×
Ju, Yamei; Liu, Dan; Ding, Derui; Wei, Guoliang

Distributed cubature Kalman filtering for nonlinear systems with stochastic communication protocol. (English) Zbl 07887234

Asian J. Control 24, No. 6, 3566-3579 (2022).
Summary: This paper is concerned with the distributed cubature Kalman filtering (DCKF) for a class of discrete time-varying nonlinear systems subject to stochastic communication protocol (SCP). In order to avoid the data collisions, the SCP is introduced to randomly schedule each sensor node information from one of the neighboring nodes to the filter which is presented via not only the information of itself sensor but also the information of neighboring sensors. The considered scheduling probability of the selected node is unknown. Therefore, the exact filtering error covariance is not available. The purpose of this paper is to design a DCKF under the spherical-radial cubature rule such that an upper bound of the filtering error covariance is guaranteed by utilizing fundamental inequality. Such an upper bound is dependent on known upper and lower bounds of the scheduling probabilities. Subsequently, the desired filter matrices are given by minimizing the upper bound of the filtering error. A sufficient condition is derived by using Riccati-like difference equations method. Besides, a recursive form of filter algorithm is designed for online computation. Finally, the usefulness of the DCKF is verified by utilizing a simulation example on the induction machines.
© 2022 Chinese Automatic Control Society and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd

Cited in 4 Documents

MSC:

93-XX Systems theory; control

Keywords:

