Abstract
Linear quantum measurements with independent particles are bounded by the standard quantum limit, which limits the precision achievable in estimating unknown phase parameters. The standard quantum limit can be overcome by entangling the particles, but the sensitivity is often limited by the final state readout, especially for complex entangled many-body states with non-Gaussian probability distributions. Here, by implementing an effective time-reversal protocol in an optically engineered many-body spin Hamiltonian, we demonstrate a quantum measurement with non-Gaussian states with performance beyond the limit of the readout scheme. This signal amplification through a time-reversed interaction achieves the greatest phase sensitivity improvement beyond the standard quantum limit demonstrated to date in any full Ramsey interferometer. These results open the field of robust time-reversal-based measurement protocols offering precision not too far from the Heisenberg limit. Potential applications include quantum sensors that operate at finite bandwidth, and the principle we demonstrate may also advance areas such as quantum engineering, quantum measurements and the search for new physics using optical-transition atomic clocks.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Takano, T., Fuyama, M., Namiki, R. & Takahashi, Y. Spin squeezing of a cold atomic ensemble with the nuclear spin of one-half. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 033601 (2009).
Appel, J. et al. Mesoscopic atomic entanglement for precision measurements beyond the standard quantum limit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 10960–10965 (2009).
Sewell, R. J. et al. Magnetic sensitivity beyond the projection noise limit by spin squeezing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 253605 (2012).
Hamley, C. D., Gerving, C., Hoang, T., Bookjans, E. & Chapman, M. S. Spin-nematic squeezed vacuum in a quantum gas. Nat. Phys. 8, 305–308 (2012).
Berrada, T. et al. Integrated Mach–Zehnder interferometer for Bose–Einstein condensates. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–8 (2013).
Muessel, W., Strobel, H., Linnemann, D., Hume, D. B. & Oberthaler, M. K. Scalable spin squeezing for quantum-enhanced magnetometry with Bose–Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 103004 (2014).
Schmied, R. et al. Bell correlations in a Bose–Einstein condensate. Science 352, 441–444 (2016).
Cox, K. C., Greve, G. P., Weiner, J. M. & Thompson, J. K. Deterministic squeezed states with collective measurements and feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 093602 (2016).
Hosten, O., Engelsen, N. J., Krishnakumar, R. & Kasevich, M. A. Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms. Nature 529, 505–508 (2016).
Hosten, O., Krishnakumar, R., Engelsen, N. J. & Kasevich, M. A. Quantum phase magnification. Science 352, 1552–1555 (2016).
Bohnet, J. G. et al. Quantum spin dynamics and entanglement generation with hundreds of trapped ions. Science 352, 1297 (2016).
Braverman, B. et al. Near-unitary spin squeezing in 171Yb. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 223203 (2019).
Bao, H. et al. Spin squeezing of 1011 atoms by prediction and retrodiction measurements. Nature 581, 159–163 (2020).
Pedrozo-Peñafiel, E. et al. Entanglement on an optical atomic-clock transition. Nature 588, 414–418 (2020).
Kruse, I. et al. Improvement of an atomic clock using squeezed vacuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 143004 (2016).
Monz, T. et al. 14-qubit entanglement: creation and coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130506 (2011).
Pogorelov, I. et al. Compact ion-trap quantum computing demonstrator. PRX Quantum 2, 020343 (2021).
Omran, A. et al. Generation and manipulation of Schrödinger cat states in Rydberg atom arrays. Science 365, 570–574 (2019).
Yurke, B., McCall, S. L. & Klauder, J. R. SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers. Phys. Rev. A 33, 4033–4054 (1986).
Kitagawa, M. & Ueda, M. Squeezed spin states. Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138–5143 (1993).
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M. & Heinzen, D. J. Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A 50, 67–88 (1994).
Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Wineland, D. J. & Heinzen, D. J. Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states. Phys. Rev. A 54, R4649 (1996).
Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M. K., Schmied, R. & Treutlein, P. Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018).
Leibfried, D. et al. Creation of a six-atom ‘Schrödinger cat’ state. Nature 438, 639–642 (2005).
Saffman, M., Oblak, D., Appel, J. & Polzik, E. S. Spin squeezing of atomic ensembles by multicolor quantum nondemolition measurements. Phys. Rev. A 79, 023831 (2009).
Davis, E., Bentsen, G. & Schleier-Smith, M. Approaching the Heisenberg limit without single-particle detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 053601 (2016).
Fröwis, F., Sekatski, P. & Dür, W. Detecting large quantum Fisher information with finite measurement precision. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 090801 (2016).
Leibfried, D. et al. Toward Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with multiparticle entangled states. Science 304, 1476–1478 (2004).
Toscano, F., Dalvit, D. A. R., Davidovich, L. & Zurek, W. H. Sub-Planck phase-space structures and Heisenberg-limited measurements. Phys. Rev. A 73, 023803 (2006).
Nolan, S. P., Szigeti, S. S. & Haine, S. A. Optimal and robust quantum metrology using interaction-based readouts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 193601 (2017).
Macrì, T., Smerzi, A. & Pezzè, L. Loschmidt echo for quantum metrology. Phys. Rev. A 94, 010102 (2016).
Strobel, H. et al. Fisher information and entanglement of non-Gaussian spin states. Science 345, 424–427 (2014).
Lücke, B. et al. Twin matter waves for interferometry beyond the classical limit. Science 334, 773–776 (2016).
Barontini, G., Hohmann, L., Haas, F., Estève, J. & Reichel, J. Deterministic generation of multiparticle entanglement by quantum Zeno dynamics. Science 349, 1317–1321 (2015).
Linnemann, D. et al. Quantum-enhanced sensing based on time reversal of nonlinear dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 013001 (2016).
Gilmore, K. A. et al. Quantum-enhanced sensing of displacements and electric fields with two-dimensional trapped-ion crystals. Science 373, 673–678 (2021).
Bohnet, J. G. et al. Reduced spin measurement back-action for a phase sensitivity ten times beyond the standard quantum limit. Nat. Photonics 8, 731–736 (2014).
Nicholson, T. et al. Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10−18 total uncertainty. Nat. Commun. 6, 6896 (2015).
Escher, B., de Matos Filho, R. & Davidovich, L. General framework for estimating the ultimate precision limit in noisy quantum-enhanced metrology. Nat. Phys. 7, 406–411 (2011).
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Kołodyński, J. & Guţă, M. The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology. Nat. Commun. 3, 1063 (2012).
Safronova, M. S. et al. Search for new physics with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).
Safronova, M. S. The search for variation of fundamental constants with clocks. Ann. Phys. 531, 1800364 (2019).
Derevianko, A. & Pospelov, M. Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks. Nat. Phys. 10, 933–936 (2014).
Arvanitaki, A., Huang, J. & Van Tilburg, K. Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks. Phys. Rev. D 91, 015015 (2015).
Wcislo, P. et al. New bounds on dark matter coupling from a global network of optical atomic clocks. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau4869 (2018).
Stadnik, Y. & Flambaum, V. Axion-induced effects in atoms, molecules, and nuclei: parity nonconservation, anapole moments, electric dipole moments, and spin-gravity and spin-axion momentum couplings. Phys. Rev. D 89, 043522 (2014).
Kolkowitz, S. et al. Gravitational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocks. Phys. Rev. D 94, 124043 (2016).
Grotti, J. et al. Geodesy and metrology with a transportable optical clock. Nat. Phys. 14, 437–441 (2018).
Takamoto, M. et al. Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks. Nat. Photonics 14, 411–415 (2020).
Young, A. W. et al. Half-minute-scale atomic coherence and high relative stability in a tweezer clock. Nature 588, 408–413 (2020).
Kawasaki, A., Braverman, B., Yu, Q. & Vuletić, V. Two-color magneto-optical trap with small magnetic field for ytterbium. J. Phys. B 48, 155302 (2015).
Kawasaki, A. et al. Trapping 171Yb atoms into a one-dimensional optical lattice with a small waist. Phys. Rev. A 102, 013114 (2020).
Hu, J. et al. Creation of a Bose-condensed gas of 87Rb by laser cooling. Science 358, 1078–1080 (2017).
Kawasaki, A. et al. Geometrically asymmetric optical cavity for strong atom–photon coupling. Phys. Rev. A 99, 013437 (2019).
Lee, J., Vrijsen, G., Teper, I., Hosten, O. & Kasevich, M. A. Many-atom–cavity QED system with homogeneous atom–cavity coupling. Opt. Lett. 39, 4005–4008 (2014).
Li, Z. et al. Collective spin-light and light-mediated spin-spin interactions in an optical cavity. Phys. Rev. X Quantum 3, 020308 (2022).
Schulte, M., Martínez-Lahuerta, V. J., Scharnagl, M. S. & Hammerer, K. Ramsey interferometry with generalized one-axis twisting echoes. Quantum 4, 268 (2020).
Pospelov, M. et al. Detecting domain walls of axionlike models using terrestrial experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 021803 (2013).
Koczor, B., Zeier, R. & Glaser, S. J. Fast computation of spherical phase-space functions of quantum many-body states. Phys. Rev. A 102, 062421 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We thank B. Braverman, A. Kawasaki, M. Lukin and J. Ye for discussions. This work was supported by the NSF (grant no. PHY-1806765), DARPA (grant no. D18AC00037), ONR (grant no. N00014-20-1-2428), the NSF Center for Ultracold Atoms (CUA) (grant no. PHY-1734011) and NSF QLCI-CI QSEnSE (grant no. 2016244). S.C. and A.F.A. acknowledge support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.C., E.P.-P., A.F.A. and Z.L. led the experimental efforts and simulations. S.C., E.P.-P., A.F.A. and Z.L. contributed to the data analysis. V.V. conceived and supervised the experiment. S.C., E.P.-P., A.F.A. and V.V. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the experimental implementation and the results, and contributed to the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Physics thanks Rafal Demkowicz-Dobrzansk and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Experimental sequence.
