×

A comparison among various inventory shortage models for deteriorating items on the basis of maximizing profit. (English) Zbl 1139.90304

Summary: For a finite planning horizon, there has been a considerable body of research papers in the area of operations management that dealt with four different inventory shortage models in the last two decades. In this paper, we establish the models to reflect the fact that the longer the waiting time, the smaller the backlogging rate. We then use maximizing profit as the objective to make an appropriate comparison among those four alternatives. The theoretical results reveal that Model 4 provides the highest profit only if the profit margin is sufficiently low. Otherwise, in general, Model 3 has the highest profit among them.

MSC:

90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1093 · Zbl 0879.90069 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1093
[2] Bellman R. E., Dynamic Programming (1957)
[3] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600801 · Zbl 1054.90507 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600801
[4] DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(198908)36:4<507::AID-NAV3220360412>3.0.CO;2-N · Zbl 0672.90037 · doi:10.1002/1520-6750(198908)36:4<507::AID-NAV3220360412>3.0.CO;2-N
[5] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.0400910 · Zbl 0677.90021 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.0400910
[6] DOI: 10.1057/jors.1987.75 · doi:10.1057/jors.1987.75
[7] Friedman M. F., INFOR 20 pp 157–
[8] DOI: 10.1057/jors.1992.20 · Zbl 0764.90026 · doi:10.1057/jors.1992.20
[9] DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(200010)47:7<602::AID-NAV5>3.0.CO;2-N · Zbl 0996.90008 · doi:10.1002/1520-6750(200010)47:7<602::AID-NAV5>3.0.CO;2-N
[10] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601062 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601062
[11] DOI: 10.1057/jors.1992.183 · Zbl 0762.90021 · doi:10.1057/jors.1992.183
[12] DOI: 10.1057/jors.1994.126 · Zbl 0842.90029 · doi:10.1057/jors.1994.126
[13] DOI: 10.1057/jors.1995.54 · Zbl 0836.90068 · doi:10.1057/jors.1995.54
[14] DOI: 10.1057/jors.1995.71 · Zbl 0830.90034 · doi:10.1057/jors.1995.71
[15] DOI: 10.1057/jors.1996.151 · Zbl 0871.90028 · doi:10.1057/jors.1996.151
[16] Murdeshwar T. M., Journal of Operational Research Society 39 pp 687–
[17] DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6377(00)00044-4 · Zbl 1096.90518 · doi:10.1016/S0167-6377(00)00044-4
[18] Sachan R. S., Journal of Operational Research Society 35 pp 1013– · Zbl 1193.42042 · doi:10.1057/jors.1984.197
[19] DOI: 10.1016/0167-6377(96)00010-7 · Zbl 0865.90038 · doi:10.1016/0167-6377(96)00010-7
[20] DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199712)44:8<791::AID-NAV6>3.0.CO;2-5 · Zbl 0890.90052 · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199712)44:8<791::AID-NAV6>3.0.CO;2-5
[21] DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00042-X · Zbl 0956.90002 · doi:10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00042-X
[22] DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6377(02)00150-5 · Zbl 1013.90006 · doi:10.1016/S0167-6377(02)00150-5
[23] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601490 · Zbl 1088.90503 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601490
[24] DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00072-7 · Zbl 1010.90001 · doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00072-7
[25] DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(200103)48:2<144::AID-NAV3>3.0.CO;2-8 · Zbl 0981.90003 · doi:10.1002/1520-6750(200103)48:2<144::AID-NAV3>3.0.CO;2-8
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.