Christine (Kreisha) Oro’s Post

📚 ['Fictional' story in Little Pink Dot country of South East Asia (SEA)] You get the drift. 🎈 In the year 2004, at the peak of racial tensions against the Chinese in South East Asia. A CEO of Little Pink Dot's top 10 construction companies was faced with a dilemma of saving 7 staff as rioters held them hostage in another SEA country. 🙋 Help was sought from the Foreign Affairs Ministry of Little Pink Dot, where the ministry advised $2 million was expected to disperse the rioters within the resort premises on an idyllic island in pristine waters. 🏃 Being the law abiding CEO, he understood the implications and did whatever he can to honour his word to save the husbands of these 7 families. 💰 Despite being $500 million in debt due to construction budgets, he had to raise the $2 million on his own based on the guidance from the Foreign Affairs Ministry. 📝 He immediately requested for a letter to be indemnified against acts of bribery in order to help his staff, which was declined by the Ministry. 🙏 At the crossroads, he was left to his own devices until the significant government representative from the country where his company operates stepped in to explain to the rioters that the CEO was providing jobs to the locals, and such rioting acts are unethically and morally incorrect. 🗡️ The local government representative was at risk when he defended the CEO, yet he pursued to do the right thing and eventually secured the release of the 7 staff. 😢 On hindsight, we get to see how Little Pink Dot's citizens are treated when they venture abroad. It's a sad reality that is often masked from the general public. ✅ We can imagine the outcome should the CEO have given the money with a bribery charge, with his company slipping into the hands of predatory companies or agencies under emotional and litigation pressure. 🌳 Here's a lesson from this fictional story: "Loyalty pays until the statistical return of investment proves otherwise for a country lacking in morals." ❓ So, which end of the spectrum are we on? And where was the Economic Overseas Agency that commits to support local enterprises? Perhaps only in good times, which never last. We never know our true friends until we get ourselves in trouble. ❓ Also, make a guess on the nationality of the CEO? Answer: a neighbour of Little Pink Dot. Maybe the support would have been better if he was a citizen of Little Pink Dot. Then again, the lives of 7 Pink Dots were obviously questionable. By the way, It's 'fiction' and a lesson with case in point. Nothing more, don't think too much. 😄 每天起身，☀️ 身戴上帝的盔甲 🛡️ 心存圣人的慈悲 💖 手握诸神的雷霆 ⚡ 遇善开恩 🙏 见恶诛灭 🔥 Every morning, ☀️ donning God's armour, 🛡️ bearing the heart of Saints, 💖 and holding the lighting spears of gods. ⚡ Let there be benevolence for the subjugated, 🙏 and let evil be vanquished. 🔥 🐇☘ 🐲🐢 🦄 上山修炼，下山锻炼。 #Payitforward #HandofGod #初一十五 #物极必反 #斗战胜佛 #大善书生 #上帝之手 #元神归位

To Conclude this thread on Governance Models we need to do some OBJECTIVE Analysis. Why is there a requirement for Governments? 1) Security on the Boarders against people we don't resonate with for whatever reason. Perhaps due to great Pride in Country, Race or Religion etc. If we desire to live in peace ourselves and trust and respect Unity in Diversity then does the first objective require the use of Governance? "One who identifies his self as the inert body composed of mucus, bile and air, who assumes his wife and family are permanently his own, who thinks an earthen image or the land of his birth is worshipable, or who sees a place of pilgrimage as merely the water there, but who never identifies himself with, feels kinship with, worships or even visits those who are wise in spiritual truth—such a person is no better than a cow or an ass." - Srimad Bhagavatam 10.84.13 2) To maintain Law and Order for various functions and protection of Rights. Rights issues by the Government? If we are act in higher consciousness the desire for cheating and retribution both are eliminated. What is the use of am expensive authority to maintain law and order and constant surveillance? Is that not proper definition of CIVILIZED? "The humble sage, by virtue of true knowledge, sees with equal vision a learned and gentle brahmana, a cow, an elephant, a dog and a dog-eater [outcaste] . Those whose minds are established in sameness and equanimity have already conquered the conditions of birth and death. They are flawless like Brahman, and thus they are already situated in Brahman." - Krishna (Bhagavad Gita 5.18) 3) To provide Infrastructure for the Trade, Enterprise and prosperity. Various Utilities including Money. Money seems for most past a way of keeping score and compete/War. The more money we make the more friends and family we tend to lose. What good is the money sitting in banks and Indexs that cannot provide basic Happiness that even a small child can feel? Can people not follow their Varna or occupation based on what they love to do? Some hidden Technological advances can easily provide important utilities in the remotest places. What is the the use of endless roads, energy supplies and thus worldwide budget deficits that drive people to TAX MISERY? "As fire is covered by smoke, as a mirror is covered by dust, or as the embryo is covered by the womb, the living entity is similarly covered by different degrees of this lust... The senses, the mind and the intelligence are the sitting places of this lust. Through them lust covers the real knowledge of the living entity and bewilders him."- Krishna (Bhagvad Gita 3.38-40) When we have the scientific advances to help the population but we don't, then the leadership is lacking Spiritual Advances #soulfamily. That is why we had trained Kings to ensure the tax was only on profits of businesses and not on general public. There were No Lobbyists and there were no hidden technology in Golden ages!

