|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1635420148
| 9781635420142
| 1635420148
| 3.08
| 279
| Aug 2017
| Jan 01, 2021
|
liked it
|
‘I just have to write, give a story back to those who’ve lost theirs.’ It is often said we can live countless lives in the pages of books. Open any cov ‘I just have to write, give a story back to those who’ve lost theirs.’ It is often said we can live countless lives in the pages of books. Open any cover and we can dive into adventure or mystery, see fantastical worlds, cozy up in the mind of great thinkers, experience lives far beyond the reach of our own. Following in the tradition of One Thousand and One Nights, Ishmael, the narrator in Algerian author Kamel Daoud’s Zabor or the Psalms, Ishmael builds stories as sanctuary in a village that has shunned him yet turn to the hope of magic in his tales when death comes knocking. Like Scheherazade, he holds that the telling of stories offsets darkness, changes, fate and extends life. ‘Destiny is a notebook filled with mistakes that we can correct,’ he writes, but when his father—who abandoned and scorned him—finds his time for the grave is near, can Ishmael save him? And does he even want to? It is a slow book that is often wanting for some catharsis, but it is blissfully philosophical and delivered in such immaculately poetic prose (wonderfully translated by Emma Ramadan) that one immediately recognizes this as a hot bath to bask in rather than a brisk swim for the finish. Coupled with a whimsical, magical realist conceit, Daoud wrestles with the legacy of his literary predecessors, such as the works of Albert Camus that were central to his previous novel The Meursault Investigation, and brings the literature of the western world into conversation with the Arabic traditions informing Ishmael’s present for a gorgeous ode to storytelling and language via investigations into meaning and morality. ‘Why do I write? Because I witness, I am the guardian, I chase death away from my people because they are important and worthy of eternity. God writes, I do too.’ Storytelling helps us to live. It guides us, it allows us to share the past to inform the future, it is filled with the cultural artifacts of a time, it enriches our lives and bonds us with others. Storytelling has always been a part of human cultures and has adapted as cultures have changed, moving from cave paintings to the oral tradition, print and now new forms with social media such as memes or stories shared on tiktok. The importance of storytelling is at the heart of Zabor: or the Psalms and is viewed by our narrator as a life-giving gift he must share. ‘Why do we write and read books? To amuse ourselves, responds the crowd, uncritically. Wrong: the need is more ancient, more vital. Because there is death, there is an end, and thus a beginning that it is up to us to restore in ourselves, a first and final explanation. To write or recount is the only way to turn back time, counter it, restore it, or control it. There’s a link between conjugation and metaphysics, I’m sure of it. It’s the first law to decipher.’ For Ishmael, storytelling is a ward against death. Death, our inevitable fate which ‘inspires faith in spectators and steals it from the dying.’ Storytelling is also central to the life of the author too. Recently named the winner of the Prix Goncourt—France’s most prestigious literary award—for his 2024 novel Houris, journalist and author Kamel Daoud has had quite the career in storytelling and its adjacency with death. His first novel, The Meursault Investigation was winner of the Prix Goncourt du Premier Roman (First Novel prize) though the views expressed there along with his public statements in interviews and in his column in Le Quotidien d'Oran—a French-language Algerian newspaper for which he is the editor—garnered him multiple death threats and a fatwa issued by a Salafist imam. His works use storytelling to grapple with Algerian identity, both individually and nationally, against a history of colonialism that is often explored through his frequent references to French literature. The Meursault Investigation, for instance, is a rebuttal to Camus and his narrator from The Stranger told from the perspective of the brother to the man killed on the beach, emphasizing how the lack of a name afforded the dead man is symbolic of the French attitudes towards Algeria. While it is accompanied by a much larger swath of literary influences here, Camus’ work is once again present in Zabor from the very The Fall-esque narration marked by lofty self-purpose and monomania to thematic confrontations with the famous opening line of The Stranger—’Aujourd’hui, maman est morte’—in which our narrator is grappling with his emotions over the possible death of his father and if he should feel anything at all for a man that sent him down a life of solitude and suffering. For Ishmael, storytelling assuages suffering—hopefully even his own—and the novel takes the form of the story he decides to tell in an attempt to push back his father’s death by piling anecdotes and life history into the text. ‘I have to recount the story of my shipwreck. It will save someone, somewhere.’ Ishael tells us he is quite prolific, having penned dozens of imaginary novels by the time he was 14 and tells us he’s filled ‘5,436 notebooks,’ many of which he goes out and buries at night—a bit of foreshadowing to the ending—because he has no space. There is a playfulness here with him claiming authorship to works like The Lord of the Rings, The Plague, Confessions of a Mask, To a God Unknown and more, though he also tells us he just borrows the titles that he reads (unfortunately his literary heroes are notably lacking in women) . Still, we see in the works cited their influence in his own work and while the novel takes a course of its own and I’ll assess it on its own merits I was hoping it would give space for a greater sense of addressing the voices of the past with the voices of his own village and time. Daoud does well to write in a rather lofty style befitting the philosophical underpinnings of the works he references, though the novel can feel so caught up in its attempt to so elegantly talk about life and language that it neglects to add any narrative tension or release making for a rather mellow energy arriving at a sluggish pace. There are some real gems of lines, however, and this is an endlessly quotable novel although some of his better lines, such as referring to people as having ‘an ellipses of a life’ get reused to the point of losing their luster. ‘I had the choice of a god: write or keep silent.’ Still, this is a rather engaging novel in its assessment of literature, language, and the meaning of those in a mortal world. Like the narrator’s of Camus, there is a bit of an arrogance to Ishmael as he figures himself a god-like figure using language like Scherazad to forgo death. Yet as a lover of language and novels, one can’t help but find a certain charm in it. ‘The miracle is the possibility of the book. The power is in its coherence that stands firm. Its unity that prevails over death. Why? Because it proposes an alternative, resolute ending. It’s a tombstone that we can move backward or forward on our paths as readers and writers.’ There is a sense that felt very empathetically relatable, however, that we come to understand his monomania for storytelling as not only a buffer against death but his own loneliness and struggles with mental health and self-worth. Abandoned to an aunt who is simultaneously every role of woman to him be it mother, lover, companion, teacher, etc, et al, he is also mocked by the rest of the village and struggles with his own lack of employment or social standing. Who amongst us hasn’t found literature a great companion and fortress to feel alive within during times of need such as great loneliness? And in discovering this balm against the brutality of life he wishes to share. ‘Theres a form of martyrdom in my practice,’ he admits, ‘but also a sliver of silent satisfaction,’ and his self-appointed role as village storyteller helps his feelings of self-worth in a mind that we know is spiraling through mental health struggles. Mid-novel he delivers a heartbreaking question: ‘If I save lives by writing, who is the writer keeping me alive?’ Is the magic of his words a reflection of his own desires to stretch out his life in language across numerous pages? Is it an attempt to keep himself alive in the memories of readers? And, when we must finally be confronted with death as a force that even the most poetic of phrases cannot put to rest, what do we make of all our attempts at life through language? ‘Pen in hand, I could make miracles and heal illness with the titles of books I had never written.’ A ponderous and poetically gorgeous novel that does fall into a bit of lethargy under the weight of its words, Zabor: of the Psalms is an interesting examination of storytelling and its impact upon both the reader and the writer. A beautiful ode to the written word that will surely sink deep with those already enamored with writing, Kamel Daoud does an excellent job at addressing the long lineage of his canonical heroes as a mixing bowl for his own prose and thematic investigations. A bit of a slow read, but a journey well worth taking. 3.5/5 ‘I’ve established rituals and ruses and reached the formidable conclusion that my mastery of the language, this language I’ve fabricated, is not only an adventure but above all an ethical obligation.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 05, 2024
|
Nov 05, 2024
|
Nov 05, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1662527942
| 9781662527944
| B0D6RMSDSY
| 4.28
| 10,156
| Nov 01, 2024
| Nov 01, 2024
|
really liked it
|
Death comes for us all and yet, despite it being a natural part of life, it is also one of our greatest fears. Veteran horror author Joe Hill has long
Death comes for us all and yet, despite it being a natural part of life, it is also one of our greatest fears. Veteran horror author Joe Hill has long mined the uncertainty around our certain demise for his horror and Ushers, his new short story, brings us face to face with death and how those who might survive it have their own hauntings to deal with. With plenty of humor to accompany the horror, such as the story featuring detective duo Duvall and Oates to add some fun texture to this story, Hill manages to extract a great deal of strangeness and unease from the two police interviews with a young man who has survived death but may hold a horrific secret that kept him alive while those around him perished in mass violence. Short but riveting as well as disquieting, Ushers is a great dose of horror that manages to feel as therapeutic as it is traumatic. ‘You think there’s something suspicious about me because I wasn’t shot in a school shooting and I didn’t die in a train crash…better take a look around. You’re surrounded by people who didn’t die in school shootings and weren’t killed in train crashes. If that makes someone a criminal, you better call for backup.’ This was my first foray into Joe Hill and I have to say, I’d like to read more. He does an excellent job eeking out tension as an uneasy atmosphere seems destined to reach a boiling point and his playful banter and prose style is so easy to sink into and be swept along. It was just a nice little dose of horror joy to read. Not that the subject matter was joyful as two police investigate a young man who opted to not board a train that would later crash and kill everyone on board and is, at the start, denying that he insisted a young girl also not get on lest she will perish. It’s a short tale and what comes about is fascinating so I won’t spoil it, but this one takes quite the turn and is a wild little ride. I really liked how for such a short story there was so much texture to this with a lot of really great characterizations that nudge towards a lot of various ideas all succinctly housed within the scary story. We have the Black cop who tries to rationalize his position on a police force that has a long history of racism by arguing ‘People are always going to want law, and if the only lawmen are white, then it isn’t law anymore. It’s apartheid.’ There is also a rather comforting look at death as something to embrace instead of fear. ‘one of those fundamental human things,’ the young suspect says, a lesson he learned growing up around a retirement home where death was a frequent customer, ‘reminds you you’re part of nature.’ His advice: be a mammal. Enjoy life, accept death. It’s coming for us all either way. Ushers is a great, chilling little tale that feels far greater than the sum of its scant few pages. A big thank you to Ashely’s review for inspiring me to check out this wonderful little read. 4.5/5 ‘It’s best to just…be a mammal. Eat as much fresh fruit as you can. Spend time with trees. Hug the people that you love. Accept that death is as natural as the rest of life. Dogs understand that. Cats understand that. Only humans have a hard time with it.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1593075553
| 9781593075552
| 1593075553
| 3.84
| 2,666
| Nov 2002
| Jan 01, 2006
|
liked it
|
Imagine if Scooby-Doo just wasn’t that good and Butterfly by Crazy Town was the theme song. That’s the succinct version of my thoughts on Kurosagi Cor
Imagine if Scooby-Doo just wasn’t that good and Butterfly by Crazy Town was the theme song. That’s the succinct version of my thoughts on Kurosagi Corpse Delivery Service, a manga from Eiji Otsuks with lots of promise and lively premise but delivers…well a corpse of a story. Does anyone remember that weird early aughts Scooby Doo reboot where Scooby spoke full ass paragraphs but the need to keep up his classic speech patterns made it unbearable and Freddy runs off to be homeless and “find himself” and returns to find Shaggy in his military recruit buzzcut and Daphne dating the werewolf guy from Twilight? Imagine that but like, if the main character looked like Ang from Avatar with a cigarette addiction instead of blue tattoos but hey don’t worry, they still have the Mystery Machine. Kind of. [image] Okay I’m being harsh but like, this just felt really clunky. It’s the start of a fairly lengthy series so maybe it finds it’s footing but I must admit I’m not invested enough to find out. The premise is pretty cool though. These volunteer students each with their own unique paranormal skills&mdash:talking to the dead, being a medium through an eerie frog hand puppet, being the unsettling Lolita-esque girl, having cool hair, that sort of thing—team up to solve some death mysteries. The dead don’t like to stay dead though and hijinks ensue. It’s alright, it just had a rather jumpy delivery and never really came together that well. But ghost talker Ang is cool and haunted and shit so that’s fun. [image] I did really like the art a lot, I will give it that. The landscapes are crisp, the characters have a lot of expression and the ghastly stuff really pops off. I love the corpse violence, it’s just real good. [image] There are also a ton of pretty badass group photo shots. But each one just seems to assert a repeat of the theme song should play over the frame as cool hair guy puts on sunglasses but instead of Roger Daltrey shouting “yeaaaaaaaAAAAHH!” over windmill guitar it’s just “come my lady / come come my lady / You're my butterfly / shu-gah bay-bay.” Why would I put that in you’re head? I heartily apologize. [image] YeaaaaaAAAAH! Okay fine, this was kind of fun. But like the kind of fun you don’t want to admit. Don’t look at my Hoopla downloads in the coming weeks ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 31, 2024
|
Oct 31, 2024
|
Oct 31, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
8886200536
| 9788886200530
| 8886200536
| 4.53
| 47
| unknown
| Sep 25, 2024
|
it was amazing
|
We are all of us connected, careening through existence riccochetting and reacting to the lives and actions of those around us. This intertwined exist
We are all of us connected, careening through existence riccochetting and reacting to the lives and actions of those around us. This intertwined existence is at the heart of Iranian author and artist Yasmeen Abedifard’s graphic novel of brief, linked stories in When to Pick a Pomegranate. A quiet yet haunting collection of philosophically ponderous examinations between two recurring souls, Anar the pomegranate and Guli the human woman, Abedifard looks at the cycle of life and death, growth and destruction through a look at the desires, disdain, hungers, and hurts that drive our lives together. Pushed into existence by a god-like figure represented by a giant hand to make us consider the implications of life alongside the characters, When to Pick a Pomegranate moves through chapters housed as metaphorical depictions of the plant life cycle for a deeply moving and thoughtful little work told through Abedifard’s whimsical artwork. [image] [Image Text: Stop the speculations about your purpose! You will travel a path that is held up by strings outside your reach.] I really enjoyed this brief but beautiful little work and once again Silver Sprocket lives up to their claim of being an awesome, radical indie publisher. Seriously, everything they put out is brilliant (and they make it all available for free through the library Hoopla app, so extra shout out to them for supporting libraries!). This is a really ponderous work that dives into the surreal and abstract to dredge up some rather heartwrenching and harrowing ideas on mortality and the interconnectedness of all living things. There are some rather existentially haunting moments, such as early on when we watch Anar the pomegranate endure an eternity of growing, dying in pain and being reborn in the seeds his former self sheds: [image] [Image Text: Again I am born…Will it never cease?] Moving through the stages of plant life with rather unsettling yet meaningful looks at concepts like propagation (she rips his arm off and plants it to grow another Anar), Ripe and Rotten, fermentation and more, this becomes a rather insightful look at life. There are moments that look at their connectivity (and revulsion) as artist and muse, gardener and garden, hunger and food and more that show how time and time again through life after life they depend on each other and affect the wellbeing of the other. It can really sting at times but it is also rather lovely in its full effect. [image] [Image Text: why did I imagine a world with you?] When to Pick a Pomegranate is a really amazing and thoughtful work that speaks volumes even in the quietude of its brief pages. Yasmeen Abedifard does a fantastic job here and I absolutely loved this and I hope you will too. 5/5 [image] So what did you learn? ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 26, 2024
|
Oct 26, 2024
|
Oct 26, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0593537610
| 9780593537619
| 0593537610
| 4.23
| 29,156
| Jan 23, 2024
| Jan 23, 2024
|
really liked it
|
