×

Corrigendum to: “Affirmative action in school choice: a new solution”. (English) Zbl 1425.91340

Summary: In [ibid. 92, 1–9 (2018; Zbl 1397.91475)] Y. Ju et al. investigate the responsiveness of affirmative action in school choice. For the minority reserves type affirmative action they introduce a new matching mechanism and claim that their mechanism is responsive to the minority reserves policy (Theorem 1). However, we construct a counterexample, which shows that it is not the case.

MSC:

91B68 Matching models

Citations:

Zbl 1397.91475
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Afacan, M. O.; Salman, U., Affirmative actions: The Boston mechanism case, Econ. Lett., 141, 95-97 (2016) · Zbl 1396.91557
[2] Doğan, B., Responsive affirmative action in school choice, J. Econ. Theory, 165, 69-105 (2016) · Zbl 1371.91133
[3] Hafalir, I. E.; Yenmez, M. B.; Yildirim, M. A., Effective affirmative action in school choice, Theor. Econ., 8, 325-363 (2013) · Zbl 1395.91344
[4] Jiao, Z.; Tian, G., Two further impossibility results on responsive affirmative action in school choice, Econ. Lett., 166, 60-62 (2018) · Zbl 1397.91473
[5] Ju, Y.; Lin, D.; Wang, D., Affirmative action in school choice: A new solution, Math. Soc. Sci., 92, 1-9 (2018) · Zbl 1397.91475
[6] Kesten, O., School choice with consent, Quart. J. Econ., 125, 1297-1348 (2010) · Zbl 1197.91153
[7] Kesten, O., Kurino, M., 2016. Do Outside Options Matter in Matching: A New Perspective on the Trade-Offs in Student Assignment. Working Paper.; Kesten, O., Kurino, M., 2016. Do Outside Options Matter in Matching: A New Perspective on the Trade-Offs in Student Assignment. Working Paper.
[8] Kojima, F., School choice: Impossibilities for affirmative action, Games Econ. Behav., 75, 2, 685-693 (2012) · Zbl 1239.91039
[9] Tang, Q.; Yu, J., A new perspective on Kesten’s school choice with consent idea, J. Econ. Theory, 154, 543-561 (2014) · Zbl 1309.91103
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.