Teresa's Reviews > The Door
The Door
by
by
4.5
At some point during my reading of this, I was reminded of The God of Small Things in that I felt as if this too can be read on two levels and that if I knew more of the history of the country of origin (here it is Hungary), I would’ve gotten even more out of the novel. Because I know basically nothing of the latter (I googled some), and even though this can be read as a character(s)-relationship study, I feel as if something essential has eluded my grasp. Yes, we are told in perfect pacing what Emerence has endured and how she has survived the upheavals, but there are also minor characters—such as Sutu and Adelka—that might represent the accommodation and compromise Hungary was forced to negotiate during and after wartime. The dignity Emerence fights so hard to keep behind the locked door of her flat is certainly a metaphor for more than just a personal boundary.
The narrator, a writer, has made accommodations with the government, though these are not spelled out. As she looks back (the whole book is a reflection), she realizes how unseeing and selfish she’d been toward the demanding, selfless Emerence, a character described in fable-like and mythological terms, who’d tried to teach her some difficult lessons in unorthodox ways, most importantly, how to act with unconditional love. Emerence’s demands are perhaps beyond the scope of anyone to fulfill; yet the narrator (only named near the end when Emerence calls her by an affectionate nickname) realizes she has failed the older woman, especially as Emerence had taught her what she needed to know (remember Polett?) to handle the climatic situation. (As I write this, I realize there is also a third level.)
During my read, I went back to the powerful beginning at least twice to reread it. A scene near the end is a strong indictment against materialism, for any reason, even love. If I have any criticism, it’s that though the book isn’t long, it went on for a bit too long. Except for the aforementioned scene, the novel’s other points had already been made. Despite this one reservation and my wish that I knew more, this is the kind of novel I love, one that has me testing my own boundaries.
At some point during my reading of this, I was reminded of The God of Small Things in that I felt as if this too can be read on two levels and that if I knew more of the history of the country of origin (here it is Hungary), I would’ve gotten even more out of the novel. Because I know basically nothing of the latter (I googled some), and even though this can be read as a character(s)-relationship study, I feel as if something essential has eluded my grasp. Yes, we are told in perfect pacing what Emerence has endured and how she has survived the upheavals, but there are also minor characters—such as Sutu and Adelka—that might represent the accommodation and compromise Hungary was forced to negotiate during and after wartime. The dignity Emerence fights so hard to keep behind the locked door of her flat is certainly a metaphor for more than just a personal boundary.
The narrator, a writer, has made accommodations with the government, though these are not spelled out. As she looks back (the whole book is a reflection), she realizes how unseeing and selfish she’d been toward the demanding, selfless Emerence, a character described in fable-like and mythological terms, who’d tried to teach her some difficult lessons in unorthodox ways, most importantly, how to act with unconditional love. Emerence’s demands are perhaps beyond the scope of anyone to fulfill; yet the narrator (only named near the end when Emerence calls her by an affectionate nickname) realizes she has failed the older woman, especially as Emerence had taught her what she needed to know (remember Polett?) to handle the climatic situation. (As I write this, I realize there is also a third level.)
During my read, I went back to the powerful beginning at least twice to reread it. A scene near the end is a strong indictment against materialism, for any reason, even love. If I have any criticism, it’s that though the book isn’t long, it went on for a bit too long. Except for the aforementioned scene, the novel’s other points had already been made. Despite this one reservation and my wish that I knew more, this is the kind of novel I love, one that has me testing my own boundaries.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Door.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
July 23, 2017
–
Finished Reading
July 24, 2017
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Michael
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jul 24, 2017 10:25PM
Lovely review. I feel from your words some of the power of the great ovie that starred Helen Mirren. So much rides on the big reveal about what is behind her door that all are forbidden to cross. Such a seemingly arbitrary proscription makes the compusion of the narrator to cross the threshold quite fable-lìke as you say. I was thinking that learning that from the movie would spoil the reading of the book. I went ahead and acquired the book to give it a chance to entrance me, and your feelings about it make a great spur.
reply
|
flag
Great review. You've written convincing insight which has given me new ways of seeing this simple yet complex relationship.
