User talk:GreenJoe

• (Note: I got the above from User talk:Tyciol).
  

This is in response to your question. Things are going pretty well, I'm trying to pass the time, thinking of not sleeping in an attempt to sleep early monday night to reset the 'ol biological clock. A mug of coke and 3 of coffee brewing and so forth. I've been checking out the different parts of Wikipedia and all the projects and I think if I get involved in them it'll feel like I'm doing something more productive and suited to the way I think and like to address many things. I really like your userpage, it is set up much neater and more concisely than mine. If I can ever figure out coding and graphics interfaces for wikilanguage then I might try something like that sometime. I just noticed that you got the disclaimer for talk page from me, thanks for listing and all that. It makes me wonder, I never asked but that Ardenn guy might have gotten it elsewhere too, it is like some sort of induction chain. Tyciol (talk) 02:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am GREATLY offended by your edit summary that said "re-established pre-vandalised version" when I did NOT vandalise anything. I have half a mind to report this to WP:ANI. GreenJoe 00:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never said that you vandalised anything. I said "re-established pre-vandalised version". The content "The Nipissing University Student Union Council comprises mainly of two parts: the powerful executive council and the largely uninfluential student representatives. They function in much the same way the Galactic Senate and Chancellor Palpatine co-existed, with each having incredible regard for the other's concerns. Chancellor Palpatine was a jolly sith lord and he would never have done anything to jeopardize the establishment." is plainly vandalism and the editor who inserted it will be in the history. TerriersFan (talk) 01:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

_{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hey, is there any chance you could look this over? Things have been changed when it comes to references and it would help if you could. Thanks.^Mitch32^contribs 14:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Holy cow, GreenJoe, I just noticed your request for checkuser on KillAllSpammers/TeerGrub ... and that it checked out positive and has resulted in a block. Very much appreciate your help. Also appreciate knowing ... suspected but glad to know for sure. Thirdbeach (talk) 17:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice please: What's the etiquette/advisability around actually creating the page below Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_KillAllSpammers? It currently exists as an empty link. I realize there's always a workaround and this editor is determined, but would at least be a starting point. Thanks. Thirdbeach (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was a little frustrated to discover that the entire history section I added was removed. I understand the concerns about a lack of citations, but this could have been requested, or at the very least questionable sections deleted rather than the entire thing. Personally I don't think that a few controversies from the last 10 years constitutes a rigorous history of a society with over 40 years of history, but perhaps we can compromise? I am happy to put in the work of inserting varifiable references for my entire section, but I would like to know before I start the work that we are operating in good faith with one another.Jgroves (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I don't know if I can email it to you but I can certainly move it to a safe place for you. I've put it here. Thanks, Mallanox 19:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]