how do I live free in this black body? It is a profound question because America understands itself as God’s handiwork, but the black body is the clea
how do I live free in this black body? It is a profound question because America understands itself as God’s handiwork, but the black body is the clearest evidence that America is the work of men.
This is an exceedingly frustrating book because the author doesn’t give an answer to his central question. He doesn’t provide the steps to redemption and the formula for white persons to ‘help’ or support him. He denies God and the hope of a better afterlife or some sort of cosmic justice to look forward to just as he tells his son to never belittle the sacrifices of their ancestors before them to be for the purpose of delivering them to the current improved state.
You must resist the common urge toward the comforting narrative of divine law, toward fairy tales that imply some irrepressible justice. The enslaved were not bricks in your road, and their lives were not chapters in your redemptive history. They were people turned to fuel for the American machine. Enslavement was not destined to end, and it is wrong to claim our present circumstance –no matter how improved – as the redemption for the lives of people who never asked for the posthumous, untouchable glory of dying for their children. Our triumphs can never compensate for this.
No – he simply struggles with the question and brings to light the various fairy tales we tell ourselves and others so that we can no longer live in blissful ignorance. Which means by the end I was thoroughly overwhelmed and tending towards despair… something the author did not desire to leave his son with. And we learn through this reading that the author has put aside his struggle for how he should himself live (or at least embraced it as an unending question) and taken up the question of how he should raise his son to be. Should he train him to be “twice as good” and make himself small to avoid incurring the wrath of those in power, or should he train him to fight and struggle himself so he never feels shame but risks his very body? When visiting a new place he struggled to keep from restraining his young son’s exuberance
But now I understand the gravity of what I was proposing—that a four-year-old child be watchful, prudent, and shrewd, that I curtail your happiness, that you submit to a loss of time. And now when I measure this fear against the boldness that the masters of the galaxy imparted to their own children, I am ashamed.
If I were an underlining, dog-earring, highlighting person this book would be bright neon and crowded with notes and exclamation marks. Every word is deeply considered, well thought out and expertly delivered. And it rips one to shreds. The slim open letter lags a little at the end but only because the reader has realized we will not get the answers we long for and we already have realized our culpability in the problem. Ta-Nehisi Coates refers to the American Dream as “the Dream” which (purposefully) conflates it with Martin Luther King’s Dream speech and wraps us up in the conspiracy to keep the “Dreamers” happy and comfortable, unthreatened by the black body or black complaints, unworried that I have anything to do with the word racism, or the effects in this country of our collective history. Coates blows such complacent thinking away … and that is why you should read this book. Not to get answers, not to feel guilt, or relief or kumbaya.
You may have heard the talk of diversity, sensitivity training, and body cameras. These are all fine and applicable, but they understate the task and allow the citizens of this country to pretend that there is real distance between their own attitudes and those of the ones appointed to protect them. The truth is that the police reflect America in all of its will and fear, and whatever we might make of this country’s criminal justice policy, it cannot be said that it was imposed by a repressive minority.
the Dreamers are quoting Martin Luther King and exulting nonviolence for the weak and the biggest guns for the strong.
