Steph Sinclair's Reviews > Fangirl

Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4642710
It's time for Rainbow Rowell and I to break up.

I didn't want to admit it, but after reading all of her books now, I can safely say her writing style just isn't for me. It's like that time I cheerfully broke up with Cassandra Clare, though, admittedly, over different reasons. But this time it hurts. It wounds me to realize that I can't join in with all my friends, ride the Rainbow iz Queen bandwagon, roll around in a meadow of flowers that magically whispers witty Rainbow Rowell quotes and feast at the Fangirl banquet. I know it may seem foolish to be disappointed. I mean, what can a person physically do? No book can be universally loved and I did give it the good old college try.

Here's the thing: For all intents and purposes, I should have loved Fangirl

The strange thing about my reading experience with Fangirl is that I actually deeply connected with all of the characters on a personal level. As a person who suffers from anxiety and has dealt with a father who was admitted to a mental hospital when I was a teen, I sympathized with Cath. I remembered those feelings of craving independence from my sibling as Wren did. I understand having an intense passion for a fandom and being at midnight parties, waiting for the next book in your favorite series. I even connected with Laura's inability to handle life as a mom. In a lot of ways, quite a few of the experiences these characters dealt with, I have dealt with. For that reason alone, I gave this book an extra star. Unfortunately, that was not enough for me.

Rainbow Rowell lives and breathes characters. They are fluid, realistic (for the most part... Eleanor & Park excluded), memorable, flawed, and relatable. These aren't the type of characters that stay on the page. They shout, scream and jump out at you because Rowell is just that good. But it's also her flaw because that's all she writes, characters. In fact, many times it feels like her stories have neither a beginning or an ending, with the reader viewing a piece of a character's life through a small window of time. So I'm convinced that Rowell can't plot her way out of a brown paper bag.

I know that might anger some of you, but hear me out.

Fangirl is a very character-driven novel and doesn't actually have a plot. Rowell's created these characters, placed them in situations and forced them to react to said situations. She's great at that. But where does the book go from there? Which direction are the characters moving? What are they moving towards? What's the goal of the novel? These are some questions I've asked myself through every one of her books. And I often feel like I'm floundering around in her prose like someone who's gone swimming in the ocean drunk. Everything around these characters is static. Only they move from point A to point B to further the story along. Because of this, if you don't happen to fall in love with the characters early on, the story doesn't work. Rainbow Rowell's characters ARE her stories.

One thing positive that came out of reading all of Rowell's books is that, I've learned that I am not the character-driven sort of reader. I'm more of a reader that needs a strong plot to see me to the end of the book. I can deal with unlikable characters or characters that have issues if the plot can save the day. I have the patience of a fruit fly and if I'm expected to sit around reading about a character who is waiting for something to happen to them, then forget it. You've lost me as a reader.

The second issue I had with Fangirl was Rowell, once again, tip-toeing around elephants in her stories. Her novels are so focused on her characters that she never addresses things that feel essential to the plot. With Fangirl is was the slash fic and how it relates to fandom. With Landline it was the magical phone. With Eleanor and Park it was race and Park's self acceptance. It's the same formula for each of her books over and over again.

Step 1: Develop characters for half the book!
Step 2: Introduce something heavy to center my quirky characters around something.
Step 3: End the book without tying up loose ends because they served my purpose and Honey Rainbow don't care.

It's the most frustrating thing about her books! It's like she dances around the heavy stuff on purpose! There is almost always something that feels deliberately left out, basically anything that could remotely make the story more interesting. Which leads me to my third point...

Fangirl is boring. While I could relate to Cath, she is the dullest person to read about ever. The only scenes that she showed life with was either with her dad or Levi when she suddenly had a personality and wanted to be witty. Those scenes were the best in the book and what kept me reading. But they were few and far between and I started to question why this book was over 400 pages. Not even the fan fiction or cute romance could save this book.

And let's talk about this Simon and Baz fan fiction. Clearly it is a homage to Harry Potter, yet, Harry Potter happens to exist in the same universe as Simon Snow? No, I don't buy that. That's a plotberg if I ever saw one. The fan fiction sections in the novel really didn't do much for me. This isn't because it wasn't good, but because it didn't have enough page time for me to attempt to connect with the Simon and Baz. I did feel like bashing my head in when Cath would read Levi the long sections of her fic, so I guess they did spawn some type of emotional reaction in me, albeit, not a positive one. Also, did Cath ever finish her fic? Rowell wrote so much about Simon and Baz and just completely left that open... AGAIN FRUSTRATING.

