User talk:Leuko: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Explaning what happened: new section |
not around since August 2011 |
||
| (544 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=5 August 2011}} |
|||
{{User talk:Leuko/Header}} |
{{User talk:Leuko/Header}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}} |
|archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}} |
||
|maxarchivesize = 50K |
|maxarchivesize = 50K |
||
|counter = |
|counter = |
||
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
<!--Add new comments below this line at the end--> |
<!--Add new comments below this line at the end--> |
||
== |
== == |
||
Hello, Leuko! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience. |
|||
* '''Easy to use''' - Unlike other tools, RedWarn uses easy to interpret icons and simple summaries for common actions, reducing both learning and reading times. |
|||
{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|Rollbackgiven}} |
|||
*'''Supports rollback and rollback-like functionality''' - Unlike Twinkle, RedWarn supports both rollback and rollback-like functionality for users will rollback permissions. This decreases waiting times during rollbacks. |
|||
[[File:Wikipedia Rollback.svg|right|80px]] |
|||
I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A{{PAGENAME}} granted] rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of ''reverting [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]'', and that you will not abuse it by reverting [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good-faith]] edits or to [[Wikipedia:Edit war|revert-war]]. For information on rollback, see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]] and [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]]. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 15:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Making life easier on the battlefield''' - Ever been in the middle of a vandalism war or campaign, frantically reloading the history page to see a new edit? No more! Enabling RedWarn's "Alert on Change" feature will automatically send you to the latest edit when a new edit occurs - and if you're working on something else, RedWarn will send you a notification while the tab is still open in the background. No time wasted. |
|||
:Thanks! [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 16:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Rollback previews''' - If you're ever worried about the changes a rollback will make, especially in the case of reverting good faith edits, you can click the rollback preview button to preview the difference a rollback will make, with the version that will be restored on the right, and the latest revision on the left. |
|||
*'''Always the latest revision''' - RedWarn will automatically redirect you to the latest revision if the rollback is no longer for the latest revision - no more frustrating errors. |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
*'''Fast''' - RedWarn can automatically select a warning level, and, on vandalism and content removal rollbacks, automatically select a warning template. |
|||
Thanks for warning the vandal on my talk page about personal attacks! [[User:Dogposter|<font color="brown">Dog</font>]][[User_talk:Dogposter|<font color="red">poster</font>]] 17:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:No problem. [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 21:14, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Built on your feedback''' - RedWarn is receiving frequent feature additions and changes based on your feedback. If there's something you don't like, or would like to see, just say! |
|||
== is this guy for real == |
|||
*'''and many more features''' ...but I don't want to fill your userpage. |
|||
So who's the vandal you or [[user: 209.6.238.201]]? If its him I'm going to request block; however, he does not seem to have many vandal edits [[User:B.s.n.R.N.|<font color="black">♠</font> <span style="color:black">'''''B.s.n.'''''</span>]] [[User talk:B.s.n.R.N.|<font color="red">♥</font><span style="color:Red">'''''R.N.'''''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/B.s.n.R.N.|contribs]] 22:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Well it's him/her... But unfortunately, I don't think enough to get a block - just a lot of annoying POV-pushing. [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 22:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: Careful with using Huggle. They will take it away for using it in RVT wars. If it is not blatent vandalism, it is better to just leave it and let the editors of the article police it. Or do an Undue with an edit summary. Or even ask what their intentions are on thier talk page and request for them to leave an edit summary. It looks as if he isn't actua;;y causing straight out vandalism with his edits. Just a word of advice. Take care and continue the good fight. [[User:B.s.n.R.N.|<font color="black">♠</font> <span style="color:black">'''''B.s.n.'''''</span>]] [[User talk:B.s.n.R.N.|<font color="red">♥</font><span style="color:Red">'''''R.N.'''''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/B.s.n.R.N.|contribs]] 22:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah, my bad I misread it and clicked to quickly. But after reading the "article," I found it to be more of a POV pushing essay, so I AfD'ed it. Thanks, [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 22:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
