Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:57, 7 January 2015

Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.

You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.

Click here to add a new section

Shortcuts

The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

Crat tasks
RfAs	0
RfBs	0
Overdue RfBs	0
Overdue RfAs	0
BRFAs	15
Approved BRFAs	0

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

It is 11:28:24 on October 3, 2024, according to the server's time and date.

Useight

Is this also an inactive admin? Last edit 12:01, 16 August 2012, Last log 14:24, 26 July 2012, Logged in at 8 January 2014, also one year ago.--GZWDer (talk) 05:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Useight is still active, although not under that account. These days they edit using User:Useight's Public Sock. 28bytes (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resysop

Misza13 (current rights · rights management · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) · block log)

Dear Bureaucrats, I have been procedurally desysopped due to inactivity. While I am not actively editing Wikipedia (which may or may not change in the near future), I would like to regain and retain my admin bit. Thank you & Best Regards, —Миша 13 08:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back, sort of. I see no problem with your request. If no other crat has a problem, one of us will return your bit after 24 hours has elapsed from now. Good to have you, I remember your excellent contributions. --Dweller (talk) 09:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No concerns. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flag Wikinews Importer Bot (talk · contribs) as bot

Another request for you cool people. :)

I have decided to reactivate my Wikinews Importer Bot (current rights · rights management · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) · block log) after a year of inactivity (due to Toolserver's decommissioning) - after some tinkering, it seems to be working again. The bot was conceived here: User talk:Misza13/Archives/2008/01#An "interwiki transclusion bot", I wrote it and started operating per WP:JUSTDOIT. Since it never had a formal BRFA, it never got a +bot flag either. Not that it makes a lot of difference, but for some people watching the recent changes, it might. Thus, can I please get a +bot flag on it, pretty please? Best, —Миша 13 21:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 :Welcome back, sort of. I see no problem with your request. If no other crat has a problem, one of us will return your bit after 24 hours has elapsed from now. Good to have you, I remember your excellent contributions. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 09:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 :No concerns. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[WP:HIJCS|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<font color="maroon">Join WP Japan</font>]]!</small> 18:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
+== Flag {{user|Wikinews Importer Bot}} as bot ==
+Another request for you cool people. :)
+I have decided to reactivate my {{userrights|Wikinews Importer Bot}} after a year of inactivity (due to Toolserver's decommissioning) - after some tinkering, it seems to be working again. The bot was conceived here: [[User talk:Misza13/Archives/2008/01#An "interwiki transclusion bot"]], I wrote it and started operating per [[WP:JUSTDOIT]]. Since it never had a formal BRFA, it never got a +bot flag either. Not that it makes a lot of difference, but for some people watching the recent changes, it might. Thus, can I please get a +bot flag on it, pretty please? Best, &mdash;[[User:Misza13|Миша]][[User talk:Misza13|<span style="color:green">'''13'''</span>]] 21:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)