · Zbl 0909.90040
[12] Chambers, R. G.; Chung, Y.; Färe, R., Benefit and distance functions, Journal of Economic Theory, 70, 2, 407-419, (1996) · Zbl 0866.90027
[13] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.; Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 6, 429-444, (1978) · Zbl 0416.90080
[14] Chen, K.; Zhu, J., Second order cone programming approach to two-stage network data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 262, 1, 231-238, (2017) · Zbl 1403.90548
[15] Chen, L.; Wang, Y.-M.; Lai, F., Semi-disposability of undesirable outputs in data envelopment analysis for environmental assessments, European Journal of Operational Research, 260, 2, 655-664, (2017) · Zbl 1403.90403
[16] Chung, Y. H.; Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 3, 229-240, (1997)
[17] Coelli, T.; Lauwers, L.; Van Huylenbroeck, G., Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 1-2, 3-12, (2007)
[18] Dakpo, K. H.; Jeanneaux, P.; Latruffe, L., Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric framework, European Journal of Operational Research, 250, 2, 347-359, (2016) · Zbl 1346.91176
[19] Debreu, G., The coefficient of resource utilization, Econometrica, 19, 3, 273-292, (1951) · Zbl 0045.41404
[20] Deprins, D.; Simar, L.; Tulkens, H., The performance of public enterprises, Vol. 33, (1984), North-Holland: North-Holland Amsterdam
[21] Diewert, W. E., The measurement of waste within the production sector of an open economy, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 85, 2, 159-179, (1983) · Zbl 0525.90016
[22] Dorfman, R.; Samuelson, P. A.; Solow, R. M., Linear programming and economic analysis, (1958), Courier Corporation · Zbl 0123.37102
[23] Epure, M.; Lafuente, E., Monitoring bank performance in the presence of risk, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44, 3, 265-281, (2015)
[24] Färe, R., Fundamentals of production theory, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, (1988), Springer · Zbl 0693.90003
[25] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., Measuring congestion in production, Zeitschrift fũr Nationalõkonomie / Journal of Economics, 43, 3, 257-271, (1983) · Zbl 0519.90019
[26] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., Measuring output efficiency, European Journal of Operational Research, 13, 2, 173-179, (1983) · Zbl 0513.90008
[27] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: Comment, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 4, 1070-1074, (2003)
[28] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., A comment on weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91, 2, 535-538, (2009)
[29] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Lovell, C. A.K., The structure of technical efficiency, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 85, 2, 181-190, (1983) · Zbl 0525.90015
[30] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Lovell, C. A.K.; Pasurka, C., Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 1, 90, (1989)
[31] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Lovell, C. K., The measurement of efficiency of production, 6, (1985), Springer
[32] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Lovell, C. K., Production frontiers, (1994), Cambridge University Press
[33] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Njinkeu, D., On piecewise reference technologies, Management Science, 34, 12, 1507-1511, (1988) · Zbl 0658.90012
[34] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Noh, D.-W.; Weber, W., Characteristics of a polluting technology: Theory and practice, Journal of Econometrics, 126, 2, 469-492, (2005) · Zbl 1334.62211
[35] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Pasurka, C., Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls, Resources and Energy, 8, 2, 167-184, (1986)
[36] Färe, R.; Hunsaker, W., Notions of efficiency and their reference sets, Management Science, 32, 2, 237-243, (1986) · Zbl 0591.90010
[37] Färe, R.; Primont, D., Multi-output production and duality: Theory and applications, (1995), Springer
