Steph Sinclair's Reviews > Fangirl

Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4642710
It's time for Rainbow Rowell and I to break up.

I didn't want to admit it, but after reading all of her books now, I can safely say her writing style just isn't for me. It's like that time I cheerfully broke up with Cassandra Clare, though, admittedly, over different reasons. But this time it hurts. It wounds me to realize that I can't join in with all my friends, ride the Rainbow iz Queen bandwagon, roll around in a meadow of flowers that magically whispers witty Rainbow Rowell quotes and feast at the Fangirl banquet. I know it may seem foolish to be disappointed. I mean, what can a person physically do? No book can be universally loved and I did give it the good old college try.

Here's the thing: For all intents and purposes, I should have loved Fangirl

The strange thing about my reading experience with Fangirl is that I actually deeply connected with all of the characters on a personal level. As a person who suffers from anxiety and has dealt with a father who was admitted to a mental hospital when I was a teen, I sympathized with Cath. I remembered those feelings of craving independence from my sibling as Wren did. I understand having an intense passion for a fandom and being at midnight parties, waiting for the next book in your favorite series. I even connected with Laura's inability to handle life as a mom. In a lot of ways, quite a few of the experiences these characters dealt with, I have dealt with. For that reason alone, I gave this book an extra star. Unfortunately, that was not enough for me.

Rainbow Rowell lives and breathes characters. They are fluid, realistic (for the most part... Eleanor & Park excluded), memorable, flawed, and relatable. These aren't the type of characters that stay on the page. They shout, scream and jump out at you because Rowell is just that good. But it's also her flaw because that's all she writes, characters. In fact, many times it feels like her stories have neither a beginning or an ending, with the reader viewing a piece of a character's life through a small window of time. So I'm convinced that Rowell can't plot her way out of a brown paper bag.

I know that might anger some of you, but hear me out.

Fangirl is a very character-driven novel and doesn't actually have a plot. Rowell's created these characters, placed them in situations and forced them to react to said situations. She's great at that. But where does the book go from there? Which direction are the characters moving? What are they moving towards? What's the goal of the novel? These are some questions I've asked myself through every one of her books. And I often feel like I'm floundering around in her prose like someone who's gone swimming in the ocean drunk. Everything around these characters is static. Only they move from point A to point B to further the story along. Because of this, if you don't happen to fall in love with the characters early on, the story doesn't work. Rainbow Rowell's characters ARE her stories.

One thing positive that came out of reading all of Rowell's books is that, I've learned that I am not the character-driven sort of reader. I'm more of a reader that needs a strong plot to see me to the end of the book. I can deal with unlikable characters or characters that have issues if the plot can save the day. I have the patience of a fruit fly and if I'm expected to sit around reading about a character who is waiting for something to happen to them, then forget it. You've lost me as a reader.

The second issue I had with Fangirl was Rowell, once again, tip-toeing around elephants in her stories. Her novels are so focused on her characters that she never addresses things that feel essential to the plot. With Fangirl is was the slash fic and how it relates to fandom. With Landline it was the magical phone. With Eleanor and Park it was race and Park's self acceptance. It's the same formula for each of her books over and over again.

Step 1: Develop characters for half the book!
Step 2: Introduce something heavy��to center my quirky characters around something.
Step 3: End the book without tying up loose ends because they served my purpose and Honey Rainbow don't care.

It's the most frustrating thing about her books! It's like she dances around the heavy stuff on purpose! There is almost always something that feels deliberately left out, basically anything that could remotely make the story more interesting. Which leads me to my third point...

Fangirl is boring. While I could relate to Cath, she is the dullest person to read about ever. The only scenes that she showed life with was either with her dad or Levi when she suddenly had a personality and wanted to be witty. Those scenes were the best in the book and what kept me reading. But they were few and far between and I started to question why this book was over 400 pages. Not even the fan fiction or cute romance could save this book.

And let's talk about this Simon and Baz fan fiction. Clearly it is a homage to Harry Potter, yet, Harry Potter happens to exist in the same universe as Simon Snow? No, I don't buy that. That's a plotberg if I ever saw one. The fan fiction sections in the novel really didn't do much for me. This isn't because it wasn't good, but because it didn't have enough page time for me to attempt to connect with the Simon and Baz. I did feel like bashing my head in when Cath would read Levi the long sections of her fic, so I guess they did spawn some type of emotional reaction in me, albeit, not a positive one. Also, did Cath ever finish her fic? Rowell wrote so much about Simon and Baz and just completely left that open... AGAIN FRUSTRATING.