Side note: I'm really curious to see how Rowell manages to write Carry On, Cath's fan fiction of Simon Snow, without people directly comparing it to Harry Potter. I mean, essentially it's Draco/Harry fic. But since monetizing fan fiction is now a thing, *cough* Cassandra Clare, E.L. James *cough* who am I to stop her?

To conclude, Fangirl ultimately let me down, but I'm not entirely disappointed that I read it. I learned something about myself as a reader and I did gain a few good laughs from the clever banter. I wouldn't call this a terrible book, and hey, it was better than Eleanor and Park. So there's always that.

I'm such a goddamn hipster, I swear.

More reviews and other fantastical things at Cuddlebuggery.
1008 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Fangirl.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: to-read
April 28, 2013 – Shelved
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: young-adult
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: st-martins-press
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: 2013-release
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: contemporary
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: netgalley
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: e-arc
April 28, 2013 – Shelved as: ebook
June 11, 2013 – Shelved as: print-arc
June 11, 2013 – Shelved as: bea-2013
June 11, 2013 – Shelved as: sent-to-cb-reviewer
March 12, 2014 – Shelved as: i-own-it
January 19, 2015 – Started Reading
January 19, 2015 –
page 1
0.21% "Harry Pottee reference on page 1. And we're off to a great start already!"
January 24, 2015 –
14.0% "A fireman's pole! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!"
January 24, 2015 –
page 114
23.6% "Why am I having a hard time with this book?"
January 24, 2015 –
page 135
27.95% "Wait. Harry Potter exists in this book's universe along with Simon Snow? That... I... What?"
January 25, 2015 –
41.0% "Levi and Cath's dad are the only two things I actually like about Fangirl."
January 25, 2015 –
50.0% ""Stupid quirky girl character. Stupid pretentious boy character."

Sounds like Nick was writing a John Green novel."
January 27, 2015 –
98.0% "Sigh. That feeling you felt at the midnight party for the final Harry Potter book. *happy sigh*"
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: le-sigh
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: 2015-reads
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: disappointment
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: didn-t-care-for-it
January 27, 2015 – Shelved as: not-for-me
January 27, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 51-100 of 131 (131 new)


Steph Sinclair WAIT. People are already writing Simon and Baz fan fiction?


Steph Sinclair @Sophie, it is a strange concept, isn't it? I wonder how it'll all work out!


Kerri (Book Hoarder) If there's one thing the internet has taught me it's that if it exists, there's fanfic of it. :P Well, the internet and Harry Potter. There's the fandom that spawned a million fics!


Richie OMG Steph you actually said everything I felt reading Fangirl but I couldn't it all in words, bless you


Richie I was going to read Eleanor and Park but you said that Fangirl is better, oh God
I'm fine without EaP then


Stephanie Another thing I find funny is, the entire time while reading this I kept thinking that she needs to write some kind of simon snow book, what with all the snippets. But I don't know how interested I'd be in actually reading it. I'd be more interested in reading Cath's fan fiction version. Wait, is that the one she's doing? Hm, still don't know if I'd actually read it.


Steph Sinclair @Richie, Yeah, I don't think you'll like E&P more. It was even more boring for me than Fangirl.

@Stephanie, I'm pretty sure she's writing Carry On. If she actually wrote the Simon Snow book (which one? There are 8), it would probably be even closer to HP.

Didn't Cath mention something like Carry On being really, really long?


message 58: by Brew (new) - rated it 2 stars

Brew Steph, I think you are right on about Fangirl. I'm still in love with Eleanor and Park though. Thanks for the review! :)


Stephanie I wonder how long it will be now? Are you interested in reading it, Steph?

Also, you're realllllly making me not want to read E&P now lol.


Steph Sinclair @Stephanie, probably not. I'm tempted only because it'll be fantasy and maybe I might actually like fantasy written by RR. But, Landline had a fantasy element too and she instead choose to focus solely on character analysis. Also, it'll be in 3rd person, too, and I dislike 3rd person so much. So, I don't know. I'll have to read a lot of reviews and make a decision later.

You should try E&P! So many people love it and it could be your next favorite read.


Lindsay I completely agree with you on this one. I couldn't exactly pinpoint why I didn't like Fangirl...or Landline for that matter. All I knew is it had a lot to do with the dull characters and boring plot. You nailed it for me with that review.


Niamh Ahhh I so agree with everything you said! I personally loved RR's other novels but this one reallyyy didn't do it for me :/


Stephanie I probably will lol. Off topic question, have you ever thought about writing something yourself?


