×

Level set topology optimization of structural problems with interface cohesion. (English) Zbl 07867240

Summary: This paper presents a finite element topology optimization framework for the design of two-phase structural systems considering contact and cohesion phenomena along the interface. The geometry of the material interface is described by an explicit level set method, and the structural response is predicted by the extended finite element method. In this work, the interface condition is described by a bilinear cohesive zone model on the basis of the traction-separation constitutive relation. The non-penetration condition in the presence of compressive interface forces is enforced by a stabilized Lagrange multiplier method. The mechanical model assumes a linear elastic isotropic material, infinitesimal strain theory, and a quasi-static response. The optimization problem is solved by a nonlinear programming method, and the design sensitivities are computed by the adjoint method. The performance of the presented method is evaluated by 2D and 3D numerical examples. The results obtained from topology optimization reveal distinct design characteristics for the various interface phenomena considered. In addition, 3D examples demonstrate optimal geometries that cannot be fully captured by reduced dimensionality. The optimization framework presented is limited to two-phase structural systems where the material interface is coincident in the undeformed configuration, and to structural responses that remain valid considering small strain kinematics.
{Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}

MSC:

74Sxx Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics
74Rxx Fracture and damage
74Mxx Special kinds of problems in solid mechanics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] BendsøeMP. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Structural Optimization1989; 1(4):193-202.
[2] RozvanyG, ZhouM, BirkerT. Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization1992; 4(3):250-252.
[3] BendsøeMP, SigmundO. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. Springer: New York, 2003.
[4] SigmundO, MauteK. Topology optimization approaches: a comparative review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2013; 48(6):1031-1055.
[5] DeatonJD, GrandhiRV. A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2014; 49(1):1-38.
[6] KikuchiN, ChenBC. Topology optimization with design‐dependent loads. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design2001; 37(1):57-70. · Zbl 0962.74049
[7] SigmundO, ClausenPM. Topology optimization using a mixed formulation: an alternative way to solve pressure load problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2007; 196(13):1874-1889. · Zbl 1173.74375
[8] YoonGH. Topology optimization for stationary fluid-structure interaction problems using a new monolithic formulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2010; 82(5):591-616. · Zbl 1188.74048
[9] HammerVB, OlhoffN. Topology optimization of continuum structures subjected to pressure loading. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2000; 19:85-92.
[10] StrömbergN. The influence of sliding friction in optimal topologies. In Recent Advances in Contact Mechanics, StravroulakisGE (ed.) (ed.). 5th Contact Mechanics International Symposium (CMIS2009), vol. 56. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2009; 327-336.
[11] Andrade‐CamposA, RamosA, SimõesJ. A model of bone adaptation as a topology optimization process with contact. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering2012; 5:229-244.
[12] vanDijkNP, MauteK, LangelaarM, Van KeulenF. Level‐set methods for structural topology optimization: a review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2013; 48(3):437-472.
[13] FriesT‐P, BelytschkoT. The intrinsic XFEM: a method for arbitrary discontinuities without additional unknowns. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2006; 68(13):1358-1385. · Zbl 1129.74045
[14] KhoeiAR. Extended Finite Element Method: Theory and Applications. Wiley: United Kingdom, 2015. · Zbl 1315.74001
[15] LawryM, MauteK. Level set topology optimization of problems with sliding contact interfaces. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2015; 52(6):1107-1119.
[16] LawryM, BehrouR, MauteK. On the influence of interface models on the optimum layout of multi‐component structures and material systems. In 11th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimisation: Sydney Australia, 2015.
[17] LiuP, LuoY, KangZ. Multi‐material topology optimization considering interface behavior via XFEM and level set method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2016; 308:113-133. · Zbl 1439.74290
[18] DugdaleDS. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids1960; 8(2):100-104.
[19] NeedlemanA. A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. Journal of Applied Mechanics1987; 54(3):525-531. · Zbl 0626.73010
[20] CamachoGT, OrtizM. Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures1996; 33(20):2899-2938. · Zbl 0929.74101
[21] TvergaardV. Effect of fibre debonding in a whisker‐reinforced metal. Materials Science and Engineering: A1990; 125(2):203-213.
[22] TvergaardV, HutchinsonJ. W. The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic‐plastic solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids1992; 40(6):1377-1397. · Zbl 0775.73218
[23] XuX‐P, NeedlemanA. Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering1993; 1(2):111-132.
[24] EspinosaHD, DwivediS, LuH‐C. Modeling impact induced delamination of woven fiber reinforced composites with contact/cohesive laws. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2000; 183(3):259-290. · Zbl 0984.74074
[25] LiS, GhoshS. Modeling interfacial debonding and matrix cracking in fiber reinforced composites by the extended Voronoi cell FEM. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design2007; 43(5):397-410.