Side note: I'm really curious to see how Rowell manages to write Carry On, Cath's fan fiction of Simon Snow, without people directly comparing it to Harry Potter. I mean, essentially it's Draco/Harry fic. But since monetizing fan fiction is now a thing, *cough* Cassandra Clare, E.L. James *cough* who am I to stop her?

To conclude, Fangirl ultimately let me down, but I'm not entirely disappointed that I read it. I learned something about myself as a reader and I did gain a few good laughs from the clever banter. I wouldn't call this a terrible book, and hey, it was better than Eleanor and Park. So there's always that.

I'm such a goddamn hipster, I swear.

More reviews and other fantastical things at Cuddlebuggery.
1008 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Fangirl.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: to-read
April 28, 2013 – Shelved
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: young-adult
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: st-martins-press
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: 2013-release
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: contemporary
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: netgalley
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: e-arc
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: ebook
June 11, 2013 – Shelved as: print-arc
June 11, 2013 – Shelved as: bea-2013
June 11, 2013 – Shelved as: sent-to-cb-reviewer
March 12, 2014 – Shelved as: i-own-it
January 19, 2015 – Started Reading
January 19, 2015 –
page 1
0.21% "Harry Pottee reference on page 1. And we're off to a great start already!"
January 24, 2015 –
14.0% "A fireman's pole! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!"
January 24, 2015 –
page 114
23.6% "Why am I having a hard time with this book?"
January 24, 2015 –
page 135
27.95% "Wait. Harry Potter exists in this book's universe along with Simon Snow? That... I... What?"
January 25, 2015 –
41.0% "Levi and Cath's dad are the only two things I actually like about Fangirl."
January 25, 2015 –
50.0% ""Stupid quirky girl character. Stupid pretentious boy character."

Sounds like Nick was writing a John Green novel."
January 27, 2015 –
98.0% "Sigh. That feeling you felt at the midnight party for the final Harry Potter book. *happy sigh*"
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: le-sigh
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: 2015-reads
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: disappointment
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: didn-t-care-for-it
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: not-for-me
January 27, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 131 (131 new)


Megan Reading this currently too


Steph Sinclair How far are you? Are you liking it?


Megan I'm 300 pages in and I loveee it!! Such a relatable book!!


Steph Sinclair Oh wow! That's awesome! I hope I end up loving it as much as you. I'm still in the beginning and hoping to devote more time to reading it this weekend.


message 5: by Jennifer (new) - added it

Jennifer You'll have to let me know how it is (obviously by your review, DUH Jennifer). I didn't like Landline and DNF'd Eleanor & Park. But my co-blogger loved Attachments (or perhaps it was this one but I don't remember).


Jane i saw your review on eleanor and park, curious on how this book turns out for you. i hope you like it, because I did, flaws and all.


Gigi You should post a review for sure. I defiantly had some problems with this book so I am curious what you will think of it.


Steph Sinclair I'm thinking I probably will review this one.


Shut Up, I'm Reading. oh snap! That last update though XD


message 10: by Kate (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kate Copeseeley Wow, that good huh? hahahahaha Tell me you at least liked Baz and Simon?


Melanie Was it really that bad? :(


Steph Sinclair @Kate, There wasn't enough of Simon and Baz for me to actually care about them. Like, I don't hate them, but I don't love them either. Also, did Cath finish Carry On? RR kinda left that open.

@Melanie, it's not a terrible book, but just didn't do much for me.


Melanie I'm sad that you didn't like it. :(


message 14: by Nati (new)

Nati This book doesn't seem like my thing either. Hope your next one is better


Jaime Arkin Sorry you didn't love this one Steph - Have you read Landline? It's adult fiction so a bit of a different feel than her YA stuff.


Steph Sinclair @Melanie, The Lady Inquisitor... me too, but happens to the best of us.

@Jamie, I did. It was just okay for me. I don't think I'm a fan of her writing style.


message 17: by Zaria (new)

Zaria I knew I wasn't the only one,this book,I couldn't even finish (still trying to) in my opinion it's way too hyped up


Kellyflower I agree Zaria


message 19: by Brigid (last edited Jan 27, 2015 08:36PM) (new)

Brigid I've kinda just guessed that her books aren't for me a while back. From other reviews, I've gathered that her characters are quirky. I don't do quirky. Unfortunately.


Steph Sinclair Yeah, the hype around this book. I can kind of see it, but Eh. I don't know. Different strokes for different folks.

@Brigid, I don't think I do either. Oh well.


Morgan I picked this up in a bookstore once and then decided it wasn't for me. Seems like I was right!


Dahlia It's funny because I enjoyed this more than you did, I think, but despite that, I stopped reading her after this one, too; her books are, for me, too based on character relationships I don't find believable. I'm too conscious of the fact that the characters are crafted for each other and it just saps the magic out for me.


