Cav's Reviews > Introduction to Zen Buddhism/A Manual of Zen Buddhism
Introduction to Zen Buddhism/A Manual of Zen Buddhism
by
by
Introduction to Zen Buddhism had its moments, but ultimately, I did not enjoy the writing. The finished presentation had me walking away not knowing too much more about Zen Buddhism than I did at the start of the book...
Author Daisetsu Teitaro Suzuki, self-rendered in 1894 as "Daisetz", was a Japanese-American essayist, philosopher, religious scholar, translator, and writer. He was a scholar and author of books and essays on Buddhism, Zen and Shin that were instrumental in spreading interest in both Zen and Shin to the West.
D.T. Suzuki:
As its title implies, the book attempts to uncover the essence of Zen Buddhism. It originated in India, before being brought to China and Japan.
Unfortunately, as mentioned above, the book is rich on anecdotes and stories but low on concrete information. There were a few good quotes in here, but lots of rambling, disjointed writing.
Suzuki says this of Zen:
Is Zen a religion? Suzuki writes:
In this quote, the author talks about meditation and Zen:
So, what exactly is Zen?? Well, the answer remained elusive in the book. This quote was the best I could pick out:
********************
I was expecting more from Introduction to Zen Buddhism. And while it started off well enough, it quickly dived straight into the weeds, where it remained for the duration.
I would not recommend this book
2.5 stars.
Author Daisetsu Teitaro Suzuki, self-rendered in 1894 as "Daisetz", was a Japanese-American essayist, philosopher, religious scholar, translator, and writer. He was a scholar and author of books and essays on Buddhism, Zen and Shin that were instrumental in spreading interest in both Zen and Shin to the West.
D.T. Suzuki:
As its title implies, the book attempts to uncover the essence of Zen Buddhism. It originated in India, before being brought to China and Japan.
Unfortunately, as mentioned above, the book is rich on anecdotes and stories but low on concrete information. There were a few good quotes in here, but lots of rambling, disjointed writing.
Suzuki says this of Zen:
"Zen is decidedly not a system founded upon logic and analysis. If anything, it is the antipode to logic, by which I mean the dualistic mode of thinking. There may be an intellectual element in Zen, for Zen is the whole mind, and in it we find a great many things; but the mind is not a composite thing that is to be divided into so many faculties, leaving nothing behind when the dissection is over. Zen has nothing to teach us in the way of intellectual analysis; nor has it any set doctrines which are imposed on its followers for acceptance.
In this respect Zen is quite chaotic if you choose to say so. Probably Zen followers may have sets of doctrines, but they have them on their own account, and for their own benefit; they do not owe the fact to Zen.
Thereore, there are in Zen no sacred books or dogmatic tenets, nor are there any symbolic formulae through which an access might be gained into the signification of Zen. If I am asked, then, what Zen teaches, I would answer, Zen teaches nothing. Whatever teachings there are in Zen, they come out of one’s own mind. We teach ourselves; Zen merely points the way."
Is Zen a religion? Suzuki writes:
"Is Zen a religion? It is not a religion in the sense that the term is popularly understood; for Zen has no God to worship, no ceremonial rites to observe, no future abode to which the dead are destined, and, last of all, Zen has no soul whose welfare is to be looked after by somebody else and whose immortality is a matter of intense concern with some people. Zen is free from all these dogmatic and “religious” encumbrances.
When I say there is no God in Zen, the pious reader may be shocked, but this does not mean that Zen denies the existence of God; neither denial nor affirmation concerns Zen. When a thing is denied, the very denial involves something not denied. The same can be said of affirmation. This is inevitable in logic. Zen wants to rise above logic, Zen wants to find a higher affirmation where there are no antitheses. Therefore, in Zen, God is neither denied nor insisted upon; only there is in Zen no such God as has been conceived by Jewish and Christian minds. For the same reason that Zen is not a philosophy, Zen is not a religion."
In this quote, the author talks about meditation and Zen:
"Zen is not to be confounded with a form of meditation as practised by “New Thought” people, or Christian Scientists, or Hindu Sannyasins, or some Buddhists. Dhyana, as it is understood by Zen, does not correspond to the practice as carried on in Zen. A man may meditate on a religious or philosophical subject while disciplining himself in Zen, but that is only incidental; the essence of Zen is not there at all. Zen purposes to discipline the mind itself, to make it its own master, through an insight into its proper nature. This getting into the real nature of one’s own mind or soul is the fundamental object of Zen Buddhism. Zen, therefore, is more than meditation and Dhyana in its ordinary sense. The discipline of Zen consists in opening the mental eye in order to look into the very reason of existence.
To meditate, a man has to fix his thought on something; for instance, on the oneness of God, or his infinite love, or on the impermanence of things. But this is the very thing Zen desires to avoid. If there is anything Zen strongly emphasizes it is the attainment of freedom; that is, freedom from all unnatural encumbrances. Meditation is something artificially put on; it does not belong to the native activity of the mind. Upon what do the fowl of the air meditate? Upon what do the fish in the water meditate? They fly; they swim. Is not that enough?
So, what exactly is Zen?? Well, the answer remained elusive in the book. This quote was the best I could pick out:
"...When Joshu (Chao-chou) was asked what the Tao (or the truth of Zen) was, he answered, “Your everyday life, that is the Tao.” In other words, a quiet, self-confident, and trustful existence of your own��this is the truth of Zen, and what I mean when I say that Zen is pre-eminently practical. It appeals directly to life, not even making reference to a soul or to God, or to anything that interferes with or disturbs the ordinary course of living. The idea of Zen is to catch life as it flows. There is nothing extraordinary or mysterious about Zen. I raise my hand; I take a book from the other side of this desk; I hear the boys playing ball outside my window; I see the clouds blown away beyond the neighbouring woods:—in all these I am practising Zen, I am living Zen. No wordy discussion is necessary, nor any explanation. I do not know why—and there is no need of explaining, but when the sun rises the whole world dances with joy and everybody’s heart."
********************
I was expecting more from Introduction to Zen Buddhism. And while it started off well enough, it quickly dived straight into the weeds, where it remained for the duration.
I would not recommend this book
2.5 stars.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Introduction to Zen Buddhism/A Manual of Zen Buddhism.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 1, 2023
– Shelved
August 1, 2023
– Shelved as:
to-read
August 4, 2023
–
Started Reading
August 9, 2023
– Shelved as:
asia
August 9, 2023
– Shelved as:
mindset
August 9, 2023
– Shelved as:
philosophy
August 9, 2023
–
Finished Reading