**Shortlisted for the National Book Award in Fiction 2024** ‘In heaven, opportunity costs,’ wrote Kaveh Akbar in his poem The Palace. It is the concept **Shortlisted for the National Book Award in Fiction 2024** ‘In heaven, opportunity costs,’ wrote Kaveh Akbar in his poem The Palace. It is the concept of martyrdom, that sacrifices must be made—the laying down of one’s life for a cause—but in exchange is eternal glory. It is also the existential question at the heart of Martyr!, Akbar’s debut novel, as the young Cyrus’ journey towards sobriety is also an internal quest to consider how one’s own death might serve to better illuminate a life now given in sacrifice. For a book about death, depression and an aching for understanding, it never feels downbeat as Akbar uplifts the wandering narrative with wry humor and whimsicality and a sense that, in the grand scheme of things, grace outshines the bleakness of rage. It is an ambitious and multifaceted work where not every element quite sticks the landing, though in keeping with the sense of grace, these aspects are easily overlooked by the power and beauty of the whole. As intricate and layered as his poetry, Akbar’s Martyr! and Cyrus’ searing self-journey is an excellent existential investigation into addiction in the face of mental health, identity in the face of history, and life and legacy in the face of death. ‘I just want to write an epic. A book. Something about secular, pacifist martyrs. People who gave their lives to something larger than themselves. No swords in their hands.’ Kaveh Akbar has emerged as an icon of modern poetry in recent years. His first full-length collection, Calling a Wolf a Wolf (a book that, like Martyr! deals heavily into addiction and the struggles towards sobriety), completely floored me when it came out and I ended up rebuying it twice after being so insistent someone read it that I’d give them my copy. Beyond his own poetry, Akbar has been such a shining light of advocacy for modern poetry, founding Divedapper as a home for modern poets to interview each other and share their voices, writing the weekly column Poetry RX for The Paris Review, and publishing his recent anthology The Penguin Book of Spiritual Verse: 110 Poets on the Divine. Here we have Cyrus also compiling an anthology of sorts, spending the duration of the novel on his “The Book of Martyrs” of ‘people who at least tried to make their deaths mean something.’ He too, hopes to become a martyr for art and complete the work with his own suicide. Akbar’s grounding in poetry shines even in this first long-form fictional release with a narrative that isn’t directionless, persay, but wanders into various narratives, mingles with history to crack it open and extract ‘the hidden voice’ inside, or occasionally diverts into abstraction. It reads as less confined as a typical novel and more in the boundless freedom of a poetry, though the habit of often remaining in metaphorical language and cashing in on frequent references works better in his poetry than prose. Still, I enjoy the frequent insertions of Cyrus’ documents or poems and quotes from real news articles to better fold the historical elements into the work. This was a deeply moving work. Akbar taps into dark territory to present it with a lightness of humor and grace that bears the fingerprints of having been there themselves. The way something dark can be spoken of with a laugh that isn’t barbed with offense to those who experience it but instead a laugh in the face of it, because you’ve confronted it, locked eyes, and survived. For the sake of sensitivity, readers should know that this deals heavily in themes of depression and suicide, but I found it to be profoundly moving. It also felt familiar. Cyrus reads like a lot of people I’ve known, the sad art types, the sort of people I’ve often been especially when I was 19 of 20 and grappling with darkness myself. The sort of darkness that pushes a lot of people into drink, drugs and poetry like Cyrus. It can be difficult to read at times. ‘ What formed in Cyrus's mind was a blunt and inarticulable plea to be done, for a reprieve from navigating what had become to him an unnavigable world, to not have to spend the next decade or decades unraveling what it all meant, had meant, would mean. The anger he felt at his mother. The vanished. The abandoner. But, also, the pride he felt for her, now. The great artist. It was too much. He prayed for an end to the tyranny of all symbols, beginning with language… It’s the sort of introspective work that reminds you of hard times, the ones you might try to make art out of. The kind that finds you pleading with yourself internally, ‘ forming a prayer not exactly in language.’ What really works is that, for having a lot of universiality, it is also highly specific and culturally informed. It’s something many can relate to, but also respect as not their own and an opportunity to listen and learn. I really appreciate Akbar for sharing it with us all. ‘To say no to a new day would be unthinkable. So each morning you said yes, then stepped into the consequence.’ Family and identity play a large role here and are often looked at in context of the history of conflict. Cyrus’ mother was killed in the real-life murder of Iranian Flight 655 when the US navy launched missels at the passanger aircraft in 1988. All aboard were killed yet Cyrus escaped the disaster as he was left behind for being deemed too young for the flight. Quite a heavy burden to bear while watching one’s father sink into alcoholism and dead-end labor in the aftermath, all but inevitably leading to Cyrus’ own struggles with addiction. Elements such as this and the martyrs of Cyrus’ book help situate the novel in the now and help give a historical stage for his family martyrdom such as his uncle dressed as the Angel of Death in battle as a martyr for a national cause.Though some of the more surreal, imagined moments in history felt a bit awkward, I was charmed by the ambitiousness of them. ‘Grace, that dictionary. A place where everything was attached to a meaning.’ Through Cyrus we also get an interesting exploration into identity, not being between both Persian and American identities but both at once. This sort of duality is thematic to the novel with Cyrus feeling both grace and rage at once. ‘But that's a misunderstanding of grace, which doesn't ask to be paid back. Even when you ve been given the gift twice, emerged from your own death to run away from your husband. Leaving him to grieve you, to raise your child by himself.’ Grace and forgiveness are key to the novel, grace that Cyrus was able to live, ‘grace that the man—the boy, reall—at the border accepted my bribe,’ or even grace in language, the medium through which Cyrus works now that his job as a hospital actor is over. ‘When I learned how to say "cigarette," I walked around saying it to myself like a prayer, like an incantation. see-GARR-ett. It was my favorite word. If I walked up to someone and said it, one time in every five they'd hand me one. Language could make a meal like that.’ The novel moves to New York City when Cyrus discovers Iranian-American artist Orkideh who also plans to use death as an artistic medium. Martyr!, at its heart, is an exploration of ‘the big pathological sad,’ or the ways that we all are ‘just a long emptiness, waiting to be filled,’ as Cyrus recounts from an old Muslim tale. This book is less about the emptiness, however, than it is about how we fill it. Cyrus had filled it with alcohol and found himself still empty. Now his life has shaped into a quest to understand that which, as Orkideh quips, has led him to grapple with all the Persian checkboxes of death, of poetry and an awe of mysticism. Like the form of the novel Martyr! itself, this is a journey with no defined shape and this often makes the soul-searching feel directionless, subjective, and highly existential. ‘This idea for the book, for his own dying going into the museum he'd had a grasp of its shape, why it mattered. It was a tidy, gallant idea about leaving life for something larger than mere living. Becoming an earth martyr. It made sense, and then suddenly it didn't. It held a shape and then suddenly it didn't.’ I suspect the term navel-gazing will appear in the criticisms of this book, but I happen to like that sort of thing in a novel. I also enjoy the way this felt like an expression of poetry but as a novel. Akbar plays with familiar territory for those who have read his poetry but takes it in bold and exciting directions and Martyr! makes for a darkly humorous read that asks a lot of big questions that, though they may not always arrive at conclusive answers, reminds us that the quest for knowledge is fulfilling in its own right. May we all find something to fill that emptiness. 4/5 'A photograph can say 'this is what it was.' Language can only say 'this is what it was like.'' ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 26, 2024
|
Jan 26, 2024
|
Jan 23, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
006332766X
| 9780063327665
| 006332766X
| 3.98
| 3,785
| Jan 09, 2024
| Jan 09, 2024
|
it was amazing
|
Shame casts a lengthy shadow over the life of a young girl in Poor Deer, the brilliant second novel from Claire Oshetsky. Haunted by a trauma from ear
Shame casts a lengthy shadow over the life of a young girl in Poor Deer, the brilliant second novel from Claire Oshetsky. Haunted by a trauma from early childhood that is muddled in misremembrance and living under a reputation marred by local rumor, Margaret Murphy has grown up under a pervading feeling of guilt that never lets her out of its grasp. In the dark hours of life we often turn to stories to make sense of our circumstances and light a candle of hope, yet Maragaret’s efforts to confess or seek atonement are under the scrutiny of the titular Poor Deer, a ghostly personification of guilt that kicks its hooves and demands only truth. All efforts to retell her past or imagine a brighter future are dashed under Poor Deer’s hooves and cast aside as ‘pretty lies.’ For Poor Deer ‘demands justice. She never forgives,’ and truth as well as the possibility of self-forgiveness or redemption become a mystery around which the novel spirals. This one truly amazed and affected me. A quiet yet powerful book, Oshetsky deftly balances the murky, oppressive weight of guilt that permeates the story with a lightness and grace of prose as they harness the atmosphere of fairy tales in order to propel the story on a feeling of whimsicality even despite the darkness. The vibes are outstanding, this is an unforgettable and utterly unique book. A heartfelt and heartwrenching investigation into the ways shame can linger a lifetime and reframe our realities, Poor Deer is ultimately a moving expression as to ‘why we press on, even after all hope is lost,’ and makes for an incredible reading experience. ‘Wherever you go, I will go, and wherever you live, I will live; and your sorrows will be my sorrows, and I will never leave you.’ While shame and guilt is often a frequent landscape to mine for literary insights, Oshetsky takes a rather unique approach that makes Poor Deer really unlike anything else I’ve ever read. It has a sense of magical realism, yet it reads with a fresh texture that defies easy categorization that touches upon the thematic insights into the ways truths sometimes don’t seem to line up. Poor Deer—a malapropism of the phrase “poor dear” Margaret hears after the tragedy of Agne’s death (several of these occur, humorously, in text such as Sister Bony Face being presumably Sister Boniface)—is a hulking, rather terrifying beast who personifies shame and the slope of her shoulders was the shape of grief itself.’ Always lurking in the corner or aggressively in Margaret’s face, Poor Deer is unsettling yet whimsical in a way only the best of A24 films could try to capture. ‘Are you my angel or my devil,’ young Margaret asks only to realize this dichotomy is beside the point for this beast. ‘There's always a price to pay for our sins and follies, Bunny, and you'll be paying that price forever and a day.’ This is often a difficult book to read as the focal point of tragedy is the horrific death of a 4 year old child (not a spoiler, we know right away but the mystery is a question of culpability) and the equally horrific treatment of the 4 year old who survives the day. It is truly shattering to experience a young girl feeling the rejection of her own mother as Oshetsky examines how one death can send a shockwave of destruction through two families and beyond (the element that Florence loses her best friend and potential love interest due to the tragedy is another really excellent thread in the story). Margaret, too young to fully comprehend, will now spend her life trying to sort out her shame and the events of that day, unable to feel forgiveness externally making self-forgiveness all the more fleeting. Set in a present as Margaret is 16 and writing her past from a motel room after picking up a stranger and her young child, most of the novel meanders through the whole of her life, bringing us back to the present where further lives may be in peril. ‘Guilt is the worst of all. Guilt is the hollow heart of it. Guilt will follow her everywhere, two steps behind.’ Margaret’s proximity to forgiveness and redemption is further exacerbated by her and her community's Catholicism, being lashed by proclamations of damnation and several symbolic moments of churches bearing down upon her. We also have the loss of a finger that possibly serves as a sort of mark of Cain symbolism. It becomes complex though as religion also offers a path for forgiveness and even when someone offers her that as an opportunity, Margaret feels unworthy because of what she has done. ‘I expect great things of you, Margaret Murphy. Because you have suffered. There will come a day when you will get your chance. You will atone. You will save a life. You will change the world for the better. I believe it. I’ve prayed over it. One day God is going to put the chance right there in front of you.’ Always the blockade and barrier, Poor Deer brushes aside any hope of forgiveness, even when Margaret attempts to confess. ‘God isn’t stronger than me,’ Poor Deer warns, ‘no one is stronger than me.’ In an interveiw with Shelbi Polk for Shondaland, Oshetsky discusses ‘growing up in a Catholic household, which was very mystical and very mixed with superstition,’ and how that informs the way the religious and fairy tale elements coalesce here as well as the way religions offers no solace for Margaret: ‘My idea of God was very fairy tale-like. Sometimes it was mixed up with The Wizard of Oz. So, it seemed very natural to me to write that way. A child would have this fairy tale-like understanding of the world, and of God, and of sin and forgiveness…Catholicism has zero answers for this little girl. If you’re 4 and you kill someone, that’s not a sin. You’re not capable of mortal sin. So, how could she even confess it? It’s outside of the religion entirely. And yet, of course, she’s gonna carry that guilt forward forever. So, I wanted to explore that too, the way faith totally fails her. It has no answers for her.’ Without anywhere else to turn, Margaret finds solace in storytelling. Despite the sorrow, her childhood has been full of ‘incantatory wonderings’ on the ways ‘words strung out like unmatched beads on a wire’ and she harnesses words like a tool to dig at an understanding of the past and an avenue to imagine possible futures. ‘You’ve told it all wrong again — you little monster.’ Neil Gaiman—in a paraphrase of G.K. Chesterton—wrote that ‘fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.’ We see this here and the ways storytelling, such as this dark fairy tale-esque novel, is a way for Margaret to ‘finally beginning to figure out how to untie the impossible knot of a problem that had tied me up, for all the years of my life.’ Even if Poor Deer demands she rewrite again and again to finally embrace the truth, each new attempt at individual pieces gives her a deeper understanding of the whole. ‘When I finally did find a way to untie that impossible knot, then all the most important questions in life would be answered. Why we love. Why we suffer. How we make sense of the happenings in our lives. The stories we tell ourselves to make it through to the next day. Why we press on, even after all hope is lost.’ When are ‘pretty lies’ or ‘pretty stories’ a harmful lie and when are they a solace that helps better understand truth from the abstract. It is like the story Margaret hears of The Little Match Girl where it ends in death but the girl going to God is a solace, yet when Margaret insists Agnes is an angel she is called a fool and told Agnes ‘is in the ground.’ Is one or the other a better framing, and is Poor Deer’s insistence on a life for a life a better redemption than one Margaret can dream up? ‘No one had ever told Margaret that they exdpected great things of her before. She couldn’t change the past, but maybe one day she could make up for it.’ A short novel that will truly bore deep into your heart and shake you up inside, Claire Oshetsky’s Poor Deer is an absolute success. Often ambiguous as is seeks out the elusive answers to its own mysteries, this is an emotional ride that plunges you deep in examinations of grief and shame. Though don’t worry, you will arrive on the other side much better for it. While it does hit you with really heavy scenes it is all interspersed with rather comic vignettes that really break up the weight of things. With incredible prose and a fascinating narrative, Poor Deer is a must read that will haunt me for a long time to come. 5/5 ‘Even in the most terrible chapters of my life, I’ve always known a certain savage beauty.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 16, 2024
|
Feb 26, 2024
|
Nov 16, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1913867498
| 9781913867492
| 1913867498
| 3.95
| 1,817
| Oct 01, 2013
| Apr 11, 2023
|
really liked it
|
**Winner of the 2024 Republic of Consciousness Prize** ‘For sure no one leaves a slaughterhouse unscathed.’ Often a novel can serve as a mirror, reflect **Winner of the 2024 Republic of Consciousness Prize** ‘For sure no one leaves a slaughterhouse unscathed.’ Often a novel can serve as a mirror, reflecting back the dark corners of society we tend to avert our attention from and asking us to consider our complicity in it. Such is the case of Brazilian author Ana Paula Maia’s Of Cattle and Men, where her direct, visceral prose—gorgeously translated from the Portuguese by Zoë Perry—unsettles with apocalyptic anxieties as much as it captivates and directs our attention to the murky moral musings at the heart of the story. Set in a small community largely upheld by a slaughterhouse and a meat processing plant, we follow men like stun operator Edgar Wilson and other slaughterhouse workers through a story that interrogates our relationship to meat, violence, and consumption. It is a clever story, one that makes us question where the dividing line is between ‘impure but morally acceptable’ and outright damnation, and Maia succeeds by allowing the narrative presentation of events speak for themselves instead of heavy-handed moralizing. Yet still the message is resoundingly clear and chilling. A steady stream of dread and death propels this tale of both human and bovine brutality and Of Cattle and Men is as evocative as it is insightful. ‘Somebody’s got to do the dirty work. Other people’s dirty work. Nobody wants to do that sort of thing. That’s why God put guys like you and me on this earth.’ Having recently been darkly delighted by Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender is the Flesh , a novel that also functions as an indictment of the meat industry where the line between human and animal becomes alarmingly blurred, I was please to find Of Cattle and Men still felt very fresh and unique read right after it. Maia has garnered comparisons with Cormac McCarthy for the raw brutality and poetic investigations into moral darkness that come alive in both their works. I see this most in the way they both expand moral investigation into the solemn weightiness of religious aesthetics is one of the sharpest edges to cut into both the reader and narrative. ‘He believes that the sacramental host cleanses him of all impurity and redeems him of all imperfection. And so, by eating Christ’s flesh and drinking His blood, he feels part of Christ. But it never occurred to him that by eating the flesh of those cattle and drinking their blood, he would also become part of the animals he slaughters every day.’ Though Maia’s prose is a glorious craft all to its own. She cites Fyodor Dostoevsky as a major influence and in that spirit her language is very raw and direct, reflective of the working class men it represents. The tone of this novella feels like a spiral towards madness, where animal and human bodies are piling up, ‘the hue of the twilight sky resembles that of a pomegranate cut in half’ or a statue of a saint canonized for healing plague victims falls and shatters all begins to amalgamate towards a feeling like the world might crack open at any moment to drip the blood of an apocalypse across the desiccated landscape. And what better setting for musings on damnation and inhumanity than a slaughterhouse? Touro do Milo Slaughterhouse is hidden away from the public who mostly only see the final product either on a tidy market shelf or seasoned, grilled and enticing on a plate, both with ‘not one glimpse of the unbridled horror behind something so tender and delicious.’ Through the mundane details of life amongst the men and beats in the slaughterhouse, we quickly begin to detect that ‘nobody will get out of here unscathed,’ a point made all the more chilling because ‘this thought makes Edgar Wilson glad’ as all who experience it, including the reader, will be forced to confront the darkness within instead of sweeping it out of sight, out of mind. ‘These are the confessions of blood and death of those who have already been condemned.’ Through Edgar we see the allegorical message of the novel about ‘death that gives life.’ There are the many condemnations of the meat industry here, which even Edgar acknowledges is foul. When asked by a student touring the facility if he considers himself a murderer, he is quick to respond affirmatively. But when asked if he is ashamed he counters with a question if she has ever eaten a hamburger—she has—and ‘how do you think it got there?’ There are no tidy moral boundaries here and Maia asks us to consider our distance of complicity. ‘Those who eat are many, and they are never satiated. They are all men of blood, those who kill and those who eat. No one goes unpunished.’ We see how the men need these jobs to put food on the table, and we see how the cows that would normally go to waste are given to the hungry who beg outside the slaughterhouse. Yes it is all monstrous but society has integrated it to such an extent that it is difficult to disentangle without collapsing the local economy. And when we are forced to consider if the cows can be aware and have agency—an idea brought on by their increasingly bizarre behavioir—the darkness of it all really takes hold. ‘One abyss calling out to another abyss.’ Though those who must partake in upholding the industry go through life like damned souls, and many meet abrupt, violent deaths. There is a certain hardness to Wilson—it is said he survived a blast in a mine even the Devil himself couldn’t have escaped from teasing the idea of Wilson as somehow an unholy, unstoppable being—and he’s not proud of what he does, but if someone has to do it, then let it be him, who has pity on those irrational beasts.’ He blesses each cow before executing it and abhors cruelty to the animals, going so far as murdering a man for not taking care to kill the cows properly. The divide between beast and man blurs throughout the novel, with the men sleeping in the field near the cows and ‘only the voices on one side and the mooing on the other distinguish the men from the ruminants,’ or the students touring the facility ‘looking like distressed cattle on their way to be stunned’. There is the juxtaposition of the cows seen as ‘impure but morally acceptable’ murder with the actions of Edgar against men he finds reprehensible and those of a man just out of prison for murder Edgar meets who dismisses the severity of his crimes because the dead man was a bad man. Of Cattle and Men is a chilling tale of the slippery slope of justifying violence and the damned men who carry out the violence. The writing in this is incredibly gripping and we can feel the dread building in every page. A searing criticism of the meat industry, this is a quick novella but one that will certainly haunt you for a long time. 4/5 ‘Not even the moon can separate heaven from earth. It’s as if that vastness had swallowed up the valley, as if Edgar Wilson were inside the belly of God, at the beginning of creation, when everything was darkness. ’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 02, 2023
|
Nov 02, 2023
|
Nov 02, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
006294083X
| 9780062940834
| 006294083X
| 3.98
| 13,901
| Jan 03, 2019
| Jan 22, 2019
|
liked it
|
‘The shuttle of the train wheel struck doom into her brain.’ If life is hurtling us towards our destruction, one would wish we could at least take cont ‘The shuttle of the train wheel struck doom into her brain.’ If life is hurtling us towards our destruction, one would wish we could at least take control over our inevitable course towards corpse-hood. Or is our trajectory so strongly determined by forces outside of us that we barely have any agency left. Such is the question in Mary Ventura and the Ninth Kingdom, a story written by Sylvia Plath when she was 20 years old and attending Smith College. It isn’t just the title, which takes its namesake from a high-school friend of Plath’s, that seems to invoke a spirit of epic fantasy, coming-of-age tales as Plath infuses her story with many of the genre elements such as threatening journey and an older mentor figure, all shrouded in menacing mystery. Drenched in a tone of lurking dread as what seems like an innocent train trip in waking reality begins to crumble into something ominously horrific, Mary Ventura and the Ninth Gate is an eerie, fun, and youthful story that displays Plath’s great promise, though also does read more like an artist attempting to discover their style and dressing it up in surreal, surprise twists. ‘Everyone has to go away sooner or later.’ Following a $500 winning prize from Mademoiselle magazine for her short story Sunday at the Mintons, Plath departed from her realist fiction to a ‘vague symbolic tale,’ as she called it, inspired by her recent love for the art of Giorgio de Chirico. The initial draft was rejected, and Plath would revise it many times, including a reworked version for a religious short story contest with a different ending to make it an allegory for, in Plath’s own words, passing ‘ through the temptation of the material world, grows aware of her own idealism and power to help others, and discovers the City of God.’ As Plath was herself an atheist, she eventually declined to submit it and the story has collected dust in her archives. It was recently published in its original form, which Plath scholars assert is the best version, and it is quite an exciting little story to read that gives early insight into her themes, though on it’s own it isn’t much more than a curio for Plath enthusiasts. Still we see Plath using surrealism to grapple with concepts of mental health struggles and taking agency in one’s life, something that would define further in Esther Greenwood of The Bell Jar. [image] Giorgio de Chirico, Present and Past Still, it is a fun and unsettling tale, rather Dantean in its approach (Plath had recently read Inferno) with a story of a train passing through stations with increasing foreboding. She does an excellent job at building tone with striking imagery portending doom. The world is described as grey, smokey and eventually frozen over, with violent looking sunsets, lips the color of blood, an interior to the train with wine red colored upholstery where all the goings on of laughter and feasting takes on a tone of near-grotesque. ‘Guilt, the train wheels clucked like round black birds, and guilt, and guilt, and guilt,’ the girl observes, and the shift from regular reality to doom is best encapsulated when ‘adorable brothers across the aisle rapidly devolve into physical violence…blood oozed from a purpling bruise.’ Her use of color is fantastic here. As the journey progresses, the creeping feeling that something is not right takes hold of Mary. What the Ninth Kingdom is exactly we never learn for sure, and Plath does well by allowing her allegory to remain vague and interperetable. Whatever it is, it isn’t good and the woman who becomes Mary’s companion takes on a sort of potential guide—or possibly mentor—role. ‘There are no return trips on this line,” the woman said softly. “Once you get to the ninth kingdom, there is no going back. It is the kingdom of negation, of the frozen will. It has many names.’ We are all headed towards our deaths and Mary is horrified to see the passengers all laughing and carrying on in ways described with sexual or violent undertones as if the final stop at the Ninth Kingdom isn’t coming. The train is an apt setting as a force of unstoppable motion with a certain destination. ‘They are blind’ she is told, and perhaps we all are looking the other way and enjoying a ride that will end in death which seems a rather pessimistic look but through Plath we often see life simply as suffering. Mary’s pleas to escape are brushed aside and when she protests her parents made her take the trip she is reminded she negated her own agency by allowing them to force her. For all our follies, we could have made other decisions. ‘They just accept it when the time comes,’ the woman says. But perhaps she can find ‘the one assertion of the will remaining’ and escape. The story is certainly open for interpretation and can be read as any means of taking our lives into our own hands and escaping an overwhelming bleakness. Though knowing mere months after writing this Plath had her first suicide attempt does nudge a hindsight reading of the ending plausibly being about simply taking ones own life to espace. Plath has been criticized for using historical tragedies such as the holocaust as metaphors for her own personal struggles, as well as the racism in The Bell Jar, and the repeated mention of the waiter as Black here seems a bit cumbersome though is also one of the several ways she denotes class differences between the passengers and the crew. The train taking them to their doom may be a holocaust reference (there are quick asides about mass arrests and executions) but is used in its own way here, so make of any of that what you will. It does feel like the sort of story one comes up with in college, where the surreal twist “reality isn’t reality at all!” feels much more fresh (this was the 1950s though so perhaps it feels a bit stale after how frequently that was a narrative trick in 1990s films and books) and while it reads like a younger Plath, it still reads quite impressively. Mary Ventura and the Ninth Kingdom is an unearthed nugget of literary history that fans of Sylvia Plath will no doubt love to discover and trace the trajectory of her themes on suffering and women attempting to wrestle back their own agency. While I wouldn’t recommend it as anyone’s first introduction to her, it is still an engaging and thought provoking story for those who aren’t very familiar with Plath as well. Short, surreal, and scorching the reader in dread, this is a fun, eerie little read from the vaults. 3.5/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 17, 2023
|
Jun 17, 2023
|
Jun 17, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0571316913
| 9780571316915
| 0571316913
| 3.74
| 1,066
| 1954
| Jul 03, 2014
|
liked it
|
When a war comes to an Nigerian village, a young boy and his brother must flee into the African wilderness and begin a surreal journey through the rea
When a war comes to an Nigerian village, a young boy and his brother must flee into the African wilderness and begin a surreal journey through the realm of ghosts in Amos Tutuola’s My Life in the Bush of Ghosts. Tutuola’s second novel, this follow-up to The Palm-Wine Drinkard reads in a very similar fashion of meanderingly episodic tales that infuses Yoruba folklore and culture with that of European and Christian colonialism and brings us face to face with the trickery and treachery of ghosts and beasts. Bewilderingly imaginative, this surreal odyssey even inspired David Byrne (of the Talking Heads) and Brian Eno to collaborate on an album of the same name (though Byrne admits neither of them have actually ever read the book and just felt the title ‘seemed to encapsulate what this record was about’). A fun and mind-bending look at traditional folklore all told in a unique voice, My Life in the Bush of Ghosts is an entertaining read, if a bit cumbersome at times, that is surprise after surprise and worth the journey. ‘I was too young to know that it was a dreadful bush or it was banned to be entered by any earthly person’ Entering the “bush” is no small undertaking in this novel, and across these pages we watch the narrator go from ghost town to ghost town, always having to quickly adapt to the expectations of each place and navigating the oddities therein. Tutuola delivers a cavalcade of creepy, ghostly characters that seem almost if Miyazaki told of a terrifying fever dream. We have ghosts that enter a womb to be born sickly in order to steal the parent’s money they will offer to the gods for the child’s health, ghosts with televisions for hands, bloodthirsty spider beasts, ghostly kings and more in this book where having a multitude of heads or eyes is just something you’ll get used to. Our narrator travels the bush in a sort-of bildungsroman, going through multiple marriages, jobs in various ghost towns, and even having to overthrow his own slave-holding brother. The story and construction of it is very similar to The Palm-Wine Drinkard, with non-traditional phrasing and poetic license with words that add to the surreal nature and destabilize you in Tutuola’s ethereal realm. I found this one to benefit from being more structured than Palm-Wine had been (though it is still more a collection of tales threaded together, and not always in chronological order) though having read this perhaps too soon after I found the former to give off more imaginative enthrallment while this felt like much of the same as I had read already there. Which isn’t a bad thing, and this is still so imaginative and magical but I was thankful it isn’t altogether very long. One thing I really appreciated was the emphasis on music here. There is a lovely notion that music was able to reach a inner memories of childhood wonder that breaks down his brother, but there is also mention of how beautiful music of the ghost realm turns out to actually be a lost boy stuck in a log hunted by a snake. Suffering turned into beauty sort of idea, and how for the realm of ghosts the ideas of right and wrong just does not exist. Something else that I felt really works is the nearly timeless feel to the narrative where often you assume it must be set way in the past but then there are nods to modern (well of the 1950s) technology like phones and televisions. Tutuola is good at destabilizing all your senses as a reader. My Life in the Bush of Ghosts is an eerie, surreal tale that feels much like listening to a collection of stories in the oral tradition, threading an epic odyssey in order to tell multiple stories of different ghosts and other folklore. It is a fascinating look at a realm of the dead, and also confronts issues of christian colonialism and the way it tries to erase indigenous culture and impose conformity. Often violently. It is not the easiest of reads, with rather circuitous storytelling that often feels like overly long lists, but it is also thought provoking and fascinating. Of the two novellas, I think I preferred his first though this was certainly a worthwhile read. 3.5/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Jun 08, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0802161510
| 9780802161512
| 0802161510
| 3.70
| 1,344
| 2023
| Oct 24, 2023
|
really liked it
|
A lifetime of winding fairy tales and the fantastical with facts unstitched from time made it only natural for Winterson to approach stories of ghosts
A lifetime of winding fairy tales and the fantastical with facts unstitched from time made it only natural for Winterson to approach stories of ghosts and death in an AI present. Now that I’ve returned to where I have a valid SIM card and internet access, I wanted to share some insights from Winterson having gotten to see her speak several times over the weekend at Hay Festival in Wales. [image] Winterson spoke about he experiences with ghosts and the history of ghost stories to propel a larger discussion around her most recent book, Night Side of the River, which I eagerly devoured when it came out this past autumn. For Winterson, it is only all too understandable that the past would somehow be contained within the present and the variety of ways we think about ghosts are manifestations of this. She even shared that she has her own ghost living in her house and he often frightens her girlfriend with loud thumps. ‘I know it’s a him because he’s needy,’ Winterson joked, ‘my ghost locked himself in the parlor the other day. And the door doesn’t lock so we had to take the whole apparatus off to get him out.’ Which all lead to intersecting with Winterson’s other current area of interest: the space of humans in an increasingly digital world. But what was most magical about it was…I finally got to meet my favorite author. I may have cried, but I got a hug. [image] After years of her books feeling like a comforting hug every time I read them, this was the best day ever. Well, on to the (original) review of this wonderful collection of stories, from which I got to listen to her read No Ghost Ghost Story. ‘There’s always a story, isn’t there? A story of somebody drowned, somebody murdered, somebody who died for love.’ Spending the days leading up to Halloween with Jeanette Winterson’s rather cozy ghost stories was a festive good time that made the season more enjoyable all around. Night Side of the River is a collection of ghost stories that vary from gothic tales of haunted houses and spectral visitations to stories that show modern technology as an expanding frontier for new forms of hauntings. These are all interspersed with insightful and intimate commentary by Winterson for a book where the thrills of these bite-sized narratives are also a vessel to examine ideas of life after death, love, loss and the significant literary qualities of the horror tradition itself. We see how the genre adapted to address the beliefs and existential anxieties of their times, making Winterson’s technology angle another step forward in its evolution. Many of her best themes find their way into these stories and while we only catch glimpses of the inimitable Winterson moments of prose practically flying off the page in astonishing aerobatics with the tales being more plot focused here, it all still charms and chills its way right into your heart. In short, Night Side of the River functions like a ghost tour through the season with Winterson as your knowledgeable guide, directing us to ponder the history and happenings while also ensuring a satisfying and spooky event. ‘She understands the advantage the Dead hold over the living; the Dead are not afraid.’ I’m quite smitten with these collections of seasonal stories Winterson has embarked on and in many ways this feels akin to her jolly Christmas Days: 12 Stories and 12 Feasts for 12 Days collection. While that book of stories certainly helped make the season bright for me last year, Night Side of the River led me through the dark corridors and stormy atmosphere of Halloween and really brought the holiday to life. I enjoyed the touch that there are 13 ghost stories here, with 13 being a rather spooky number befitting the season much like how the Christmas collection had a story for each of the 12 days of christmas. Sure, they aren’t the strongest of stories Winterson has ever written, but this is easily overlooked because the full effect of the fiction and non-fiction approach to analyzing hauntings is so devilishly pleasant. And while these aren’t always the scariest of stories—I like to term them “cozy horror” here, particularly as they usually have happy endings, though if you want some actually frightening and unsettling Winterson horror I highly recommend The Daylight Gate —that also seems beside the point. Besides, as Winterson says in conversation with The Guardian, ‘I don’t get scared of the dead, it’s the living that scare me. I’m not worried about ghosts – I’d rather spend the night in a haunted house than in Romania with Andrew Tate.’ Overall, the collection invites us to lean in and enjoy this tour through the realm of the dead, not shrink from it. ‘I used to believe that life and death were separate states. Now I know that things are liquid, porous; not solid at all.’ There is a genuine love for the season and the literary traditions that accompany it that is endlessly infectious and the introduction essay alone is worth the price of admission (you can read an abbreviated version of it HERE in The Paris Review). Winterson looks at the long history of ghost stories and the way they can work as commentary on the general attitudes of the times in which they were created and why they’ve long captivated readers. ‘In spite of Protestant theology, scientific materialism, or the plain fact that there is no empirical proof that anyone has come back from the dead,’ Winterson writes, ‘ghosts have not been evicted from their permanent ancestral home: our imagination.’ This is part of what makes this collection so heartfelt is that it isn’t trying to make any big claims on ghosts—though Winterson does include several stories of hauntings she has experienced—but to ask us to think about what is so interesting about the ideas behind them. She recently addressed this in an interview with NPR: ‘I like to play with the form. I thought, well, why not break in as myself and talk about things that have happened to me that I can't explain away? So I was showing that I've got some skin in the game here, that these things have been part of my reality, and I don't understand it. And simply, I have to live with it. And, you know, we're in a world now that's always looking for easy answers, quick-fire solutions. Nobody likes to say, I don't know. And this is a book about saying, I don't know. And when it comes to the supernatural, I think that's the most honest answer.’ The book really holds the door open to invite imagination and possibility, and she provides an interesting look at how authors have long done so and helped continuously shape the genre. She writes about The Castle of Otranto in 1764, for example, and how it brought the Gothic atmospheres to ghost stories or Washington Irving’s 1820 tale, The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, with ‘themes distinctive to the American Gothic – in particular, the undertow of the land itself, its bloodstained colonisation returning as a series of hauntings.’ Of course she mentions Edgar Allan Poe, as the gambling scene in The Passion with life or death stakes was written as an attempt to write a Poe-like story. She even provides a few of her favorites like M.R. James or Susan Hill’s The Woman in Black and one could make quite a spooky reading list from these pages. I really love her approach to categorizing the stories here, although I do wish Devices—the technology-based stories—were moved to later in the collection as it isn’t the strongest start. But I am particularly fascinated by her choice to include stories addressing Places and People, a distinction on hauntings she addresses in the introduction. We often think of haunted houses traditionally as a haunted space that assails those who enter. However, she looks at authors like Nathaniel Hawthorne bringing in ‘the psychic fractures and guilty disturbances peculiar to the pioneering spirit’ in his fiction it begins to ask ‘are such hauntings from the outside or the inside?’ This is also present in The Turn of the Screw by Henry James where we must ask ‘Is the manipulation a direct haunting? Or does Bly feed off the haunted places in the heads of its inhabitants?’ and Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House certainly shows the house more as a mirror reflecting a haunted mind back on itself. So, as the names of these sections suggest, each addresses a different form of haunting. There is the method of ‘you are haunting yourself,’ as the narrator advises herself in the first tale, App-arition, or, as is theorized in The Door (one of my favorites) ‘Maybe that’s what a haunting is: time trapped in the wrong place…haunted place working as a memory store.’ It’s all quite fun. As a side note, I've always the way Stephen Graham Jones offers two distinctions on haunted houses: the Stay Away Houses and the Hungry Houses. ‘Whereas Stay Away Houses just want to be left alone,’ Jones writes, ‘Hungry Houses aren't complete without people to digest for reasons or decades or centuries.’ In these stories Winterson tends towards the Hungry Houses, though this makes sense based on her influences in Poe, James and Jackson and the way a psychological haunting is better geared at examining the genre mechanics. ‘To honour you is to live. To love you is to live…I promised you I would live. Not a half-life, not a haunted life, not a shadowlife.’ Winterson also includes what she terms “hinge stories” that are printed back to back and offer two different perspectives on the same situation. I really enjoyed this approach to give a more dynamic look at the events but also to address differing ideas on ghosts in general. As one would expect with Winterson, we get some really lovely, philosophical ideas expressed. Such as thoughts on death as an interruption on life and questioning if that interrupts love. ‘Death, though, is a different reality. You are dissolved. Into what? Into time, into space, into the leaky container that is me, who will also dissolve into time, into space. No. 80 on the PeriodicTable, you are gone. But before I take up my role as the long-suffering one – the gold-band-wearing survivor who was always there and is still – I am aware that mercury makes possible the extraction of gold from poorer-quality ores. You brought out the best in me.’ There are many different depictions of what comes after death here, and a few humorous thoughts such as ‘Who gets to be reunited? Is the Afterlife polyamorous?’ I also enjoy how, for a collection that addresses haunted homes, it also considers the common phrase that death is a sort of “returning home”: ‘Home is inside us as well as outside us. An image we hold in our minds. Some people like to say that when we die we are going home. But it’s a strange home. We never visit it, until we do, and when we do, we never return.’ Through these stories we see a lot of love and loss, and I enjoy how these themes are the primary focus to examine. The spooky settings make excellent adornment for such investigations and it also asks us to consider what our own thoughts on death and ghosts says about us. ‘Truly, technology is going to affect our relationship with death. In theory, no one needs to die. In theory, anyone can be resurrected. We can be our own haunting.’ It seems only natural with Winterson that she would take the idea of haunting and look towards the future with it. AI is a topic of interest for Winterson, such as her collection of essays 12 Bytes: How We Got Here. Where We Might Go Next that look at how the technology might impact the way we love and interact or how it gives Mary Shelley’s ideas a new life as she played with in Frankissstein. ‘We have unexpectedly created an opportunity for the dead,’ she writes about concepts like the metaverse and apps that can mimic texting as if from someone you knew now gone and explores how a dead person living on in a virtual world isn’t unlike a haunting. ‘It seems to me like a perfect space for ghosts,’ she says and I will never look at online interactions the same again. Maybe I’m actually a ghost haunting you right now. ‘When i am climbing, i understand that gravity exists to protect us from our own lightness of being, just in the same way that time is what shields us from eternity.’ I have to say, Night Side of the River was an ideal was to spend spooky season and having new material from Winterson is always a joy. This is charming and insightful and I really enjoyed the way she plays with themes as a way of examining the literary implications and pushing the boundaries of them. She certainly makes you see the phrase "ghost in the wires" in a new light here too. A spooky treat that I can’t wait to revisit every October. 4/5 ‘Does the door open when we are born, to let us into this life? we won't notice it again until we are done, until it's there at the top of the stairs, waiting for us, our entrance then, our exit now.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 23, 2023
|
Oct 30, 2023
|
Jun 02, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1684158052
| 9781684158058
| 1684158052
| 4.30
| 8,439
| Feb 01, 2022
| Feb 01, 2022
|
it was amazing
|
Okay so this is ASTONISHINGLY GOOD. The Many Deaths of Laila Starr is a visual treat and emotional ride. Author Ram V. and artist Felipe Andrade deliv
Okay so this is ASTONISHINGLY GOOD. The Many Deaths of Laila Starr is a visual treat and emotional ride. Author Ram V. and artist Felipe Andrade deliver this incredible story set in Mumbai, playing with Hindu mythology through characters that are fun and comical enough to keep the otherwise heavy, existential themes of the graphic novel from dipping into melodrama. Plus it is absolutely gorgeous to look at, with a sharp art style brought to life in heaping doses of arrestingly bright color palettes. When Death (visually represented as Kali finds herself laid off because a boy has been born that will put an end to death, she is sent to live a mortal life and decides she must kill him to allow death to continue. We follow Death as she finds herself without a purpose and living through several of her own deaths, and through this immortal being grappling with the emotions of those with a finite lifespan we must ultimately confront the question if death itself does have a purpose in life. [image] Told across five issues, The Many Deaths of Laila Starr has an engaging, episodic narrative with each issue comprising its own arc within a larger story. In each we see Laila brought back to life, with longer gaps of years between each death, and engaging with Darius (the boy destined to end death) at different phases of his life. Having been unable to kill him as a baby, and dying herself in the escape, Laila begins to contemplate existence and in each arc—aided by some fascinating characters like a funeral bird who ferries souls from death, a talking cigarette, or a Chinese temple—we discover more ideas on the meaning of life in a reality where we know it must come to and end. It is rather amusing seeing Death, already in the stolen body of Laila, continuously meet an abrupt and tragic end and have to start over again. [image] The story mercifully manages to avoid seeming overly cliched or pop-self-helpy, with so rather moving lines and messages from ‘to be witnessed by someone else and to be remembered when you are gone, these are the things that belong to mortals,’ or ‘I’ve just learned today that those are different things…dying and going away forever.’ The story is zany with plenty of dark humor to keep it upbeat as it moves along at a rather fast pace, but it is still quite ponderous and lovely. As much as it bends your thoughts towards ideas of death and destruction, it also celebrates life and is a surprisingly comforting read. Plus it is a joy to look at, this is worth it for the bold and colorful art alone. [image] This was one where I though I knew where it was going but was surprised to see the rather clever and moving twists in it. This is a book that keeps you on your toes and keeps your mind working. It’s a lovely reminder that death doesn’t have to be such a gloomy concept and makes you think about outlooks that could create more death-positivity. This is such a fun book, it’ll make you laugh, it’ll blow your mind, and it’ll also hit you deeply in the feelings. My only minor complaint is the font is occasionally hard to read. The Many Deaths of Laila Starr is a complete gem of a graphic novel that reminds you ‘like a cigarette, the point of life, my friends, is to be smoked.’ 5/5 [image] ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 21, 2023
|
Mar 21, 2023
|
Mar 21, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0802135331
| 9780802135339
| 0802135331
| 3.91
| 17,301
| 1987
| Sep 18, 1997
|
it was amazing
|
[U]nless I am a part of everything I am nothing. We are like waves in a vast ocean moving forward to break upon the shore and vanish, yet the ocean rem [U]nless I am a part of everything I am nothing. We are like waves in a vast ocean moving forward to break upon the shore and vanish, yet the ocean remains. Each wave has it’s own narrative, each person a starring role in the story of their own lives, yet all of us are a collective ocean of minor and major roles coming and going from the larger narrative of human history. Penelope Lively’s Booker Prize winning novel Moon Tiger examines ‘the intimate debris of people’s lives’ through a sweeping century of history at its calms and most tumultuous moments while also being highly personal and private through the lens of Claudia Hampton and her close acquaintances. Though Moon Tiger was dismissed as the ‘housewife’s choice’ upon reception of the Booker Prize in 1987, do not let this misogynistic slight discourage you; this novel has teeth and bites with a walloping dose of grit through a mosaic masterwork of love, loss, war, incest and the fragile ties between people that bind and break. Moon Tiger moves with the ebb and flow of history, deftly sashaying across the lifespan of Claudia Hampton in a kaleidoscopic narrative that highlights the friction of lives passing and ricocheting with one another as well the human will in conflict with the horrors of history. Language tethers us to the world; without it we spin like atoms. As the novel opens, Claudia is dying slowly of stomach cancer and reflecting back over her life. She ‘does seem to have been someone’ as her doctor muses reading her charts--Claudia the historian, writer, mother, etc.--but Lively isn’t concerned with the accomplishments and signposts of a life, but rather the stories that surround them. Claudia will likely come across as thorny, and perhaps even unlikeable, to most readers but there is a real charm to be found in her fierce independence and will, and, as one finds with most people, the more you get immersed in her life the more you come to an understanding and sympathy for her. The stories that serve as scars and impetus for personality quirks are the gateways to empathy as well as the immortal residue of lives that linger on in the memories of those closest to us. ‘We all survive in the heads of others,’ says Claudia, and our stories live on because ‘words are more durable than anything, that they blow with the wind, hibernate and reawaken, shelter parasitic on the most unlikely hosts, survive and survive and survive.’ Claudia reflects early on about a photograph of a village street in which the photographer let the exposure go for sixty minutes. The result is that those who passed down the street during this time do not appear in the photograph due to the exposure length. ‘A neat image for the relation of man to the physical world,’ Claudia says of it, ‘Gone, passed through and away.’ Stories, then, are the way we grapple with the reality of our impermanence and assuage the pain caused by the impermanence of those we love. ‘The power of language. Preserving the ephemeral; giving form to dreams, permanence to sparks of sunlight.’ While Moon Tiger is a novel of love--be it love found and lost or love neglected--it is also a love story to language and the way it shapes history. Many of the characters are occupied with preserving history: Claudia as a historian of questionable academic accuracy; Jaspar and his work on a war-glorifying television series; or Tom’s war diary where he needs to ‘get yesterday down while I still have the taste of it.’ Claudia tells us that ‘once it is all written down we know what really happened,’ because we use language to assess and process life while also digesting it in narrative form as if to secure our role in the immortality of history. When the times are out of joint it is brought uncomfortably home to you that history is true and that unfortunately you are a part of it. One has this tendency to think oneself immune. This is one of the points when the immunity is shown up as fantasy.Language and memory commingle, ‘you keep the dead with you forever and deny the possibility of your own annihilation,’ as if composing the narrative filled with anecdotes of the dead place the storyteller on a God-like pedestal of creation in hopes of retaining the immortality of the Creator’s role. We are ‘a people obsessed with mortality’ and the fascination and fear of death subconsciously makes its way into many of our actions and relationships. Claudia’s callus impression and treatment of Lisa is linked to the child she did not have. ‘Giving presents is one of the most possessive things we do, did you realize that?’ Tom says to Claudia. ‘It's the way we keep a hold on other people. Plant ourselves in their lives.’ Our relationships and holds we keep on others assures us a tiny piece of us will go on without us. We are constantly trying to dig our heels into history in hopes of not being washed away by it. Most notable is Claudia’s relationship with her brother Gordon. ‘Incest is closely related to narcissism,’ Claudia muses. The incestual realtionship is a key to understanding Claudia, who openly admits to being self-centered (‘aren’t we all? Why is it a term of accusation?’), as it reflects the desire to love oneself and one’s existence. ‘We looked at one another and saw ourselves translated...we were an aristocracy of two,’ she says. It’s a way of joining her childhood past to her present, embracing all the past Claudias and past Gordons and their youthful camaraderie, like fortifying the lifeline. The incestual aspects also nudge towards the idea of nobility, keeping the crown and power within a noble bloodline as if in hopes of an immortality. While it is never made factually clear if there was ever actualization to the incestual tendedencies, there is a dance sequence between the two in which Lively joyfully toys with such overtly sexual language that even the most prudish reader will pick up that something is sexually implicit in the metaphor. ‘’Let me contemplate myself within my context: everything and nothing.’ A tidy summary Moon Tiger’s plot would be a massive disservice to the novel. Unadorned by style and voice, Moon Tiger doesn’t sound relatively fresh, we follow the life from cradle to grave--her affairs, budding romance with a dashing soldier, successes, failures, etc--all played out on the stage of historical context. ‘There are plenty who would point to it as a typical presumption to align my own life with the history of the world,’ Claudia admits as she sets up the rather meta-narrative of the novel: The question is, shall it or shall it not be linear history? I’ve always thought a kaleidoscopic view might be an interesting heresy. Shake the tube and see what comes out. Chronology irritates me. There is no chronology inside my head. I am composed of a myriad Claudias who spin and mix and part like sparks of sunlight on water.Lively’s refreshing pace with it’s mosaic technique avoids linear chronology and, quite rightly so, favours an introspective emotional climactic discovery and delivery over a natural climax of plot. It also allows for a refracted image of each character, seeing them in different times and ages with each flip of the page which enables us to sift through their lives in a way to best pinpoint what makes them Them and examine aspects of personality in isolated incident instead of focusing on overall development (rest assured to those who prefer character development over character study, the principal cast are blissfully well developed over the course of the novel) and cause and effect of personality. ‘In my head, Jaspar is fragmented: there are many Jaspars, disordered, without chronology. As there are many Gordons, many Claudias.’ The effect also allows the progression of the novel to assess aspects of Claudia in a way that makes cause and effect more like a mystery to unravel--had the novel been linear certain emotional reveals would have carried little weight. Though Laszlo enters Claudia’s world in her forties, not introducing the character until the final segments of the novel builds for a redemptive conclusion to her poor mother skills personality plotlines. Another refreshing and engaging stylistic choice are the multiple voices that help the story spiral around in a whirlwind of overlapping and incongruous perspectives. We witness the same event from several vantage points and have to conclude for ourselves what is ‘truth’. Lively utilizes this narrative structure to examine the dramatic ironies of life, probing the psychology of secrets we take to the soil with us, the lies we tell, and examines how much of the hurt we inflict on others is due to misunderstanding or acting on half-understood information. Lively’s prose is very fluid and adapts into multiple unique and distinctive voices that function effortlessly and adds authenticity to the style instead of condemning it to gimmickry. I began Moon Tiger on a plane trip across the Atlantic. It seemed the perfect context to begin the novel as I was hoping to force myself to ignore the contexts of time to avoid jet-lag on a trip that felt more like fiction than reality. This became the first of an international bookclub between my partner and I, reading it back and forth to each other over Skype as we were still living separated by the ocean (this book is particularly exciting to read aloud as it offers multiple voices to switch between). There is something to be said about the power of good literature here: it binds people. Look at this wonderful community of readers on Goodreads, coming together over shared love for novels despite distance, culture, age, social standings, etc. Like the characters in the novel, we are all finding way to plant ourselves in the world, in the lives of others, and opening our hearts to allow others to grow within us like a seed of memory. We write about the books, about our experience reading the books, wrapping our personal narratives with the novel’s own, and with the larger community of readers. Shared love for a book becomes a way to share love. That is something very important we need to continue to embrace in a world where we are all marching towards an inevitable end. Love each other, remember those you love, share your stories. Much like Claudia’s assertion, we understand history through the written word. We are all chroniclers of the new horizons, the poets and historians of the present. We cannot stop death, but at least we can live on regardless. Moon Tiger is an extraordinary book with a fascinating, strong and fiercely independent female lead (though she does come with a certain amount of white privilege that is impossible to ignore) and no one who reads her story will forget her. Words live on, and so we write. 5/5 ‘Death is total absence, you said. Yes and no, You are not absent so long as you are in my head. That, of course, is not what you meant; you were thinking of the extinction of the flesh. But it is true; I preserve you, as others will preserve me. For a while.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