Kerri (Book Hoarder) Aww, I'm sad that you didn't enjoy it. But you're so right about how learning what sort of books work for us as readers! I do like good plot driven books but I also love me some character focused books and self discovery and all that.


Sophie I feel weird about not unconditionally loving Rainbow Rowell. I really liked E&P and Fangirl, but I could not get into her "adult" books. Attachments was especially grating to me.


message 25: by Amerie (new)

Amerie I am so interested to see how this read goes for me. It's been on my shelf and I've been meaning to get to it, but I especially want to get to it now to see how I feel about the things you mentioned. I'm with you: I love character-driven stories but that's just it: I need STORY aka PLOT. Character studies without plot don't really do it for me. :/ Also, I thought the same thing (that it was interesting the fanfic story would be published when it actually is kind of real HP fanfic, right?). But I haven't read FANGIRL so I don't know how close the Simon Snow story is to HP.

Sidenote: I saw a pic online of someone having a Sailor Moon themed wedding and you popped into my head first thing! ^_^


Katie.g Great review Steph. I read this last year and even though I gave it 4 stars, I totally get where you're coming from. I actually like character driven stories. The best ones are a combination of the two. But the complete lack of plot was a bit much and I also thought having Harry Potter in the same universe was unnecessary. We don't need someone to spell it out for us. I'm a bit nervous about reading Landline now. Already bought it.


message 27: by Gieliza (new)

Gieliza Hmm...I'm not a character-driven reader either and this one's on my TBR. Altho character-driven books work for me sometimes, so there's a 50/50 chance that I'd like this at least. Also, I'm very curious about it because of the fandom element.


Angela I didn't even finish this book, but I agree SO much! Cath was the most boring person, ever, to read about. And while I love characters, they're the number 1 thing I love in a novel, I still need something to happen.

And the Simon Snow/Harry Potter parallel with HP existing, too? Ugh. Doesn't make sense! Did not like.


message 29: by Amber J. (new) - added it

Amber J. I totally feel you on the whole plot-less stories thing. It's almost like being duped in a way -- the author knows all the events and dialogue and little details don't really mean anything and aren't going to lead you anywhere.

I should have waited for your review, but I already bought it after seeing so many high-rated reviews.


Steph Sinclair @Dahlia, that's s good point. The characters do seem to exist only to compliment each other. Feels a little too staged.

@Kerri, yeah, I really wished I could have loved this more.

@Sophie, was it that you didn't comndct with the characters? I find that each of her books are written for a certain kind of reader and tends to not work with others.

@Ameriie, I'll be interested to hear your thoughts! For me, character-driven stories work the best when the focus is romance. Otherwise, I don't have much to cling to. Some people say the Simon Snow isn't HP fanfic, but just a homage to HP. But I don't know, it's very similar and right from the first page saw the similarities. (OMG! A Sailor Moon wedding! I would die. Now to convince my husband to renue our vows as Usagi and Tuxedo Mask)

@Katie, I definitely agree about a combination of both character-driven novels and plot-driven being ideal. It just makes for a more interesting and stronger novel for me. I really wish HP wasn't mentioned at all! I don't understand why she added that.

@Gieliza, I was interested in it for the same reasons, but surprisingly, aside from the occasional Simon Snow fan fic passages, Rowell doesn't really delve into fandoms. It's just used as something else to develop Cath as a character and give an excuse to her quirky, Hobbit-like behavior.

@Angela, She got better as the novel went on, but it's mostly because their were more scenes with Levi and therefore, infinitely more interesting. Cath could not carry this novel on her own and wasn't an overall strong character, IMO.

@Amber, exactly! She never actually does anything with all the details and doesn't give much resolution in any of her stories. I just can't deal with that level of unfulfillment.

@Frantrele, I liked Landline okay, but yeah, it definitely suffered the same issues as her other novels. If you disliked Landline, there's a strong chance her other works might not work for you either.


message 31: by Farhin (new) - added it

Farhin Great review Steph. Glad you learnt something from the read


Aimal I think your review is very well thought out. Great job! I actually really loved this book, mainly because I'm more of a character over plot person, and I agree with everything you said about how real her characters are. But I also agree that this book lacked in a refined plot, and the fanfic did nothing for me either. :) Sad to hear you were disappointed, but great review!


message 33: by Kat (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kat Montemayor I read this a while back and liked it, but after reading your review I'm really questioning why I rated it as high as I did. I liked the writing style and some of the characters were relatable and endearing. But you're absolutely right. Plot is MIA.


message 34: by Tory (new)

Tory I was the same. The hype is big but I tried and failed. It is surely a great book. Just not for me.


