×

Price discrimination based on buyers’ purchase history. (English) Zbl 1391.91098

Summary: We consider a repeated sales situation in which a seller sells one unit of a good each period to the same buyer. Having incomplete information about the buyer’s valuation, the seller responds to the buyer’s behavior, meaning, whether she bought previous units and at what price. We characterize the equilibrium of the no-commitment game for a uniform distribution and show that the seller discriminates between buyers based on their purchase history. Moreover, we show that the buyer’s ex-ante expected payoff is higher in the no-commitment game than in a game in which the seller can commit in advance to the prices he will charge (the commitment game). We also demonstrate that the buyer’s ex-post payoff is higher for each type of buyer in the no-commitment game. Social welfare is also higher in the no-commitment game. As the number of periods (units) increases, the opening prices decline, but fewer types of buyers accept the opening price.

MSC:

91B26 Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Acquisti L, Varian HR (2005) Conditioning prices on purchase history. Market Sci 24(3):367-381 · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0103
[2] Armstrong M (2006) Recent developments in the economics of price discrimination In: Blundell R, Newey WK, Persson T (ed) Advances in economics and econometrics: theory and applications, Ninth World Congress of the Econometric Society volume 2. Econometric Society Monographs · Zbl 1118.91042
[3] Ausubel L, Deneckere R (1989) Reputation in bargaining and durable goods monopoly. Econometrica 57:511-531 · Zbl 0676.90006 · doi:10.2307/1911050
[4] Ausubel L, Deneckere R (1992) Durable goods monopoly with incomplete information. Rev Econ Stud 59(4):795-812 · Zbl 0760.90023 · doi:10.2307/2297998
[5] Bagnoli M, Salant S, Swierzbinski J (1989) Durable-goods monopoly with discrete demand. J Polit Econ 97(6):1459-1478 · doi:10.1086/261663
[6] Board S, Skrzypacz A (2010) Revenue management with forward looking buyers. Working paper
[7] Caillaud B, De Nijs R (2014) Strategic loyalty reward in dynamic price discrimination. Market Sci 33(5):725-742 · doi:10.1287/mksc.2013.0840
[8] Chen Y (1997) Paying customers to switch. J Econ Manag Strat 6:877-897 · doi:10.1162/105864097567291
[9] Coase R (1972) Durable goods monopolists. J Law Econ 15:143-150 · doi:10.1086/466731
[10] Conitzer V, Taylor C, Wagman L (2010) Online privacy and price discrimination, Working paper
[11] Derman C, Liebermann GJ, Ross SM (1972) A sequential stochastic assignment problem. Manag Sci 18(7):349-355 · Zbl 0238.90054 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.18.7.349
[12] Esteves RB, Reggiani C (2014) Elasticity of demand and behaviour-based price discrimination. Int J Ind Organ 32:46-56 · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.10.010
[13] Freixas X, Guesnerie R, Tirole J (1985) Planning under incomplete information and the ratchet effect. Rev Econ Stud 52(2):173-191 · Zbl 0555.90011 · doi:10.2307/2297615
[14] Fudenberg, D.; Levine, D.; Tirole, J.; Roth, A. (ed.), Infinite-horizon models of bargaining with one-sided incomplete information (1985), Cambridge
[15] Fudenberg D, Tirole J (2000) Customer poaching and brand switching. RAND J Econ 31:634-657 · doi:10.2307/2696352
[16] Fudenberg, D.; Villas-Boas, JM; Hendershott, T. (ed.), Behavior based price discrimination and customer recognition (2007), Amsterdam
[17] Gershkov A, Moldovanu B (2009) Dynamic revenue maximization with heterogeneous objects: a mechanism design approach. Am Econ J Microecon 1(2):168-198 · doi:10.1257/mic.1.2.168
[18] Gershkov A, Moldovanu B (2010) Efficient sequential assignment with incomplete information. Games Econ Behav 68:144-154 · Zbl 1197.90277 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.06.005
[19] Gul F, Sonnenschein H, Wilson R (1986) Foundations of dynamic monopoly and the coase conjecture. J Econ Theory 39:155-190 · Zbl 0605.90037 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(86)90024-4
[20] Hart O, Tirole J (1988) Contract renegotiation and coasian dynamics. Rev Econ Stud 55(4):509-540 · Zbl 0649.90024 · doi:10.2307/2297403
[21] Hörner J, Samuelson L (2011) Managing strategic buyers. J Polit Econ 119(3):379-425 · doi:10.1086/660902
[22] Jing B (2011) Pricing experience goods: the effects of customer recognition and commitment. J Econ Manag Strat 20(2):451-473 · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00294.x
[23] Krishna V (2010) Auction theory, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Elsevier, Amsterdam
[24] Li KJ, Jain S (2015) Behavior-based pricing, an analysis of the impact of peer-induced fairness, working paper · Zbl 0649.90024
[25] Myerson R (1981) Optimal auction design. Math Operat Res 6:58-73 · Zbl 0496.90099 · doi:10.1287/moor.6.1.58
[26] Schmidt K (1993) Commitment through incomplete information in a simple repeated bargaining game. J Econ Theory 60:114-139 · Zbl 0803.90141 · doi:10.1006/jeth.1993.1037
[27] Shin J, Sudhir K (2010) A customer management dilemma: When is it profitable to reward one’s own customers? Market Sci 29(4):671-689 · doi:10.1287/mksc.1090.0547
[28] Shin J, Sudhir K, Yoon D (2012) When to “Fire” customers: customer cost-based pricing. Manag Sci 58(5):932-947 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1453
[29] Skreta V (2006) Sequentially optimal mechanisms. Rev Econ Stud 73:1085-1111 · Zbl 1201.91085 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00409.x
[30] Sobel J (1991) Durable goods monopoly with entry of new consumers. Econometrica 59(5):1455-1485 · Zbl 0781.90026 · doi:10.2307/2938375
[31] Sobel J, Takahashi I (1983) A multistage model of bargaining. Rev Econ Stud 50(3):411-426 · Zbl 0515.90085 · doi:10.2307/2297673
[32] Stokey N (1979) Intertemporal price discrimination. Quart J Econ 93:355-371 · Zbl 0426.90005 · doi:10.2307/1883163
[33] Stokey N (1981) Rational expectations and durable goods pricing. Bell J Econ 12:112-128 · doi:10.2307/3003511
[34] Villas-Boas JM (1999) Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND J Econ 30:604-631 · doi:10.2307/2556067
[35] Villas-Boas JM (2004) Price cycles in markets with customer recognition. RAND J Econ 35:486-501 · doi:10.2307/1593704
[36] Zhang J (2011) The perils of behavior-based personalization. Market Sci 30(1):170-186 · doi:10.1287/mksc.1100.0607
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.