A satisfying ending to the trilogy (never a given!) I again appreciated the relationships more in the final (though there may have been some histrioniA satisfying ending to the trilogy (never a given!) I again appreciated the relationships more in the final (though there may have been some histrionics) and I loved the mix between faith/sainthood and ordinary people doing extraordinary things because it was the right thing to do and they have their own faith to find. And the not-so-subtle Russian landscape (and neighbors) was vivid, vast and a character in its own right....more
Uber creepy and fascinating. A mother embarks on a terrifying journey with her two 4-year-olds in the hope of a safe haven promised years earlier. NotUber creepy and fascinating. A mother embarks on a terrifying journey with her two 4-year-olds in the hope of a safe haven promised years earlier. Not only was the horror subtle and insidious (and like the best of horror, more about the man than the monster), but the main character is a remarkable drawn woman of deep resources and constant self-analysis about whether the life she has trained her children for is a life worth living. (I really feel no longer obligated to read Room anymore after this.) And I find it a funny coincidence that this book and the recently read graphic novel Rat Queens both have characters named 'Gary' who deserve to get their teeth kicked in. :)...more
One of the most serious and psychologically heavy editions from this series. Amazing plotting and action. I still struggle with the artist changing beOne of the most serious and psychologically heavy editions from this series. Amazing plotting and action. I still struggle with the artist changing between operations but no one style drove me crazy at least. I don't know why this isn't a Netflix series or HBO show - tons of content and atmosphere (Perhaps it's just too recent history for many of us?)...more
Usual fare (which isn't a criticism but I had hopes for something more after seeing the reviews.) Actually isn't this a good title for 90%+ of this genUsual fare (which isn't a criticism but I had hopes for something more after seeing the reviews.) Actually isn't this a good title for 90%+ of this genre? ...more
Read this because it counts as a "banned book" (silly banned stuff) and I have friends with boys who gobble these up. So, if I ever have a boy and I cRead this because it counts as a "banned book" (silly banned stuff) and I have friends with boys who gobble these up. So, if I ever have a boy and I can't get him to read ANYTHING ELSE and he loves these, I might come back to change my rating. But really I feel like while these aren't inherently bad books, they still also aren't any GOOD and that they underestimate what boys could be interested in or sit still for. Oh well. Get your second opinions....more
I don't get it. This is a "comedy," really? This was an experimental play within an experimental play that if anything is a tragedy, not a comedy. WhenI don't get it. This is a "comedy," really? This was an experimental play within an experimental play that if anything is a tragedy, not a comedy. When I read a play (which isn't often) by an exalted playwright, and said play is the most exalted of said exalted playwright, I would expect at least to take away a little nugget from this play. Even A Midsummer's Night Dream gave me something despite my response of "Meh." This did not. Perhaps I'm not intellectual enough but I can't think well of this play except to be glad it was brief....more
It sucks to be poor, and it sucks to feel that you somehow deserve to be poor. You start believing that you’re poor because you’re stupid and ugly.
It sucks to be poor, and it sucks to feel that you somehow deserve to be poor. You start believing that you’re poor because you’re stupid and ugly. And then you start believing that you’re stupid and ugly because you’re Indian. And because you’re Indian you start believing you’re destined to be poor. It’s an ugly circle and there’s nothing you can do about it. Poverty doesn’t give you strength or teach you lessons about perseverance. No, poverty only teaches you how to be poor.
This book is a story about a Spokane Indian boy escaping his fate as written from his point of view. The book as often feels realistically written by a horny, clever, struggling teenager as it feels written by a sage adult able to verbalize extremely complex realizations and insightful reflections. But the point of view aside, this book is such an authentic, richly-felt insight into high school and an unknown culture that it should be read by every fifteen-year-old in school.
I read this book not only because it was banned in several places (faugh!) but because I needed a ‘hometown’ selection for my 2015 PopSugar Reading Challenge and this was the closest I could get. That is because nothing happens in Spokane, and if something happens, something is asked to stop rocking the boat. So while the Spokane Indian Reservation is actually around Wellpinit, WA, I am counting this for Spokane (plus a little action actually happens inside Spokane city limits). This story is about what it means to be poor, what it means to feel as if you are betraying your culture by wanting more for yourself, what it means to have alcoholism be a defining part of your culture, what it means to desire revenge and then realize your fight only undermines your credibility, what it means to lose more than you thought possible and then keep losing, and what it means to make connections and find hope you never thought possible. I shared so little with Junior’s history and problems and yet I could identify so well with his struggles. Plus he’s a bookgeek and I love him for that!