message 35: by hayden (new) - added it

hayden what a great review!


message 36: by P. (new) - rated it 5 stars

P. Kirby I love this book, but I agree, it's a plot-free, character study. It worked for me because I saw so much of my younger self (and even current self) in Cath. But, if I hadn't related so hard to Cath, I probably would have written the novel off as a couple hundred pages of navel gazing.


message 37: by Liz (new) - rated it 2 stars

Liz Great review, very argument driven ;) I am kinda unsure whether to give this one a try or not because while I am very often into character-driven books, I have my problems with dorky humour (or humour in general, I am a serious reader) and "plain" characters who try to be witty... Would you recommend the book to a reader like me? :D


Natalie I actually enjoyed Fangirl, but I also agree with everything? And I'm so not excited about Carry On. Also, I did NOT get one with Eleanor and Park. So am I half a hipster?


Katie Tingle I felt like this too. Didn't love it as much as everyone else. Was a little disappointed. Maybe because I went in with so high hopes? I haven't read her other books, so I can't comment on those- will prob read them though knowing me!


Sophie I hated the premise of Attachments. In real life, a guy who hasn't been on a date for 9 years and hasn't gotten over his first love would set off my alarm bells so bad. And I was puzzled by the email conversations. If the friends work together, wouldn't they just chat, and not email?

I did love Fangirl, but I found Cath's degree of shut-in-ness (not wanting to go to the cafeteria, not having a single internet friend) hard to believe. And I'm a pretty advanced shut-in myself.


message 41: by AnnMarie (new)

AnnMarie Oh crap! I have had this story in my kindle forever, just haven't gotten around to it but bought it because there was so much love for it, especially reg the fandom which I love.

Hmmm...well I suppose one day but doubt I will move it up my TBR list.

As always, love your reviews and you have been my guiding light for so many stories I have been on the fence about.


message 42: by Katy (new) - rated it 4 stars

Katy Great review! I read Fangirl last year (and may re-read it again this Spring for inspiration in my own YA writing) and really liked it, but as you pointed out - the circumstances surrounding Cath weren't strong and I kept expecting the story to go further/deeper. Similarly, I thought this one was far better than Eleanor and Park (which I felt was a collection of lovely sentimental sentences about what it means to struggle/falling in love as a teen) and Attachments (which was just sorta creepy).


Wendy Darling I liked this one better than you did (3.5 stars), but I'm totally with you on the plot thing. I never feel satisfied with the way her books end. Also--I read a review recently that pointed out that "manic pixie universe" should be coined for her books, which made me laugh, but is also so true.


Martina I skipped all of the fanfiction sections. This book could have been condensed down to 200 pages because, as you said, there is virtually no plot that occurs. I did a lot of skipping and scanning for actual action to occur and I was ultimately disappointed. Plus, though everyone else was adequately developed, Cath came off as a caricature of book fans/fanfiction writers/fangirls. Much of what she did or was characterized by was textbook fangirl stereotypes. I guess it really was Levi and Cath's relationship that kept me going through to the end, because if that hadn't existed, I probably would have left this unfinished.


message 45: by Mary (new) - rated it 2 stars

Mary Oh THANK YOU!!!! I thought I was the ONLY one who didn't adore this book!!!


message 46: by Gigi (new) - rated it 3 stars

Gigi I know how you feel about the Rainbow train. EVERYONE I know is obbessed with her but me... Not so much. :)


Stephanie It's funny, I agree with a lot of what you said in your review, even though I really liked the book. Lol. Very well written review.


Steph Sinclair Thanks everyone. It's really very interesting that even though many of you loved this book, agree with some of my points. I'll be interested to hear what you guys think of the Simon and Baz story when it comes out. Are any of you planning on picking that up?


Kerri (Book Hoarder) Steph wrote: "Thanks everyone. It's really very interesting that even though many of you loved this book, agree with some of my points. I'll be interested to hear what you guys think of the Simon and Baz story w..."

I just heard about that and think it's kind of weird, to be honest :/ I didn't really mind the HP references in the books, unlike some people here, but I'm not sure how it's going to translate to being an actual book...

Also, I just discovered Simon Snow fanfiction while I was on Google looking for the title of the book and that's just a bit too meta for me...


Sophie Steph wrote: "Thanks everyone. It's really very interesting that even though many of you loved this book, agree with some of my points. I'll be interested to hear what you guys think of the Simon and Baz story w..."

I might read it if it's short, but novel-length fanfic by a character you created about a series you also created? Sounds like a meta-vanity project. (And just to be clear, Rainbow Rowell seems like an awesome person! I just don't like all her books!)


« previous 1 3
back to top