I would like to formally retract my earlier 'plating of your page. Please review the [[WP:PRESERVE]] policy, at any rate, as far as trying to crack the nut of what constitutes vandalism. While POVs can indeed be pushed by adding content, deleting content is rarely acceptable, all the more so when it is fully sourced. -- [[Special:Contributions/209.6.238.201|209.6.238.201]] ([[User talk:209.6.238.201|talk]]) 22:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
RedWarn is currently in use by [[WP:MOSTIMPORTED|over 35]] other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. If you're interested, please see see the [[WP:REDWARN|RedWarn tool page]] for more information on RedWarn's features which I haven't listed here. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! [[User:Ed6767|<span style="font-family:'Roboto',sans-serif;font-weight:300;color:red;text-shadow: 2px 2px 10px black;">Ed6767</span>]] [[User talk:Ed6767|<span style="color:black;"><strong>talk!</strong></span>]] 23:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== [[National Endowment for Alzheimer's Research]] == |
|||
I apologize for the breach of etiquette, which was unintended. But it appears heavy-handed to delete this article before the discussion has settled the matter? And your comment on spam is really not a valid criticism. There are many additions which could be made to the article, but instead of deleting valid contributions, you might consider soliciting improvements to the entry instead? Do please reconsider your comments and position. Danke schoen. [[User:Doctorjanson|Doctorjanson]] ([[User talk:Doctorjanson|talk]]) 23:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: The article will not be deleted until the discussion has settled the matter at AfD. We will gather everyone's opinions and decide what to do: keep/improve or delete. Thanks, [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 23:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== vandalism == |
|||
Thanks for reverting the vandalism for the article [[Battle of Long Tần]]. I didn't know how to revert so I had to manually undo. --<font color="blue" face="Impact" size="3">[[User:Tex KT|TEX]] <sup>[[User talk:Tex KT|t]]</sup></sub></font>[[Special:Contributions/Tex KT|c]] 01:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:No problem - a lot easier to do it automatically. :-) [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 02:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Serena Williams]] == |
|||
My edit on Serena Williams was not intended as vandalism. In fact, I do not remember what I wrote. It was in the heat of the moment, and I always give 200% effort in everything I do, whether it is tennis, or editing Wikipedia. Cheers, and best wishes. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.43.233.110|68.43.233.110]] ([[User talk:68.43.233.110|talk]]) 02:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I don't remember either, so hopefully it was correct. :-) [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 02:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Appropriate external links are inappropriate? == |
|||
Hi Leuko! Sorry if this isn't where I'm supposed to reply to you, I'm new to this. I just had an edit of mine reverted that I posted on the 'Pole dance' page, and got a message from you asking me not to post "inappropriate" external links. My links pointed to the most popular and useful pole dance/fitness forums and help sites on the net (studioveena and polejunkies). I can see why you might think it was advertising or something, but I'm confused why 'wikipole.org' is an acceptable external link when these free instructional, educational and resourceful websites are not. Please let me know what made you decide that I deserved a warning. {{unsigned|Asphyxiatedg}} |
|||
:Hi, yes this is the appropriate page. A couple of reasons that your links were tagged as spam. 1) Adding the links is your first and only contribution. 2) They are commercial sites - the former requires registrations and the latter has a shop trying to sell stuff. 3) Worst of all, there was an affiliate link. All of these point to posting the links for personal gain, which is a violation of the [[WP:EL|external links policy]] and [[WP:SPAM]]. [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 05:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Hi, thanks for the reply. I'm not sure what 'affiliate link' means, and I have made many edits to wikipedia over the years but never registered til now (which I was forced to do because the computer I was using had a shared IP with a bad record it seemed). Oh well, I thought the links were useful and relevant, especially since the creator of wikipole (the acceptable external link) is a member of both those sites too. |
|||
== External link in the "Henna" article == |
|||
The link to www.hennapage.com in the "external links" section is not spam and was permitted after considerable discussion with two other editors several years ago during an extensive rewrite of the henna entry, as you can see in the discussion section of the article. The site is primarily informational and contains links to articles, books and bibliographies on the subject, as well as articles written by the site owner who is a PhD candidate in geography and is writing her dissertation on the spread of henna usage and traditions in the West.[[User:49oxen|49oxen]] ([[User talk:49oxen|talk]]) 10:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Sorry, missed the talk page - first day with Huggle and it just looked like spam. (Though looking more thoroughly at the link, it is not). My apologies. [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 16:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::No problem...Thank you. [[User:49oxen|49oxen]] ([[User talk:49oxen|talk]]) 02:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Barnstar == |