“Yes. It’s a small library. It’s a tiny one. But if you read one of these books a day, it would still take you almost ten years to finish.” “What’s your point?” “The world, even the smallest parts of it, is filled with things you don’t know.” Wow. That was a huge idea. Any town, even one as small as Reardan, was a place of mystery. And that means that Wellpinit, that smaller, Indian town, was also a place of mystery.
For Bookriot or PopSugar challenge readers this counts as: A banned book A funny book A book that takes place in a high school A book by/about an indigenous culture A book based on a true story (this is highly autobiographical) A YA book A book that takes place in your hometown (if your hometown is Reardon, Spokane, or Wellpinit) ...more
lovely and surprising. There was a moment in the movie "Shadowlands" when a dying Deborah Winger tells Anthony Hopkins (as her husband C.S. Lewis) thatlovely and surprising. There was a moment in the movie "Shadowlands" when a dying Deborah Winger tells Anthony Hopkins (as her husband C.S. Lewis) that the joy that they grab hold to in the present will make her future absence even more painful, but that her future absence is what makes THIS moment, this NOW, so beautiful and joyful. This book is a lovely few days in a family's retreat in New England to ostensibly celebrate an anniversary with their friends... it would be a subtle, well-observed tale of family, friends and humanity even if that were the whole of the tale. But the mother Helen is actually terminal and her husband set this up as a way to give their friends a chance to say goodbye (and to tell his daughter who doesn't know there is no hope). It is sentimental in all the best ways... avoiding the maudlin while savoring all those quiet moments and histories that make us a person, a family unit, a friend. It manages to be in turns tragic and joyful without making me bawl. It reminded me to love my body as it is now (as I love my teenage body in hindsight but failed to do in the present), it reminded me of what it is like to be a horrible and yet wonderful teenager, it reminded me of the little things that make up a marriage and turn it into something wonderful (or the little things that can break it)... I managed to love it without feeling like gushing, it is more a quiet relishing.
It’s ironic, isn’t it,she thinks -- you don’t have to get more attractive to catch your husband’s eye; you can just get sick and ugly. But God she loved that old self of hers! She hadn’t appreciated it enough. Why hadn’t she celebrated those big strong thighs instead of trying all the time to shrink them? Why hadn’t she found her feet beautiful, or her sturdy ankles? Why hadn’t she loved her coarse, graying hair? Why had she not praised every perfect square inch of herself? She feels an almost unbearable ache of longing for all that doesn’t belong to her anymore.
This fits the PopSugar Challenge for a book with antonyms in its title, which is why I discovered it (happily so). I recommend it!...more
Pitch perfect Austen language. If Jane Austen had taken it upon herself to write Miss Marple, we might have something like this. So yes it's a derivatPitch perfect Austen language. If Jane Austen had taken it upon herself to write Miss Marple, we might have something like this. So yes it's a derivation (I could have easily compared it to Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, but that doesn't mean it isn't a perfect distraction for someone who loves the combination. One could picture the combination of each of Austen's heroines in Jane, and her family and acquaintances in this tale are equally comparable to long-familiar characters both dear and exasperating. For PopSugar Book Challengers, this fits the Christmastime category...more
I'm not a regular consumer of poetry, though I wish I were. I rarely take the time to sit and absorb a single poem the way many deserve to be considerI'm not a regular consumer of poetry, though I wish I were. I rarely take the time to sit and absorb a single poem the way many deserve to be considered. This collection is not the kind to read through in one sitting - it has as many 'wow, I can't believe she just said that so perfectly/shockingly/gently/perversely etc' moments as there are 'what on earth is she talking about right now?' moments. But even the later mostly deliver powerful impressions and 'aha' moments that stick with the reader long after the final phrase. I'm in awe of her turns of phrase, though I dislike the frequent pauses. She speaks for the voiceless in many of these poems; the oppressed, the departed, the silenced. And she speaks for everyone when talking about love and loss. A couple examples of favorite lines (that are lovely but the whole poems from these samples are perfection):
We will not live to settle for less
I am not with her I have been waking off and on all night to that pain not simply absence but the presence of the past destructive to living here and now
The poem that thunderstruck me was in the Love Poems section, number V. It's an amazing piece about how each of our bookshelves of the 'greats' is hiding the absence of the greats that never got a chance to speak or be heard -- women, minorities, voices of defiance, the prophets, the poor -- either because they died or lived oppressed never able to speak, or due to silencing. This was such an important poem for me because at one point in my life I had a significant other who pointed to the lack of female philosophers and mathematicians on the shelves as proof that women didn't have a lot to contribute to new thought and discovery. He was just an example of a multitude of voices surrounding me with similar, and both loudly or subtly expressed opinions. And those opinions worm their way into society broadly, and my own self-image locally. It takes a lot of energy to call BS on something so widespread and insidious (and to have to repeatedly do so). So I embraced this whip-smart, poignant poem as a call-to-arms to remember the voiceless.