May 08, 2017
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
3.88
| 7,581
| 2000
| Sep 25, 2015
|
liked it
|
Jon Fosse, dubbed ‘the Becektt of the 21st Century’ by French newspaper Le Monde, has a staggeringly impressive career and output. The Norwegian novel
Jon Fosse, dubbed ‘the Becektt of the 21st Century’ by French newspaper Le Monde, has a staggeringly impressive career and output. The Norwegian novelist, poet, Ibsen Award-winning playwright has published over thirty books and twenty-eight plays, been named Chevalier to the French Ordre national du Mérite, been granted a lifetime stipend by the Norwegian government to pursue his craft, been published in over 40 languages and is the most produced living playwright in the world. Oh and he is also a recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2023. Fosse is an international success yet, here in America from which I am writing, he is all but unheard of. His novels are often abstract and ethereal, which may point towards the lack of commercial acceptance in an American culture and the limited English translations of his work available, but anyone who sails the river of his ever-flowing prose can’t deny the somber beauty carrying them forth. Morning and Evening (Morgen og Kveld), first released in the original Norwegian in 2000, has finally been beautifully rendered into English by translator Damion Searls. With this new edition from Dalkey Archive, who has previously published Melancholy I & II as well as Aliss at the Fire, alongside a collection of Fosse’s essays, we are granted a greater glimpse into a brilliant and celebrated mind regrettably underappreciated by an English speaking audience. There is a very theatrical feel to Fosse’s novels as if they could easily be converted to dramatic form. Despite being a rather internal novel, Morning and Evening is actually quite visual. Sparse and with few changes of setting, much of the book involves characters coming and going as if on a stage, and it is not a great stretch to imagine the novel performed by a theatre group. What would be lost, however, is the marvelous stream-of-conscious puzzlement and repetitious prose that take us into the human soul in a way that would be inaccessible through visuals alone. Morning and Evening is simple on the surface. A man, Johannes, is born, and years later, the same man dies. Not much actually happens in the novel, yet somehow the entirety of a life lived crawls out from the small crack of novelistic space. Fosse has a unique style that creates quiet novels with a roaring fluidity marked by repetition and unhindered by traditional, or virtually any, punctuation. The lack of periods and new paragraphs beginning without capitalization emphasizes the way life moves in a continuous flow, and it is the bare, natural and quotidian aspects of life that Fosse best mines for universal understanding. Morning and Evening shines by compressing a lifespan down to an utterly basic and mundane essence. Divided into two major sections, the first being the father witnessing Johannes’s birth and the second letting the reader walk hand-in-hand with Johannes on a seemingly normal day where everything around him feels intangibly different. As the second section unfolds, we are given fleeting glimpses at the key elements of Johannes’ life as they spiral together down a drain toward death. This compressed essence is like the thesis statement of a life’s ‘meaning’, and over the short novel Fosse examines the way we ascribe meaning on a world lacking inherent meaning. 'and everything is in a way heavy in itself, everything in a way announces itself and announces everything you do with it,' he writes. When we see objects, we understand them through our perception of what they mean to us through their use, their name, or even through association with past events containing the object. An object is forever drenched in the residue of our experiences with it, becoming a part of us whereas it would be meaningless without our perspective ruling over it. Nietzsche wrote that ‘God is dead,' inviting us into a world of possibility with no objective morality. How weightless the set-pieces of our existence would be with no defined purpose to validate their being. Fosse employs frequent repetition of statements and ideas which function like a refrain in the melody of his prose to insert his messages in our heads like a musical hook. There are frequent moments when characters assert the belief that there is a 'lower god' which rules the world and not an 'all-powerful' God which would have created the world. Perhaps in a world where God has turned away, as Fosse reminds us time and again, we ourselves become the lesser gods. An individual gives meaning to the surrounding world in ways which spell out a personal story, giving individualized substance to the weightlessness of experience when assessing one’s own existence. ll the things are normal things but they have become somehow dignified, and golden, and heavy as though they weighed much much more than themselves and at the same time had no weightWe read the tremors of a self-authored set of purpose and meaning as they wane to reveal a weightless reality upon which they were built. Fosse’s tone is not one of sorrow or fear but of simple freedom. 'he has a feeling that he will never see all of this again,' Fosse writes, 'but that it will stay in him, as what he is, as a sound…' Death takes the world from Johannes, but he also takes the world with him by carrying it in his eternal memories. It creates a comforting vision of death and Johannes revisits the standardly expected places, friends and family that is most dear to him before venturing from this world. The image of death presented in the novel is especially reassuring considering the depiction of the world with all it’s 'darkness and all the terrible evil...' Olai considers the implications of bringing forth a child into this world 'starting out on his own life, out in the hard world, already you are connected to both God’s goodness and a lower god or devil…' If not for the lowly goodness we decide to find in the world, all we would be left with is fear and a void and death would be 'to be dissolved and turn back into nothing...from nothing to nothing, that’s the path of life…' It is this fear of the nothing and the evils of the world which makes us believe there must be meaning and a god of some sorts, something to pacify us into continuing in the dark, continuing our species. Most importantly, this belief embraces us into accepting the inevitable oblivion at the end of all our timelines. Peter, best friend to Johannes, is the comforting face sent to usher him down the path of acceptance. A fisherman with long, unkempt hair and a calm demeanor, his character is sure to invoke Christ-like comparisons. A pivotal scene finds Johannes and Peter out fishing and Johannes' bait is unable to sink below the surface. The sea doesn’t want you, he saysThe scene recalls the biblical moment of fishermen John and Simon Peter being called by Jesus as he walks across the water and reflects Peter’s calling Johannes into death. The unknown beneath the surface is gone, all that’s left is the earth and it’s previously known wonders locked in Johannes’ memory. While Morning and Evening has an obvious biblical undercurrent, the book benefits from Fosse’s message which may be read as a non-denominational, philosophical inquiry into meaning that uses biblical principles as pre-existing guideposts rather than religious dogma. 'God does exist,' insists Johannes’ father, Olai, 'but far far away and very very close...he shows himself, both in the individual person and in the world.' While the book can be read at face value as individuals being agents of God in an evil world, the novel also works metaphorically as a solipsistic investigation of the inescapable, internal consciousness making us each gods of our own realm of reality within the void of shared reality. Fosse’s works are open to interpretation, and this is as much their source joy as their attempts at universality. The novel’s stream-of-conscious style is only broken up by a period in one particular place: [Olai] will be the father of a little fellow who will also be named Johannes, after his father. There is a God, yet, Olai thinks. But he is far away, and he is very close. And he is not all-knowing and not all-powerful. And it is not this God who rules over the world and humankind…From here the novel progresses uninterrupted. Fosse stops the flow to punctuate the importance of the Father, both God and human fathers. Life stops at God and only begins from him. Similarly, Olai and his wife Marta are also creationary forces, the lesser gods that rule not from on high but from within the world. Beginning the novel with Olai witnessing the birth of the character who dominates the rest of the novel shows the endless flow of life from one being into another. Fosse slowly and steadily twists the screws in his work, increasing tension and awe so gradually that it is hardly noticeable until the reader is practically overcome by it at the conclusion. The novel progresses down a path which is, admittedly, predictable though Fosse’s goal is not to shock readers with a cheap trick dropping the floor from under them. The effect is there, however the novel does slog and feel flat from all the humdrum ideas and predictability. He shows his authorial hand throughout so readers may focus on the internal human tragedy rather than the plot, and the novel is all the better for it. Fosse’s prose lives up to his message and is imbued with a heavy weightlessness. Morning and Evening is a brief work in a minor key sung in hushed tones and is certainly one worth experiencing despite feeling like an overused chord progression. With the help of Dalkey Archive and Damion Searls’ crisp translation, Fosse’s voice will reverberate within a new audience. 3.5/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Nov 01, 2015
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
4.30
| 7,745
| 1992
| May 31, 2002
|
really liked it
|
I am exactly what I am supposed to be. This is likely my favorite collection by Charles Bukowski. A man made famous for his vulgarity and debauchery—th I am exactly what I am supposed to be. This is likely my favorite collection by Charles Bukowski. A man made famous for his vulgarity and debauchery—though to cling to such things misses the point and heart of his poetry—The Last Night of the Earth Poems removes the caustic armor and lets the tender heart beat out prose without fear, without need for deflection. While it is often the boozing and whoring and bitterness of Bukowski that is spoken of, particularly in college dorms, I've always felt that his abrasive nature was a mask for a fragile soul wincing away from pain, that there was something beautiful and passionate lurking beneath the gutters. Last Night was Bukowski's final collection written while alive and his awareness of inevitable demise creeps into the pages and allows him to speak more freely and passionately than ever before. A fitting collection to be revisiting as I sit silently with my beer, awaiting the next family funeral, awaiting the sharp daggers of held-back tears and gut-clenching awareness of mortality while a man I love and respect breaths through a tube in a nearby hospital with mere days left. Poetry keeps us eternal, keeps our conquests and regrets, our loves and shames alive and on display for all to learn from and imbibe like a fine wine to satisfy the soul and abate our nerves through the knowledge that we all share the same fate and fears and pains. The Last Night of the Earth is a splendid array of all things Bukowski, from his bitter wit to his most impassioned confessions, and is certainly a collection any fan should have at their fingertips. Confession waiting for death like a cat that will jump on the bed I am so very sorry for my wife she will see this stiff white body shake it once, then maybe again “Hank!” Hank won’t answer. it’s not my death that worries me, it’s my wife left with this pile of nothing. I want to let her know though that all the nights sleeping beside her even the useless arguments were things ever splendid and the hard words I ever feared to say can now be said: I love you. This collection is nearly painful to read at times. Bukowski offers a reflection on his life that is often funny, bitter and, in this collection, very heartbreaking. The ever-famous Bukowski poem Bluebird is found here (I've never felt much for this poem and wonder about its fame, it feels so detached from his typical style and reminds me of some of his extreme early works that I also didn't care much for as they felt as if he was overtly playing too much at 'being poetic' than simply letting the poetry flow freely as he argues for in many of his fine poems about the art of being a poet), as well as the awe-inspiring Dinosauria, We (you can listen to Bukowski read that poem himself here) and many others. There are angry tirades against false poets, hostile statements towards humanity, yet always a tenderness lurking beneath that reminds us of the importance of being good to one another, of appreciating the life we have, or keeping true to ourselves and striving towards our wildest dreams lest we become another fake and phony that Bukowski so detested. Let yourself be stricken with poverty and debauchery, he would say, as long as it was who you are and you stayed true to yourself. There are powerful statements of the ways literature can move us, memories of being driven to the heights of excitement and passion from Knut Hamsun's Hunger or Huxley's Point Counter Point, the pride in betraying his parents wishes and joining the obscene masses of writers (a absolutely fantastic account of this is found in Them and Us). There are humorous poems on feeling out of touch with the forward-moving world such as in Hemingway Never Did This which recounts accidentally deleting a poem from his computer, or the regret that fame came too late in life to make much use of it as in Creative Writing Class . More heartbreaking is his awareness of death and his testimonies to the agonies of old age. 'young or old, good or bad, I don't think anything dies as slow and as hard as a writer,' wrote Bukowski. It truly hurts to read a tired and dying Bukoswki, but it fills the heart to the point of beautiful overflow. Are You Drinking? washed-up, on shore, the old yellow notebook out again I write from the bed as I did last year. will see the doctor, Monday. "yes, doctor, weak legs, vertigo, head- aches and my back hurts." "are you drinking?" he will ask. "are you getting your exercise, your vitamins?" I think that I am just ill with life, the same stale yet fluctuating factors. even at the track I watch the horses run by and it seems meaningless. I leave early after buying tickets on the remaining races. "taking off?" asks the motel clerk. "yes, it's boring," I tell him. "If you think it's boring out there," he tells me, "you oughta be back here." so here I am propped up against my pillows again just an old guy just an old writer with a yellow notebook. something is walking across the floor toward me. oh, it's just my cat this time. The Last Night of the Earth Poems is a perfect Bukowski collection that contains all the joys from his range of poetry but keeps to the most heartfelt of messages. While it isn't an ideal introduction to his work, it is certainly a necessity for anyone who holds any love for the man in their heart. Painful as it may be, this is truly brilliant and a perfect examination of a life as it was lived. 4.5/5 'So this is the beginning / not the / end.' Dinosauria, We Born like this Into this As the chalk faces smile As Mrs. Death laughs As the elevators break As political landscapes dissolve As the supermarket bag boy holds a college degree As the oily fish spit out their oily prey As the sun is masked We are Born like this Into this Into these carefully mad wars Into the sight of broken factory windows of emptiness Into bars where people no longer speak to each other Into fist fights that end as shootings and knifings Born into this Into hospitals which are so expensive that it's cheaper to die Into lawyers who charge so much it's cheaper to plead guilty Into a country where the jails are full and the madhouses closed Into a place where the masses elevate fools into rich heroes Born into this Walking and living through this Dying because of this Muted because of this Castrated Debauched Disinherited Because of this Fooled by this Used by this Pissed on by this Made crazy and sick by this Made violent Made inhuman By this The heart is blackened The fingers reach for the throat The gun The knife The bomb The fingers reach toward an unresponsive god The fingers reach for the bottle The pill The powder We are born into this sorrowful deadliness We are born into a government 60 years in debt That soon will be unable to even pay the interest on that debt And the banks will burn Money will be useless There will be open and unpunished murder in the streets It will be guns and roving mobs Land will be useless Food will become a diminishing return Nuclear power will be taken over by the many Explosions will continually shake the earth Radiated robot men will stalk each other The rich and the chosen will watch from space platforms Dante's Inferno will be made to look like a children's playground The sun will not be seen and it will always be night Trees will die All vegetation will die Radiated men will eat the flesh of radiated men The sea will be poisoned The lakes and rivers will vanish Rain will be the new gold The rotting bodies of men and animals will stink in the dark wind The last few survivors will be overtaken by new and hideous diseases And the space platforms will be destroyed by attrition The petering out of supplies The natural effect of general decay And there will be the most beautiful silence never heard Born out of that. The sun still hidden there Awaiting the next chapter. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Apr 21, 2015
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
1568580762
| 9781568580760
| 1568580762
| 3.87
| 53
| 1996
| Oct 16, 1996
|
really liked it
|
