Darya Silman's Reviews > American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer
American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer
by
by
Darya Silman's review
bookshelves: after-ww2, american-history, before-ww2, ww2, biography, books-to-movies, nuclear-atomic
Dec 02, 2023
bookshelves: after-ww2, american-history, before-ww2, ww2, biography, books-to-movies, nuclear-atomic
My own benefit from American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin is debunking the myth that Einstein was directly involved in the A-bomb's development. As a non-American, I'd never heard the phrase 'the father of the atomic bomb' until reading the book, and, for me, Einstein was the epitome of progressive physics as well as a refugee from Nazi Germany. Of course, that proved incorrect.
It's unnecessary to speak at length about the book so well-known and so well-advertized by the 2023 movie (which I have yet to see, by the way). It was highly enlightening in general and particularly in its part dealing with the frenzy behind the arms race. The Cold War hysteria was born at the dawn of atomic energy: If we didn't do it first (create the first bomb, then stockpile bombs, then make a more powerful H-bomb), 'they' would have the advantage over us. Oppenheimer and many physicists insisted on sharing all available information with the Russians. It was a utopian plan - Stalin wouldn't have reciprocated - but still admirable from hindsight.
Also, from hindsight, Oppenheimer's days as an innovative theoretical physicist seemed over after the Manhattan Project. He gained the undisputed reputation of a genius, yet political squabbles with the FBI had murked up his Princeton years.
As one reviewer noted, such a comprehensive biography running up to 721 pages, including indexes and a bibliography, needs more depth in parts concerning pure physics. The authors emasculated the text to make it readable for every audience member at the expense of those who would be okay with little bits of science. With respect to the amount of research on which the book is mounted, I still gave it five stars.
It's unnecessary to speak at length about the book so well-known and so well-advertized by the 2023 movie (which I have yet to see, by the way). It was highly enlightening in general and particularly in its part dealing with the frenzy behind the arms race. The Cold War hysteria was born at the dawn of atomic energy: If we didn't do it first (create the first bomb, then stockpile bombs, then make a more powerful H-bomb), 'they' would have the advantage over us. Oppenheimer and many physicists insisted on sharing all available information with the Russians. It was a utopian plan - Stalin wouldn't have reciprocated - but still admirable from hindsight.
Also, from hindsight, Oppenheimer's days as an innovative theoretical physicist seemed over after the Manhattan Project. He gained the undisputed reputation of a genius, yet political squabbles with the FBI had murked up his Princeton years.
As one reviewer noted, such a comprehensive biography running up to 721 pages, including indexes and a bibliography, needs more depth in parts concerning pure physics. The authors emasculated the text to make it readable for every audience member at the expense of those who would be okay with little bits of science. With respect to the amount of research on which the book is mounted, I still gave it five stars.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
American Prometheus.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
November 11, 2023
–
Started Reading
November 11, 2023
– Shelved
November 11, 2023
– Shelved as:
biography
November 11, 2023
– Shelved as:
ww2
November 11, 2023
– Shelved as:
before-ww2
November 11, 2023
– Shelved as:
american-history
November 11, 2023
– Shelved as:
after-ww2
November 11, 2023
–
5.27%
"One professor wrote to another about J.R.O in 1925: "As appears from his name, O.is a Jew, but entirely without the usual qualifications of his race." Imagine writing something similar in today's realities. Back then, it was not an unusual remark in a recommendation letter."
page
38
November 25, 2023
–
41.89%
"No one can be certain of Oppenheimer's reaction had he learned that on the eve of the Hiroshima bombing, the president knew> the Japanese were "looking for peace," and that the military use of atomic bombs on cities was an option rather than the neccessity for ending the war in August. (p.302)"
page
302
December 2, 2023
–
Finished Reading
December 27, 2023
– Shelved as:
books-to-movies
March 31, 2024
– Shelved as:
nuclear-atomic
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Sonny
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Dec 08, 2023 03:30PM
I read Richard Rhodes' book The Making of the Atomic Bomb. I would love to know how much overlap there is between the two books. Oppenheimer is much discussed in the Rhodes' book.
reply
|
flag