×

Neuro-adaptive output-feedback optimized stochastic control for the active suspension systems with state constraints. (English) Zbl 07841272

Summary: This article investigates an adaptive neural network (NN) output-feedback optimal control design problem for active suspension systems (ASSs) with stochastic disturbance. The ASSs under consideration contain the characteristics of spring nonlinear dynamics, unmeasured states, and state constraints. The NNs are developed to approximate the unknown nonlinear functions. Meanwhile, observer-based output feedback control design method is proposed based on the adaptive backstepping technique. Furthermore, the stability of the closed-loop system is demonstrated by constructing the barrier Lyapunov function, thus ensuring that the full-state constraints are not exceeded. In particular, the simulation validations are given for the cases of bump, C-class, and D-class road displacements inputs. Finally, the simulation results verify the effectiveness of the studied control strategy.
{© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.}

MSC:

93C40 Adaptive control/observation systems
93C10 Nonlinear systems in control theory
93E20 Optimal stochastic control
93E03 Stochastic systems in control theory (general)
93B52 Feedback control
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Montazeri‐GhM, SoleymaniM. Investigation of the energy regeneration of active suspension system in hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2010;57(3):918‐925.
[2] HuangYB, NaJ, WuX, GaoGB. Approximation‐free control for vehicle active suspensions with hydraulic actuator. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2018;65(9):7258‐7267.
[3] HrovatD. Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal control applications. Automatica. 1997;33(10):1781‐1817. · Zbl 0900.93214
[4] AmirifarR, SadatiN. Low‐order controller design for an active suspension system via LMIs. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2006;53(2):554‐560.
[5] LiHY, JingXJ, LamHK, ShiP. Fuzzy sampled‐data control for uncertain vehicle suspension systems. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2014;44(7):1111‐1126.
[6] FeiZY, WangXD, LiuM, YuJY. Reliable control for vehicle active suspension systems under event‐triggered scheme with frequency range limitation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021;51(3):1630‐1641.
[7] LiHY, ZhangZX, YanHC, XieXP. Adaptive event‐triggered fuzzy control for uncertain active suspension systems. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2019;49(12):4388‐4397.
[8] WenS, ChenMZQ, ZengZG. Fuzzy control for uncertain vehicle active suspension systems via dynamic sliding‐mode approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A‐Syst Humans. 2017;47(1):24‐32.
[9] CaoJ, LiP, LiuH. An interval fuzzy controller for vehicle active suspension systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2010;11(4):885‐895.
[10] MrazguaJ, TisssirEH, OuahiM. Fuzzy fault‐tolerant \(H_{\operatorname{\infty}}\) control approach for nonlinear active suspension systems with actuator failure. Proc Comput Sci. 2019;148:465‐474.
[11] NaJ, HuangYB, WuX, SuSF, LiG. Adaptive finite‐time fuzzy control of nonlinear active suspension systems with input delay. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2020;50(6):2639‐2650.
[12] WenSP, ChenMZQ, ZengZG, YuXH, HuangTW. Fuzzy control for uncertain vehicle active suspension systems via dynamic sliding‐mode approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2017;47(1):24‐32.
[13] HeW, WangTT, HeXY, YangL‐J, KaynakO. Dynamical modeling and boundary vibration control of a rigid‐flexible wing system. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2020;25(6):2711‐2721.
[14] HeW, MuXX, ZhangL, ZouY. Modeling and trajectory tracking control for flapping‐wing micro aerial vehicles. IEEE/CAA J Automat Sin. 2021;8(1):148‐156.
[15] HomayounB, ArefiMM, VafamandN, YinS. Neural minimal learning backstepping control of stochastic active suspension systems with hydraulic actuator saturation. J Franklin Inst. 2020;357:13687‐13706. · Zbl 1454.93126
[16] MarzbanradJ, AhmadiG, ZohoorH, HojjatY. Stochastic optimal preview control of a vehicle suspension. J Sound Vib. 2004;275:973‐990. · Zbl 1236.93153
[17] GobbiM, LeviF, MastinuG. Multi‐objective stochastic optimisation of the suspension system of road vehicles. J Sound Vib. 2006;298:1055‐1072.
[18] HuangK, ZhangYC, YuF. Predictive controller design for electromagnetic suspension based on mixed logical dynamical model. J Vib Control. 2012;18(8):1165‐1176.
[19] WuJ, LiaoFC, TomizukaM. Optimal preview control for a linear continuous‐time stochastic control system in finite‐time horizon. Int J Syst Sci. 2017;48:129‐137. · Zbl 1358.93193
[20] ElmadanyMM. Stochastic optimal control of highway tractors with active suspensions. Veh Syst Dyn. 1988;17(4):193‐210.
[21] SuiS, LiYM, TongSC. Observer‐based adaptive fuzzy control for switched stochastic nonlinear systems with partial tracking errors constrained. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2016;46(12):1605‐1617.
[22] LiYM, SuiS, TongSC. Adaptive fuzzy control design for stochastic nonlinear switched systems with arbitrary switchings and unmodeled dynamics. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2017;47(2):403‐414.
[23] NamadchianZ, RouhaniM. Observer‐based adaptive neural control for switched stochastic pure‐feedback systems with input saturation. Neurocomputing. 2020;375:80‐90.
[24] MinX, LiYM, TongSC. Adaptive fuzzy output feedback inverse optimal control for vehicle active suspension systems. Neurocomputing. 2020;403:257‐267.
[25] LiYM, LiuYJ, TongSC. Observer‐based neuro‐adaptive optimized control of strict‐feedback nonlinear systems with state constraints. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3051030 · doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3051030
[26] LiuYJ, ZengQ, TongS, ChenCLP, LiuL. Adaptive neural network control for active suspension systems with time‐varying vertical displacement and speed constraints. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2019;66(12):9458‐9466.
[27] LitakG, BorowiecM, FriswellM, SzabelskiK. Chaotic vibration of a quarter‐vehicle model excited by the road surface profile. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2008;13(7):1373‐1383. · Zbl 1221.70037
[28] SunK, MouS, QiuJ, WangT, GaoH. Adaptive fuzzy control for nontriangular structural stochastic switched nonlinear systems with full state constraints. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2019;27(8):1587‐1601.
[29] LiuY, TongS. Barrier Lyapunov functions‐based adaptive control for a class of nonlinear pure‐feedback systems with full state constraints. Automatica. 2016;64:70‐75. · Zbl 1329.93088
[30] WenGX, ChenCLP, LiWN. Simplified optimized control using reinforcement learning algorithm for a class of stochastic nonlinear systems. Inf Sci. 2020;517:230‐243. · Zbl 1461.93555
[31] XiaM, ZhangT. Adaptive neural dynamic surface control for full state constrained stochastic nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics. J Franklin Inst. 2019;356:129‐146. · Zbl 1405.93138
[32] LiuYJ, LuSM, TongSC, ChenXK, ChenCLP, LiDJ. Adaptive control‐based barrier Lyapunov functions for a class of stochastic nonlinear systems with full state constraints. Automatica. 2018;87:83‐93. · Zbl 1378.93137
[33] MinX, LiYM, TongSC. Adaptive fuzzy optimal control for a class of active suspension systems with full‐state constraints. IET Intell Transp Syst. 2020;14(5):371‐381.
[34] JiHB, XiHS. Adaptive output‐feedback tracking of stochastic nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2006;51(2):355‐360. · Zbl 1366.93620
[35] YangX, LiuDR, WeiQL. Online approximate optimal control for affine non‐linear systems with unknown internal dynamics using adaptive dynamic programming. IET Control Theory Appl. 2014;8(16):1676‐1688.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.