[26] ZhangZJ, PaulinoGH. Cohesive zone modeling of dynamic failure in homogeneous and functionally graded materials. International Journal of Plasticity2005; 21(6):1195-1254. · Zbl 1154.74391
[27] ParkK, PaulinoGH. Cohesive zone models: a critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces. Applied Mechanics Reviews2011; 64(6):060802‐20.
[28] YangB, Ravi‐ChandarK. A single‐domain dual‐boundary‐element formulation incorporating a cohesive zone model for elastostatic cracks. International Journal of Fracture1998; 93(1‐4):115-144.
[29] BelytschkoT, OrganD, GerlachC. Element‐free Galerkin methods for dynamic fracture in concrete. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2000; 187(3):385-399. · Zbl 0962.74077
[30] XuX‐P, NeedlemanA. Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids1994; 42(9):1397-1434. · Zbl 0825.73579
[31] GullerudAS, GaoX, DoddsRH, Haj‐AliR. Simulation of ductile crack growth using computational cells: numerical aspects. Engineering Fracture Mechanics2000; 66(1):65-92.
[32] TijssensMGA, SluysBLJ, van der GiessenE. Numerical simulation of quasi‐brittle fracture using damaging cohesive surfaces. European Journal of Mechanics‐A/Solids2000; 19(5):761-779. · Zbl 0993.74073
[33] BelytschkoT, FishJ, EngelmannBE. A finite element with embedded localization zones. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1988; 70(1):59-89. · Zbl 0653.73032
[34] JirásekM. Comparative study on finite elements with embedded discontinuities. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2000; 188(1):307-330. · Zbl 1166.74427
[35] MoësN, DolbowJ, BelytschkoT. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1999; 46:131-150. · Zbl 0955.74066
[36] MoësN, BelytschkoT. Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Engineering Fracture Mechanics2002; 69(7):813-833.
[37] LiuF, BorjaR. A contact algorithm for frictional crack propagation with the extended finite element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2008; 76:1489-1512. · Zbl 1195.74186
[38] Mueller‐HoeppeDS, WriggersP, LoehnertS. Crack face contact for hexahedral‐based XFEM formulation. Computational Mechanics2012; 49:725-734. · Zbl 1312.74043
[39] KhoeiAR, NikbakhtM. An enriched finite element algorithm for numerical computation of contact friction problems. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences2007; 49(2):183-199.
[40] FarsadM, VernereyFJ, ParkHS. An extended finite element/level set method to study surface effects on the mechanical behavior and properties of nanomaterials. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2010; 84(12):1466-1489. · Zbl 1202.74168
[41] GeniautS, MassinP, MoësN. A stable 3D contact formulation using X‐FEM. European Journal of Computational Mechanics/Revue Européenne de Mécanique Numérique2007; 16:259-275. · Zbl 1208.74096
[42] AmdouniS, HildP, LlerasV, MoakherM, RenardY. A stabilised lagrange multiplier method for the enriched finite‐element approximation of contact problems of cracked elastic bodies. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis2012; 46:813-839. · Zbl 1271.74354
[43] LiuF, BorjaRI. Stabilized low‐order finite elements for frictional contact with the extended finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechancis and Engineering2010; 199:2456-2471. · Zbl 1231.74426
[44] GinerE, TurM, TaranconJE, FuenmayorFJ. Crack face contact in X‐FEM using a segment‐to‐segment approach. International Journal for Numercial Methods in Engineering2010; 82:1424-1449. · Zbl 1188.74057
[45] NistorI, GuitonMLE, MassinP, MoësN, GéniautS. An X‐FEM approach for large sliding contact along discontinuities. International Journal For Numerical Methods In Engineering2009; 78:1407-1435. · Zbl 1183.74301
[46] SiavelisM, MassinP, GuitonMLE, MazetS, MoësN. Robust implementation of contact under friction and large sliding with the extended finite element method. European Journal of Computational Mechanics2010; 19:189-203. · Zbl 1426.74305
[47] KhoeiAR, MousaviST. Modeling of large deformation-large sliding contact via the penalty X‐FEM technique. Computational Materials Science2010; 48(3):471-480.
[48] Taheri MousaviSMJ, Taheri MousaviSM. Modeling large sliding frictional contact along non‐smooth discontinuities in X‐FEM. International Journal of Modeling and Optimization2011; 1:169-173.
[49] BiotteauE, PonthotJP. Modeling frictional contact conditions with the penalty method in the extended finite element framework. In European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Vienna, Austria, 2012; MS119.