Debarments are rife within the financial services sector. Are these the actions of roque individuals or indicative of a deeper cultural issue within the sector. To find out more, please see my latest article below. #AdamsandAdams #InsuranceTeam #FinancialServices #Debarments #Culture https://lnkd.in/dBMD8YNW

My strategy guidance note on BO registries for the UN Committee of Experts on Public Administration (CEPA) is out. It offers an overview of the relationship of BO to UN SDGs, main players, challenges and proposals to get BO transparency right.

Choosing a political leader is not merely about selecting someone to occupy a government seat; it is a crucial step in preserving the image and continuity of Aceh. As a region with a rich history and strong identity, Aceh requires a leader who not only possesses administrative skills but also has a deep understanding of local values and a strong commitment to protecting and advancing the interests of its people. The image of Aceh, known for its Islamic principles, steadfast traditions, and spirit of resilience, must be reflected in the chosen leader. Therefore, this political decision must be grounded in integrity, morality, and dedication to upholding Islamic law while improving the quality of life for the people. Choosing the right leader means safeguarding Aceh's honor, ensuring that development aligns with local wisdom, and that every step taken by the government remains rooted in the culture and values that have fortified Aceh's identity in the eyes of the world. However, to maintain a balanced and sustainable development that truly benefits the people of Aceh, careful negotiation between the central government and the local government is also essential. The elected leader must possess strong diplomatic skills to advocate for Aceh's interests at the national level, particularly in terms of budget allocation, policy implementation that fits the local context, and the management of natural resources that are the backbone of Aceh's economy. These negotiations are vital to ensure that policies made at the national level can be effectively adapted and support Aceh's progress without sacrificing its identity and local wisdom. Moreover, an effective leader must be able to build synergy with the local bureaucracy. This is where the importance of choosing a leader who can collaborate with bureaucrats to implement policies efficiently and effectively comes into play. A well-functioning bureaucracy is the backbone of governance, and only through close cooperation between the leader and bureaucrats can important agendas like strengthening the local economy, education, health, and infrastructure be realized optimally. As part of the Acehnese community, our choice will determine how this image is preserved or even strengthened in the future. Therefore, it is our responsibility to ensure that the leader we choose is someone who truly understands and champions Aceh, not only at the local level but also in the national political arena. Only then can we ensure that Aceh continues to shine as a sovereign, dignified, and respected region throughout the country

Many of my followers are asking me why I haven't written anything about current charges being laid upon Bainimarama and his group. My answer is simple: they are irrelevant. What is relevant is the current government and their performance. The government should have just concentrated on governance issues and moving the country forward. The perception among general public is the government is directly involved in these investigations and some are even accusing the government of political persecution. They seem to be spening very little energy and time in running the affairs of the country and this will be counter producitve to Fiji. There should have been independant commission taking care of these investigations. So for me what is relevant is this government and their performance. Today I will touch on our business and investment environment. I have been compelled to write on these issues after utterances from Minister Gavoka asking business community not to hold funds but to invest regardless of rhe uncertainty in the country and the other is not resolving the Grace Raod Saga where it's director has been in the custody for more than three months. I come from an American diplomatic service background and every year the foreign governments do an assessment of the business and investment climate in their host country and this becomes the business bible for foreign businesses and investors. The assessment becomes an integral part of their decision making proccess. One of the most important aspects of the Country Commercial Guide or assessment is political stability and mechanism for dispute settlement. Dispute settlement is about access to courts, mechanism available at the disposal of the investor to seek justice and dispute resolution in timely manner. To keep an investor in custody for more than three months does not augur well for our country. It sends shockwaves through business communities and investors do not want to take the risk of spending months in custody without any resolution. And how does Minister Gavoka wants people to invest their money when people do not know what tomorrow holds for Fiji because of ongoing power struggle and uncertainties among coalition partners and when ministers are embroiled in controversies. The government has gone through half of their term and all we hear is government sorting out its internal matters and trying to survive. Unfortunately the leadership of the country has no clue on the challenges we are facing. He doesn't want to see the reality on the ground. The business community is worried because majority of them are hardly able to meet their overheads and they can sense a bleak future. The biggest sign that we are failing as a nation when we see thousands of our people who have the spending power and have the ability to pay our debts are deserting Fiji. What hope we have when our young and future leaders have lost faith in their country.

