Input price discrimination can encourage downstream investment and increase welfare. (English) Zbl 1494.91061
Summary: This paper investigates the implications of input price discrimination when an upstream monopolist commits to prices before downstream firms make R&D investment and output decisions. We find that input price discrimination can stimulate downstream R&D investment and shift production efficiently relative to uniform pricing. Specifically, input price discrimination impedes investment when the investing firm is a technological leader, fosters investment when it is a laggard, and may improve welfare when investment allows the laggard to overtake the leader. An important policy implication of our results is that antitrust regulation that allows input price discrimination may contribute to technological catch-up.
MSC:
| 91B24 | Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets) |
| 91B38 | Production theory, theory of the firm |
Keywords:
commitment; distance to frontier; price discrimination; R&D investment; technological catch-upReferences:
| [1] | Acemoglu, Daron; Aghion, Philippe; Zilibotti, Fabrizio, Vertical integration and distance to frontier, J. Eur. Econom. Assoc., 1, 2-3, 630-638 (2003) |
| [2] | Acemoglu, Daron; Akcigit, Ufuk, Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation, J. Eur. Econom. Assoc., 10, 1, 1-42 (2012) |
| [3] | Aghion, Philippe; Bloom, Nick; Blundell, Richard; Griffith, Rachel; Howitt, Peter, Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship, Q. J. Econ., 120, 2, 701-728 (2005) |
| [4] | Aghion, Philippe; Blundell, Richard; Griffith, Rachel; Howitt, Peter; Prantl, Susanne, The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity, Rev. Econ. Stat., 91, 1, 20-32 (2009) |
| [5] | Costello, Anna M., Mitigating incentive conflicts in inter-firm relationships: Evidence from long-term supply contracts, J. Account. Econ., 56, 1, 19-39 (2013) |
| [6] | DeGraba, Patrick, Input market price discrimination and the choice of technology, Amer. Econ. Rev., 80, 5, 1246-1253 (1990) |
| [7] | Grennan, Matthew, Price discrimination and bargaining: Empirical evidence from medical devices, Amer. Econ. Rev., 103, 1, 145-177 (2013) |
| [8] | Katz, Michael L., The welfare effects of third-degree price discrimination in intermediate good markets, Amer. Econ. Rev., 77, 1, 154-167 (1987) |
| [9] | Valletti, T., Input price discrimination in cournot games, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 21, 7, 969-988 (2003) |
| [10] | von Hirschhausen, Christian; Neumann, Anne, Long-term contracts and asset specificity revisited: An empirical analysis of producer-importer relations in the natural gas industry, Rev. Ind. Organ., 32, 2, 131-143 (2008) |
| [11] | Yoder, Jonathan; Hossain, Ishrat; Epplin, Francis; Doye, Damona, Contract duration and the division of labor in agricultural land leases, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 65, 3-4, 714-733 (2008) |
| [12] | Yoshida, Yoshihiro, Third-degree price discrimination in input markets: Output and welfare, Amer. Econ. Rev., 90, 1, 240-246 (2000) |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
