×

Iterated decomposition of biased permutations via new bounds on the spectral gap of Markov chains. (English) Zbl 07758305

Byrka, Jarosław (ed.) et al., Approximation, randomization, and combinatorial optimization. Algorithms and techniques. 23rd international conference, APPROX 2020, and 24th international conference, RANDOM 2020, August 17–19, 2020, Virtual conference. Proceedings. Wadern: Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Zentrum für Informatik. LIPIcs – Leibniz Int. Proc. Inform. 176, Article 3, 21 p. (2020).
Summary: In this paper, we address a conjecture by J. Fill [An interesting spectral gap problem. Unpublished manuscript (2003)] about the spectral gap of a nearest-neighbor transposition Markov chain \(\mathcal{M}_{nn}\) over biased permutations of \([n]\). Suppose we are given a set of input probabilities \(\mathcal{P}=\{p_{i,j}\}\) for all \(1=i\), \(j=n\) with \(p_{i,j}= 1-p_{j,i}\). The Markov chain \(\mathcal{M}_{nn}\) operates by uniformly choosing a pair of adjacent elements, \(i\) and \(j\), and putting \(i\) ahead of \(j\) with probability \(p_{i,j}\) and \(j\) ahead of \(i\) with probability \(p_{j,i}\), independent of their current ordering.
We build on previous work [S. Miracle and A. P. Streib, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 10807, 820–834 (2018; Zbl 1505.60069)] that analyzed the spectral gap of \(\mathcal{M}_{nn}\) when the particles in \([n]\) fall into \(k\) classes. There, the authors iteratively decomposed \(\mathcal{M}_{nn}\) into simpler chains, but incurred a multiplicative penalty of \(n^{-2}\) for each application of the decomposition theorem by R. Martin and D. Randall [in: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 492–502 (2000)], leading to an exponentially small lower bound on the gap. We make progress by introducing a new complementary decomposition theorem. We introduce the notion of \(\varepsilon\)-orthogonality, and show that for \(\varepsilon\)-orthogonal chains, the complementary decomposition theorem may be iterated \(O(1/\sqrt{\varepsilon})\) times while only giving away a constant multiplicative factor on the overall spectral gap. We show the decomposition given by Miracle and Streib [loc. cit.] of a related Markov chain \(\mathcal{M}_{pp}\) over \(k\)-class particle systems is \(1/n^2\)-orthogonal when the number of particles in each class is at least \(C\log n\), where \(C\) is a constant not depending on \(n\). We then apply the complementary decomposition theorem iteratively \(n\) times to prove nearly optimal bounds on the spectral gap of \(\mathcal{M}_{pp}\) and to further prove the first inverse-polynomial bound on the spectral gap of \(\mathcal{M}_{nn}\) when \(k\) is as large as \(\Theta(n/\log n)\). The previous best known bound assumed \(k\) was at most a constant.
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1445.68009].

MSC:

68W20 Randomized algorithms
68W25 Approximation algorithms
90C27 Combinatorial optimization

Citations:

Zbl 1505.60069

References:

[1] D. Aldous. Random walk on finite groups and rapidly mixing Markov chains. In Seminaire de Probabilites XVII, pages 243-297, 1983. · Zbl 0514.60067
[2] D. Bayer and P. Diaconis. Trailing the dovetail shuffle to its lair. The Annals of Applied Probability, 2:295-313, 1992. · Zbl 0757.60003
[3] I. Benjamini, N. Berger, C. Hoffman, and E. Mossel. Mixing times of the biased card shuffling and the asymmetric exclusion process. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 357:3013-3029, 2005. · Zbl 1071.60095
[4] P. Bhakta, S. Miracle, D. Randall, and A. P. Streib. Mixing times of Markov chains for self-organizing lists and biased permutations. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM/SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA ’13, pages 1-15, 2013. · Zbl 1423.60109
[5] F. Chierichetti, A. Dasgupta, R. Kumar, and S. Lattanzi. On reconstructing a hidden permutation. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs, 28:604-617, September 2014. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2014.604. · Zbl 1359.68293 · doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2014.604
[6] C. Cooper, M. Dyer, A. Frieze, and R. Rue. Mixing properties of the Swendsen-Wang process on the complete graph and narrow grids. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 41(3):1499-1527, 2000. doi:10.1063/1.533194. · Zbl 1019.82011 · doi:10.1063/1.533194
[7] N. Destainville. Bounding spectral gaps of markov chains: a novel exact multi-decomposition technique. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(13):3647-3670, March 2003. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/13/301. · Zbl 1040.60060 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/13/301
[8] P. Diaconis and L. Saloff-Coste. Comparison techniques for random walks on finite groups. The Annals of Applied Probability, 21:2131-2156, 1993. · Zbl 0790.60011
[9] P. Diaconis and L. Saloff-Coste. Comparison theorems for reversible Markov chains. Annals of Applied Probability, 3:696-730, 1993. · Zbl 0799.60058
[10] P. Diaconis and M. Shahshahani. Generating a random permutation with random transpositions. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw. Gebiete, 57:159-179, 1981. · Zbl 0485.60006
[11] J. Ding, E. Lubetzky, and Yuval Peres. Mixing time of critical Ising model on trees is polynomial in the height. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 295(1):161-207, April 2010. · Zbl 1201.82027
[12] P.L. Erdős, I. Miklós, and Z. Toroczkai. New classes of degree sequences with fast mixing swap Markov chain sampling. Combinatorics Probability and Computing, 27(2):186-207, 2018. · Zbl 1387.05052
[13] J. Fill. Background on the gap problem. Unpublished manuscript, 2003. APPROX/RANDOM 2020
[14] J. Fill. An interesting spectral gap problem. Unpublished manuscript, 2003.
[15] R. Grone, K. Heinz Hoffmann, and P. Salamon. An interlacing theorem for reversible Markov chains. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41(21):212002, May 2008. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/21/212002. · Zbl 1148.60046 · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/21/212002
[16] S. Haddadan and P. Winkler. Mixing of permutations by biased transposition. In 34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS ’17, pages 41:1-41:13, 2017. · Zbl 1402.60091
[17] J. H. Hester and D. S. Hirschberg. Self-organizing linear search. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 17 Issue 3:295-311, 1985.
[18] M. Jerrum, J. Son, P. Tetali, and E. Vigoda. Elementary bounds on Poincaré and log-Sobolev constants for decomposable Markov chains. Ann. Appl. Probab., 14(4):1741-1765, November 2004. doi:10.1214/105051604000000639. · Zbl 1067.60065 · doi:10.1214/105051604000000639
[19] Donald K. The Art of Computer Programming, volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, 1969. · Zbl 0191.18001
[20] D. A. Levin, Y. Peres, and E. L. Wilmer. Markov chains and mixing times. American Mathematical Society, 2006.
[21] N. Madras and D. Randall. Markov chain decomposition for convergence rate analysis. Annals of Applied Probability, pages 581-606, 2002. · Zbl 1017.60080
[22] Y. Mao and Liang H. Spectral gap for open Jackson networks. Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, 31:1879-1894, December 2015. doi:10.1007/s10114-015-4138-3. · Zbl 1336.60178 · doi:10.1007/s10114-015-4138-3
[23] R. Martin and D. Randall. Sampling adsorbing staircase walks using a new Markov chain decomposition method. In Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 492-502, 2000.
[24] S. Miracle, D. Randall, and A. P. Streib. Cluster algorithms for discrete models of colloids with bars. In 8th Workshop on Analytic Algorithmics and Combinatorics, ANALCO, pages 135-150, 2011. · Zbl 1435.92096
[25] S. Miracle and A.P. Streib. Rapid mixing of k-class biased permutations. In LATIN, volume 10807 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 820-834. Springer, 2018. · Zbl 1505.60069
[26] N. Pillai and A. Smith. Elementary bounds on mixing times for decomposable Markov chains. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 127(9):3068-3109, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.spa. 2017.02.002. · Zbl 1395.60082 · doi:10.1016/j.spa.2017.02.002
[27] D. Randall. Decomposition methods and sampling circuits in the Cartesian lattice. In Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, MFCS ’01, pages 74-86, London, UK, UK, 2001. Springer-Verlag. URL: http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=645730.668026. · Zbl 1004.60076
[28] D. Randall and P. Tetali. Analyzing Glauber dynamics by comparison of Markov chains. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 41:1598-1615, 2000. · Zbl 0974.60052
[29] O. Reingold, S. Vadhan, and A. Wigderson. Entropy waves, the zig-zag graph product, and new constant-degree expanders and extractors. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS ’00, pages 3-13, Washington, DC, USA, 2000. IEEE Computer Society. URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=795666.796583.
[30] R. Rivest. On self-organizing sequential search heuristics. Commun. ACM, 19(2):63-67, February 1976. doi:10.1145/359997.360000. · Zbl 0317.68025 · doi:10.1145/359997.360000
[31] S. Vadhan. Pseudorandomness. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, 7(1-3):1-336, 2012. doi:10.1561/0400000010. · Zbl 1308.68011 · doi:10.1561/0400000010
[32] D. Wilson. Mixing times of lozenge tiling and card shuffling Markov chains. The Annals of Applied Probability, 1:274-325, 2004. · Zbl 1040.60063
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.