Intercomparison of PurpleAir Sensor Performance over Three Years Indoors and Outdoors at a Home: Bias, Precision, and Limit of Detection Using an Improved Algorithm for Calculating PM2.5
- PMID: 35408369
- PMCID: PMC9002513
- DOI: 10.3390/s22072755
Intercomparison of PurpleAir Sensor Performance over Three Years Indoors and Outdoors at a Home: Bias, Precision, and Limit of Detection Using an Improved Algorithm for Calculating PM2.5
Abstract
Low-cost particle sensors are now used worldwide to monitor outdoor air quality. However, they have only been in wide use for a few years. Are they reliable? Does their performance deteriorate over time? Are the algorithms for calculating PM2.5 concentrations provided by the sensor manufacturers accurate? We investigate these questions using continuous measurements of four PurpleAir monitors (8 sensors) under normal conditions inside and outside a home for 1.5-3 years. A recently developed algorithm (called ALT-CF3) is compared to the two existing algorithms (CF1 and CF_ATM) provided by the Plantower manufacturer of the PMS 5003 sensors used in PurpleAir PA-II monitors. Results. The Plantower CF1 algorithm lost 25-50% of all indoor data due in part to the practice of assigning zero to all concentrations below a threshold. None of these data were lost using the ALT-CF3 algorithm. Approximately 92% of all data showed precision better than 20% using the ALT-CF3 algorithm, but only approximately 45-75% of data achieved that level using the Plantower CF1 algorithm. The limits of detection (LODs) using the ALT-CF3 algorithm were mostly under 1 µg/m3, compared to approximately 3-10 µg/m3 using the Plantower CF1 algorithm. The percentage of observations exceeding the LOD was 53-92% for the ALT-CF3 algorithm, but only 16-44% for the Plantower CF1 algorithm. At the low indoor PM2.5 concentrations found in many homes, the Plantower algorithms appear poorly suited.
Keywords: ALT-CF3; CF1; PM2.5; PMS-5003 sensors; Plantower; PurpleAir; limit of detection; low-cost particle monitors; precision.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Calibration of PurpleAir PA-I and PA-II Monitors Using Daily Mean PM2.5 Concentrations Measured in California, Washington, and Oregon from 2017 to 2021.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;22(13):4741. doi: 10.3390/s22134741. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35808235 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Indoor-Outdoor PM2.5 Measurements Using PurpleAir Sensors: An Improved Method of Calculating Indoor-Generated and Outdoor-Infiltrated Contributions to Potential Indoor Exposure.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;23(3):1160. doi: 10.3390/s23031160. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36772199 Free PMC article.
-
Cracking the code-Matching a proprietary algorithm for a low-cost sensor measuring PM1 and PM2.5.Sci Total Environ. 2023 Oct 1;893:164874. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164874. Epub 2023 Jun 17. Sci Total Environ. 2023. PMID: 37336395
-
Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors.Environ Pollut. 2019 Feb;245:932-940. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.065. Epub 2018 Nov 24. Environ Pollut. 2019. PMID: 30682749
-
Particulate Matter Measurement Indoors: A Review of Metrics, Sensors, Needs, and Applications.Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Oct 15;53(20):11644-11656. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03425. Epub 2019 Sep 25. Environ Sci Technol. 2019. PMID: 31512864 Review.
Cited by
-
Low-Cost Indoor Sensor Deployment for Predicting PM2.5 Exposure.ACS EST Air. 2024 May 21;1(8):767-779. doi: 10.1021/acsestair.3c00105. eCollection 2024 Aug 9. ACS EST Air. 2024. PMID: 39144754
-
Improvement of Surface PM2.5 Diurnal Variation Simulations in East Africa for the MAIA Satellite Mission.ACS EST Air. 2024 Jan 29;1(4):223-233. doi: 10.1021/acsestair.3c00008. eCollection 2024 Apr 12. ACS EST Air. 2024. PMID: 38633207 Free PMC article.
-
222 nm far-UVC light markedly reduces the level of infectious airborne virus in an occupied room.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 20;14(1):6722. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57441-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38509265 Free PMC article.
-
Laboratory Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors to Measure Transient Events of Pollution-Part B-Particle Number Concentrations.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 4;23(17):7657. doi: 10.3390/s23177657. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37688113 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial Variation of PM2.5 Indoors and Outdoors: Results from 261 Regulatory Monitors Compared to 14,000 Low-Cost Monitors in Three Western States over 4.7 Years.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 29;23(9):4387. doi: 10.3390/s23094387. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37177591 Free PMC article.
References
-
- AQ-SPEC Field Evaluation Purple Air PM Sensor. [(accessed on 30 March 2022)];2016 Available online: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/aq-spec/field-evaluations/purple....
-
- He M., Kuerbanjiang N., Dhaniyala S. Performance characteristics of the low-cost Plantower PMS optical sensor. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2020;54:232–241. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1696015. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous