Quantifying the Impact of Atmospheric Transport Uncertainty on CO2 Surface Flux Estimates
- PMID: 31244506
- PMCID: PMC6582606
- DOI: 10.1029/2018GB006086
Quantifying the Impact of Atmospheric Transport Uncertainty on CO2 Surface Flux Estimates
Abstract
We show that transport differences between two commonly used global chemical transport models, GEOS-Chem and TM5, lead to systematic space-time differences in modeled distributions of carbon dioxide and sulfur hexafluoride. The distribution of differences suggests inconsistencies between the transport simulated by the models, most likely due to the representation of vertical motion. We further demonstrate that these transport differences result in systematic differences in surface CO2 flux estimated by a collection of global atmospheric inverse models using TM5 and GEOS-Chem and constrained by in situ and satellite observations. While the impact on inferred surface fluxes is most easily illustrated in the magnitude of the seasonal cycle of surface CO2 exchange, it is the annual carbon budgets that are particularly relevant for carbon cycle science and policy. We show that inverse model flux estimates for large zonal bands can have systematic biases of up to 1.7 PgC/year due to large-scale transport uncertainty. These uncertainties will propagate directly into analysis of the annual meridional CO2 flux gradient between the tropics and northern midlatitudes, a key metric for understanding the location, and more importantly the processes, responsible for the annual global carbon sink. The research suggests that variability among transport models remains the largest source of uncertainty across global flux inversion systems and highlights the importance both of using model ensembles and of using independent constraints to evaluate simulated transport.
Keywords: GEOS‐Chem; OCO‐2; TM5; atmosphere; carbon; inversions.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Global Synthesis Inversion Analysis of Recent Variability in CO2 Fluxes Using GOSAT and In Situ Observations.Atmos Chem Phys. 2018 Aug;18(15):11097-11124. doi: 10.5194/acp-18-11097-2018. Epub 2018 Aug 9. Atmos Chem Phys. 2018. PMID: 33868395 Free PMC article.
-
Weaker regional carbon uptake albeit with stronger seasonal amplitude in northern mid-latitudes estimated by higher resolution GEOS-Chem model.Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169477. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169477. Epub 2023 Dec 22. Sci Total Environ. 2024. PMID: 38143002
-
Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models.Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):626-30. doi: 10.1038/415626a. Nature. 2002. PMID: 11832942
-
[Research progress on urban carbon fluxes based on eddy covariance technique].Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014 Feb;25(2):611-9. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014. PMID: 24830264 Review. Chinese.
-
Global Air-Sea Fluxes of Heat, Fresh Water, and Momentum: Energy Budget Closure and Unanswered Questions.Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2019 Jan 3;11:227-248. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060704. Epub 2018 Aug 29. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2019. PMID: 30156969 Review.
Cited by
-
Slowdown in China's methane emission growth.Natl Sci Rev. 2024 Jun 26;11(8):nwae223. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae223. eCollection 2024 Aug. Natl Sci Rev. 2024. PMID: 39262925 Free PMC article.
-
Improved atmospheric constraints on Southern Ocean CO2 exchange.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Feb 6;121(6):e2309333121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309333121. Epub 2024 Jan 30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 38289951 Free PMC article.
-
National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations.Nat Commun. 2023 Aug 16;14(1):4948. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6. Nat Commun. 2023. PMID: 37587101 Free PMC article.
-
Airborne Lidar Measurements of XCO2 in Synoptically Active Environment and Associated Comparisons With Numerical Simulations.J Geophys Res Atmos. 2022 Aug 27;127(16):e2021JD035664. doi: 10.1029/2021JD035664. Epub 2022 Aug 17. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2022. PMID: 36582815 Free PMC article.
-
Global monthly gridded atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations under the historical and future scenarios.Sci Data. 2022 Mar 11;9(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01196-7. Sci Data. 2022. PMID: 35277521 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barnes, E. A. , Parazoo, N. , Orbe, C. , & Denning, A. S. (2016). Isentropic transport and the seasonal cycle amplitude of CO2 . Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121, 8106–8124. 10.1002/2016JD025109 - DOI
-
- Basu, S. , Baker, D. F. , Chevallier, F. , Patra, P. K. , Liu, J. , & Miller, J. B. (2017). The impact of transport model differences on CO2 surface flux estimates from OCO‐2 retrievals of column average CO2 . Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 18, 7189–7215.
-
- Bey, I. , Jacob, D. J. , Yantosca, R. M. , Logan, J. A. , Field, B. D. , Fiore, A. M. , Li, Q. , Liu, H. Y. , Mickley, L. J. , & Schultz, M. G. (2001). Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(D19), 23,073–23,095.
-
- Bosilovich, M. G. (2015). Technical report series on global modeling and data assimilation, volume 43 MERRA‐2: Initial evaluation of the climate. NASA‐GMAO. Retrieved from https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/pubs/docs/Bosilovich803.pdf
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources