dorian ♕ ♕'s Reviews > Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone by J.K. Rowling
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
96210903
's review

did not like it

We don't support transphobes in this house
383 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

2017 – Started Reading
2017 – Finished Reading
April 18, 2019 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-50 of 56 (56 new)


message 1: by EJ (new) - rated it 5 stars

EJ This was suppose to be a book review. Not an author review.


Jeffrey Gao In that case, The Worst Witch would be a good substitute. It's kinda like Harry Potter with none of the baggage and it's super underrated.


Jeffrey Gao EJ wrote: "This was suppose to be a book review. Not an author review."

JK Rowling deserves to be called out for her very atrocious beliefs.


Anonymous Potter i dont support you in this review section


message 5: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan she did write the series without any of that in it. Just saying.


message 6: by Fey (new) - added it

Fey Flowers (enbytweenthepages) I just like to thank you 🖤


elin ✩ you do realise authors and books aren’t the same thing?


Florance manning Yes we know but she wrote the book and though it may be “good” she’s still a terrible person who I do not support in any way


Harriet Wallis You can like the book series just because the author is a transpobe no one is ‘supporting her’


Harriet Wallis We all hate her, don’t worry.


message 11: by Will (new) - rated it 1 star

Will Exactly!!!


Francisco Ramirez Telling the truth isn’t being transphobic


message 13: by Miranda (new)

Miranda Johnson If you’re writing a book review maybe you should review the actual book and not the author’s personal opinions.


Ethan Kim Buying the book is supporting her. Reviewing it is not. At this point, the book is so well known and with millions of reviews that Harry Potter already has a reputation. JK Rowling is not recieving support from goodreads because this site does not monetize. If people want to read her book, there are plenty of free pirated versions on the web that don't support Rowling either. Stop jumping to conclusions. A book is a book and an author is an author.


Matteo Vandy Rowling is the greatest writer and the greatest human of the 21st cen


message 16: by lealion (new) - added it

lealion Has anyone ever actually read her essay ?
That woman if for SAFETY for women!
She was sexually assaulted and got through that. And is strong. She is remarkable.
And no she is not transphobic.


Ethan Kim What does sexual harassment have to do with transphobia? It's great she survived that trauma but that doesn't mean she isn't transphobic.


message 18: by Emily (new)

Emily EggsOnSourdough Ty Dorian 🫡


message 19: by Nate (new) - rated it 4 stars

Nate Miller Books Yes we do! I’ll keep spending my money on her books until I’m broke!


Moony Severus You are on goodreads to rate a book, not an author’s (true) statement about only women getting their periods, get over it


•Charli• You can dislike the artist and still like the art. Also Harry Potter is so big you can get the books at libraries and second hand shops without the proceeds going to the author. And merchandise you can buy from small businesses that don’t give any money to her.

Also goodreads is a book review site. You’re here to rate a BOOK, not a person.


Carlyyy Se nn ti è piaciuto Harry Potter, potresti provare.... DI NUOVO


Brooke Roberson Chronically online


message 24: by Mak (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mak Abigail This is to rate a book, not a person. I agree JKR is a horrible person, but she is a very good writer


Ariel Chelsau Worthless review. You should rate the work here. And, btw, kudos to JK Rowling for standing up against the absurd online mob.


barbie "We don't support transphobes in this house", but racists like SJM aren't a problem...


ann ☆ mad embarrassing


message 28: by Raven (new)

Raven Rose Yep, we don't support transphobes


message 29: by Hush (new) - added it

Hush lets separate personal opinions and books


Transosaurs Rex WE DON'T SUPPORT TRANSPHOBES IS RIGHT!


message 31: by Jo (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jo Cav Cur THANK YOU!! All of my friends love HP but I kinda just refused after hearing what J.K Rowling has been saying about the trans community.


message 32: by Jo (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jo Cav Cur WE MOST DEFINITELY DO NOT SUPPORT TRANSPHOBES


message 33: by Eden (new) - rated it 5 stars

Eden Firman What if you wrote a great review on this book with an amazing analysis and reasonable points on why you should or should not read it. Let’s say I read that review and completely agreed with it. Then I reported the review because I didn’t like your profile picture.

Trust me, there are authors I don’t politically or socially agree with, but I still love and respect their work. I doubt you even read the book if you only left a review about the author’s beliefs. If you did, my bad, but that doesn’t change the fact that you should judge a book based on its author’s personal life.


autumn rose lets come to terms with the fact that who rowling is as a person, and who she is as a writer are separate. shes an amazing writer, horrible person. not that deep


message 35: by fara (new) - added it

fara but we do support pedophiles like some incredibly popular authors at the moment as well as racists and misogynists apparently…


dorian ♕ ♕ barbie wrote: ""We don't support transphobes in this house", but racists like SJM aren't a problem..."

Besides the fact that SJM isn’t racist, if you truly want to go bar for bar about this, then maybe you shouldn’t be saying that with a Taylor swift profile picture, because she doesn’t exactly do anything for poc, now does she?


message 37: by Sunshineelix (new)

Sunshineelix shut the fuck up


message 38: by Serenity (new)

Serenity S @Sunshineelix you need to chill😭😭 please


message 39: by Leahleelee (new)

Leahleelee Oh ok.


message 40: by Dollee (new)

Dollee Reported. Don’t like the person; don’t read the book, but this has nothing to do with Goodreads and the rating system.


message 41: by Brooke (new) - added it

Brooke Bates I understand what she did and that wasn’t ok, but what she does and says has nothing to do with what she writes. Especially Harry Potter it has nothing to do with any of that.


message 42: by Kennedy (new) - added it

Kennedy Holmes We're rating the book, not the author.


Froghis Child ❤️


TheReadersVoyager What is so transphobic about Rowling though? Serious question.


Ahaan Mittal To anyone in agreement with the original review, does it really matter? I am not supporting transphobia in any way, nor do I mean to insult anyone who agrees with this review. I simply wish to bring to the forefront of people’s mind the difference between the work and the creator. The creator is not the work, nor is the work the creator, so to conflate the two in a review dedicated to the work alone is pointless. If you do not wish to read the book due to Rowling’s views, that is your right, but please do not mistake those views for the quality of the work, as those two are very different things.


message 46: by Flora (new)

Flora Wood y'all need to calm down its a reveiw omg its not that deep


Paige ‧͙⁺˚*・༓☾ Paige (huntress of Artemis)☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ Dollee fr


Paige ‧͙⁺˚*・༓☾ Paige (huntress of Artemis)☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ @kennedy thank you. Thank you so much


message 49: by Leahleelee (new)

Leahleelee We do support. We don't support cunts like JK Rowling tho.


message 50: by Fellow (new)

Fellow Reader Womp womp, go cry about it 🥲


« previous 1
back to top