The three stages of the experiment are represented in different color-shaded areas in the upper part: preparation, protocol, and detection. Bloch spheres (bottom) show the collective atomic state after the indicated process has been performed in time. The time axis is not to scale.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Single-atom cooperativity.
The dashed line represents the quadratic regression fit, with the prefactor of the linear term yielding the slope \(\eta (1+{\sigma }_\mathrm{meas}^{2})/4=2.2\pm 0.1\) and the quadratic term prefactor being consistent with zero (0 ± 3) × 10−4. The gray band denotes the expected projection noise given by the single-atom cooperativity calculated from our cavity parameters η = 7.8 ± 0.2. The linearity of the data indicates the classical sources of noise are negligible in the CSS state preparation, since they would manifest as a quadratic dependence of the measured variance on collective cooperativity Nη. Each data point corresponds to the mean value obtained from 50 to 150 experimental realizations. The error bars correspond to 1 σ and are the standard error of a Gaussian distribution: \({\sigma }_{s}^{2}/(n-1)\), where σs is the sample variance and n is the number of experimental realizations. Statistical horizontal error bars are smaller than the marker size.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Squeezed spin distribution on the generalized Bloch sphere.
The normalized shearing strength \(\tilde{Q}\) represents the angle subtended by the sheared distribution with respect to the x-axis, along which the initial CSS was prepared.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Relevant parameters for our squeezing protocol.
Excess broadening \({{{\mathcal{I}}}}\) (yellow dashed line) per scattered photon and shearing strength \(| \tilde{Q}|\) (solid line). The red and blue parts of the solid line represent positive and negative values of \(\tilde{Q}\), respectively, which lead to forward and backward evolution in time. The blue and red dashed lines represent the detuning, − 8 MHz and 8 MHz, chosen to generate \({\tilde{Q}}_{+}\) and \({\tilde{Q}}_{-}\), respectively. The duration of the entangling/disentangling pulses is about 4 ms. In this figure, we have used the experimental parameters N = 220 and η = 7.7. For illustration purposes, contrast loss has not been included.
Extended Data Fig. 5 SATIN contrast loss.
Contrast reduction in an optimized SATIN protocol as a function of the twisting strength \({\tilde{Q}}_{+}\). “Optimized SATIN” means that the entangling light detuning is chosen in order to maximize the protocol’s metrological gain. It is worth noting that, under this optimization condition, the contrast reduction is independent of the atom number.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Graphical representation of the model used to describe contrast loss due to scattering of photons into free space.
The atomic spin can be decomposed into the coherent signal (large Bloch sphere) and the signals of the sub-ensembles of atoms that due to photon scattering have been projected into the spin states \(\left|\uparrow \right\rangle\) or \(\left|\downarrow \right\rangle\), and that have lost any coherence. The radii of the generalized Bloch-spheres represent the relative populations of the states. The dashed circle indicates the size of the generalized Bloch sphere size with all spin being in the same pure state, i.e., in the absence of contrast losses. The left figure corresponds to \({\tilde{Q}}_{+}=0.3\) (mostly Gaussian distribution) while the right figure is calculated for \({\tilde{Q}}_{+}=1.3\).
Extended Data Fig. 7 Expected Metrological Gain in Optical Clocks.
Dashed lines represent fundamental quantum limits. Solid lines represent metrological gain versus atom number expected in our system with a short Ramsey time of 3.5 ms (black) and an atom loss rate of 0.1s−1., and in a state-of-the-art optical clock operated with a SATIN protocol for Ramsey times of 50 ms (red) and 1 s (blue). We notice that the transition between HS to SQL scaling occurs in the region of N = 4 × 104 and N = 300, respectively.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 2
Raw data for Fig. 2.
Source Data Fig. 3
Raw data for Fig. 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colombo, S., Pedrozo-Peñafiel, E., Adiyatullin, A.F. et al. Time-reversal-based quantum metrology with many-body entangled states. Nat. Phys. 18, 925–930 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01653-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01653-5
This article is cited by
-
Graph states of atomic ensembles engineered by photon-mediated entanglement
Nature Physics (2024)
-
Quantum-enhanced metrology with large Fock states
Nature Physics (2024)
-
Direct comparison of two spin-squeezed optical clock ensembles at the 10−17 level
Nature Physics (2024)
-
Scalable spin squeezing from finite-temperature easy-plane magnetism
Nature Physics (2024)
-
Realizing spin squeezing with Rydberg interactions in an optical clock
Nature (2023)