Al's Reviews > The Marriage Plot

The Marriage Plot by Jeffrey Eugenides
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1138334
's review

really liked it

I'm afraid that I don't know enough about the old marriage plot novels (Austen, Elliot, James, etc.) that this one references to really "get" everything Eugenides is trying to do here. For example, I initially found Madeline to be fairly thinly rendered in comparison to the more fully fleshed out intellectual and emotional lives of her male counterparts, but by the end I thought that might be part of the point (ie. that she exists on the page only as an ideal mirrors the way she exists to her suitors). There were other things I found a little disappointing that may also be explained away, such as how the semiotic/deconstructionist thread of the first act is dropped for the remainder of the book, though the entire work itself clearly intends to fit that category. Maybe that doesn't sound like a 5 star review, but I did find it extremely well crafted and written, and the problems I have with it are more those that raise questions than just this-or-that was done poorly.
25 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Marriage Plot.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
September 8, 2011 – Shelved
September 8, 2011 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Sonya My interpretation is that the semiotics thread was dropped when Madeline realizes she's a Victorianist. In the realm of the novel, the semiotics seemed to be no more than a trend, and especially Mitchell's whole quest was to find meaning outside of the deconstructionists; the whole novel to me was a refutation of deconstructionism. It was in the varieties of experience where the meaning was held. That was my interpretation, anyway.


Laura Thanks Al and Sonya for your thoughts on this novel. They helped clarify my own. I just finished writing my review and then I found yours, Al. We said some similar things, but you came up with a much better theory to explain Madeleine's thin characterization. Well done.


back to top