| [1] |
Agresti, A.; Kotz, S.; Johnson, N. L., Fallacies, Statistical, Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, 3, 24-28 (1983), New York: Wiley, New York |
| [2] |
Aldrich, J., Correlations Genuine and Spurious in Pearson and Yule, Statistical Science, 10, 364-376 (1995) |
| [3] |
Alin, A., Simpson’s Paradox, WIREs Computational Statistics, 2, 247-250 (2010) |
| [4] |
Bickel, P. J.; Hammel, E. A.; O’Connell, J. W., Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions: Data From Berkeley, Science, 187, 398-404 (1975) |
| [5] |
Bishop, Y. M. M.; Fienberg, S. E.; Holland, P. W., Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice (1975), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA · Zbl 0332.62039 |
| [6] |
Blyth, C. R., On Simpson’s Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principle, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 364-366 (1972) · Zbl 0245.62008 |
| [7] |
Breslow, N. E.; Day, N. E., Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Vol. 1: The Analysis of Case Control Studies (1980), Lyon, France: WHO, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France |
| [8] |
Cartwright, N., Causal Laws and Effective Strategies, Noûs, 13, 419-437 (1979) |
| [9] |
Cartwright, N., How the Laws of Physics Lie (1983), New York: Oxford University Press, New York |
| [10] |
Cartwright, N., What is Wrong With Bayes Nets?, The Monist, 84, 242-265 (2001) |
| [11] |
Cohen, M. R.; Nagel, E., An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method (1934), New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co, New York · JFM 60.0845.02 |
| [12] |
Cornfield, J.; Haenszel, W.; Hammond, E.; Lilienfeld, A.; Shimkin, M.; Wynder, E., Smoking and Lung Cancer: Recent Evidence and a Discussion of Some Questions, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 173-203 (1959) |
| [13] |
Cox, D. R.; Wermuth, N., Causality: A Statistical View, International Statistical Review, 72, 285-305 (2004) |
| [14] |
Dupre, J.; Cartwright, N., Probability and Causality: Why Hume and Indeterminism Don’t Mix, Noûs, 22, 521-536 (1988) |
| [15] |
Fisher, R. A., Statistical Methods for Research Workers (1934), Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Scotland · JFM 60.1162.01 |
| [16] |
Greenland, S.; Neutra, R., Control of Confounding in the Assessment of Technology, International Journal of Epidemiology, 9, 361-367 (1980) |
| [17] |
Greenland, S.; Pearl, J.; Robins, J. M., Causal Diagrams for Epidemiologic Research, Epidemiology, 10, 37-48 (1999) |
| [18] |
Gunasekara, F. I.; Carter, K.; Blakely, T., Glossary for Econometrics and Epidemiology, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 858-861 (2008) |
| [19] |
Knapp, T. R., Instances of Simpson’s Paradox, College Mathematics Journal, 16, 209-211 (1985) |
| [20] |
Lesser, L. M., Representations of Reversal: An exploration of Simpson’s Paradox, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2001) |
| [21] |
Lindley, D. V.; Novick, M. R., The Role of Exchangeability in Inference, The Annals of Statistics, 9, 45-58 (1981) · Zbl 0473.62005 |
| [22] |
Malinas, G.; Bigelow, J.; Zalta, E. N., Simpson’s Paradox, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2009) |
| [23] |
Niles, H. E., Correlation, Causation, and Wright’s Theory of ‘Path Coefficients,’, Genetics, 7, 258-273 (1922) |
| [24] |
Ooi, Y. H., Simpson’s Paradox—A Survey of Past, Present, and Future Research, Wharton Research Scholars Journal (12004) |
| [25] |
Pearl, J., Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference ( (2009), New York: Cambridge University Press, New York · Zbl 1188.68291 |
| [26] |
Pearson, K.; Lee, A.; Bramley-Moore, L., Genetic (Reproductive) Selection: Inheritance of Fertility in Man and of Fecundity in Thoroughbred Racehorses, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 192, 257-330 (1899) · JFM 30.0223.01 |
| [27] |
Robins, J. M., The Control of Confounding by Intermediate Variables, Statistics in Medicine, 8, 679-701 (1989) |
| [28] |
Rosenbaum, P. R., The Consequences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable That Has Been Affected by the Treatment, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 147, 656-666 (1984) |
| [29] |
Rosenbaum, P. R., Does a Dose-Response Relationship Reduce Sensitivity to Hidden Bias?, Biostatistics, 4, 1-10 (2003) · Zbl 1139.62337 |
| [30] |
Rosenbaum, P. R.; Rubin, D. B., The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects, Biometrika, 70, 41-55 (1983) · Zbl 0522.62091 |
| [31] |
Rothman, K. J.; Greenland, S.; Lash, T. L., Modern Epidemiology ( (2008), PhiladelphiaPA: Walters Kluwer | Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaPA |
| [32] |
Schield, M., Simpson’s Paradox and Cornfield’s Conditions (1999) |
| [33] |
Schield, M., Beware the Lurking Variable: Understanding Confounding From Lurking Variables Using Graphs, STATS Magazine, 46, 14-18 (2006) |
| [34] |
Schisterman, E. F.; Cole, S. R.; Platt, R. W., Overadjustment Bias and Unnecessary Adjustment in Epidemiologic Studies, Epidemiology, 20, 488-495 (2009) |
| [35] |
Simpson, E. H., The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 238-241 (1951) · Zbl 0045.08802 |
| [36] |
Wainer, H.; Brown, L. M., Two Statistical Paradoxes in the Interpretation of Group Differences, The American Statistician, 58, 117-123 (2004) |
| [37] |
Weinberg, C. R., Toward a Clearer Definition of Confounding, American Journal of Epidemiology, 137, 1-8 (1993) |
| [38] |
Yule, G. U., Notes on the Theory of Association of Attributes in Statistics, Biometrika, 2, 121-134 (1903) |
| [39] |
Zidek, J., Maximal Simpson-Disaggregations of 2 × 2 Tables, Biometrika, 71, 187-190 (1984) · Zbl 0538.62046 |