This apartment full of books could crack open to the thick jaws, the bulging eyes of monsters, easily: Once open the books, you have to face the underside of everything you’ve loved – the rack and pincers held in readiness, the gag even the best voices have had to mumble through, the silence burying unwanted children- women, deviants, witnesses – in desert sand. Kenneth tells me he’s been arranging his books so he can look at Blake and Kafka while he types; yes; and we still have to reckon with Swift loathing the woman’s flesh while praising her mind, Goethe’s dread of the Mothers, Claudel vilifying Gide, and the ghosts – their hands clasped for centuries-- of artists dying in childbirth, wise-women charred at the stake, centuries of books unwritten piled behind these shelves; and we still have to stare into the absence of men who would not, women who could not, speak to our life—this stlll unexcavated hole called civilization, this act of translation, this half-world.
Received as part of BookRiot's "Explore New Reads" quarterly set which is why I'll admit I enjoyed it (that, and to count towards Book Riot's 2015 reaReceived as part of BookRiot's "Explore New Reads" quarterly set which is why I'll admit I enjoyed it (that, and to count towards Book Riot's 2015 reading challenge for "Romance Novel"). :) If I'm being honest, I didn't like it as much as I've previously enjoyed Sarah Maclean'sNine Rules to Break When Romancing a Rake. The plot is typical, the male unsurprisingly virile and scandalous (and jaded and distrusting), the female unsurprisingly virginal, curious and able to break down her man's barriers... but the plotting moves along and just because the outcome is practically foretold, doesn't mean it isn't satisfying to the reader. (one of the reasons listed in the quarterly's "10 Reasons to Read Romance" insert)....more
So I started randomly and managed to pick my least favorite short story in this collection for my first foray. Glad I went back because 1) they read bSo I started randomly and managed to pick my least favorite short story in this collection for my first foray. Glad I went back because 1) they read better in order & 2) there were some great short stories in here that seems incredibly familiar yet fresh....more
Thank you Ms. Day! The first half of this book is witty and flippant and manic and adorable and everything weird and wonderful that anyone familiar witThank you Ms. Day! The first half of this book is witty and flippant and manic and adorable and everything weird and wonderful that anyone familiar with Felicia Day's work will recognize. If you loved Jenny Lawson, you're in good hands. I laughed out loud multiple times and had many of those "me too!" moments that one always hopes for in a memoir of a person you're already inclined to love and want for a bestie. But this is just a set-up. The second half is still witty and adorable and relatable and wise, but it is serious stuff folks. Felicia unwaveringly details her depression and extreme anxiety as she tries to take on everything and keep on pleasing the crowd. It is every bit as poignant as some of the best material out there (folks will be reminded of Hyperbole and a Half for instance) and a good reminder that these struggles are not a one-size-fits-all experience nor cure. And all of that leads up to the description of her experience and thoughts on #GamerGate. If you're like me (i.e. NOT a gamer, completely inept with a controller), GamerGate was super confusing from the outside. Large PC corporations were pulling funding and participation from websites and events, there were horror stories of cyber bullying and self-righteousness running amok, no one could explain well what the origins were.... it was bewildering while apparent that SOMETHING IMPORTANT IS HAPPENING. Felicia does a great job sifting through the mess and helping the layperson understand the history and progression and complexity. And she explains how she personally felt and was impacted. And it's both awful and inspiring. Her thoughts and her description of what happened to her would have been valuable on their own, but something about 1) laughing at/with her through her childhood and early adulthood and then 2) SEEING her as she opens up about her personal struggles, make this analysis more meaningful and certainly held my attention, trust and regard. She doesn't leave you hanging on the tough stuff... overall this book is a super positive reinforcement for folks to embrace their true selves to thrive. And if that sounds like the type of affirmation you'd see on a mug or cubicle poster, well Felicia is one step ahead of you and very much in on the joke. I struggled between humor and serious advice fare for an example of the prose... because they're both great. But in the end, one of my favorite scenes highlit Felicia's young adulthood so well, made me laugh and also recalled for me the classical voice and guitar recital I attended in college that practically turned me into a stalker for the soloist.