cubature Kalman filtering; nonlinear systems; spherical-radial cubature rule; stochastic communication protocol; unknown scheduling probability
Cite Review PDF
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] K.Sebastian, R.Konrad, and B.Martin, Stochastic stability of the extended Kalman filter with intermittent observations, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control55 (2010), no. 2, 514-518. · Zbl 1368.93717
[2] J.Mao, Y.Sun, X.Yi, H.Liu, and D.Ding, Recursive filtering of networked nonlinear systems: A survey, Int. J. Syst. Sci52 (2021), no. 6, 1110-1128.
[3] B.Chen, D. W. C.Ho, G.Hu, and L.Yu, Secure fusion estimation for bandwidth constrained cyber‐physical systems under replay attacks, IEEE Trans. Cybern.48 (2018), no. 6, 1862-1876.
[4] D.Li, S.Kar, F. E.Alsaadi, A. M.Dobaie, and S.Cui, Distributed Kalman filtering with quantized sensing state, IEEE Trans. Signal Process.63 (2015), no. 19, 5180-5193. · Zbl 1394.94311
[5] X.Zhang, Z.Yan, and Y.Chen, High‐degree cubature Kalman filter for nonlinear state estimation with missing measurements, Asian J. Control (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.2510 · Zbl 07887051 · doi:10.1002/asjc.2510
[6] A.Chibani, M.Chadli, S. X.Ding, and N. B.Braiek, Design of robust fuzzy fault detection filter for polynomial fuzzy systems with new finite frequency specifications, Automatica93 (2018), 42-54. · Zbl 1400.93297
[7] Q.Li, B.Shen, Z.Wang, and W.Sheng, Recursive distributed filtering over sensor networks on Gilbert-Elliott channels: A dynamic event‐triggered approach, Automatica113 (2020), 108681. · Zbl 1440.93253
[8] X.Lv, P.Duan, and Z.Duan, Distributed Kalman filtering for uncertain dynamic systems with state constraints, Int. J. Robust Nonlin. Control31 (2021), no. 2, 496-508. · Zbl 1525.93455
[9] M.Kooshkbaghi and M.Horacio, Event‐triggered discrete‐time Cubature Kalman filter for nonlinear dynamical systems with packet dropout, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control65 (2020), no. 5, 2278-2285. · Zbl 1533.93474
[10] A.Sharma, S. C.Srivastava, and S.Chakrabarti, A Cubature Kalman filter based power system dynamic state estimator, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.66 (2017), no. 8, 2036-2045.
[11] A.Kazmi, M.O’Grady, D.Delaney, A.Ruzzelliand, and G.O’Hare, A review of wireless‐sensor‐network‐enabled building energy management systems, ACM Trans. Sensor Netw.10 (2014), no. 4, 1-43.
[12] P.Park, D.Piergiuseppe, and K.Johansson, Cross‐layer optimization for industrial control applications using wireless sensor and actuator mesh networks, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.64 (2017), no. 4, 3250-3259.
[13] J.Song, D.Ding, H.Liu, and X.Wang, Non‐fragile distributed state estimation over sensor networks subject to DoS attacks: The almost sure stability, Int. J. Syst. Sci.51 (2020), no. 6, 1119-1132. · Zbl 1483.93632
[14] H.Liu and H.Yu, Event‐triggered robust state estimation for wireless sensor networks, Asian J. Control22 (2020), no. 4, 1649-1658. · Zbl 07872697
[15] W.Li, K.Xiong, Y.Jia, and J.Du, Distributed Kalman filter for multitarget tracking systems with coupled measurements, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Syst.51 (2021), no. 10, 6599-6604
[16] B.Shen, Z.Wang, D.Wang, and H.Liu, Distributed state‐saturated recursive filtering over sensor networks under round‐robin protocol, IEEE Trans. Cybern.50 (2019), no. 8, 3605-3615.
[17] F.Wang, Z.Wang, J.Liang, and X.Liu, Recursive distributed filtering for two‐dimensional shift‐varying systems over sensor networks under stochastic communication protocols, Automatica115 (2020), 108865. · Zbl 1436.93140
[18] S.Liu, Z.Wang, L.Wang, and G.Wei, On quantized H_∞ filtering for multi‐rate systems under stochastic communication protocols: The finite‐horizon case, Inform. Sci.459 (2018), 211-223. · Zbl 1448.93330
[19] L.Zou, Z.Wang, and H.Gao, Observer‐based H_∞ control of networked systems with stochastic communication protocol: The finite‐horizon case, Automatica63 (2016), 366-373. · Zbl 1329.93041
[20] L.Sheng, Y.Niu, and M.Gao, Distributed resilient filtering for time‐varying systems over sensor networks subject to round‐robin/stochastic protocol, ISA Trans.87 (2018), 55-67.
[21] Y.Ju, G.Wei, D.Ding, and S.Liu, Finite‐horizon fault estimation for time‐varying systems with multiple fading measurements under torus‐event‐based protocols, Int. J. Robust Nonlin. Control29 (2019), no. 30, 4594-4608. · Zbl 1426.93082
[22] L.Zou, Z.Wang, Q.‐L.Han, and D. H.Zhou, Full information estimation for time‐varying systems subject to round‐robin scheduling: A recursive filter approach, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Syst.51 (2021), no. 3, 1904-1916.
[23] L.Zou, Z.Wang, Q.‐L.Han, and D. H.Zhou, Moving horizon estimation of networked nonlinear systems with random access protocol, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Syst.51 (2021), no. 5, 2937-2948.
[24] S.Liu, Z.Wang, G.Wei, and M.Li, Distributed set‐membership filtering for multirate systems under the round‐robin scheduling over sensor networks, IEEE Trans. Cybern.50 (2020), no. 5, 1910-1920.
[25] X.Li, H.Dong, Z.Wang, and F.Han, Set‐membership filtering for state‐saturated systems with mixed time‐delays under weighted try‐once‐discard protocol, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs66 (2018), no. 2, 312-316.
[26] J.Guo, Z.Wang, L.Zou, and Z.Zhao, Ultimately bounded filtering for time‐delayed nonlinear stochastic systems with uniform quantizations under random access protocol, Sensors20 (2020), no. 15, 4143.
[27] G. H.Hardy, J. E.Littlewood, and G.Polya, Cambridge mathematical library: Inequalities, 1952. · Zbl 0047.05302
[28] C.Andrzej and S.Amari, Adaptive Blind Signal and Image Processing: Learning Algorithms and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[29] K.Reif, F.Sonnemann, and R.Unbehauen, An EKF‐based nonlinear observer with a prescribed degree of stability, Automatica34 (1998), no. 9, 1119-1123. · Zbl 0938.93504
[30] B.Shen, Z.Wang, D.Wang, J.Luo, H.Pu, and Y.Peng, Finite‐horizon filtering for a class of nonlinear time‐delayed systems with an energy harvesting sensor, Automatica100 (2019), 144-152. · Zbl 1411.93176
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.