Steph Sinclair I honestly don't think I could commit to writing a book. It's a lot of work and I don't have the dedication for it. I much prefer reading. :)


message 65: by Ati ୨୧ (new) - added it

Ati ୨୧ This was probably the only Rainbow Rowell book I liked, but it was too long and so boring at times I had to push myself to finish it. (Definitely not as bad as Eleanor & park tho) If it wasn't for some of the cute Levi moments I wouldn't have liked this book at all.
Yikes! Baz and Simon is going to be published?! I deff don't think I'm going to pick it up, fanfiction isn't my thing..


message 66: by Mary (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mary Landline did it for me.


Vlora I absolutely loved the book, but I agree with a lot of what you said as well. It's more like experiencing someone's life for a little while than a well-structured, plot-driven book. But the thing is, I'm a character person. I read books for the characters, and if I can't connect to them, the story has to be REALLY good to make me keep reading. So in a way Rowell is perfect for me, but I did have a couple of issues with it. I didn't really mind the length of the book, but there wasn't much happening and then the ending just felt completely rushed. Like, what the fuck, if you can take that much time for everything else, why rush the ending? Anyways, I loved the book, but I also understand your reasons for not feeling the same way.


message 68: by Jess (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jess It hurts my soul that you didn't love this one, but I do understand. Great review!


Giedre Hey, I'm with you on Simon & Baz issue. The fact that they exist in the same world as Harry Potter, being so crazily similar and all. Odd. And I really couldn't put myself through reading Simon & Baz bits, so I just flicked past those pages because.. Well because although I loved Harry Potter, S & B just seemed..dull.
Just like you I connected with the characters of the story and I felt involved but again, I couldn't quite see where the story was going. Or should I just think that the pointer was right there, when Wren said that everyone deserves a happy ending? Still, I wish it had addressed more issues (like what happened to Cath's conversations with Wren about their mother? All of a sudden they were just ignored) and other stuff. All in all I really enjoyed reading this book but I finished it and feel a bit empty.


Miranda Kerr-Bloom im currently reading this book and i couldnt agree more with what you have said. it felt slow paced for me and reading jt was half a drag... tho i could connect with the characters... i guess the character sketch is the only thing that keeps me from putting this book down


Natasha I only just discovered Rainbow and I dont see a long term relationship with her. Fangirl was boring and had no plot. Thats where she lost me and any future relationship we may have had


Silvia Turcios When I read it, somebody commented about this book and called it a "fluff" (I had to look for the definition) but that's exactly what this is: a "fluff". However I enjoyed reading it, make me realized how much I miss Harry Potter :')


Gabriella B. I agree with you completely, Steph. My friends have read all these Rainbow Rowell books, but I just can't get myself to enjoy them. I didn't recommend Fangirl to my friends for pretty much all the reasons you said you didn't like it. It took me too long to finish this book, it just dragged on and on.


Sonja Love your review! I agree with you on every point! The lack of plot and "goal" made me frustrated. I don't really like character-driven novels. I'm much more a plot-reader.


Michelle Ham Yep, I love this book but referencing HP? Big mistake. Like Berger mentioning an NYC socialite going out in public wearing a scrunchie! (Sex and the city).


Michelle Ham Yep, I love this book but referencing HP? Big mistake. Like Berger mentioning an NYC socialite going out in public wearing a scrunchie! (Sex and the city).


message 77: by Kay (new) - rated it 2 stars

Kay Agree, wholeheartedly!


Mangosk I liked Fangirl a lot, but I agreed with some points you made. I didn't really care too much about the fanfiction, or the actual Simon Snow books itself, because the little snippets that we were given really didn't catch my attention well enough. I suppose if I viewed them through HP-lenses, I could've liked them better, but somehow I just couldn't. And also about HP series coexisting with the Simon Snow books. It felt so weird for me, like I couldn't imagine the SS series gaining success if the HP books already existed, just simply because of how similar they both were! So I tended to skim through the parts featuring the fanfiction and the SS books, though I could tell they'd be interesting if I read them in full (well, I love HP, and yes that is a present tense.)
But I guess despite the lack of plot, as you mentioned, I still enjoyed the book a lot (I am all about the characters. Give me an interesting plot with an unlikeable protagonist is like torture to me - I'll get so fed up that I swear my blood pressure rises as I read the book. Which was the case for The Young Elites. Up till now I'm still not sure if I want to read the sequel. I'm desperate to know what comes next, but can't bring myself to think about the protagonist.)


message 79: by Mary (new) - rated it 2 stars

Mary Kristen wrote: "I agree with EVERYTHING! I'm a little over a third of the way through the book, and when Levi mentioned Harry Potter, I was like wait, isn't that like copyright infringement? How can Harry Potter a..."

Exactly, Kristen! :D There was literally nothing in this book that made me squeal like a Fangirl. I don't understand why it's so popular. Is it because Cath just wrote slash fanfics off of HP, or is it because people just latch onto any romance in YA? I have no idea...