‘What’s so wrong with a man who is fond of Social Tea and Biscuits?’ Much like the word that serves as the namesake of Gordon Lish’s 1996 novel, Epigra ‘What’s so wrong with a man who is fond of Social Tea and Biscuits?’ Much like the word that serves as the namesake of Gordon Lish’s 1996 novel, Epigraph, Lish has created a duality of self that runs—or, more appropriately, writes amok through the darkly comedic novel. After the death of his wife, Barbara, who shares the same name and tragic demise as Gordon Lish the author’s own wife, character Gordon Lish writes a series of letters to those surrounding him from the in-home nurses to the church, hospital and even to the recently departed. Gordon—Gordon!— Lish simply wants to understand and be understood, to reach out for affection and caress the human bond, but his methods are not exactly the most polite (‘I want to see your bosoms,’ he writes in a letter to a nurse praising her months of service.’Yours are the bosoms that tremble, not the bosoms that shake.’) and Lish reverts into bitter assaults when bitten or an admission of being ‘pooped’ and overwhelmed. My personal favorite letters concern the refusal to return the hospital bed and his various reasons for not doing so, or the scathing letters in response to the deceased being summoned for jury duty. The novel, composed solely of his letter, is a one-sided conversation that manages to hone in on the humanity of the situation and allow their creator to assess his own affairs and psychological condition. Outrageously funny despite the bleakness, Epigraph is a uniquely literary epigraph to the passing of Mrs. Lish in both reality and fiction that probes the human soul while opening up the poetic gap between author and author character. Dear St. E’s, Could I explain something to you? I’m going to explain something to you. What’s mine is mine. You people never hear of squatter’s rights? Look it up—squatters rights. I’m sitting on it. I am reclining on it. It’s tilted at the three-quarter tilt, which is the best tilt for me to be tilted in it at to write assholes like you letters in it. Anyway, get the fuck off my back! Yours in impermanent patience, Mr. Gordon Lish There is a great joy to be found when you read several books chosen seemingly at random and find they share a common thread and work as if in conversation with each other to examine a particular aspect of fiction. Recently, books such as Hardwick’s Sleepless Nights, Aira’s How I Became a Nun and Luiselli’s Faces in the Crowd have made me keenly interested in the blurring of an author as author and the author as fictionalized self. Reading these books brought Epigraph back into mind, which I had read this past summer and first started the gears of thought churning on this subject. While Hardwick builds backwards, weaving fact and fiction to examine her past leading up to the present ‘self’ reflecting back, Lish latches fiction onto the present and boldly presses forward into a ‘possible future’ with a narrator that both is and isn’t Gordon Lish. Written after the death of his wife, Barbara, the Gordon Lish found in Epigraph is also grieving the loss of his wife Barbara, deceased under similar conditions. Lish teases the Intentional Fallacy, bringing his Gordon—Gordon!— Lish to the closest proximity of The Gordon Lish and extracting the highest possible effect. The Lish in Epigraph has suffered the same tragedies, and is even intensely interested in examining grammar (‘Don’t you dare think I’m through with you! Or, actually, it’s probably think me through with you.’) as one would imagine the Great Editor G.W. Lish would be. It is easy to entertain the idea that this is who Lish really is, and fun to do so, and Lish reminds us of the infinite possibilities of the magic of Literature in doing so. Also, using what most would consider a touchy subject and examining it in this highly and darkly comedic manner reminds us that, for the true writer, nothing should be sacrosanct. The title 'Epigraph' primarily refers to both an inscription on a monument, this book being the monument to the deceased, and to the quotes that precede a novel. The constant usurpation of the father, F.W. Lish, in the epigraphs before and after the book points towards an understanding of the G.Lish of the book. As his sanity deteriorates on the pages, he opens up about a cold childhood and difficult relations with his parents. Lish manages to make us empathize with the cantankerous bastard cursing out everyone, putting us in the uncomfortable shoes of ‘What would you do if somebody said to you for you to do something and you weren't really actually yet big enough yet for you to actually yet do it?’ Wildly comedic, with enough ‘fuck you’s’ to make anyone’s head spin, Epigraph is a wonderful example of how literary theory can be put to use in engaging and wholly entertaining ways. From the poetic mirroring of the self and the dualities of meaning found therein, to just good old fashion laughs at Lish offending everyone around him, this novel probes the darkest corners of the heart without feeling burdenous or dark. 4.5/5 Dear St. E’s, Up yours. I would not join your religion if you paid me. Zay gezunt, Gordon Jay Lish ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Feb 20, 2015
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
2743617640
| 9782743617646
| 2743617640
| 3.70
| 14,762
| Feb 01, 2006
| 2008
|
really liked it
|
‘What's the purpose of being with someone if they don't change your life?’ There are some books that can be consumed in a singular hour, yet remain wit ‘What's the purpose of being with someone if they don't change your life?’ There are some books that can be consumed in a singular hour, yet remain within you to be digested by the intellect for days or weeks. Alejandro Zambra’s Bonsai is such a book. The precise simplicity of the novel makes it a difficult book to talk as the novella feels as fragile as an intricately colored moth’s wing—admire its beauty but don’t touch it lest it turn to dust. There is a feeling of weightlessness to the prose and story that still manages to weigh heavy in the heart and soul upon completion. It is the story of two young lovers, lovers of one another and literature, and what happens to them once they part. It is as simple as that, yet complex in its mechanics and implications. Like the bonsai grown by Julio, the story exists and flourishes within the confines of its literary container, with Zambra’s pristine prose trimming the limbs of love to enshrine it as a miniature work of art and beauty. There is a sweet simplicity and breathless fluidity to this tiny novel. Characters silently sweep on and off the stage, love is found and lost within the length of a paragraph, revelations are made and people are lost forever, all without rising from a soft idyllic tone that Zambra executes with the care of one polishing expensive glassware. Broken into five short segments, each comes like a delicate waves on the ocean, each separate with their own emotional peak to crash onto our heart’s shores yet all one body of literature moving together. There is also a wry humor integrated in the otherwise somber plot that gives it wings and keeps it from plummeting into melodrama. What is most impactful is the way that Zambra circles around the story yet never jabs his pen into it’s heart, keeping everything in the hazy peripherals of a story that need not be addressed head on as the reader already understands it’s shape. ‘In the end Emilia dies and Julio does not die. The rest is literature.’ This is a novel of love, but most importantly a novel about literature. Zambra shows his hand, plot-wise, from the very first sentence, entrusting the reader to understand that this is an exercise of literature and that the ‘from A to B’ plot is secondary, a mere current of events to power the lightbulb of ideas. There is a gorgeous character study at play: Julio and Emilia, two college students become lovers ‘doomed to seriousness.’ These two could be anyone, symbols really for any two people connected by ‘the emotional affinities that any couple is capable of discovering with only a little effort.’ Much of the simplicity, and the way Zambra refers to Julio and Emilia ‘who are not exactly characters, though maybe it’s convenient to think of them as characters,’ helps build a universal microcosm of relationships. Anyone that has loved or loved and lost can find charm in the hazy tale Zambra has created. Julio and Emilia lie to one another on their first sexual encounter, both claiming to have read Marcel Proust, and embellish the lies with partly-true details to bring their falsehoods to life. In a way, they are creating literature and as their relationship continues, full of lies and truths and half-truths like any young couple, they further their depth as characters both literally and metaphysically. Any lover of literature is sure to be charmed by their sexual foreplay consisting of reading to one another, from role-playing Madame Bovary (neither ever wanted to be Charles), and the way they ‘re-read’ Proust together. It is their reading of the short story Tantalia¹ by Macedonio Fernández—a story of a couple who fear the survival of their relationship is dependant on the life of a clover plant the unnamed woman gives the man as a symbol of love, that gives them pause and reveals the mortality of theirs and all relationships. ‘Once outside its flowerpot, the tree ceases to be a bonsai.’ When Julio decides to grow a bonsai, he discovers a few key lines in a care manual: A bonsai is an artistic replica of a tree, in miniature. It consists of two elements: the living tree and the container. The two elements must be in harmony and the selection of the appropriate pot for a tree is almost an art form in itself.The opening sentence, ‘in the end she dies and he remains alone,’ becomes the container from which the story—the ‘the rest is literature,’ grows and flourishes. The people that come and go from their lives are like the limbs of the bonsai tree which are carefully cut to grow in a desired shape. However, the story itself is a series of containers. Julio writes a novel about a man who learns of the death of a lost love (this being before Julio learns of Emilia’s death) and grows a bonsai as a love plant in her honour, the story of which, later, Julio will act out in his own life. The story of the bonsai is the literature that grows from the container of Fernandez’s story, Tantalia, and finds itself actually occurring on several levels of the narrative; there is a doubling, or tripling and so forth, of meaning that all functioning in relation to one another, a meta-narrative style that works nearly like two mirrors reflecting back at one another with a bonsai situated between them. The bonsai ‘an artistic replica...in miniature,’ is then Julio’s novel, but also the novel itself with so many self-referential aspects that it teases the reader into fantasizing an intentional fallacy and pondering if the Zambra wrote his novel in relation to Tantalia as did Julio, and if the love plot has any half-truths in Zambra’s own life. It is the intricate potting of a story within a story that really sticks with the reader, the half-truths of life that go on to become a work of art, the literature housed in the container of experience. Bonsai is a quiet little novel with quite the emotional punch. It displays a budding promise for it’s young author, who would later make good on those promises with The Private Lives of Trees, which I found to be even more emotionally impactful. What I love most is the way this novella makes literature seem like the most important aspect of life. The fragility of life and love is explored in beautiful and breathless prose that makes this elliptical little novel well worth the time. 4.5/5 ‘I want to end Julio’ story, but Julio’s story doesn’t end, that’s the problem.’ ¹ A big thank you to Mike and Matt for sending me Tantalia, a quite insightful story that is also key to unlocking the heart of Zambra’s own story. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Dec 03, 2014
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0156628708
| 9780156628709
| 0156628708
| 3.79
| 320,977
| May 14, 1925
| Sep 24, 1990
|
it was amazing
|
‘Moments like this are buds on the tree of life.’ Our lives are an elaborate and exquisite collage of moments. Each moment beautiful and powerful on th ‘Moments like this are buds on the tree of life.’ Our lives are an elaborate and exquisite collage of moments. Each moment beautiful and powerful on their own when reflected upon, turned about and examined to breath in the full nostalgia for each glorious moment gone by, yet it is the compendium of moments that truly form our history of individuality. Yet, what is an expression of individuality if it is not taken in relation to all the lives around us, as a moment in history, a drop in a multitude of drops to form an ocean of existence? Virginia Woolf enacts the near impossibility in ‘Mrs Dalloway’ of charting for examination and reflection the whole of a lifeline for multiple characters, all interweaving to proclaim a brilliant portrait of existence itself, all succinctly packaged in the elegant wrappings of a solitary day. Akin to Joyce’s monumental achievement, Ulysses, Woolf’s poetic plunge into the minds and hearts of her assorted characters not only dredges up an impressively multi-faceted perspective on their lives as a whole, but delivers a cutting social satire extending far beyond the boundaries of the selective London society that struts and frets their 24 hours upon the stage of Woolf’s words. ‘Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself.’ This simple phrase is one any serious student of literature would recognize lest they fear an inadequacy of appearance in the eyes of their collegiate classmates, much in the way a great deal of actions in Mrs Dalloway is a learned behavior for the sake of appearances. ‘Rigid, the skeleton of habit alone upholds the human frame,’ and much of what we do out of habit, out of adherence to social standards, is what upholds the society at hand and shapes the civilization of the times. Woolf’s novel hinges upon manners and social standings, highlighting a withering hegemony during the a period of change and rebirth with society marching forward into an uncertain and unrestrained future following the first World War. However, before getting too far ahead into a broad scope, it is imperative to examine the immediate and singular implications of the novel. Much of Mrs Dalloway is deceptively simplistic, using the singular as a doorway into the collective, and offering a tiny gift of perfect that can be unpacked to expose an infinite depiction of the world. Take the title, for instance. In most cases, the central character is referred to as Clarissa Dalloway, yet it was essential to place Mrs Dalloway first and foremost in the readers mind to forever bind their impression of her as a married woman, an extension of Mr. Richard Dalloway. In comparison, Miss Kilman is never addressed in text without the title ‘Miss’ to emphasize her unmarried—and, in terms of the social standings of the time, inferior—position in society; or even Ellie Henderson whose poverty doesn’t even earn her a title of marital status in the eyes of the Dalloway circle, forever condemned to a singular name inconsequential to anything. Just the indication of Clarissa as the wife of a member of government expands well beyond her status as an individual to open a conversation about social implications. ‘Mrs Dalloway is always giving parties to cover the silence.’ Personal identity plays a major theme within the novel with each character’s entire life on display simply through their actions and reflection within the solitary June day. Clarissa is examined through a weaving of past and present as she tumbles through an existential crises in regards to her position as the wife of a dignitary and as a the perfect party host. ‘Why, after all, did she do these things? Why seek pinnacles and stand drenched in fire? Might it consume her anyhow?’ Through her interactions with Peter, the reader is treated to her romantic lineage, rejecting Peter for the safer, more social circle security of Robert, which gives way to a questioning if she is merely a snob. Furthermore, the reader witnesses Clarissa in her heights of emotion through her friendship with Sally Seton¹, a relationship that seems to transcend the rigid gender roles of the time. The strange thing, on looking back, was the purity, the integrity, of her feeling for Sally. It was not like one’s feeling for a man. It was completely disinterested, and besides, it had a quality which could only exist between women.Virginia Woolf’s own sexuality has been a topic of interest over the years, and the relationship between Clarissa and Sally—the kiss shared between them being considered by Clarissa to be a notable peak of happiness in her life—was often written as being “open to interpretation.” Which is funny to me because it feels like the tumblr joke of like “they were just really good friends,” and reading Woolf’s own letters with Vita Sackville-West it all feels very out in the open that there are queer desires in the novel that get packed away due to an unwelcoming society. We see how socially enforced gender norms and heterosexuality become restrictive and Sally is a symbol of rejecting those through examples such as her openly smoking cigars which is said to be a “man’s thing” to do. Through Clarissa we see a desire of life, of not becoming stagnant, of not ‘being herself invisible; unseen; unknown…this being Mrs. Dalloway; not even Clarissa any more; this being Mrs. Richard Dalloway.’ There must be a way to separate from the society, to form an identity beyond social conventions or gender, to find life in a world hurtling towards death. ‘Once you fall, Septimus repeated to himself, human nature is on you.’ As a foil to the character of Clarissa, Woolf presents the war-torn Septimus. While Clarissa finds meaning in her merrymaking because ‘what she liked was simply life’, and bringing people together to be always moving towards a warm center of life, Septimus is shown as moving outwards, stolen away from the joys of life through his experiences of bloodshed in battle. So there was no excuse, nothing whatever the matter, except the sin for which human nature had condemned him to death; that he did not feel.While Clarissa grapples with her fear of death, ‘that is must end; and no one in the whole world would know how she had loved it all,’ Septimus finds life, a never-ending spiral of guilt for not feeling beset by visions of his fallen comrade, to be a fearsome and loathsome beast. Doctors would have him locked away (a dramatic contrast to the lively parties hosted by Clarissa), and even his own wife forges an identity of guilt and self-conscious sorrow for upholding a clearly disturbed husband. This is a haunting portrait of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression, the latter fmuch like Woolf herself suffered. Septimus and Clarissa are like opposite sides to the same coin, however, and many essential parrallels exist between them. Both find solace in the works of Shakespeare², both obsess over a lonely figure in an opposing window (one of Septimus’ last impressions in the land of the living), and both trying to express themselves in the world yet fearing the solitude that their failures will form for them. Even his inability to feel is similar to the love felt by Clarissa: 'But nothing is so strange when one is in love (and what was this except being in love?) as the complete indifference of other people.' Death becomes an important discussion point of the novel, with each character trying to define themselves in the face of, or in spite of, their impending demise. Peter so fears death that he follows a stranger through town, inventing an elaborate fantasy of romance to blot out the deathly darkness. Yet, it is in contrast to death that we find life. Clarissa’s desire for communication, community and life is only given weight in relation to the news of death that invades her party. Death was defiance. Death was an attempt to communicate; people feeling the impossibility of reaching the centre which, mystically, evaded them; closeness drew apart; repute faded, one was alone. There was an embrace in death. What is most impressive about Mrs Dalloway is the nearly endless array of tones and voices that Woolf is able to so deftly sashay between. While each character is unique, it is the contrast between death and life that she weaves that is staggeringly wonderful. Right from the beginning, Woolf treats us to a feast of contrast. For it was the middle of June. The War was over, except for some one like Mrs. Foxcroft at the Embassy last night eating her heart out because that nice boy was killed…but it was over; thank Heaven – over. It was June…and everywhere, thought it was still early, there was a beating, a stirring of galloping ponies, tapping of cricket bats…Cold death and warm life on a sunny June day all mingle together here, and throughout the novel. And we are constantly reminded of our lives marching towards death like a battalion of soldiers, each hour pounded away by the ringing of Big Ben. This motif is two-fold, both representing the lives passing from present to past, but also using the image of Big Ben as a symbol of British society. The war has ended and a new era is dawning, one where the obdurate and stuffy society of old has been shown to be withered and wilting, like Clarissa’s elderly aunt with the glass eye. Not only are the lifelines of each character put under examination, but the history of the English empire as well, highlighting the ages of imperialism that have spread the sons of England across the map and over bloody battlefields. Clarissa is a prime example of the Euro-centrism found in society, frequently confusing the Albanians and Armenians, and assuming that her love of England and her contributions to society must in some way benefit them. ‘But she loved her roses (didn’t that help the Armenians?)’ In contrast is Peter, constantly toying with his knife—a symbol of masculinity imposed by an ideal enforced by bloodshed and military might—to evince not only his fears of inadequacy as a Man (fostered by Clarissa’s rejection for him and his possibly shady marriage plans), but his wishy-washy feelings of imperialism after spending time in India. Beauty, the world seemed to say. And as if to prove it (scientifically) wherever he looked at the houses, at the railings, at the antelopes stretching over the palings, beauty sprang instantly. To watch a leaf quivering in the rush of air was an exquisite joy. Up in the sky swallows swooping, swerving, flinging themselves in and out, round and round, yet always with perfect control as if elastics held them; and the flies rising and falling; and the sun spotting now this leaf, now that, in mockery, dazzling it with soft gold in pure good temper; and now again some chime (it might be a motor horn) tinkling divinely on the grass stalks—all of this, calm and reasonable as it was, made out of ordinary things as it was, was the truth now; beauty, that was the truth now. Beauty was everywhere.Mrs Dalloway is nearly overwhelming in scope despite the tiny package and seemingly singular advancements of plot. Seamlessly moving between the minds and hearts of each character with a prose that soars to the stratosphere, Woolf presents an intensely detailed portrait of post-war Europe and the struggles of identity found within us all. While it can be demanding at times, asking for your full cooperation and attention, but only because to miss a single second would be a tragic loss to the reader, this is one of the most impressive and inspiring novels I have ever read. Woolf manages to take the scale of Ulysses and the poetic prowess of the finest poets, and condense it all in 200pgs of pure literary excellence. Simple yet sprawling, this is one of the finest novels of the 20th century and an outstanding achievement that stands high even among Woolf's other literary giants. This novel has a bit more of a raw feel when compared to To the Lighthouse, yet that work is nothing short of pure perfection, a novel so highly tuned that one worries that even breathing on it will tarnish it's sleek and shiny luster. Dalloway stands just as tall, however, both as a satire on society and a powerful statement of feminism. A civilization is made up of the many lives within, and each life is made up of many moments, all of which culminating to a portrait of human beauty. Though at the end of life we must meet death, it is through death we find life. 5/5 It is a thousand pities never to say what one feels. ¹ With regards to the discussion of marital titles, Sally Seton later becomes Lady Rosseter through marriage. This title further emphasizes marriage as a means of climbing the social ladder, with Sally seen in the past as an impoverished, rebellious ragamuffin, yet through marriage gains an aura of dignity. Perhaps Sally becoming a housewife is a statement on the society of the times suffocating feministic freedoms. ² There is an interesting rejection of Shakespeare found most notably in the characters of Richard Dallowlay and Lady Bruton. This emphasized the dying British society as a cold and artless being, devoid of emotion. This is most evident through Richard Dalloway, seen as a symbol of British society, as he fails to express his emotions of love towards his wife. [image] ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Feb 20, 2014
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0241145368
| 9780241145364
| 0241145368
| 3.55
| 13,118
| 2011
| Mar 07, 2013
|
really liked it
| A murderer, nothing more.Truth is not always an easy thing to come by. Any event that occurs reaches our ears and eyes from a vast assortment of n A murderer, nothing more.Truth is not always an easy thing to come by. Any event that occurs reaches our ears and eyes from a vast assortment of new media, eyewitnesses, and other second-hand accounts, each with their own unique perspectives and agendas that all encode the same message into infinitely variable packages of information. We all become amateur detectives, sifting through the various accounts to decipher what we choose to believe, and thus creating our own unique perspectives of an event that we will inevitably pass along through our interactions and conversations with others. Javier Marías’ 2013 novel, Los Enamoramientos—re-dressed as The Infatuations to best accommodate the English language—is an incredible exploration of the detective work we all must undergo when attempting to deduct any semblance of truth about even the most seemingly common of tragedies that cross our paths. What is truly astounding is Marías' ability to create a novel with the exciting two-faced dealings and baffling plot twists typically found in fast action, blood-soaked thrillers out of a collaboration of scenes mainly comprised of late-night dialogues over a glass of wine in a quiet living room. Through a re-examination of Marías' standard themes of mortality and language, The Infatuations explores with prodigious depth the effects of death on the surrounding survivors lives as well as the labyrinthine complexities of trying to understand material reality through the fallible and distorted words of others. Irreversible, unpredictable death casts its grim shadow across every page of the novel. Maria, the young female narrator working for a modern publishing house learns that the husband of a loving and attractive couple whom she has studied and admired from afar for years during her daily breakfast at a Madrid café has been brutally stabbed to death by a homeless man in a vacant street beneath the indifferent night sky. The reader follows Maria as the lives of the friends and family to the deceased Miguel enfolding around her while she plunges inwards towards the murder, each bestowing upon her their unique attitudes regarding death. Through the widow we see experience the loneliness and the shock of having an essential extension of their livelihoods stricken from existence, while through Javier—the deceased’s closest friend—we are treated to a seemingly calloused yet realistic perspective that those left alive must soldier forth and not bemoan past sorrows that inevitably shape us into the person we are at present. We mourn our father, for example, but we are left with a legacy, his house, his money and his worldly goods, which we would have to give back to him were he to return, which would put us in a very awkward position and cause us great distress. We might mourn a wife or a husband, but sometimes we discover, although this may take a while, that we live more happily and more comfortably without them or, if we are not too advanced in years, that we can begin anew, with the whole of humanity at our disposal, as it was when we were young; the possibility of choosing without making the old mistakes; the relief of not having to put up with certain annoying habits, because there is always something that annoys us about the person who is always there, at our side or in front or behind or ahead, because marriage surrounds and encircles. We mourn a great writer or a great artist when he or she dies, but there is a certain joy to be had from knowing that the world has become a little more vulgar and a little poorer, and that our own vulgarity and poverty will thus be better hidden or disguised; that he or she is no longer there to underline our own relative mediocrity; that talent in general has taken another step towards disappearing from the face of the earth or slipping further back into the past, from which it should never emerge, where it should remain imprisoned so as not to affront us except perhaps retrospectively, which is less wounding and more bearable. I am speaking of the majority, of course, not everyone.While we mourn the lives that have been snuffed out, Javier posits that we must look to the future, the future left to those still retaining a pulse, and make the best of what we have. Our lives are a culmination of each event we experience and our lives are fragile and ephemeral, we should not waste the opportunities we have before the great mystery of death closes it’s inevitable curtains on our story. This viewpoint is initially jarring, however, as light is shed on the motives and character of Javier, we see that the opinions one holds reflect those that are in the best interest of the beholder—we rationalize our reality to accommodate our actions. What is aesthetically pleasing of this European edition of the novel is the thick black pages that precede and follow the novel, as well as the black hardback, which seem to reflect Javier’s presumed belief of death as being a void-like eternity mirroring the time we spend before birth. The novel itself then becomes the interactions of life between the bookends of eternity. While we miss and long for those gone before us, the return of a person thought deceased may not be the happy reunion we all would fantasize it to be. Through a dissection of Balzac’s Le Colonel Chabert, Javier expounds the disastrous implications of such a from-the-grave return to Maria. The worst thing that can happen to anyone, worse than death itself, and the worst thing one can make others dois to return from the place from which no one returns, to come back to life at the wrong time, when you are no longer expected, when it is too late and inappropriate, when the living have assumed you are over and done with and have continued or taken up their lives again, leaving no room for you at all.Our deaths become just another event, and life is made for moving on. Maria also offers her own dissertation into the return of one thought dead, reciting passages form The Three Musketeers when Athos’ fleur-de-lys adorned wife returns, seemingly from the grave in which he thought he had put her, as a sinful, murderous villain aligned with the enemy. We all play our part in the human comedy, but sometimes when our role has been written out of the lives of others, it is best to remain in the wings and not to reemerge, for our return, brining with it a heavy weight of former selves, no longer has a place in their lives now altered and reshaped by the hands of time. What is important to note is that these are truths held by the characters, and for reasons held hidden in their hearts but offer glimpses into their true motivations. Maria knows her affair with Javier has an expiration date, and that his real aim is with Luisa, the widow, for why else would he preach the importance of putting the dead behind us? I would never know more than what he told me, and so I would never know anything for sure…Language is central to any work of Marías, and the plot is a convenient vessel in which he can explore the intricacies of words. Jorge Luis Borges once said that ‘language is an artificial system which has nothing to do with reality.’ ¹ Borges often examined the dualities of existence, the universe of physical material and action, and the universe of words, the latter being the method in which we attempts to convey the former. However, language can only probe essence of physical reality, can only build a model or imperfect mirror of it, and can never accurately reconstruct reality aside from giving a cathartic experience. With The Infatuations, Marías explores such imperfections and their effect on our attempts to reach any sort of truth. When someone speaks, they encode their message, their beliefs and intentions, into words, which are they decoded by the receiver. Each party exists in their own realm of perspectives built from preconceived opinions, agendas and experiences that must inevitably interact with their packaging and unpacking of any message, refurbishing it to our particular (and often subconscious) needs. Each message we receive shapes our opinions, from framing a new idea in our mid, reinforcing a previous belief, to offering contradictory or supplemental information that will alter our previous opinions. Marías delivers his novel in a method that takes the reader on a turbulent ride of altering opinions all filtered through the mind of the narrator. Long ‘what if’ scenarios play out in her mind, lengthy and engrossing enough for the reader to lower their guard and allow the information to shape their opinions, and the opinions formed then meet with actual interactions of the character. The preconceived notions constructed towards characters like Javier latch on to anything congruous and gives the reader a sense that they understand his motives and intentions. However, once new information accrues, we must reassess what we know, or think we know, as the truth wiggles and squirms just beyond our outstretched fingertips. Everything becomes a story and ends up drifting about in the same sphere, and then it’s hard to differentiate between what really happened and what is pure invention. Everything becomes a narrative and sounds fictitious even if it’s true.As soon as we attempt to place material reality into words, we create a story, a unique perspective on an event tainted by our words and opinions. Even recounting mundane events forms a narrative of events that give a spin on reality. Truth is an unobtainable purity, like an asymptote it is something that we can reach for but never truly touch; the closest we can come to it through all our reshaping of opinions with each new version we encounter, is simply our own perspective of truth which, due to language, can never fully be the ideal 'truth' of events. Maria, and the reader must question any new information that is told to them, or heard in fragments through a closed bedroom door. What becomes particularly perplexing is realizing that everything the reader receives only occurs through the mind of Maria, and the reader must then not only run through the possible motives of those speaking to Maria, but also assess the motives and perspectives of Maria herself. El enamoramiento - the state of falling or being in love, or perhaps infatuation. I’m referring to the noun, the concept… it’s very rare to have a weakness, a genuine weakness for someone, and for that someone to provoke in us that feeling of weakness. That’s the determining factor, they break down our objectivity and disarm us in perpetuity, so that we can in over every dispute…Who can be sure that any character is acting rationally, speaking truthfully, assessing any situation accurately, when their eyes are clouded by infatuation? While a murder and the mystery of why it occurred is central to the plot, the answers are superfluous; it is the examination of the attempt towards the answers, the probing of truth, that Marías parades in eloquent speech and ponderous musings for the reader to satisfy themselves upon. It is the deduction of each jigsaw piece, the faith in our ability to read others, the emotion of the chase and the game, that shines in incredible glory from each page of the novel. The reader is constantly met with discussions of perspectives and different ‘versions’ of truth, from varying translations and editions of Don Quixote, contradictory eyewitness testimonies of Miguel’s murder, to interesting artistic interpretations of Adam And Eve. As in each Marías novel, the narrator and those around them are compelled to spill their stories; there is an utter compulsion to speak and let their version of the truth be heard. In Marías ‘ phenomenal novel Tomorrow in the Battle Think on Me, he highlights this desire to step out of the shadows and share what lurks within the dark recesses of the mind and heart. [T]hey have merely been overcome or motivated by weariness and a desire to be whole, by their inability to continue lying or keeping silent, to go on remembering what they experienced and did as well as what they imagined, to go on remembering their transformed or invented lives as well as those they actually lived, to forget what really happened and to replace it with a fiction.These truths, or half-truths, are itching to come to life, and once they are spoken, they become the property of all those who have heard them, free to be reshaped by perspectives and passed along through endless permutations of fact and fiction. As Maria recounts her journey inward, she tells of characters as they attempt to distance themselves from the murder. However, can putting more versions of the truth between oneself and an event truly remove them from the violence? Does distancing oneself through chance remove responsibility? What is especially interesting to examine is that each opinion expressed is a reflection of the Teller. Maria, a character of Javier Marias, often paints in broad strokes while describing the motives and inner workings of women. This is initially troublesome, especially as women are depicted as subservient beings that pine after men and hang on their every action, giving the book a bit of a sexist taste. However, when remembering that these opinions belong to those of Maria, a character that just so happens to be rather submissive and infatuated as best serves the nature of the novel, it becomes understandable that she would assume that her feelings and actions are a generic representation of other women. As expressed in Tomorrow in the Battle Think on Me, ‘our idea of justice changes according to our needs, and we always think that what we need is equivalent to what is just.’ ² Maria’s opinions on women serve to support her own needs, justifying her actions by believing that it is just the way people act. While the journey is a bit rocky and certain aspects seem distasteful or cumbersome when they first occur, this is a novel that rewards the patient as everything is eventually weaved together to form an impressively poignant final amalgamation of the individual parts. Marías once again proves himself a master of language, with fantastic flowing discussions of death and carefully crafted sentences that ensure their linguistic subtleties will survive the repacking of translation. There are a few comical moments discussing authors, and a few vitriolic stabs at pretentious contemporary writing trends, that bring Marías’ own job as a translator at a publishing house to mind and wonder where his inspirations came from (there are a few jabs seemingly directed at himself as well that are sure to bring a smile). Despite having a slow burning story packed with philosophical reflections, this novel is full of incredible twists and turns that will keep the reader feverishly flipping the pages. This is a fantastic novel, but is best suited to those who are already familiar with Javier Marías. 4/5 ‘There’s nothing like sharing round the guilt if you want to emerge from a murky situation smelling of roses.’ ¹ A translation of this clip The following discussion on Borges in this review relies heavily on ideas expressed in stories such as Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius. ² As well as re-examining several themes from TitBToM, fans of the author will be glad to see the return of Ruibérriz de Torres (also spotlighted in Bad Nature, or With Elvis in Mexico). Marias seemingly makes Madrid his own Yoknapatawpha through his reoccurring characters and themes that bring the streets and underworld of his fictional Madrid to life and allow the reader repeat visits. [image] I highly recommend reading Mike's (who first introduced me to this wonderful author), as well as Garima's fantastic reviews. It was a pleasure reading and discussing this book together. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 10, 2013