Michael wrote: "Lovely review. I feel from your words some of the power of the great ovie that starred Helen Mirren. So much rides on the big reveal about what is behind her door that all are forbidden to cross. S..."
Thank you kindly, Michael. I haven't seen the movie, but the book eventually makes it very clear why she doesn't let anyone in behind the door. As I read, I wondered how any reveal could meet such a build-up, but it definitely works.
Thank you kindly, Michael. I haven't seen the movie, but the book eventually makes it very clear why she doesn't let anyone in behind the door. As I read, I wondered how any reveal could meet such a build-up, but it definitely works.
Marita wrote: "Teresa, I'm so pleased to see your lovely review, as it has reminded me that I downloaded this book ages ago and forgotten about it. Time to read it!"
Oh, good, Marita -- can't wait to read your review!
Oh, good, Marita -- can't wait to read your review!
James wrote: "Great review. You've written convincing insight which has given me new ways of seeing this simple yet complex relationship."
Thank you very much. I reread your review and your third paragraph is the 'third level' of seeing it that I mention in my review. I'd thought of some of that while reading the novel, but not fully until afterward. This is definitely a novel with depth.
Thank you very much. I reread your review and your third paragraph is the 'third level' of seeing it that I mention in my review. I'd thought of some of that while reading the novel, but not fully until afterward. This is definitely a novel with depth.
Fionnuala wrote: "Very thoughtful review, Teresa. And you've made me curious about the third level. [spoilers removed]"
Thank you, Fionnuala. I should've written myself a spoiler about the third level; of course I no longer remember. :(
Thank you, Fionnuala. I should've written myself a spoiler about the third level; of course I no longer remember. :(
Carol wrote: "A great review, Teresa. This one sounds intriguing. It's mentioned in the NY Review Books today."
Thanks so much, Carol. Intriguing is a good word for the book. How interesting!
Thanks so much, Carol. Intriguing is a good word for the book. How interesting!
I love your reviews. I so appreciated this book. Read it in one sitting. I love those books that enthrall me like that.
Thanks so much, Jim. I just read your review and I understand your feeling about this kind of book completely.
Is the movie the same title? Wow all of you got a lot out of this book that i thought might or could be involved in it. Thank again Teresa intriguing review. Now i really want to read this book!
Ann wrote: "Is the movie the same title? Wow all of you got a lot out of this book that i thought might or could be involved in it. Thank again Teresa intriguing review. Now i really want to read this book!"
Yes, it is, Ann. And you are welcome!
Yes, it is, Ann. And you are welcome!
Teresa wrote: "Ann wrote: "Is the movie the same title? Wow all of you got a lot out of this book that i thought might or could be involved in it. Thank again Teresa intriguing review. Now i really want to read t..."
:D
:D
Hi Teresa! Hi Candi - I Just finished The Fawn (1963) by Magda Szabo. It is on the same level as ‘The Door’. Unfortunately, “The Fawn’ has yet to be re-issued. I got a Jonathan Cape edition (1963) signed by Magda Szabo in the mail on Friday. Yes, hard to believe but true!!!! I had no idea when I bought it that the signature on the title page was that of Ms. Szabo. I have read GR reviews of The Fawn….most were in Italian/Spanish/Hungarian/Turkish…and most reviewers wrote very strong reviews of the book. It is dark, but I think that is not uncommon to Szabo’s oeuvre. I do hope ‘The Fawn’ gets-reissued so it is available to readers like you!
JimZ wrote: "Whoops...I was sending this message to several friends Teresa. Copy-and-paste error!"
No worries, Jim, and thanks for the info! And I certainly have no problems with dark works.
No worries, Jim, and thanks for the info! And I certainly have no problems with dark works.
Ooh, great review, Teresa, and I just love your last statement. I agree, and also about the many layers to this, which makes its darkness even more haunting.