Wikidata:Property proposal/is invariant under: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
add |
→{{int:Talk}}: +1 |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
==={{int:Talk}}=== |
==={{int:Talk}}=== |
||
* {{s}}, an important property for science.--[[User:Arbnos|Arbnos]] ([[User talk:Arbnos|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC) |
* {{s}}, an important property for science.--[[User:Arbnos|Arbnos]] ([[User talk:Arbnos|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
* {{s}} Definitely an important mathematical property --[[User:YjM|YjM]] | <sub>[[User talk:YjM|d]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/YjM|c]]</sup> 23:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:28, 12 February 2024
is invariant under
You have not transcluded your proposal on Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science yet. Please do it.
Under discussion
Motivation
"A is invariant / constant under, or preserved / kept unchanged by B" is usually an important property of A, but currently the way to model this seems to be Ainstance of (P31)invariant (Q188211)
Some other notes:
- When object is a symmetry, it might be possible to say regular icosahedron (Q18015071)has characteristic (P1552)icosahedral symmetry (Q5986738), but "symmetry" besides being a property can also mean the transformation itself (or the whole symmetry group (Q902019) of transformations), so I believe the "unchanged by" relation is more suitable than has characteristic (P1552), the latter also encouraging to use a "more specific property".
- One might also consider the inverse property “is symmetry of / keeps constant / preserves”. It works well for the defining properties e.g. Equiareal map (Q5384436)preservesarea (Q11500) and isothermal process (Q486921)preservestemperature (Q11466), but this is in general one to many e.g. determinant (Q178546), trace (Q321102), and rank (Q656784) are invariant under change of basis (Q810255), and also many notable polyhedrons share the same symmetry type.
- One might also consider separating the "symmetry group / has symmetry" property for geometric objects from this "is invariant under" property. I think there is no need because symmetry properties are defined as being invariant under certain transformations.
Would this be a useful property to have?
–HTinC23 (talk) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Discussion
- Support, an important property for science.--Arbnos (talk) 09:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely an important mathematical property --YjM | dc 23:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)