×

Computation of higher-order moments of generalized polynomial chaos expansions. (English) Zbl 07867092

Summary: Because of the complexity of fluid flow solvers, non-intrusive uncertainty quantification techniques have been developed in aerodynamic simulations in order to compute the quantities of interest required in an optimization process, for example. The objective function is commonly expressed in terms of moments of these quantities, such as the mean, standard deviation, or even higher-order moments. Polynomial surrogate models based on polynomial chaos expansions have often been implemented in this respect. The original approach of uncertainty quantification using polynomial chaos is however intrusive. It is based on a Galerkin-type formulation of the model equations to derive the governing equations for the polynomial expansion coefficients. Third-order, indeed fourth-order moments of the polynomials are needed in this analysis. Besides, both intrusive and non-intrusive approaches call for their computation provided that higher-order moments of the quantities of interest need to be post-processed. In most applications, they are evaluated by Gauss quadratures and eventually stored for use throughout the computations. In this paper, analytical formulas are rather considered for the moments of the continuous polynomials of the Askey scheme, so that they can be evaluated by quadrature-free procedures instead. Matlab\textsuperscript© codes have been developed for this purpose and tested by comparisons with Gauss quadratures.
{Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}

MSC:

33Cxx Hypergeometric functions
42Cxx Nontrigonometric harmonic analysis
65Cxx Probabilistic methods, stochastic differential equations

Software:

Matlab

References:

[1] WienerN. The homogeneous chaos. American Journal of Mathematics1938; 60(4):897-936. · Zbl 0019.35406
[2] CameronR, MartinW. The orthogonal development of nonlinear functionals in series of Fourier-Hermite functionals. Annals of Mathematics1947; 48(2):385-392. · Zbl 0029.14302
[3] XiuD, KarniadakisGE. The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing2002; 24(2):619-644. · Zbl 1014.65004
[4] SoizeC, GhanemRG. Physical systems with random uncertainties: chaos representations with arbitrary probability measure. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing2004; 26(2):395-410. · Zbl 1075.60084
[5] ClouteauD, SavinÉ, AubryD. Stochastic simulations in dynamic soil-structure interaction. Meccanica2001; 36(4):379-399. · Zbl 1061.74054
[6] CreamerDB. On using polynomial chaos for modeling uncertainty in acoustic propagation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2006; 119(4):1979-1994.
[7] DebusschereBJ, NajmHN, PébayPP, KnioOM, GhanemRG, Maître LeOP. Numerical challenges in the use of representations for stochastic processes. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing2005; 26(2):698-719. · Zbl 1072.60042
[8] GhanemRG. Ingredients for a general purpose stochastic finite elements implementation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1999; 168(1-4):19-34. · Zbl 0943.65008
[9] GhanemRG, SpanosPD. Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Springer: New York NY, 1991. · Zbl 0722.73080
[10] GhiocelDM, GhanemRG. Stochastic finite‐element analysis of seismic soil-structure interaction. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics2002; 128(1):66-77.
[11] NajmHN. Uncertainty quantification and polynomial chaos techniques in computational fluid dynamics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics2009; 41:35-52. · Zbl 1168.76041
[12] Maître LeOP, KnioOM. Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification. With Applications to Computational Fluid Dynamics. Springer: Dordrecht, 2010. · Zbl 1193.76003
[13] SavinÉ, ResminiA, PeterJ. Sparse polynomial surrogates for aerodynamic computations with random inputs, 2016. AIAA Paper #2016‐0433.
[14] SeguiB, FaverjonB, Jacquet‐RichardetG. Effects of random stiffness variations in multistage rotors using the polynomial chaos expansion. Journal of Sound and Vibration2013; 332(18):4178-4192.
[15] SunT‐C. A finite element method for random differential equations with random coefficients. Journal on Numerical Analysis1979; 16(6):1019-1035. · Zbl 0426.65079
[16] XiuD, HesthavenJS. High‐order collocation methods for differential equations with random inputs. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing2005; 27(3):1118-1139. · Zbl 1091.65006
[17] SinghT, SinglaP, KondaU. Polynomial chaos based design of robust input shapers. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control2010; 132(5):051010, 13. available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0509-4. · Zbl 1422.42041 · doi:10.1186/s13662-015-0509-4
[18] GeraciG, CongedoPM, AbgrallR, IaccarinoG. High‐order statistics in global sensitivity analysis: decomposition and model reduction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2016; 301:80-115. · Zbl 1425.65021
[19] ChiharaTS. An Introduction to Orthogonal Polynomials. Gordon and Breach: New York NY, 1978. · Zbl 0389.33008
[20] Abd‐ElhameedWM. New formulas for the linearization coefficients of some nonsymmetric Jacobi polynomials. Advances in Difference Equations2015; 2015:168, 13. available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4001793. · Zbl 1422.42041 · doi:10.1115/1.4001793
[21] AdamsJC. On the expression of the product of any two Legendre’s coefficients by means of a series of Legendre’s coefficients. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London1878; 27:63-71. · JFM 10.0337.01
[22] ChaggaraH. Operational rules and a generalized Hermite polynomials. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications2007; 332(1):11-21. · Zbl 1115.33006
[23] ChaggaraH, KoepfW. On linearization coefficients of Jacobi polynomials. Applied Mathematics Letters2010; 23(5):609-614. · Zbl 1189.33013
[24] ChaggaraH, KoepfW. On linearization and connection coefficients for generalized Hermite polynomials. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics2011; 236(1):65-73. · Zbl 1231.33010
[25] FeldheimE. Quelques nouvelles relations pour les polynômes d’Hermite. Journal London Mathematical Society1938; 13(1):22-29. · Zbl 0018.21301
[26] GasperG. Linearization of the product of Jacobi polynomials I. Canadian Journal of Mathematics1970; 22(1):171-175. · Zbl 0191.35002
[27] HylleraasEA. Linearization of products of Jacobi polynomials. Mathematica Scandinavica1962; 10:189-200. · Zbl 0109.29603
[28] RahmanM. A non‐negative representation of the linearization coefficients of the product of Jacobi polynomials. Canadian Journal of Mathematics1981; 33(4):915-928. · Zbl 0423.33003
[29] Sánchez‐RuizJ, ArtésPL, Martinez‐FinkelshteinA, DehesaJS. General linearization formulae for products of continuous hypergeometric‐type polynomials. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General1999; 32(42):7345-7366. · Zbl 0945.33006
[30] WatsonGN. A note on the polynomials of Hermite and Laguerre. Journal of the London Mathematical Society1938; 13(1):29-32. · Zbl 0018.21302
[31] AskeyR. Orthogonal polynomials and special functions. In CBMS‐NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, vol. 21 SIAM: Philadelphia PA, 1975. · Zbl 0298.33008
[32] NeumannFE. Beiträge Zur Theorie Der Kugelfunctionen II. Teubner: Leipzig, 1878.
[33] RosenblumM. Generalized Hermite polynomials and the Bose‐like oscillator calculus. In Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, BallJA (ed.), DymH (ed.), KaashoekMA (ed.), LangerH (ed.), TretterC (ed.) (eds)., vol. 73 Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel; 369-396, 1994. · Zbl 0826.33005
[34] SullivanTJ. Introduction to Uncertainty Quantification. Springer: Berlin, 2016.
[35] GolubGH, WelschJH. Calculation of Gauss quadrature rules. Mathematics of Computation1969; 23(106):221-230. · Zbl 0179.21901
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.