What do you think?
Rate this book
704 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1891
"I always liked Hannibal best of all the classical figures in the military history of the Roman Empire, because he comes down to us only in the written memoirs of his enemies. And if they thought he was such a good leader, he must have been a hell of a leader"
President, Dwight D. Eisenhower
"He alone of all the leaders of history fought against a power and against armies which were unequivocally his superiors in intelligence, breadth, discipline, military training - in every quality except only his individual genius."
"If Alexander was born under a lucky star, so, assuredly, was Hannibal born under a luckless one. It seems as if Fortune delighted to betray him and to thwart his best-laid plans. While fortune is largely of man's own making, it cannot be admitted that there is not in war, as there is in all human events, such an element as simple luck."
Rome had absolute material preponderance. All Hannibal had to oppose this was his burning genius. And in his greatest successes he never forgot this limitation to his power; nor did his divine fury ever mislead him.
"I have come not to make war on the Italians, but to aid the Italians against Rome."
"But during the past thirty years, we Americans have seen so many utterly unreliable statements with regard to our civil war put before the public in good faith by well-equipped witnesses of the event, that it appears wise to distrust the statements of one of Hannibal's worst enemies, unless we find them well vouched for by the attendant circumstances."
For the Roman actual war was but a bloody repetition of his daily drill, as his daily drill was but a bloodless campaign.
"We shall see, in the succeeding century, when the material of the legion degenerated from the citizen whose service was a privilege rather than a burden, to the proletariat who enlisted as a means of a better livelihood, and the individuality of the soldier could no longer be depended on, that the mobility of the legion disappeared. The men were no more to be relied upon unless held close in hand by the general commanding, and unless they were massed for mutual support. The intervals between maniples became dangerous; they were gradually decreased and finally given up; the legion reverted to a body resembling the old Dorian phalanx from which it had sprung. The period of its elastic structure was coincident with the service privilege of the Roman citizen. So long as the terms citizen and soldier were equivalents, so long lasted the best period of the legion. The great victories it later won, the splendid work of which it was capable, were no longer due to the rank and file, to the Roman burgess, that perfect type of the citizen-soldier, but distinctly to the skill of the leader, to the talent of such men as Marius, Sulla, Pompey, to the genius of Caesar."
"The Romans had little to fear from Hannibal's army. This had been so weakened that it had aught left but the strong will of its commander. The body was hectic, wasted, exhausted by long marches, desperate fighting and constant privation; but as the heart of the man will surmount the weakness of the body, - as you may read in the flashing eye the unaltered devotion to the cause, the unflagging courage and the unchanged ability to do great deeds, so was Hannibal the soul and impulse of this army. "
'Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few'.