This was published 1 year ago
Stanley Tucci is perfect in TV’s new buzz-worthy crime drama
By Debi Enker
I think I’d probably be happy watching Stanley Tucci reading a map or doing a jigsaw puzzle. Along with more than a million others, I’ve certainly enjoyed watching the actor, screenwriter, director, producer, author, food lover and former bartender mixing a negroni in his Instagram instructional video. That singular clip became a global sensation and a virtual tonic during the 2020 lockdowns.
Our kitchen shelves hold a cherished copy of his first family cookbook, Cucina & Famiglia, purchased in 1999 at a book launch in New York, which he good-naturedly signed with his own name as well as that of “Richard Cross”, because my husband and I had relished his performance as the smoothly sinister suspect in the mid-’90s legal drama series, Murder One.
Since then, there’s been a steady procession of captivating performances: the shrewd and quietly supportive fashion-magazine art director in The Devil Wears Prada; the oily, flamboyant TV host in The Hunger Games; the hilariously harried political adviser in Maid in Manhattan; the loving husband to Meryl Streep’s Julia Child in Julie & Julia; the devoted partner to Colin Firth in Supernova. As well, there’s the wonderful restaurant movie, Big Night, which he co-wrote, co-directed, co-produced and co-starred in, about two brothers in the 1950s who plan a lavish last hurrah of a banquet for their struggling Italian restaurant.
Tucci often brings a wry, bracingly dry humour and a twinkling eye to his performances, even when he’s playing a killer, like the methodical assassin of The Pelican Brief, or one of the two main characters in Inside Man (Netflix).
In creator and writer Steven Moffat’s short, surprising and satisfying four-part crime drama, Tucci is Jefferson Grieff, a convicted murderer on Death Row who’s also a professor of criminology. As the date of his execution looms, he seems accepting of his fate. In fact, he reckons he deserves it for killing and decapitating his wife. But, in the meantime, he and the serial killer in the neighbouring cell, Dillon Kempton (Atkins Estimond), have established an unofficial sideline in crime solving with the consent of the prison warden (Dylan Baker).
In this strand of its dual storyline, the series, shaped by the deft hand of Moffat (Sherlock, Doctor Who, The Time Traveler’s Wife and, further back, the excellent Press Gang), sets up a playful refashioning of the Sherlock Holmes story. Grieff is the brilliant, mercurial one and his Dr Watson is a lumbering African-American with a mischievous manner and a photographic memory who’s killed more than a dozen women, turned rib cages into book cases and eaten toes. They’re quite a combo.
As that inventive variation on the famed detective duo develops, another plotline runs alongside in intriguing and suspenseful style. It involves the enigmatic Janice (Dolly Wells) and ambitious crime journalist Beth (Lydia West) and its initial set-up suggests that things and people are not necessarily what they seem and that events can twist and turn in unpredictable ways.
In the arresting opening sequence, set on a train, Janice is on her way to meet Harry Watling (David Tennant). A vicar in a pretty village, he’s confident about his role and his place in the world. He’s married to Mary (Lyndsey Marshal) and they have a teenage son, Ben (Louis Oliver), whom Janice is tutoring in maths. Theirs is a stable and comfortable life that’s about to be disrupted in a wildly dramatic fashion, and Tennant, like Tucci, is perfectly cast, with director Paul McGuigan (Sherlock, Dracula) making good use of his charisma and nervy energy.
The two initially remote strands gradually wind together, at times in ways that might seem unbelievable if they weren’t being manipulated by a writer as adroit as Moffat. He makes even the most fanciful narrative leaps seem credible, in part because he manages to keep the pace rollicking along so rapidly that there’s little time to pause and reflect on such mundane matters.
Underpinning the considerable tension about how this two-pronged tale might play out is the role in both story strands of morality and ethics. They’re a key issue for Grieff, as well as for Harry and Mary. And central to both storylines is the question of what people are capable of doing, and what actions they can justify, in order to protect themselves or their loved ones. What compromises are they prepared to make, what values will they betray? Grieff is firm in his belief that anyone can be a killer given the right circumstances and the horrible mess that the “sexy vicar” finds himself tangled in supports that view.
In spite of the quality of the series and its excellent credentials, Inside Man appears to have generated relatively little fanfare. It’s arrived quietly amid the ongoing parade of streamer offerings, without attracting much buzz. It deserves more and, given that its cluey writer leaves a few tantalising plot threads dangling, it looks likely to continue, although there’s been no official word on a second season. But given the series’ conspicuous assets, it would be surprising if there wasn’t more engrossing business involving Grieff and Dillon to come.
Inside Man is streaming on Netflix.
Find out the next TV, streaming series and movies to add to your must-sees. Get The Watchlist delivered every Thursday.
Reward your time with these TV shows
- Visceral yet bittersweet, Carmy (played by Shameless star Jeremy Allen White) is a fine dining chef who returns to his late brother’s broken down restaurant, The Beef, determined to turn it around but The Beef, has other ideas. The Bear is a rare critic and people’s favourite.
- Four Irish sisters plot to murder their abusive brother-in-law. With Sharon Horgan (Pulling, Catastrophe and Motherland) writer and star of Bad Sisters, what could possibly go wrong?
- Want to feel good about the world for 61 minutes? Old People’s Homes for Teenagers follows an intergenerational experiment that brings together older Australians and teenagers. They should have nothing in common but they do: both groups are lonely, and both don’t understand the other at all - at first.