Andrina Murray I actually really loved this book because of the characters and I slightly disagree with some of your points. BUT you are right about there not being a plot in any of her books. I've always felt like something was missing or I was always waiting for something but not really sure of what.


Faith i totally agree with your review! i honestly don't get the hype about this author. really wanted to like it, but i don't.


Marian Shannon Finally! Someone who I can agree with. Can't get myself to hop in the Rainbow bandwagon to be honest. I've tried reading Eleanor & Park and this, but don't understand the hype.


Rachel Hyde Just read the book and 100% agree with every word you've written.

I actually really enjoyed it but when I read the ending and realised that there was no resolution - I felt cheated!


Rachel Hyde Just read the book and 100% agree with every word you've written.

I actually really enjoyed it but when I read the ending and realised that there was no resolution - I felt cheated!


Fizzy I liked the book a lot but the Simon/baz fic was soooo boring. I agree with you about how annoying it was and how she'd read it to Levi which was really vexing that I just skipped those parts.


message 86: by Skye (new) - added it

Skye Vincent I totally agree, nothing really happens in this book. don't get me wrong I'm enjoying it so far but it's just completely plotless


message 87: by Elmi (new) - rated it 3 stars

Elmi I decided reading fangirl because it has so many good comments even though I'm not into romance books. In the beginning I like it so much, I like to know every characters well and Rainbow did it so well. But after I read a half of it I feel missing something. There just no conflict I mean a really conflict. The plot just meeh I dunno. But I finish the story thanks to Levy and Art. It's good story but I think romance is not so me XD, but hey I smile like an idiot every time Levi's coming. I'll try to read Eleanor&park and I hope it's better than fangirl. Thanks for the review, it's really great review and I think I got your point. Happy reading!


Farjana Totally agree and thank god i did not pick up elanor and park, saved my precious time from disappointment


Eliza Rapsodia Completely agree with you steph.


message 90: by Temi (new) - rated it 2 stars

Temi Fantastic review!!!! Exactly my thoughts.


Brittany Murray This review is everything that I wanted to say about this book but couldn't find the words. Guess I can skip writing my review now :-)


hpboy13 Agree, agree, so much agreement over here! I think that's my problem with Rowell - she keeps writing books with interesting concepts, but the concept is just a ribbon put on her characters muddying about.


Camille I've just finished the book and couldn't quite figure out why I didn't like it as much as the others. I think your review partly answers my question. Though I love character-driven novels, I felt that the absence of plot in Fangirl was too much. Also I thought the Simon and Baz extracts were somewhat useless and bored me. Thank you for this review !


message 94: by Kate (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kate I like your well written review! I completely agree with you. I never skim read, so I'm biting through hick layers of boredom to finish the plotless book.


Whitney I agree with this review and appreciate the heads up of the author's tendency to leave matters unresolved. That's what bothered me most about this book.


Kayla Ahahababa. The author/reader breakup: A tough one to get through. Struggled through this book too. Certain parts were academically relatable for me on that I am also an English major. And, as much as I hate to admit it, the awkward relationships we're painfully reminescent. Buttttt...I definitely she'd a few calories trudging through the dialogue and the too-similar-to-Harry-Potter "fandom". This was just "Meh" for me. Don't get the hype myself.


Jessica Wagstrom I have to humbly disagree (though this review is a few years old at this point). The plot *is* the characters and how they develop - it's Cath growing out of her shell, learning to stop hiding behind her fanfic and start living her life. Thus, whether or not she finished is irrelevant (though I felt it was implied she did). She was able to let it go and hang out with her friends, write her own stories, live her own life. I thought that was very clear, the climax of her story happening when she spoke up and said no to Nick. She wouldn't have done that at the beginning of the book.

All that said, I DO read for character, I prefer watching characters grow and change and if there's too much "plot" in the way (I'm assuming in this instance you refer to plot as a goal to accomplish or a mystery to solve, etc.), I get bored. So we are obviously different readers and that would clearly affect how we interpreted the book.


Whitney ^The commenter above wrote what I was going to say. The plot is Cath’s growth as a human being. Not everything can be an action movie. Some books are just about life in general.

Again, respect that this didn’t do it for you. But I thoroughly disagree.


MELANIE MARIE DELGADO ROSADO I finished the book feeling like....that's it? I didn't even know how to review it because the end felt like the middle of it. It wasn't a bad book it just seems unfinished. I didn't even know what the problems with it were until I read this review. You wrote my feelings perfectly.


Jessica (JT) Thank you for helping me understand why I did not enjoy this book. I could not quite figure it out until I read your review and realized that it's the lack of plot that I can't stand.


back to top