|||
[[File:Original_Barnstar.png|100px|frame|left|After a really long absence I am extremely impressed with your return and number of edits in such a short period of time Here's a barnstar rewarding you for your efforts. [[User:Basket of Puppies|<font color="brown" size="2" face="Constantia">'''Basket of Puppies'''</font>]] 16:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)]] |
|||
:Thanks! [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 16:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of panels making life or death decisions]] == |
|||
I added a link to your statement at the discussion page which made it clear which version of this page you were referring to. This is because I have cleaned up the article a bit (given that it is going to take a week to delete) and was afraid that the new cleaned up version might seem to be less objectionable (though personally I don't think it does). Some other editor who I think has pushed this article has taken away that link I added on the grounds that I was engaging in an inappropriate editing of your words. You may wish to add back the link if you think that is appropriate, but if you think I acted wrongly then I apologise unreservedly. |
|||
Regards--[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 21:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I hadn't realized that the article changed so much. While I don't mind the adding of the link, i'll leave it alone, and just add my comments re: the new version. Thanks. --[[User:Leuko|Leuko]] ([[User talk:Leuko#top|talk]]) 23:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[HitClips]] == |
|||
ok i dont have to put its real in the hitclips article now <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Buck9998|Buck9998]] ([[User talk:Buck9998|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Buck9998|contribs]]) 00:54, 16 September 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Well, that should be self-explanatory since everything in WP must be [[WP:V|verifiable]]. :-) <span style="color:White;background:Maroon"><b>Leuko</b></span> <sup>[[User talk:Leuko|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Leuko|Contribs]]</sub> 00:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Judy Room Oz link on Wizard of Oz Page == |
|||
Hi! |
|||
I'm not sure why my OZ site link has been deleted. My site is no different than the link that is currently on the page for "http://www.thewizardofozonline.net/". |
|||
My OZ section is the most extensive site done about the film to date, including the Warner Bros. "official site" (which is more for DVD promotion). My site gives a complete history and information and photos, all for free. I'm certainly not trying to spam Wikipedia, nor am I trying to sell any merchandise. I'm merely providing the link to the site for people who want to get more complete information, photos, and links (including a link back here to Wikipedia!) about the film and the film's stars. |
|||
Thanks in advance for your cooperation. |
|||
Scott B. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ozianscott|Ozianscott]] ([[User talk:Ozianscott|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ozianscott|contribs]]) 02:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Please see [[WP:ELNO]] and [[WP:LINKSPAM]]. Your additions violate a few policies, namely: It's your site that you are spamming across multiple articles in an attempt to promote it. Also, the inclusion of one spam link is not a reason to include another. But thanks for pointing it out, I've removed them as well. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, <span style="color:White;background:Maroon"><b>Leuko</b></span> <sup>[[User talk:Leuko|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Leuko|Contribs]]</sub> 02:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I'm sorry, but I disagree with you. The link you provided mentions "a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article." - which is what my site is. My site actually provides more information about the film than any of the other sites linked. Definitely check it out. I only added it to the pages of the principle players (Jack Haley, etc.) because I thought that it pertained to those actors as well as to this page about the film itself. My site doesn't make any money, I'm not "promoting" it anymore than IMDB, Allmovie, Box Office Mojo, Rotten Tomatoes, etc. are. And they ARE making money and selling things and promoting their sites. I still don't see the difference. Again, mine is much more comprehensive than the one or two page listings those sites have. You're not being fair about this at all. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ozianscott|Ozianscott]] ([[User talk:Ozianscott|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ozianscott|contribs]]) 02:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:::Well, sorry, inserting the same link into multiple articles is spamming. And you do have a paypal link for donations on your page, which does give an economic incentive to spam. That being said, if you feel that the addition of your link would benefit the encyclopedia project, suggest it's addition on the article's talk page. If a consensus of editors agreee, and are willing to overlook the violations of the above listed policies, then it will be added. <span style="color:White;background:Maroon"><b>Leuko</b></span> <sup>[[User talk:Leuko|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Leuko|Contribs]]</sub> 02:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::I'll do that. I didn't think putting the same link in articles on the same subject would be spamming. And honestly, I was doing that for information only, there was no economic incentive to my posting the links at all. I have a donation page, to help defray the cost of running the site, but believe me it's definitely NOT a money maker at all. Again, there's still not difference with the IMDB and other links, which are on almost all of the pages. At any rate, do I simply go to the article and find a "talk page"? Sorry, I'm not as versed in the Wikipedia format <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ozianscott|Ozianscott]] ([[User talk:Ozianscott|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ozianscott|contribs]]) 02:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:::::Yup, go to the article, and on the top bar there is a talk tab. <span style="color:White;background:Maroon"><b>Leuko</b></span> <sup>[[User talk:Leuko|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Leuko|Contribs]]</sub> 03:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Speedy deletion declined: [[Allan Pease]] == |
|||
Hello Leuko, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of [[Allan Pease]] - a page you tagged - because: '''was made spammy recently, check history, previous non-spam version exists.''' Please review the [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]] before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #AC0000">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #35628F">Why</span>]]''' 08:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Which is still full of unverified claims so tagged for 2 years... [[User:Leuko|<span style="color:White;background:Maroon"><b>Leuko</b></span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Leuko|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Leuko|Contribs]]</sub> 16:08, 16 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Explaning what happened == |
|||
Firstly it was I who made all the last insertions including I Ching external link and this latter because I am the translator of the first arabic edition of the I Ching. As for the all links I lately inserted add to my own activities wheather in literary or translation achievement, as I'm not only poet, I am also novelist, journalist and translator. So plz help in regaining my additions, thank u.[[User:Basharabdulah|Basharabdulah]] ([[User talk:Basharabdulah|talk]]) 23:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 00:11, 20 November 2023
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Leuko has not edited Wikipedia since 5 August 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Status: Busy 
| Please leave a . |
When editing this page:
- Please put comments on new topics in a separate section.
- Please put newer comments at the bottom of the page/section.
- Please sign your name with "~~~~".
- Please indent replies to already-posted text with ":".
- I will reply to your comments on this page unless you ask otherwise.
Index
|
||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Invitation to RedWarn
[edit]Hello, Leuko! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.
- Easy to use - Unlike other tools, RedWarn uses easy to interpret icons and simple summaries for common actions, reducing both learning and reading times.
- Supports rollback and rollback-like functionality - Unlike Twinkle, RedWarn supports both rollback and rollback-like functionality for users will rollback permissions. This decreases waiting times during rollbacks.
- Making life easier on the battlefield - Ever been in the middle of a vandalism war or campaign, frantically reloading the history page to see a new edit? No more! Enabling RedWarn's "Alert on Change" feature will automatically send you to the latest edit when a new edit occurs - and if you're working on something else, RedWarn will send you a notification while the tab is still open in the background. No time wasted.
- Rollback previews - If you're ever worried about the changes a rollback will make, especially in the case of reverting good faith edits, you can click the rollback preview button to preview the difference a rollback will make, with the version that will be restored on the right, and the latest revision on the left.
- Always the latest revision - RedWarn will automatically redirect you to the latest revision if the rollback is no longer for the latest revision - no more frustrating errors.
- Fast - RedWarn can automatically select a warning level, and, on vandalism and content removal rollbacks, automatically select a warning template.
- Built on your feedback - RedWarn is receiving frequent feature additions and changes based on your feedback. If there's something you don't like, or would like to see, just say!
- and many more features ...but I don't want to fill your userpage.
RedWarn is currently in use by over 35 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. If you're interested, please see see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features which I haven't listed here. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 23:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC)