User talk:184.99.172.218: Difference between revisions
Oracle Orb (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Hi there. You've been removing cats from articles and claiming "over-categorisation". What do you mean by this? Given, for instance, that you've removed articles on algal groups from the algae category, it's not at all clear why this is necessary. There is not, AFAIK, any limit on the number of categories an article can be in. And it seems rather perverse for ''bona fide'' algal articles not to appear to readers perusing the relevant category (especially groups like [[diatoms]] that are major players in the world of algae). Anyway, I've reverted your edits in a few of the articles, but will wait to hear an explanation from you before I revert the rest. I might well be missing some obvious reason for thinning the category count. Cheers, --[[User:Plumbago|P<small>LUMBAGO</small>]] 09:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC) |
Hi there. You've been removing cats from articles and claiming "over-categorisation". What do you mean by this? Given, for instance, that you've removed articles on algal groups from the algae category, it's not at all clear why this is necessary. There is not, AFAIK, any limit on the number of categories an article can be in. And it seems rather perverse for ''bona fide'' algal articles not to appear to readers perusing the relevant category (especially groups like [[diatoms]] that are major players in the world of algae). Anyway, I've reverted your edits in a few of the articles, but will wait to hear an explanation from you before I revert the rest. I might well be missing some obvious reason for thinning the category count. Cheers, --[[User:Plumbago|P<small>LUMBAGO</small>]] 09:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Little Something== |
|||
{{cookie}} |
|||
In real life I just ate a cookie myself! [[Special:Contributions/86.173.33.234|86.173.33.234]] ([[User talk:86.173.33.234|talk]]) 14:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Talkback== |
|||
{{talkback|Alacante45|Alacante45's latest sock|ts=17:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)}} |
|||
:0 :0 :0 :0 [[User:Oracle Orb|Oracle Orb]] ([[User talk:Oracle Orb|talk]]) 17:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:50, 7 October 2010
|
Talkback
Be nice. FYI, anyone can post at ANI. Tommy! 00:12, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Over-categorisation
Hi there. You've been removing cats from articles and claiming "over-categorisation". What do you mean by this? Given, for instance, that you've removed articles on algal groups from the algae category, it's not at all clear why this is necessary. There is not, AFAIK, any limit on the number of categories an article can be in. And it seems rather perverse for bona fide algal articles not to appear to readers perusing the relevant category (especially groups like diatoms that are major players in the world of algae). Anyway, I've reverted your edits in a few of the articles, but will wait to hear an explanation from you before I revert the rest. I might well be missing some obvious reason for thinning the category count. Cheers, --PLUMBAGO 09:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)