When I turned eighteen, there was a small party on the fifth floor of the music building, because the guys could flirt openly with me and not get arrested, but even then, I was too shy to hook up with them. Not that I didn’t have the desire to. In my heart, I wanted to be with one of the classical guitarists because they were the biggest pick-up artists in the musical world. They had the quietest instruments, which meant they could play in the hallways and not get yelled at, so they sat around playing sexy classical guitar all day, and panties just DROPPED. But the few times one started circling me seriously, my professor would see us together and say, “That flamenco scam artist? He’s not good enough for you, get back to work.” And I’d skitter off back into my practice room and lock the door against a potentially glorious and rhythmically complicated seduction. Sigh.
Great depiction of "Navajo Way," the landscape, and the language. The mystery/thriller side of the story was a slow burn with a great climax and the cGreat depiction of "Navajo Way," the landscape, and the language. The mystery/thriller side of the story was a slow burn with a great climax and the characters were well realized without extra exposition. It was weird to read this at the same time as The absolutely true story of a part-time Indian since that depiction focuses more on the failings (cyclical poverty, hopelessness and alcoholism) to be found on a reservation while this shows a respected tradition comparable (as the author subtly does) to Christianity.
**For BookRiot Challenge, this fits the "By or about an aboriginal or native people" category. ...more
This is all the more heartrending and beautiful knowing that the author is pulling from her own experiences in working with death row cases. Flowery lThis is all the more heartrending and beautiful knowing that the author is pulling from her own experiences in working with death row cases. Flowery language and amazing turns of phrase lull one into forgetting the grotesqueness of the actions and reality presented. Until she reminds you, sharply, with a scene you want to look away from and that your mind skitters from picturing, until, with relief, a new and beautiful passage begins and you can leave the horror behind. I can't decide if that is the purpose and she is extremely successful or not. Certainly this mirrors the way we as a society prefer such ugliness to be invisible in our daily lives. There is a scene describing the sounds, scents and currents felt from the crematorium alongside the banality of the guards stuck near the oven.
They eat their packed lunches and drink weak coffee from Styrofoam cups. Neither has much of an appetite. The male guard reads a car magazine. His female counterpart knits a pair of blue baby socks for her best friend’s baby.
The scene ends with a terse yet poetic summary.
There are no names on the urns. You die a number here.
The nameless (until the end) narrator is the only criminal without a name even if they are gruff nicknames like "Risk" "Striker" "Conroy." The rest of the innocents have vague titles like "the lady" "the priest" "the warden" even "the boy." Either we're upending the idea of the invisible prisoner or we are recognizing that titles wouldn't work with so many murderers, rapists, deviants.
This is a horrific story. But it is a beautiful story too. In the end we are asked to see and hear the monsters because they too need to be seen. If this is possible for the convicts within these pages, it is perhaps possible for the rest of us.
The lady is like me in many ways. Serpents crawl inside her. She is deathly afraid that others will see them. She is afraid, and yet she wants the priest to see inside her and accept the monsters that wrap around the secret, pure part of her – the part she managed to save, miraculously, that so many of us have lost. She know the monsters are there and yet wants to be seen. Her courage frightens and amazes me. It makes me hopeful for her. It makes me crave happiness for her. Is that what you call love? Is that what you call hope?
a book only a graphic design geek would love - the rest of us will just like it. This is a book for typography geeks and people who don't want to pissa book only a graphic design geek would love - the rest of us will just like it. This is a book for typography geeks and people who don't want to piss off typography geeks :) to that end there are lots of helpful things to know such as: 1)creative types hate Papyrus 2)Microsoft is the evil empire who robs artists of royalties (in not so many words) 3)people have emotional responses to text so choose wisely for your message (the Obama campaign's brilliant usage of GOTHAM for instance read 'honesty' and 'fairness,' Tarantino's usage of Souvenir Bold reminds one of 70's exploitation and soft porn films - see Jackie Brown for an example).
Garfield spends a lot of time differentiating between legibility and readability but fails to reliably ensure readability in his choice of sentence structure. For instance he mentions the most famous quote in typography by Beatrice Warde, then fails to produce a quote for three additional pages, at which time we only get fragments of quotes as well as one poster created by Ms. Warde which hung at the US Government Printing Office. With these examples, one isn’t sure which influential quote the author was referring to and may be excused for having lost interest along the way.
I definitely learned some key items, especially should I ever deign to publish a book (Garamond, Bembo & Bodoni are among the scientifically proven (in 1940’s) most readable, though the most familiar types are also the most readable and these types are old stand-bys. Also, readability in books is “ideally considered to be between ten and twelve words” depending of course on font size, and the size itself best between 8 and 12 font). I learned about serif’s and pica’s and ‘maths’ (always funny to me to hear that) but most of the book after the history portion comprises chapter after chapter regarding Simon Garfield'spet and pet-peeve typefaces and creators. Attention fatigue definitely sets in by the end with the occasional moment of exaggeration adding some humor to the extreme obsessiveness of industry contributors.
‘It’s one of my favorite things to do,’ Stephen Coles says at the FontShop office in San Francisco. ‘You get to play with type, pick the characters that are most interesting and do what you want with them. For a type lover it’s like porn.’
While I'm guessing even the most obsessive don't truly replace their DVD stash with punny typography jokes to get happy, one appreciates the sentiment. I think my biggest takeaway was the answer to a question I'd often wondered; "how do type creators make money?" The answer is, they don't. There really isn't ownership protection in the copyright law for typefaces so even a successful design can be copied and cloned without repercussion (see point #2 regarding the evil empire). So these are artists who do their thing out of sheer love for the design work and the beauty of the result. If they want to be snobby about advertising choices or friends' font selections in documents and e-mails, well, I think they're warranted some form of recompense....more
a tiny book with one story regarding coming to terms with his Star Trek career accounting for 75% of the content. I was pretty unaware that Wheaton goa tiny book with one story regarding coming to terms with his Star Trek career accounting for 75% of the content. I was pretty unaware that Wheaton got so much hate during "The Next Generation" so that story taught me a lot more about conventions and how some folks don't lose their fanboy miens just because they are in Hollywood. (Williams FUCKING Shatner!) The story itself was a great one. the other stories were minor but sweet and about his regular life....more
good again. I love this side of the Mercy Thompson world and have always appreciated the Anna and Charles story. Some things are getting a little old good again. I love this side of the Mercy Thompson world and have always appreciated the Anna and Charles story. Some things are getting a little old and heavy handed (we get it, Charles is SUPER-alpha!) but all-in-all the world is always consistent and interesting...more