9
Metascore
33 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 50Chicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonChicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonScientology or not, the movie is a battlefield bummer that makes you want to revolt.
- 38Boston GlobeJay CarrBoston GlobeJay CarrSo heavy and lifeless that you keep waiting for those three little front-row kibitzers from "Mystery Science Theatre 3000" to appear at the bottom of the screen to start goofing on it.
- 30SalonAndrew O'HehirSalonAndrew O'HehirShot after shot photographed at wobbly, off-center angles for no particular reason, weigh every action sequence down with super-slo-mo in lame imitation of "The Matrix" or end every single scene with a vertical wipe.
- 20VarietyDennis HarveyVarietyDennis HarveyYet the overall look, though derivative ("The Matrix," "Blade Runner," "Waterworld," etc.), rates as Battlefield's one non-guilty pleasure.
- 16Portland OregonianShawn LevyPortland OregonianShawn LevyA ghastly, unappealing mess that lacks a single absorbing character, engaging story line or entertaining snippet of dialogue.
- 10Film.comRobert HortonFilm.comRobert HortonThe film is Travolta's baby, but indifference and boredom is everywhere.
- 10NewsweekTed GideonseNewsweekTed GideonseThe dialogue is inane, the acting wooden, and Roger Christian's directing choices are a lesson in sci-fi film cliché.
- 10TNT RoughCutJ. RentillyTNT RoughCutJ. RentillyThe only danger in seeing this film is in busting a gut at its unintentional hilarity.
- 0Film.comSean MeansFilm.comSean MeansIn the pantheon of cinematic train wrecks, from "Ishtar" to "Waterworld," set a place at the table for Battlefield Earth.
- 0Rolling StonePeter TraversRolling StonePeter TraversWith this kind of epic ineptitude -- hell, the flick is set in the year 3000 -- you go for "worst of the millennium."