More than $100bn of public money has been awarded to private #investors in investor-state dispute settlement (#ISDS) #courts, according to the most comprehensive analysis yet. The controversial #arbitration system which allows #corporations to sue #governments for #compensation over decisions they argue affect their profits is largely carried out behind closed doors, with some judgments kept secret. But, according to a global ISDS tracker which launches today, $114bn has so far been paid out of the public purse to investors – about as much as rich nations provided in climate aid in 2022. #Fossilfuel companies have been by far the biggest beneficiaries of the corporate panels, raking in $80.21bn since 1998, according to the site. If current trends continue, at least another $48bn will be disbursed to settle cases currently under #litigation, the research finds. Lucia Barcena of the Transnational Institute, one of the three groups that created the tracker, said: “Much like the British government paid slaveholders around £7tn in today’s money for ending slavery, the ISDS mechanism continues a system where corporate perpetrators get paid for finally doing the right thing, or at least for stopping with doing the wrong thing. This money should be spent on #reparations for the innocent victims of global heating not handed out to the corporations responsible for causing it.” Thomas Wills, the director of the Trade Justice Movement, which co-created the tracker, said: “The data backs up what we’ve been saying for years: ISDS is the secret weapon for #fossilfuel #companies against #climate #laws. #Corporate #courts are also used to threaten governments not to give in to popular local or national demands for climate action [#chillingeffect]. This needs to be put to an end. The data shows reform is urgently needed.” The ISDS system is reeling after EU countries last week withdrew en masse from the #energychartertreaty [#ECT], one of the most significant sources of investor-state claims. But the mechanism remains a feature of most modern international investment agreements. It gives foreign investors the right to sue states for billions of dollars when their anticipated #profits are affected by public measures such as green #regulations. Unlike national #courts, ISDS #tribunals allow investors to shape the panels that will hear their case, creating “obvious risks of bias, conflicts of interest, potential misconduct and other abuses of power”, according to a United Nations report last October. The tracker has a searchable archive of all 1,362 ISDS cases filed. It shows that investors have so far tried to claim $857bn from national governments, with 129 claims registered for $1bn or more. [Nb: this does not include the many cases where governments and corporations settle outside of court as governments recognise the biased nature of these arbitration tribunals].

Pakistan: SIFC, NAB and the civil service All efforts are useless for the sustainable development of Pakistan till corruption laws are forced without discrimination Majority of lawmakers are illiterate with no experience and knowledge of the Quran and the Constitution of Pakistan. The best option is to follow Singaporean, Malaysian, Korean and Chinese laws against corruption.

In response to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency (ECCT) Bill, Companies House has announced significant changes to incorporation and registration fees, impacting Community Interest Company (CIC) registrations. Effective from 1st May 2024, the revised fees for CIC incorporation are as follows: Incorporation online: £65 (previously £27) Incorporation by paper: £86 (previously £35) Limited company to a CIC (conversion): £45 (previously £25) These adjustments align with broader efforts to enhance the accuracy of information on Companies House registers and address economic crime. The ECCT Bill grants Companies House expanded powers to fulfill these objectives effectively. For further details on these fee changes and their implications, please refer to: [https://lnkd.in/ehN6gBj3] Stay informed and ensure compliance with the latest regulations. #CIC #CompaniesHouse #ECCTBill #UKCompanyLaw #EconomicCrime #Transparency #RegulatoryChanges