[38] Färe, R.; Svensson, L., Congestion of production factors, Econometrica, 48, 7, 1745-1753, (1980) · Zbl 0457.90011
[39] Farrell, M. J., The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 120, 3, 253-290, (1957)
[40] Fukuyama, H.; Weber, W. L., A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs, Omega, 38, 5, 398-409, (2010)
[41] Førsund, F. R., Good modelling of bad outputs: Pollution and multiple-output production, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 3, 1, 1-38, (2009)
[42] Hailu, A.; Veeman, T. S., Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: An application to the canadian pulp and paper industry, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 3, 605-616, (2001)
[43] Halická, M.; Trnovská, M., The Russell measure model: Computational aspects, duality, and profit efficiency, European Journal of Operational Research, 268, 1, 386-397, (2018) · Zbl 1403.90509
[44] Kerstens, K.; Managi, S., Total factor productivity growth and convergence in the petroleum industry: Empirical analysis testing for convexity, International Journal of Production Economics, 139, 1, 196-206, (2012)
[45] Kneip, A.; Park, B. U.; Simar, L., A note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA estimators for production efficiency scores, Econometric Theory, 14, 6, 783-793, (1998)
[46] Kneip, A.; Simar, L.; Wilson, P. W., Asymptotics and consistent bootstraps for DEA estimators in nonparametric frontier models, Econometric Theory, 24, 6, 1663-1697, (2008) · Zbl 1231.62077
[47] Kneip, A.; Simar, L.; Wilson, P. W., A computationally efficient, consistent bootstrap for inference with non-parametric DEA estimators, Computational Economics, 38, 4, 483-515, (2011) · Zbl 1247.91139
[48] Kneip, A.; Simar, L.; Wilson, P. W., When bias kills the variance: Central limit theorems for DEA and FDH efficiency scores, Econometric Theory, 31, 2, 394-422, (2015) · Zbl 1441.62777
[49] Koopmans, T., Activity analysis of production and allocation, (1951), New York, NY: Wiley · Zbl 0045.09503
[50] Korostelev, A.; Simar, L.; Tsybakov, A., Efficient estimation of monotone boundaries, Annals of Statistics, 23, 2, 476-489, (1995) · Zbl 0829.62043
[51] Kumar, S., Book review: “New directions in productivity measurement and efficiency analysis: Counting the environment and natural resources”, Journal of Economic Literature, 56, 1, 267-270, (2018)
[52] Kuosmanen, T., Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 4, 1077-1082, (2005)
[53] Kuosmanen, T.; Podinovski, V., Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis: Reply to Färe and Grosskopf, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91, 2, 539-545, (2009)
[54] Lee, C.-Y., Meta-data envelopment analysis: Finding a direction towards marginal profit maximization, European Journal of Operational Research, 237, 1, 207-216, (2014)
[55] Leleu, H., Shadow pricing of undesirable outputs in nonparametric analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 231, 2, 474-480, (2013) · Zbl 1317.62087
[56] Lobo, M. S.; Vandenberghe, L.; Boyd, S.; Lebret, H., Applications of second-order cone programming, Linear algebra and its applications, 284, 1-3, 193-228, (1998) · Zbl 0946.90050
[57] Mahlberg, B.; Luptacik, M.; Sahoo, B. K., Examining the drivers of total factor productivity change with an illustrative example of 14 EU countries, Ecological Economics, 72, 60-69, (2011)
[58] Maxwell, W. D., Short-run returns to scale and the production of services, Southern Economic Journal, 32, 1, 1-14, (1965)
[59] McFadden, D., Cost, revenue, and profit functions, (Fuss, M.; McFadden, D., Production economics: A dual approach to theory and applications, 1, (1978))
[60] Murty, S.; Russell, R. R.; Levkoff, S. B., On modeling pollution-generating technologies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64, 1, 117-135, (2012)
[61] von Neumann, J., A model of general economic equilibrium, The Review of Economic Studies, 13, 1, 1-9, (1945)
[62] Park, B. U.; Simar, L.; Weiner, C., The FDH estimator for productivity efficiency scores: Asymptotic properties, Econometric Theory, 16, 6, 855-877, (2000) · Zbl 0967.62102
[63] Park, K. H.; Weber, W. L., A note on efficiency and productivity growth in the Korean Banking Industry, 1992-2002, Journal of Banking Finance, 30, 8, 2371-2386, (2006)
[64] Petersen, N. C., Data envelopment analysis on a relaxed set of assumptions, Management Science, 36, 3, 305-314, (1990) · Zbl 0699.90009
[65] Pham, M. D.; Zelenyuk, V., Slack-based directional distance function in the presence of bad outputs: Theory and application to Vietnamese banking, Empirical Economics, 54, 1, 153-187, (2018)
[66] Podinovski, V. V.; Chambers, R. G.; Atici, K. B.; Deineko, I. D., Marginal values and returns to scale for nonparametric production frontiers, Operations Research, 64, 1, 236-250, (2016) · Zbl 1336.90052
[67] Podinovski, V. V.; Kuosmanen, T., Modelling weak disposability in data envelopment analysis under relaxed convexity assumptions, European Journal of Operational Research, 211, 3, 577-585, (2011) · Zbl 1237.90158
[68] Ray, S. C.; Mukherjee, K.; Venkatesh, A., Nonparametric measures of efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs: A by-production approach, Empirical Economics, 54, 1, 31-65, (2018)
[69] Rødseth, K. L., Axioms of a polluting technology: A materials balance approach, Environmental and Resource Economics, 67, 1, 1-22, (2017)
[70] Roshdi, I.; Hasannasab, M.; Margaritis, D.; Rouse, P., Generalised weak disposability and efficiency measurement in environmental technologies, European Journal of Operational Research, 266, 3, 1000-1012, (2018) · Zbl 1403.90433
[71] Sahoo, B. K.; Luptacik, M.; Mahlberg, B., Alternative measures of environmental technology structure in DEA: An application, European Journal of Operational Research, 215, 3, 750-762, (2011) · Zbl 1238.91116
[72] Samuelson, P. A., Foundations of economic analysis, (1947), Harvard University Press · Zbl 0031.17401
[73] Shephard, R. W., Cost and production functions, (1953), Princeton University Press · Zbl 0052.15901
[74] Shephard, R. W., Theory of cost and production functions, (1970), Princeton University Press · Zbl 0244.90011
[75] Shephard, R. W., Indirect production functions, (1974), Verlag Anton Hain: Verlag Anton Hain Meisenheim am Glan · Zbl 0278.90036
[76] Simar, L.; Wilson, P. W., Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 1, 49-78, (2000)
[77] Sitorus, B. L., Productive efficiency and redundant factors of production in traditional agriculture of underdeveloped countries: A note on measurement, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), 39, 153-158, (1966)
[78] Sueyoshi, T.; Sekitani, K., Computational strategy for Russell measure in DEA: Second-order cone programming, European Journal of Operational Research, 180, 1, 459-471, (2007) · Zbl 1114.90073
[79] Sueyoshi, T.; Yuan, Y.; Goto, M., A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment, Energy Economics, 62, 104-124, (2017)
[80] Tyteca, D., On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms - a literature review and a productive efficiency perspective, Journal of Environmental Management, 46, 3, 281-308, (1996)
[81] Valadkhani, A.; Roshdi, I.; Smyth, R., A multiplicative environmental DEA approach to measure efficiency changes in the world’s major polluters, Energy Economics, 54, 363-375, (2016)
[82] Yang, H.; Pollitt, M., Incorporating both undesirable outputs and uncontrollable variables into DEA: The performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants, European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 3, 1095-1105, (2009)
[83] Zhang, S.; Lundgren, T.; Zhou, W., Energy efficiency in Swedish industry: A firm-level data envelopment analysis, Energy Economics, 55, 42-51, (2016)
[84] Zhou, P.; Ang, B.; Poh, K., Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance, Ecological Economics, 60, 1, 111-118, (2006)
[85] Zhou, P.; Ang, B.; Poh, K., Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies, Energy Economics, 30, 1, 1-14, (2008)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.