|
May 03, 2013
|
Feb 22, 2013
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1564787028
| 9781564787026
| 1564787028
| 3.67
| 4,173
| 2009
| Oct 25, 2011
|
liked it
|
‘Nothing is like being breathed on by a life’ -Knut Hamsun In youth, we foolishly chase away the days looking towards the future. Once we get there, we ‘Nothing is like being breathed on by a life’ -Knut Hamsun In youth, we foolishly chase away the days looking towards the future. Once we get there, we realize the limited number of days remaining and look backwards, hoping we left enough of a mark on our race to the end so we can be remembered. Kjersti A. Skomsvold’s heart-warming The Faster I Walk The Smaller I Am, winner of the Tarjei Vesaas First Book Prize in 2009, tells the story of Mathea Martinsen, an elderly woman whose crippling social anxieties have kept her removed from the world, as she fights back against her disappearance from all memory. Although Skomsvold wraps the reader up in her playful and engaging language as this quirky novel delights and entertains across it’s darkly comedic investigation of loneliness and the acceptance of death, the joy begins to stretch thin and being adorable isn’t nearly enough to hold the novel up. Mathea Martinsen always took pride in her longevity, gloating at the names in the obituaries of whom she had outlived until time passes on – and Mathea does not, and her loneliness becomes a burden too heavy to bear. Her attempts to make herself known, and their successive failures, are endearing and cause the reader to open their hearts for Mathea. She has become practically invisible in the world, and while she is terrified to make contact with others, all she desires is to mingle with another person. ‘[I]f I was kidnapped five minutes later,’ she thinks after departing from the cashier at the local grocery store (she cannot open her jam jars, and is too afraid to ask the cashier to open it for her), ‘and the cops came by and showed him my picture, the buy would say he’d never seen me before in his life.’ This sort of dark humor fills the novel, and is often laugh-out-loud funny as the reader takes pity on her. Each trace of existence she tries to leave on the world is erased or to insignificant to make a mark, and it makes one wonder if our lives leave any significant remnants behind. ‘I wonder what will happen to all our things, they’ll probably be thrown out and all our memories with them.’ What we attach to ourselves with such significance is merely garbage without us to give them meaning. The anxieties of the narrator are nearly heartbreaking as all her attempts to leave her mark go unnoticed. ‘Still I am just as afraid of living as I am of dying’. Through episodic accounts of her past and present, we see her slowly approaching death like an exposure therapy, stripping away her fears as she faces it step by step. Skomsvold does an incredible job of blending past and present to give the effect of a full life, carefully baiting the readers interest with an allusion to an event that isn’t revealed until later, and blending the timeline together to achieve a moving, yet tragic, reveal at the novel’s end. While the subject and the events are often dismal, her playful use of language and humor manage to transform the melancholy into a bittersweet, and often uplifting, narrative. This technique allows the reader to examine death head-on without being burdened by its bleakness. While Mathea wants to die (all her life she hopes any ambulance siren is headed for her), she simply won't and is afraid to. I recently saw an elderly woman, while leaving a family Christmas get-together, tell her great-granddaughter 'Goodbye, hopefully you won't see me again. I want to go but He just won't take me!' Everyone felt bad for the granddaughter (in her twenties) for having to hear this, yet I felt bad for the great-grandmother. This novel only reinforced my sympathy for her. However, there is not much hope to be found, only acceptance. Mathea mentions her dislike for the tongue, as it is a muscle only attached at one end. ‘It reminds me of everything I’ve lost. The kites I flew when I was a child – the string broke every time. The dog I walked, the leash that snapped…’. She is childless and nobody living knows her aside from the neighbors across the hall whom she avoids – she is a thread in life attached to nothing. ’The banana plant looks like a tree, just a big plant that has flowers without sex organs and fruit without seeds. Therefore… when the banana plant has lost its fruit, it dies. It was the meaninglessness of this cycle that made Buddha love the banana plant, which he believed symbolized the hopelessness of all earthly endeavors.’All that live must die. This is something we all must face, nobody can do it for us, and, as Mathea learns, sometimes life is more terrifying than death. We are all unique, she posits, yet if everyone is unique, that is not very unique. We are all a part of a totality, and death is easier to accept if we let go of our image of the individual and give in to the totality. ‘But sometimes you have to give meaning to meaningless things,’ is her succinct summing up the human condition. While the final sentiments of the novel, especially those between her and a deranged elderly man she speaks with in a park, are bleak, they fill the heart and make death seem a little less of a burden. There was much to enjoy in this novel. The relationship between Mathea and her husband was both sad and cute. Skomsvold does a wonderful job of using his love of mathematical logic to emphasize the rift between their hearts and souls. His view of the world as a nice, orderly place where everything has meaning and leads to the next so clashes with the void in which she exists. His use of a venn diagram to explain that he is having an affair was a great touch, charming yet saddening, cold and calculated yet brimming with emotion. Often the whimsy language reminded me of a less bizarre Amelia Gray, and I often laughed aloud while reading the trials and tribulations of the endearing narrator. However, this wears thin, even in the short 147pgs of the novel and by the time it reaches its moving conclusion (and the last few pages are gold), it was time to say goodbye. This book is like a short, torrid relationship with someone whom you find irresistible at first because they are so adorable and quirky and different, but after a few weeks their quirks began to grow in your mind as flaws (the narrators insistance of making things rhyme got annoying after so long, although a round of applause is due to translator Kerri A. Pierce for making these rhymes work in english while still maintaining the full impact of Mathea's quips) and you realize the two of you are just simply not right for one another. Like the repetitive style of this book, you repeat the same dates or events that first caused your hearts to sing but begin to be revealed as a forced event to not let the magic disintegrate. Yet, despite your decision to break hearts and move on, you can’t speak ill of them either, as you do still find them cute and charming, but just not for you. In this small dose, it is great, but without cutting loose, it is the sort of over cutsey-ness that would drive me mad. Our time together was fun, but it didn’t satisfy me in the ways that I needed to be satisfied and I know there are other books out there that are a better match for me. If you are looking for a good laugh while being immersed in a somber story, this is a wonderful novel. There are many that I can see absolutely loving this book, and it is one that is well-crafted enough that I hope it finds its way into the hands of readers that will love every word of it. Skomsvold is very talented and her words flow effortlessly as it weaves a tragic portrait of the life and times of Mathea Martinsen, and I will definitely be reading any other books from her when they get translated into English. Plus, she gets many cool points for quoting Knut Hamsun. A quick read that won’t fill your head with ideas to ponder, but will fill your heart. 3.5/5 ‘What’s the point of having neighbors anyway? They walk around their apartments and act like they’re not going to die, but they’re going to die, the cashiers at the grocery store are going to die, and that old man with the walker is quite likey already dead now. You’ve earned your heavenly sleep, though our earthly sorrow’s deep.’ [image] ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 27, 2013
|
Feb 28, 2013
|
Oct 24, 2012
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
3.80
| 193,245
| May 05, 1927
| Dec 27, 1989
|
it was amazing
|
The lighthouse is out there, it's eye caressing our struggles with cold indifference. We can beat against the tides in pursuit, but will we ever reach
The lighthouse is out there, it's eye caressing our struggles with cold indifference. We can beat against the tides in pursuit, but will we ever reach it? Does it even matter, and is it even attainable? If we only look to that spot on the horizon we miss the love around us, miss those gasping for our love and friendship, miss the callouses born in dedicated strife rowing us towards the end. Like in all things, it is the journey that matters, not the destination. Futility can be beautiful, especially when we don't give up on plunging our oars against it and making our place in a world destined to end in a .... flash..... ‘…for it was not knowledge but unity that she desired, not inscriptions on tablets, nothing that could be written in any language known to men, but intimacy itself, which is knowledge…’ To enter within the pages of Woolf’s 1927 masterpiece, To the Lighthouse, is to dive headlong into a maelstrom of vivid perspectives and flawless prose. Few authors are able to achieve the vast scope of human emotions and frustrations as of this novel, let alone accomplish such a task in the mere 209pgs Woolf offers. Flowing to the breezy soundtrack of waves breaking upon the shoreline, To the Lighthouse investigates the frailties of life and human relationships in breathtaking prose through the minds and hearts of Woolf’s characters as they struggle to affect a state of permanence within an ever-changing ephemeral existence. Reading Woolf is like reading an extended prose poem. Each word shimmers from the page as every sentence illuminates the deep caverns of the heart. She accentuates her themes through carefully chosen imagery and metaphors, or constantly alluding to the passage of time themes through metaphors of fraying draperies and aging furniture and keeping the focus on the island setting through descriptions such as ‘bitter waves of despair’. The notion of each person as an island plays a major role in the novel. The waves continuously crash on shore much like the collision of characters as they interact and attempt to understand one another. These repetitions of ideas and symbols are used through this novel as a method of reinforcing them. Similarly, the characters often repeat their own beliefs, much like a mantra, to help reassure themselves of who they are. Woolf effectively utilizes her own stream-of-consciousness style to tell her story, examining each characters unique perspectives and feelings of one another that culminate to form a tragically beautiful portrait of the human condition. Unlike the stream-of-consciousness technique employed by others such as James Joyce or William Faulkner, Woolf retains a consistence prose style, being more an observer of the inner-workings of each character instead of melding with their consciousness and writing in their own words. While this may seem a cop-out to some, it felt actually beneficial to the structure of this novel, such as allowing Woolf to seamlessly transition from character to character. This also was in keeping with the ‘person as an island’ theme since we could only observe through an authorial perspective and never truly know commune with the character, leaving the reader as just another wave crashing upon the shoreline of their consciousness. Late in the novel, Lily ponders over the power of narrating what one thinks a person is like as a method of understanding them: ‘this making up scenes about them, is what we call “knowing” people, “thinking” of them, “being fond” of them!’ There are several metafictional moments such as this within the novel that justify Woolf’s stylistic choices. Woolf’s decision to maintain a constant narration makes the book ‘about’ perspectives instead of ‘constructed out of’ perspectives. Human interaction is the crux of this novel, and also one of its saddest messages. These characters interact daily and are under the constant scrutiny of one another, yet, try as they might, they can never truly understand each other. ‘She would never know him. He would never know her. Human relations were all like that, she thought, and the worst were between men and women’. They all try to leave their impressions upon one another but, at the end of the day, are still only left with their perspective and opinion of the others instead of the unity and knowledge of who their contemporaries truly are inside and what motivates their actions. They are forever separated by the fact that souls cannot ever meld and become one. The real tragedy is that these characters, while desiring to understand and be understood, more often than not hurt one another, often due to fear and insecurity, through their attempts of reaching into the others soul. Mr. Ramsey, while being exceptionally needy of praise and security, keeps his family at arms length through his neediness while resenting them and wishing they would leave him be: ‘he would have written better books if he had not married’. These characters reach out to one another as if to a life raft, they need something to cling to and bind them with the present. Each character in their own way, be it Mr. Ramsey’s philosophy, Mr. Carmichael’s poetry, Lily’s paintings or Mrs. Ramsey’s guiding hand, attempt to leave their permanent scar on the face of eternity. Mrs. Ramsey in particular fears death and the unstoppable change that pushes us forward towards the grave. ‘A scene that was vanishing even as she looked…it shaped itself differently; it had become, she knew, giving one last look at it over her shoulder, already the past’. She watches in horror as time slips by, firmly believing nothing good can come with the future and goes so far as to cover up Deaths bleak head in the form of a boars skull that hangs on her children’s walls. ‘With her mind she had already seized the fact that there is no reason, order, justice but suffering, death, the poor. There was no treachery too base fir the world to commit… No happiness lasted’. No matter what, time will pass us all by, like the lighthouse beam, illuminating us and calling us up from the dark for one brief moment, and then passing on again to leave us formless in the dark. If is fitting, given the fears of death and time passing, that death comes in this novel swiftly and suddenly. There is no telling when the beam of life will be gone, no preparations can be made, and we must deal with it. Such is existence. These fears can only be subsided, our lives given meaning, if we can reach each other, understand and love each other, thereby existing forever in memory and framed by love in the hearts of those we knew. This novel takes much inspiration from Woolf’s own life (Mr. and Mrs. Ramsey being based on Virginia’s own parents, making this an elegy to her own mother as well as an elegy to Mrs. R) and doubly serves as a cutting commentary on the literary world in which Woolf was immersed. Woolf set out to oppose the obdurate male society that dominated the literary scene, Tansley’s words to Lily of ‘women can’t paint, women can’t write’ echoing a stereotype that Woolf would have had to combat her whole life. Woolf combats the patriarchy through this novel, creating a sleek, short masterpiece as opposed to the behemoth (but equally amazing) Ulysses, filled with attacks on the ‘masculine intelligence’ and making parody of the male opinions on women. Often the reader is given the opinion though a male perspective that ‘women made civilization impossible with all their “charm”, all their “silliness”…’, yet these same men crave the attention and affection of Mrs. Ramsey – they fly into an anxious fit without the reassurance of the women. They spend their time thinking lofty thoughts, but it is the women that keep order. Mrs. Ramsey despises such masculine activities as hunting and is the head of the household and the keeper of peace, yet she still reads as a bit of a cautionary tale. She still succumbs to the gender roles expected of her, such as being submissive to Mr. Ramsey and playing matchmaker – although this serves more as her attempt to maintain control over life than actually falling into stereotypes. Lily is therefor given as the ideal, the one who can press on despite naysayers like Tansley, be a self-sustaining, ambitious woman that keeps an understanding and open heart and painting those around her into eternity through her perseverance. This was without a doubt one of the finest novels I have ever read. Woolf offers pages after page of incredible poetry, never letting up for an instant. It takes a bit to get your footing, as she drops the reader right into the scene without any exposition, but once you have found your bearings your heart will swell with each flawless word. The middle section of the novel, the brief 20pgs of ‘Time Passes’, may be one of the most enduring and extraordinary displays of writing I have ever seen. This novel will force the reader to face the bleak truths of change and death along with the characters, yet offer a glimmer of hope through unity and love that is sure to strike a chord in even the coldest of hearts, all the while being a stunning anthem of feminism. This is a novel to read, and read again and again as you witness your own present and future fade into the past. 5/5 ‘Of such moments, she thought, the thing is made that endures’ This novel came highly recommended to me through two trusted friends, whose reviews I would like to share with you here and here. But don’t just take our word for it, because this is one that should not be missed! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 26, 2012
|
Sep 06, 2012
|
Aug 17, 2012
|
Paperback
|
s.penkevich > Books: death (26)
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.08
|
liked it
|
Nov 05, 2024
|
Nov 05, 2024
|
||||||
4.28
|
really liked it
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
||||||
3.84
|
liked it
|
Oct 31, 2024
|
Oct 31, 2024
|
||||||
4.53
|
it was amazing
|
Oct 26, 2024
|
Oct 26, 2024
|
||||||
4.23
|
really liked it
|
Jan 26, 2024
|
Jan 23, 2024
|
||||||
3.98
|
it was amazing
|
Feb 26, 2024
|
Nov 16, 2023
|
||||||
3.95
|
really liked it
|
Nov 02, 2023
|
Nov 02, 2023
|
||||||
3.98
|
liked it
|
Jun 17, 2023
|
Jun 17, 2023
|
||||||
3.74
|
liked it
|
not set
|
Jun 08, 2023
|
||||||
3.70
|
really liked it
|
Oct 30, 2023
|
Jun 02, 2023
|
||||||
4.30
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 21, 2023
|
Mar 21, 2023
|
||||||
3.91
|
it was amazing
|
not set
|
May 08, 2017
|
||||||
3.88
|
liked it
|
not set
|
Nov 01, 2015
|
||||||
4.30
|
really liked it
|
not set
|
Apr 21, 2015
|
||||||
3.87
|
really liked it
|
not set
|
Feb 20, 2015
|
||||||
3.70
|
really liked it
|
not set
|
Dec 03, 2014
|
||||||
3.79
|
it was amazing
|
not set
|
Feb 20, 2014
|
||||||
3.55
|
really liked it
|
May 03, 2013
|
Feb 22, 2013
|
||||||
3.67
|
liked it
|
Feb 28, 2013
|
Oct 24, 2012
|
||||||
3.80
|
it was amazing
|
Sep 06, 2012
|
Aug 17, 2012
|