[50] AllaireG, JouveF, ToaderAM. Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level‐set method. Journal of Computational Physics2004; 194(1):363-393. · Zbl 1136.74368
[51] WangS, WangMY. Radial basis functions and level set method for structural topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2006; 65(12):2060-2090. · Zbl 1174.74331
[52] LuoZ, TongL, WangMY, WangS. Shape and topology optimization of compliant mechanisms using a parameterization level set method. Journal of Computational Physics2007; 227(1):680-705. · Zbl 1127.65043
[53] PingenG, WaidmannM, EvgrafovA, MauteK. A parametric level‐set approach for topology optimization of flow domains. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2010; 41(1):117-131. · Zbl 1274.76183
[54] MakhijaD, MauteK. Numerical instabilities in level set topology optimization with the extended finite element method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2014; 49(2):185-197.
[55] VillanuevaCH, MauteK. Density and level set‐XFEM schemes for topology optimization of 3‐D structures. Computational Mechanics2014; 54(1):133-150. · Zbl 1384.74046
[56] MauteK, KreisslS, MakhijaD, YangR. Topology optimization of heat conduction in nano‐composites. In 9^th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization: Shizuoka, Japan, 2011.
[57] vanDijkNP, LangelaarM, vanKeulenF. Explicit level‐set‐based topology optimization using an exact heaviside function and consistent sensitivity analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2012; 91(1):67-97. · Zbl 1246.74045
[58] CoffinP, MauteK. Level set topology optimization of cooling and heating devices using a simplified convection model. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2016; 53:985-1003.
[59] Van MiegroetL, DuysinxP. Stress concentration minimization of 2D filets using X‐FEM and level set description. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2007; 33(4‐5):425-438.
[60] WangMY, WangS. Parametric shape and topology optimization with radial basis functions. In IUTAM Symposium on Topological Design Optimization of Structures, Machines and Materials,Springer, Netherlands, 2006; 13-22.
[61] KreisslS, MauteK. Levelset based fluid topology optimization using the extended finite element method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2012; 46:1-16.
[62] JenkinsN, MauteK. Level set topology optimization of stationary fluid-structure interaction problems. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2015; 52(1):179-195.
[63] CoffinP, MauteK. A level‐set method for steady‐state and transient natural convection problems. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2016; 53:1047-1067.
[64] WriggersP. Computational Contact Mechanics. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. · Zbl 1104.74002
[65] FriesTP, BelytschkoT. The extended/generalized finite element method: an overview of the method and its applications. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2010; 84(3):253-304. · Zbl 1202.74169
[66] TeradaK, AsaiM, YamagishiM. Finite cover method for linear and non‐linear analyses of heterogeneous solids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2003; 58(9):1321-1346. · Zbl 1032.74685
[67] TranAB, YvonnetJ, HeQ‐C, ToulemondeC, SanahujaJ. A multiple level set approach to prevent numerical artefacts in complex microstructures with nearby inclusions within XFEM. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2011; 85(11):1436-1459. · Zbl 1217.74138
[68] LangC, MakhijaD, DoostanA, MauteK. A simple and efficient preconditioning scheme for XFEM with heaviside enrichments. Computational Mechancis2014; 54(5):1357-1374. · Zbl 1311.74124
[69] ZhangLG, YuTX. Modified adaptive dynamic relaxation method and its application to elastic‐plastic bending and wrinkling of circular plates. Computers & Structures1989; 33(2):609-614. · Zbl 0698.73063
[70] SalehiM, AghaeiH. Dynamic relaxation large deflection analysis of non‐axisymmetric circular viscoelastic plates. Computers & Structures2005; 83(23):1878-1890.
[71] PanL, MetzgerDR, NiewczasM. The meshless dynamic relaxation techniques for simulating atomic structures of materials. In ASME 2002 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2002; 15-26.
[72] MoréJJ. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory. In Numerical Analysis.Springer: Berlin Heidelberg; 105-116, 1978. · Zbl 0372.65022
[73] KawamotoA. Stabilization of geometrically nonlinear topology optimization by the Levenberg-Marquardt method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2009; 37:429-433.
[74] SvanbergK. A globally convergent version of MMA without linesearch. In Proceedings of the First World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 28 May ‐ 2 June 1995: Goslar, Germany, 1995; 9-16.
[75] KreisslS, PingenG, MauteK. Topology optimization for unsteady flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2011; 87(13):1229-1253. · Zbl 1242.76052
[76] DavisTA. Algorithm 832: UMFPACK V4. 3 - an unsymmetric‐pattern multifrontal method. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS)2004; 30(2):196-199. · Zbl 1072.65037
[77] SaadY. Ilut: A dual threshold incomplete LU factorization. Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications1994; 1(4):387-402. · Zbl 0838.65026
[78] AndersonTL, AndersonTL. Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. · Zbl 1083.74001
[79] SongSH, PaulinoGH, ButtlarWG. Simulation of crack propagation in asphalt concrete using an intrinsic cohesive zone model. Journal of Engineering Mechanics2006; 132(11):1215-1223.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.